User talk:PaulBredereck

JETGO

G'day Paul. I don't think we have met but we have several acquaintances in common (you know how small the industry is) and I think we have spoken on the 'phone when I did some work on 'NEY. Here on WP there are a few things you need to be aware of. Please read WP:COI, WP:V, WP:RS and WP:OR - you may know that it should be "JETGO" but someone other than you needs to say it, and do so in something other than internal company documents or in an email to me. I did a search for "jetgo" on ABN Lookup and found "JET-GO INTERNATIONAL", "Jet-Go International Pty Ltd" and "Jetgo Australia Holdings Pty Ltd" were active. If the change to "JETGO" hasn't actually been completed, then you shouldn't change it in the article. Also, if you want to change the styling of the name, please don't be lazy by using the Undo function; among other things there is broad consensus on WP that registrations of individual aircraft is not worthy of inclusion in airline articles, and in my opinion there is no need to have ICAO airport codes in image captions or more than one image in such a small article, especially when one doesn't show a complete aircraft. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I understand the rules. But writing JETGO in the style JetGo infringes the rights of JetGo International.

When Jason Ryder sold JetGo International he also assigned certain rights to the name. It has taken me 6 months to try and clean out the use of the old font to remove any possible conflict.

If I knew how to upload images I would post appropriate material.

As for the website... don't go there, it is a major frustration for me!

There are several places you can see the correct logo font etc... such as wholesale Investor website http://www.wholesaleinvestor.com.au/company/jetgo-australia/ BTW. while you are at it why not upload the logo? 58.173.224.250 (talk) 08:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Paul

Jetgo issue

This issue can be sorted out pretty painlessly if you could email [e-mail] regarding the matter, using your corporate email address (or any that is identifiable with the company). Thanks. —Dark 11:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that... yes some of the stuff that has been put on Wiki about us is just crap... cheers Paul 58.173.224.250 (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Paul, and thankyou for your feedback relating to JETGO edits. I created the original JETGO Wikipedia article although I have no connection to the aviation industry, it is more just an interest of mine. I feel that the company is notable enough to warrant a case against it's deletion, and my recent edits were aimed at demonstrating there is discussion in the wider community by providing secondary and tertiary sources in line with WP:CORP notability guidelines (Quantity of discussion over quality perhaps in hindsight). I appreciate your comments as someone connected to the company on the accuracy of these media reports. The facts you have provided for me are solid enough to make a case for notability also, however first hand information from yourself needs to be verified by secondary sources - in the absence of press releases and links posted on the company website, and without subscriptions to industry journals etc, I am finding it difficult to find reliable sources to verify this information. If you agree JETGO warrants a Wikipedia article, and COI rules prevent you from updating yourself, perhaps you can point me towards some recent documents from CASA with substantial information - or some other source beyond local media - published online and I will update the article again? Thankss Dfadden (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for that. The issue I had is the other guys obsessed with putting up false or misleading information... or gossip, just because it was reported in some media.

And constantly changing it back once it is corrected. AS I understand it the rules of Wikipedia allow information to be provided by a company representative if it is from a verifiable source... such as @jetgoaustralia.com.au email address.

Frankly I don't really care that much, but if the page is there it can at least be accurate and not breach someone else's IP... just because the media reports something does not make it fact, such as JETGO RPT which is pure speculation, as we have never announced where we will service once we get our AOC upgraded.

Likewise our website was put together by a third party before the company started and has basically not been touched since... a new website is in the pipeline, but will not go live until the RPT ops are ready to commence as it has our internet booking engine etc....

I agree I think JETGO is sufficiently significant in that it is the only operator of true regional jets in Australia, and quite successful I might add.

I was also once asked about my former company Tamair, which ceased operations in 1998... mainly because so many pilots got their start in the industry through Tamair... I did up some info for Zarik who runs The Australian Aviation Collection... see http://aviationcollection.org/Tamair/Tamair%20History.pdf

I am happy to provide you with a word version of this if it is of interest, just give me an email address I can attach it to.. [e-mail]

Cheers Paul PaulBredereck (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]