|
User talk:Pbradbury/Archive 1
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Captaincy in football for the discussion pertaining to the above article. I agree with User:Angelo.romano that Vice-captain (football) adds very little in terms of content to Captain (football) and that the two pages should be merged, with Vice-captain (football) becoming a redirect to Captain (football). If you have any further comments, please restrict them to the discussion at WP:FOOTY. – PeeJay 19:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Man City redirectHey there, I saw your note on Oldepaso's page and I have deleted the redirect for you. You can alert administrators by using one of the tags located at WP:CSD. Once a tag has been added to the page, an administrator will come along and delete them for you (if appropriate) Thanks for alerting people. Woody (talk) 00:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Your rollback requestHi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/January 2008#Pbradbury. RFRBot (talk) 11:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you put Castillo up as a good article nomination. Most of the article is solid enough, but as it is right now it will probably not pass, due to much of the Olympiacos section being unreferenced and the short lead section. However, your improvements have been good, and the length of the queue for good article reviews means there should be plenty of time to work on it. I'd be more than happy to help, but as this one is "your" nomination I wouldn't want to tread on your toes or anything. If you want any help, whether in direct contributions or a peer review type run through the article giving notes and advice, don't hesitate to ask. Oldelpaso (talk) 21:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Rhodesia: As you can see in the category of the country Rhodesia, it exsisted until 1979. Benjani was born in 1978. Therefore his correct place of birth is Rhodesia, not Zimbabwe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maracana (talk • contribs) 22:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC) No problem :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maracana (talk • contribs) 22:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC) User:MaracanaHey, that guy is an idiot. He also changes everything to USSR, while the Union consisted of 15 diffrent republics. He needs a wiki-editing detention. re:Task Force CityReplied on the proposal page. Falastur2 (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC) City - Celtic friendlyHey. Was just wondering the source of your information for the Celtic match. I can't see it on the City site, and newsnow.co.uk hasn't picked up any links about it. I'm not doubting the veracity of the edit, I was just wondering since it's rare that something like that slips through my net ;) Falastur2 (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
GeovanniHi. The BBC source did say pending medical when originally published on Friday 4th. When I reverted your edit at 12:57 today it still said the same; it was updated at 13:03. However I then checked the Hull City OWS and saw that the transfer had gone through and 'undid' my edit. Regards Beve (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC) User:Kaka12oHi. Despite you putting a warning on their talk page User:Kaka12o has undone all the formatting changes to the Club América article. Additionally, they removed the semi-protection, before someone else reinstated it. What do you think is the appropriate thing to do in this case? Dancarney (talk) 08:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
not superfluous?I don't see why anyone would think that this is not superfluous. It's extra information that isn't needed for navigation, and already appears here, where it's relevant. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 22:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC) ...I've raised the issue here. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 02:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC) football team - singular/pluralIn British English collective nouns can take either singular or plural form - however when the team name has a proper noun, then in British English it should be treated as plural. ie. Manchester is a proper noun, therefore Manchester United should be treated as plural, hence the usage of "are" rather than "is" If a team name does not use a proper noun - ie. Arsenal, then either choice is acceptable, it depends if you want to think about the team as a business - Arsenal has made a profit this season - or as a team Arsenal have won the double. However, I did not change the Arsenal article, it already used the plural form. Sennen goroshi (talk) 09:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC) I have reverted your edits, however as an act of good faith, I have let the singular form remain on the Man City, article. If you wish to have what you consider to be the correct form of grammar on their article, feel free. I am confident that my edits are correct. Sennen goroshi (talk) 09:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Club AméricaHi there. I did not ignore you, I changed the source from a board to the CONSULTA MITOFSKY site (not yelling), just forgot to add the comment (CONSULTA MITOFSKY). Consulta Mitofsky is used as one of the most reliable consulter in Mexico. Please the article in Spanish. JC 19:55 23 July 2008 (PST) Edit War at Club AméricaUser Dedos07, did not make any comment nor explain his/her edits. The same popularity issue is present in the Spanish wiki, were more americanistas (Club america fans) are wikipedians, but as such info is sourced even them respect "most hated" and "second most loved/popular" sentences. Check up the 3rd paragraph in the Spanish version. JC 13:35 15 Aug 2008 (PST) User Dedos07No, no, I see. I didn't see the point in saying why I deleted that refernece because it's a poll on something that is a matter of opinions of selected people, but I see what you mean now. I'll stop all the re-edits on that. Thanks for the attempt to resolve that. Hopefully it works out. User:Dedos07 15 August 2008, 10:07PM (PST) Hi, Pbradbury. I raise an issue on Sennen goroshi's behaviors, so I really appreciate if you leave your thought at WP:ANI. Thanks.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:Mexico Squad 2007 CONCACAF Gold CupTemplate:Mexico Squad 2007 CONCACAF Gold Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. BlueRed 19:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Man City squad templateMy memory must be failing me, because I always thought that the inclusion of the "(c)" symbol in squad templates was frowned upon. And rather than me "hiding" this action without mentioning it in my edit summary, I don't include it because it's more of a subconscious action. As I said, I always thought it was standard for them to not be included. Could you direct me to the relevant discussion at WP:FOOTY where this consensus was gained? Mattythewhite (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) CSD Declined on reserve playersHi. I thought I ought to explain why I did not delete the two footballer articles you nominated for deletion. CSD A7 is for articles where no notability has been given. If notability is given, even a small amount, then the article is to be given the benefit of the doubt and allowed to stay. Despite what I said in the edit summary, PROD/AFD probably would work, as they are both reserve players, so they may not meet the requirments of WP:ATH. But as a small amount of notibility was stated, I cannot delete them as a CSD candidate. Stephen! Coming... 11:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Good that you are trying to help this user, but he can't use a copyrighted fair-use image on his talk page; WP:NFCC explicitly forbids that. Cheers. Rodhullandemu 23:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Manchester City logoThat was a really strange episode. However, re this, User:The One & Only Fools and Horses was not trying to solve the problem, he added to it by uploading a terrible jpeg file of the MCFC logo with the word "LONDON" photoshopped across the middle of it! pablohablo. 23:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 18:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Manchester City LogoAll the images uploaded got mistakes (for MCFC only). At first, it should be deleted and be replaced with raster (preferably PNG), instead you asked for it to be restored (and I don't blame you for that because you doesn't know whether the file need to be corrected or not). I am the one who converted and made it, I don't take it from other sites or etc and I know whether it contains error or not. My aim is to upload the highest quality SVG logo for the club. The reason for the deletion request can be seen clearly - there are mistakes on the file. I don't want the wrong version of it to be seen on wikipedia, I wanted it to be deleted subsequently. And fyi the wrong version still can be downloaded if it is not deleted. Instead of helping me to resolve the situation, you make the matter worse by asking it to be deleted. Now it has been deleted and it is now quite hard for me to request it for fixing. Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 21:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new version of File:Manchester_City.svg as requested by Arteyu at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Image workshop#Manchester City FC. Certes (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
TevezHey there. Just so you know, even Man City say that Tevez's transfer is not quite complete yet. Although the transfer has been ratified by the FA and the Premier League, and Tevez himself has agreed terms, he has not yet passed a medical or actually signed the contract. Please see this link for proof. Thanks. – PeeJay 22:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Brasil TemplateNo matter the actual shirt, are well known, use most of the shirts so. Are lusophone! And I would not want to give explanations on the names of Brazilian players. You are not Portuguese and Brazilian much less! Paulo (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC) City third stripHey Paul. Just wondering where you got the third kit shorts and socks from - I've been looking for images of them for ages ;) Falastur2 Talk 14:27, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
GA stuffAre you still working on those 4 articles on your user page? Only Petrov still plays for Man City Spiderone 16:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Making old City season articlesHey Paul. As you may, or probably haven't, seen I've started writing up the old City season articles. I got through a couple of the most recent ones working backwards but decided that a new approach was needed, and consequently I'm currently working on the season articles from City's first years in competitive football, starting with their time as Ardwick and the first FA Cup game in 1890 and going onwards year by year. Two of those articles have already gone live (and are linked to on the City seasons template at the bottom of all City articles) and I'm on the 1892-93 article at the moment in my userspace. My primary motivation is to give City season articles a better coverage than the United articles have, meaning putting more articles up than they have (preferably all but it's going to be a huge effort) and with more detail, but my second motivation is trying to give these articles a decent level of detail, unlike a lot of the season articles around for past years, even United ones, which basically give a list of games played and stop there. Consequently I'm trying to add some basic statistical season analysis, I'm putting in the kit templates, and doing a table for number of games played by players etc etc - basically I'm replicating the current City season article to the best of my ability. However, I'm lacking a fair amount of info - even down to players' first names, though the absolutely astounding mcfcstats.com has at least given me surnames, and I'm wondering if I shouldn't be looking at other stuff I can include instead - maybe prose descriptions of the events of the season, for instance, though I've never totally liked them. Anyway, to get to my point, I was wondering if you had any suggestions. Obviously I'm not trying to rope you into doing the work yourself, but I've been wondering if a little Read&Review isn't needed here, and I'd gladly appreciate any ideas you might have, whether they be to add something, to cut something, or if you know a source of info for anything I haven't been able to find info on. Either way, if you have the time it'd be great if you could cast a quick eye over my efforts and see whether you like them or not. I'm not 100% happy with them, but I'm not entirely sure what to do about it. Thanks for your time, anyway. Falastur2 Talk 12:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC) New, worthy City articles?Hey Paul. I'd noticed that you haven't been editing on Wikipedia recently, but I'm sending you this in the hope that you still visiting every now and again, and would consider lending me your opinion. As you probably know I've had a self-implemented underlying project to update Man City on Wikipedia in terms of article volume to bring us into line with other clubs as prestigious as us or more, for self-respect as much as anything. The bulk of my work has been on my set of City season articles, which now stretches from 1890 to 1915, and which I will not stop at until I've entirely finished. However, writing 25 of those things gets monotonous and I'd enjoy another project just for a few hours to let me have some fun drawing totally different tables and researching something other than match appearances. One thing I'd noticed recently is a quantity of "xxx F.C. in Europe" articles, a trend which I'm expecting to only continue until any self-respecting club has one, which set me thinking. Should we consider adding a page like this for City? And for that matter, are there any other pages it would be worthwhile to add, either to keep up with continuing trends or to be a trend-setter ourselves? At present, I don't really have any sources except Wikipedia and mcfcstats.com at present, so I'm personally limited to low-prose articles, but I'm happy to take on any challenge I have the information for. What I don't want to do, however, is jump two feet first into a project which is either entirely superfluous, or undesirable/unpopular with the other regular City fans on Wikipedia. Thus, I wanted to test the water for your opinion - I will also be consulting Oldelpaso on this, and I welcome other users getting involved if they have any comments to make, though to be honest I'm only aware of the three of us as regular City-supporting contributors (exception of a couple of guys who update the 2009-10 City season article, and whom I've never had any contact with). I'm not asking you to commit any effort yourself to such a project (wouldn't turn down the help, of course, but I quite enjoy something like this to focus my mind on), I simply want to know whether you think it's a good idea or not. In the meantime, I may well make a test page on my subspace, so check the revision history there to see if I've added such a page in the last few hours or days and you might get a taster of what I'm thinking of - unless I have a brainwave or someone else gives me some ideas, though, I'll just follow what most clubs have on their pages at present. Anyway, thanks for your time. Would love to hear any ideas you might have. Falastur2 Talk 02:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC) Manchester City squad numbershttp://shop.mcfc.co.uk/stores/mancity/products/kit_selector.aspx?selectorid=531 .. when you choose the player to add his number to your order you will find the new numbers.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AhMeD BoSS (talk • contribs) 21:18, 10 July 2014 (UTC) TransfermarktSince most of its content is user generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with 2015–16 Manchester City F.C. season. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
"Some readers of Wikipedia are partially or fully color-blind". You may not care about them, and you may think that your cute little team colors are important, but that's not how it works. See Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
AdviceNo problems; what do you need help with? GiantSnowman 17:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey!Hi mate. Not a problem - everyone has their own life to live and it's absolutely fair that you focused on your own stuff for a while. I probably could've done with taking a break myself on a few occasions, though I've responded in my own way by becoming much more intermittent in my activity. Now that the season articles largely run themselves, and even the more stats-y articles like number of appearances and so on, I am a bit less active as I just work on a few niche things every now and again (ones I really need to get around to updating). Over a fair amount of time I've founded enough articles that City is now on a level with most major teams, so I'm content - the only major hole is the sheer number of missing season articles, but since we have about 60 to go and they each take 3-5 hours to write, I've struggled badly for the energy to do them for some time now. Honestly, the thing I've found most drives me to activity on Wikipedia is having something new to work on, so if you come across a club-related article which could be adapted for City but which we don't have one of yet, give me a shout and I'll pitch in. That's my thing at the moment - every few months I will scan the categories of the scum, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal etc for anything they might have added which we haven't, and then I put it in. I've been toying with trying to introduce season articles for the EDS for a while, but there's no precedent for academy side season articles so I'm pretty sure it would get deleted. In the meantime, I've largely been busying myself with doing work on NYCFC and Melbourne City stuff. Anyway, good to hear from you again. Don't hesitate to drop by if there's anything you ever want to discuss. Falastur2 Talk 22:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC) Your signatureYour signature is unreadable. Could you use a darker blue? Alakzi (talk) 15:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Why do you need to insult me every time i do something wrongEverytime i make a small error you feel the need to insult everything i do. Ok yes, it wasn't a great match report. It's not easy on a crappy phone that doesn't work or show what im writing properly.Thursby16 (talk) 10:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm not saying I don't want help, which I need. It just seemed to me a little insulting. But fair enough. Thursby16 (talk) 11:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC) External linksCould a footballers official Facebook, Twitter, Instagram ect.. accounts be included in external links?Thursby16 (talk) 19:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC) I'm going to assume they are allowed because I just read WP:LINKSTOAVOID . Number 9 says social networking sites shouldn't be allowed. However, at the top it says "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject" and a footballer's official social network page comes under that, right? Thursby16 (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I've brought it up on that page now.Thursby16 (talk) 22:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Assistance?User @Avdagicdennis: created James Horsfield earlier today and it got deleted. They then re-made the article. The player has never made a first team appearance for Manchester City so I have put it up for speedy deletion again. Have I done the right thing?Thursby16 (talk) 19:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC) @Thursby16: if it has already been deleted and then simply recreated then yes speedy is fine, you should add a reason to the speedy templet though so an admin knows why. In this case it would be G4. Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, you can use the {{Db-g4}} tag Jason DeneyarJason is back from loan and sign new contract with mcfc, currently he is on pre season tour with mcfc , and play both matches ( against roma and madrid )
Devante ColeMy opinion is that if they have a squad number, they should be in the squad template navbox. GiantSnowman 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Reviewer granted Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also:
Article on Jean-Marie SpeichDespite the bulk of reference materials cited, it is observable that certain contributors are aggressively trying to place undue tags in this article. Some claim that knowing (a close relationship with) the subject personally, would be tanamount to serious violation against being objective in writing about the person in question. This will be true if a contributor includes information that are unsubstantiated with suitable reference materials. However, it seems more biased if one deletes contirbutions of wikipedians without substantial support to contrary claims, at least by pointing out objective reference materials; or worse, to places tags for some kind of paranoid reason. It is an insult to sensibilities of contributors who include information substantiated by citations, when such presumptive tags and comments are stamped on wikipedia articles. On the otherhand, contributors who know the subject personally are more knoweledgeable about this subject. For this reason, I remove the tag you placed on 17 August 2015.--Northern Lights 2000 (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the advice and really sorry I completely forgot to do it. Btw you can easily find out on the web the news was rght. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emalas (talk • contribs) 23:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I listened the deal was done and Utd decided not to do another bid for the player; honestly I had no idea here we need the confirmation of the purchising team. No problem we can immediately change it back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emalas (talk • contribs) 23:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Man City colorsSorry, at first I made a mistake, I confused th bgcolor with the text color. I used a program to determine the actual hashtag colors of the official logo. It should be:
It would look like this: 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 11:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank youThanks and thank you for your work. I hope we can put this behind us going on forward and improving wikipedia. Both of us have the same goals and I do understand where you are coming from. Do you want me to remove this warning, that was a bit impulsive after your sudden level 3 on me? Qed237 (talk) 17:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
2016 World Cup of HockeyHi, after our little dispute earlier I thought I should let you know that I have updated the 2016 World Cup of Hockey with groups and schedule. This after now after IIHF (see this) and NHL (see this) has now released the info. I hope this looks good enough now, but feel free to look through it. Qed237 (talk) 15:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC) A questionCan you help me to break this table in two tables ? 2008–09 Liga II, because all the editions of Liga II have two separate tables. Thank you !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Hi, Thank youWith your help, I have developped the french article and I mention you (fr:Discussion:Football aux Jeux olympiques d'été de 1948/Bon article); Thank you so much. Watch the article. Cordially.--FCNantes72 (talk) 14:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Pbradbury. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Pbradbury. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Pbradbury. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Template:Manchester City F.C. squad Your recent editing history at Template:Manchester City F.C. squad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 16:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Flexes with resolutionHi there! I'm that guy from the Manchester City article that changed the size of the image. Can you please explain what it means by "flexes with resolution"? Thanks. JoshuaInWiki (talk) 04:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
