What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.
If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.
Where next?
If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!
Please supply an edit summary for every revert, unless it is a non-controversial revert of vandalism. In addition, reverts, in case of content dispute should not be marked as minor.
As for this edit in Windows 8, template {{Windows 8}} is already integrated in infobox. There is no need to use it again. It is for the other articles of the series only.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kompas TV may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Note that I have reverted your use of the {{distinguish}} template at Jesse McCartney. The template is meant to be used to help readers differentiate between two (or more) very similar spelled or sounding names (e.g. Jessie McCartney). I cannot imagine how a reader could ever confuse the two other than the fact that their given name startes with 'J' (Jesse and Jenette are too dissimilar) and their surname begins with "Mc". --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots15:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop using the {{distinguish}} template disruptively, as you did, yet again, here. Yes, there are people with the same first name. In fact, there are lots of them. We do not add this template in those cases. We use it when names are similar enough that people are likely to be confused. "Ashley Tisdale" is no where near similar to "Ashley Greene". "George W. Bush" and "George H. W. Bush", OTOH, are easily confused. If you do not understand this, please stop using the template and ask for help. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pai Walisongo. You have new messages at Talk:Winx Club. Message added 22:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You added a new alias to the infobox of Jennette McCurdy but provided no sourcing for it. If the alias warrants being mentioned in the infobox, it should be sourced. Really, it should be mentioned somewhere else in the article when talking about the work she performed under the alias. —C.Fred (talk) 22:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Twice you have replaced a block of text at this article that, on top of being pretty clear POV soapboxing, was expressly sourced to "eyewitness account" (i.e., WP:OR). And you blandly accused the removing editors of "blanking." You're not paying close enough attention, and obviously not reading the edit summaries of the edits that removed the text. Try harder. postdlf (talk) 16:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And it looks like this is not the only time you've done this... That edit you reverted at Taxicab as "blanking" was reasonable with a reasonable edit summary (regardless of whether you agree with it), and the removed paragraph was largely incoherent. It is inappropriate to label such edits as "blanking," which is a form of vandalism, and it is a misuse of Twinkle to apply it to an edit just because it removed text without regard to the merits of that removal. postdlf (talk) 16:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at User talk:Louis Erisson, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. He gave an explanation for the content he removed. Discuss the issue with him or give a better reason than "blanking" for the revert and vandalism warning if you think the content removal was in bad faith.Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pai, as I noted above, this is a continuing problem with you. And you have yet to respond to any of these concerns here; you have never even made a talk page comment that isn't automated. You need to start discussing this issue and how you will improve. Abuse of editing tools may result in them being taken away. postdlf (talk) 15:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.
I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.
