|
User talk:Packerfansam/Archive 4
Speedy deletion nomination of Simon Lock Lord
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Simon Lock Lord requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Xx236 (talk) 07:47, 9 July 2015 (UTC) DeadlinksPlease do not remove citations to reliable sources when the link is dead. Instead, it's better to find an archived copy of the page and link to that. Example here 32.218.32.230 (talk) 01:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC) External links: always plural never singularAccording to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, the External links section is always plural never singular even if has only one link in the external links section in an article. Thank you-RFD (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Use of {{mergenote}}Hi! I was doing maintenance on {{mergenote}} and noticed you had transcluded mergenote to notify users of a merge discussion. I went ahead and fixed them so you don't need to worry. For future reference, mergenote should always be substituted or else it won't automatically sign your contribution. To do so, use:
Thanks for your contributions! Happy editing. Wugapodes (talk) 23:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC) Removal of referenceI am puzzled that you removed a reference in this edit. I see that you added it back as an external link in a subsequent edit. That doesn't seem like the appropriate way to handle this, but perhaps you have a good explanation. I note that it wasn't explained in the edit summary; had you explained your reasoning in the edit summary I might not be bothering you. Would you be so kind as to explain your rationale?--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Olin B. LewisHi-I had to make a change to the Olin B. Lewis article; Lewis never served in the Minnesota House of Representatives. However, Lewis did served in the St. Paul Municipal Assembly. Unfortunately, the Political Graveyard website listed Olin B. Lewis as serving in the Minnesota House of Representatives. To add to the confusion, as you know, the lower house of the Wisconsin Legislature is: the Assembly. One of the reference librarians of the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library was very helpful; the Minnesota Legislators Past and Present weblink is maintain by them. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Season's GreetingsTo You and Yours!
Hi, Packerfansam. I noticed in this edit you removed, without explanation, a notable person from the above article. I have restored the link and mention. If you think I've made a mistake, let me know - thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Edit-a-thon in Madison
Packerfansam, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:
RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Can you please provide a reference for Julius Ingram as Orrin Henry Ingram's brother? Very interesting if true. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 07:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
AN/I notificationSee Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Packerfansam_still_removing_content_for_POV_reasons. KateWishing (talk) 00:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC) 2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community SurveyThe Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Hi Packersfansam! I noticed your username and wanted to let you know that I recently restarted the Green Bay Packers WikiProject! If you are interested in joining, please feel free to add your username to our active member list. Let me know if you have any questions! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 00:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Gaylord Graves for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaylord Graves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaylord Graves until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 01:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Adolph R. Bucknam for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adolph R. Bucknam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolph R. Bucknam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Nathan Sadowsky for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Sadowsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Sadowsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Michael B. Danaher for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael B. Danaher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael B. Danaher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Nomination of A. U. Coates for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. U. Coates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. U. Coates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Joshua H. Berkey for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua H. Berkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua H. Berkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dolotta (talk) 00:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Packerfansam. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Merry, merry!From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Alva Garey for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alva Garey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alva Garey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC) Seasons' Greetings ...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Eliot Wolf for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eliot Wolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliot Wolf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC) HelloGlad to have you back editing! -- Dolotta (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Please link to sourcesI noticed that you've been adding a lot of sources that are online, but haven't linked to their URLs (example). It would be helpful to readers to link to the sources you've used. Thanks. 32.218.37.81 (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Wisconsin NRHP articlesHi, i happen to have recently expanded some articles you created back in 2012 or 2013, including this expansion of Delavan Post Office. Also I have gotten notifications of your creating some new NRHP articles. thank you for your contributions! Perhaps you are aware of some effort going on to improve NRHP articles, with some discussion at wt:WI, with my main focus being to add the very relevant, usually available now, NRHP nomination documents and associated photos. It would be great if you would include those into your new articles, from the get go. You can find them by clicking on the NRHP reference number in the county list-article or in the NRHP infobox of an existing article. Or simply by copy-pasting in the following draft reference and filling in the reference number at "id=" in two places: <ref name=nrhpdoc>{{cite web|url={{NRHP url|id=}}|title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: |publisher=[[National Park Service]]|author= |date= |accessdate=, 2018}} With {{NRHP url|id=|photos=y|title=photos}}.</ref> Also, I think you may be creating articles by copy-pasting an NRHP infobox from one article and adapting it. It is easier and better to use the already filled out custom NRHP infobox available here, at least for places listed by 2010. See more about that and other tips at wp:NRHPHELP. Also you are including links to private, commercial website www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com, which is a copy of the National Park Service's data. I personally would simply remove from your articles. I prefer the NRIS reference from the NRHP infobox generator, which refers to the National Park Service's database. Your links to landmarkhunter seem more worthwhile because, while that also has a copy of NPS info, it also seems to provide a photo somehow. Hope you don't mind my making suggestions this way. Please don't sweat it if any of this is a bother. The main thing is that you're helping build coverage, keep up the good work! cheers, --Doncram (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
suggestionWhen you create a new one, e.g. Charles R. Smith House, you appear to be using internet search results (e.g. landmarkhunter.com and Wisconsin Historical Society) plus an infobox from Elkman's NRHP infobox generator (if it has anything available, which is only for places NRHP-listed before mid 2010). Thank you for doing all that. But could I suggest that you also copy-paste the content from the corresponding NRHP-county-list-article into your draft, and edit from that, too? This way you would be guaranteed to include at least everything from the list-article item, and that would save other/future editors' time in checking whether everything was transfered, etc. That way would guarantee that readers get more, and not anything less. I personally would argue that ensuring readers get nothing less should be like a requirement, though I am ambivalent about making any requirements exactly. I don't like being forced on anything myself, or forcing other editors to do anything (we are all volunteers, it is clear that some value is being added no matter what, including that there is now a larger photo visible for the reader, etc.). I just hope you can find it easy to incorporate everything in the list-article item, so that you want to. When you're editing, maybe this means having an extra window or two open. For the Charles R. Smith House, you would hit "edit" on the list-article, and copy-paste the following: |image=CharlesRSmithHouseNeenahWI.jpg
|lat=44.190556
|lon=-88.445
|description=Rambling mansion begun by Smith in 1890 and later expanded with various pavilions and porches with [[Queen Anne style architecture in the United States|Queen Anne]], [[Italianate architecture|Italianate]], and [[Colonial Revival architecture|Colonial Revival]] features.<ref>{{cite web|title=Charles R. Smith House|url=https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/NationalRegister/HI16519|work=Architecture and History Inventory|publisher=Wisconsin Historical Society|accessdate=2015-08-08}}</ref> Charles was a son of Elisha Smith, founder of Menasha Wooden Ware, and expanded, modernized, and diversified the company when he took over. For his second wife, Smith got the town of Warner renamed [[Ladysmith, Wisconsin|Ladysmith]], and after Charles died, that wife married the silent movie actor [[Orrin Johnson]], who retired to the mansion.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Adams|first1=Peter James|title=Charles R. Smith House|url={{NRHP url|id=79000122}}|accessdate=2015-08-08|work=NRHP Inventory-Nomination Form|agency=National Park Service|publisher=US Dept. of the Interior|date=1979-04-08}}</ref>
You would be inserting that into the starter material you get from the Elkman infobox generator. It includes a perfectly good well-formed reference to the NRHP document in this case. Optionally, also if the infobox doesn't already include any coordinates (as sometimes happens), this gives you coordinates for the article (it is a bit of a bother, but you could take the lat= and lon= items and compose an infobox line: |coordinates={{coord|44.190556|N|88.445|W|display=inline,title}} But mainly you would just select the description text with its included footnote(s) (which is of extraordinarily good quality in Wisconsin NRHP list-articles), and probably you would delete the rest. In your edit summary it would be nice if you would acknowledge the source, i.e. use edit summary like "create page, including text from [[National Register of Historic Places listings in Winnebago County, Wisconsin]]", although I don't think you have to do that, you could just say "create page" instead. Does this seem workable? Really it is just cutting and pasting one thing, and it does save you from cutting and pasting the photo file name from elsewhere, and I hope you might try it and see if it works for you. --Doncram (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Columbus, WisconsinGreat work you are doing JD Milburn (talk) 07:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
MergerHi-the Charles C. Schmidt article could be merged into the Charles J. Schmidt article; an administrator may be able to merge the two articles. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
no further disambiguation needed for "Third Avenue Historic District (Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin)" and similarHi there. I often get notices of new articles like Third Avenue Historic District (Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin), which I sometimes browse to check. This article includes a "for" hatnote, "For other places of the same name, see Third Avenue Historic District". I don't personally care much and certainly don't want to carry on any dispute about it, but perhaps you should know that the "for" note will get removed by other editors, because it is not needed by readers to clarify anything (the title includes "Sturgeon bay, wisconsin" and is not at all ambiguous) and it is highly unlikely that any reader interested in this article also wants to read articles about other random, essentially unrelated historic districts about Third Avenues elsewhere. In my experience, there are disambiguation-focused editors who will eventually find and remove unnecessary disambiguation. So why add it in the first place; and why not remove it to save others' effort. You must think that disambiguation and for-notes work differently than I do; perhaps you or I could ask a question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation or some other forum where the disambiguation specialists hang out. But anyhow, I am glad to see the new article, and I just tried to add a bit from the available NRHP document about it. The reference number in the NRHP infobox already linked to the NRHP document; i just pasted a draft reference from the Elkman NRHP infobox generator into the article and adapted it a bit, and included a quote and a bit more from the document. I do think it helps readers to give them access to the document and its 41 accompanying photos. :) --Doncram (talk) 13:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)  The article Elroy C. Honadel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Greetings and hi. I am writing to ask if you wouldn't mind moving W.G.C. Bagley to W. G. C. Bagley. The reason is that the initials represent three separate names and not one abbreviated single form of a name. Check out my edits if you like, also. Thanks! --Southern Iowan (talk) 22:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Andrew M. Schuster for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew M. Schuster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew M. Schuster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 03:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Packerfansam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Wisconsin political bio formatHowdy. Assuming you're the fellow who creates all the Wisconsin politician bio articles. Why do you keep putting one line at the top, then have a Biography section, with the rest of the article after it? That's not the correct format. GoodDay (talk) 14:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Ralph E. Kronenwetter for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph E. Kronenwetter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph E. Kronenwetter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Wisconsin political bio formatHowdy. Just a friendly reminder, to format those article intros correctly, when you're creating them :) GoodDay (talk) 18:17, 2 September 2019 (UTC) The article Michael D. Navrkal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Proposed deletion of James Loy (United States Navy) The article James Loy (United States Navy) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Proposed deletion of Harold DrotningThe article Harold Drotning has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Proposed deletion of George Engel (United States Army)The article George Engel (United States Army) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Thanks butThanks much for your help but someone else can put up with this. I have better things to do. R — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlevse (talk • contribs) 19:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Nomination of D. J. Clark for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. J. Clark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. J. Clark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Charles P. DykmanHello. I have recently proposed the deletion of Charles P. Dykman. Please check the article if you want to contest the proposed deletion. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael T. Sullivan for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael T. Sullivan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael T. Sullivan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Daniel L. LaRocque for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel L. LaRocque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel L. LaRocque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Paul Lundsten for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Lundsten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Lundsten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Paul C. Gartzke for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul C. Gartzke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul C. Gartzke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Robert D. Sundby for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert D. Sundby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert D. Sundby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC) The article Edward T. Hartman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
|||||||||||||||
.jpg)
