User talk:Pablogarciadaz

Evanescence discography

Information icon Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Evanescence discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Kids

I admire your enthusiasm for "Crazy Kids" by Kesha, but I have had to alter your edits multiple times. First and foremost, we do not add hashtags for chart positions, not only because it's tacky and makes reading difficult, but because the hashtag has other uses in wiki markup that can cause serious formatting issues. Additionally, we strongly want to avoid chart trajectory unless its well-sourced and dramatic. For example, a song moving from the 99 position to the 1 position in one day. I do not wish to attack you personally or offend you, but I rewrote many of your contributions to the article because they were poorly worded with almost no attention to grammar. Then, you went reversed correct grammar and strong verbiage, to incorrect grammar and poor verbiage. If there is a specific wording you're adamant about adding, please leave a message either here, on my talk page, or on the talk page for "Crazy Kids". We can work something out, I'm sure. Otherwise, I might end up undoing your contributions again. Thanks for reading through my rant! :) --Thevampireashlee (talk) 23:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I noticed you changed the chart position from 49 to 41 for "Crazy Kids". Can you send me a link to that? I looked all over Billboard.com, including the Chart-Beat blog, and I could not find a single mention of it. Thanks in advance. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 01:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removing the UK peak from the Official Charts Company was an accident. Sorry. Thanks for changing it back. As far as the Hot 100 position goes, Twitter is not a reliable source, even if it comes from the verified account of Billboard, until they update the website, or until another reliable source mentions the peak as 41, we'll have to leave it at 49. Remember that here, at Wikipedia, it's not about what we know to be true, it's about what we can prove through sources to be true. Thanks for the speedy response and happy editing! --Thevampireashlee (talk) 01:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Still no source yet for the 41 rank. Please do not add it until you can prove it. I will revert the additions until proof from a reliable source exists. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 16:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Naturally, I looked before reverting your edit and did not see it. Could you send me a link? --Thevampireashlee (talk) 16:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC) EDIT: I found it. Just had to clear my cache and cookies. Thanks for your patience. :) --Thevampireashlee (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

False Certifications

Per http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=%22Here%2527s+To+Never+Growing+Up%22 "Here's to Never Growing Up" is still only certified as gold. Don't update certifications without reliable sources.—Kww(talk) 20:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Down

The song made its debut on June 3, 2013. Therefore, that is the original release date. Want proof? You can either search the web or read it here: [1]

Second warning for false certifications

This is the second time I have had to revert your edits because you were adding false certifications. Certifications are not automatic. This week, you were adding certifications for "Crazy Kids", claiming that it had been certified as gold by the RIAA. Take a look at the RIAA certification listings for Ke$ha ( http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=%22Ke$ha%22 ) and you will see that "Crazy Kids" is not certified.

If you continue to add false certifications, your account will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 16:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Selling 500,000 units does not mean that the single has received a Gold certification. A gold certification is received when the RIAA certifies the sales and issues the certification. If you continue to insert false certification claims, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 19:09, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Here's to Never Growing Up, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bangerz (album), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 00:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timber (song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements by decade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 27 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pitbull (rapper) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • albums chart<ref>{{cite web|url={{Allmusic|class=album|id=r858313|pure_url=yes}}|title=El Mariel > Charts & Awards > Billboard Albums|publisher=allmusic|accessdate=August 9, 2009}}</ref> and peaked at No. 17 on the '
  • On March 22, 2011, Pitbull released his second single, "[[Give Me Everything|Give Me Everything (Pitbull Song]]"; three months later, the song became Pitbull's first single to top the [[Billboard

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Avril Lavigne Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Adabow. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lorde discography without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Adabow (talk) 04:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Avril Lavigne concert tours (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Alice and Wish You Were Here
The Avril Lavigne Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Alice and Wish You Were Here

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]