User talk:PCN02WPS/Archive 1

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, PCN02WPS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at "100+ (QuizUp)". Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see What Wikipedia is not for further details). Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Presbyterian Blue Hose football seasons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NAIA and 2007 college football season. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Arkansas-Georgia football rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arkansas-Georgia football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkansas-Georgia football rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CrashUnderride 06:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arkansas-Georgia football rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 college football season. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of national stadiums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veterans Memorial Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hashtag United logo (soccer).jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hashtag United logo (soccer).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Social media, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 21:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to QuizUp. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization Talk 21:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Google Maps (mobile application). General Ization Talk 21:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016–17 UEFA Champions League qualifying phase and play-off round. Qed237 (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Football at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament. Qed237 (talk) 00:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roy Krishna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salvador. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 En Avant de Guingamp season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEST. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1952 Tangerine Bowl

The article 1952 Tangerine Bowl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A college football game from the 1950s is not notable in itself. No other indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marianna251TALK 00:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


I don't understand why the following is your criteria for deleting this article:

"A college football game from the 1950s is not notable in itself. No other indication of notability". I have created several pages like this (see here, here, and here), and they are all notable due to the fact that they are bowl games. I wouldn't create an article for any old college football game in 1952, but this one was notable because it was a bowl game. This game was notable in the same way that this one is, they're the same bowl game, just under a different name and sixty years apart. That shouldn't be a reason for deletion. PCN02WPS (talk) 00:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 1952 Tangerine Bowl. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 09:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

PROD tags may be removed, so it was okay for PCN02WPS to remove that. However, AfD tags may not be removed if the article should be nominated. Qed237 (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Pilot Flying J Battle at Bristol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2002 Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commonwealth Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2003 North Texas Mean Green football team

The article 2003 North Texas Mean Green football team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication that this seasons roster is notable in and of itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  00:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003 North Texas Mean Green football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War Memorial Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

2017 college football season article

PCN02WPS, it's a bit too early to be creating articles for the 2017 season. Please see a recent discussion on the topic at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#2017 articles. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 06:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PCN02WPS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (United States presidential election in Kansas, 1976) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating United States presidential election in Kansas, 1976, PCN02WPS!

Wikipedia editor Dps04 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for this article

To reply, leave a comment on Dps04's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dps04 (talk) 04:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (United States presidential election in Arkansas, 1972) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating United States presidential election in Arkansas, 1972, PCN02WPS!

Wikipedia editor Dps04 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks again for this article, as well as the many other articles about statewide election results you've created. Judging from your contribs, u may wish to apply for autopatrolled rights. This can reduce the workload of page patrollers.

To reply, leave a comment on Dps04's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dps04 (talk) 04:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, PCN02WPS. You have new messages at Dps04's talk page.
Message added 03:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dps04 (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Championship Game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Championship Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Championship Game until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GLenhart1 (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (United States presidential election in West Virginia, 1972) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating United States presidential election in West Virginia, 1972, PCN02WPS!

Wikipedia editor Dps04 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Dps04's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dps04 (talk) 13:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Score format in season article schedule tables

There's currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Score format in seasons article schedule tables that you may be interested in. Kobra98 (talk) 21:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use

Hi PCN02WPS. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. One of these restrctions is WP:NFCC#9, which says that non-free content can only be used in the article namespace. Non-free content should not be used on usepages or their subpages as explained in WP:UP#Non-free images which is why I have converted the non-free File:Flag of the City of Clinton, South Carolina.png to a link on your user page. Perhaps you did not notice the edit sum I left the first time I made said edit; therefore, I'm posting this here to provide more explanation. Please do not re-display this file again because doing so is clearly in violation of relevant Wikipedia policy. If you have any questions about this, you can ask for help at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Alternatively, if you are the copyright holder of this design, you may release it on a Creative Commons license so that it can be used anywhere in Wikipedia. The instructions on how to do this are at WP:DCM. Black Kite (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
    • @Marchjuly and Black Kite: Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I designed this for my city and it was adopted several months ago. We tried to trademark/copyright it but we couldn't because it already belongs to the city. I was told I could release the image anywhere, since the flag belongs to the city, so can I change it to a free use license? Thanks, PCN02WPS (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
      • If it belongs to the city, I suspect you would have to check whether they hold copyright in it (which is usual on most recent city flags, see for instance File:Flag of Provo, Utah (2015).png) or whether they would release the design on a CC license. Unfortunately in this case, Wikipedia policy states that the onus falls on the person wishing to use it as a free image to prove that it actually is. Black Kite (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
      • Hi PCNo2WPS. First of all, congrats on being selected to do such a thing; I think its pretty cool to be able to look at that flag and say "I did that". Also, sorry if either my edit sums or the above post were a bit cryptic or confusing. About the free licensing, I agree with what Black Kite wrote. On Wikipedia, a free license means that the copyright holder is basically agreing in advance to allow anyone anywhere in the world permission to download the file and modify/use without restriction, including for commercial purposes. There are certain restrictions that can be added, such as requiring attribution, etc. depending upon the type of license chosen, but basically the copyright holder is giving people the right to do with the image as they please. Since a free license cannot be revoked, Wikipedia often requires some sort of declaration of consent from the copyright holder for verifiation purposes as explained here. It is possible in some cases for particular content to be licensed as public domain for a variety of reasons and permission of the copyright holder is not needed to do so. Since the flag is quite new, treating it as public domain for its age is not an option. Certain works deemed to be below the threshold of originality are considered to be ineligible for copyright protection. Whether that applies in this case may require some discussion and an agreement of the Wikipedia community at a venue such as WP:FFD. Like a free license, public domain content would not be considered non-free content and thus could be displayed on your user page. Just for reference, all of the other flags displayed on your user page are freely licensed or licensed as public domain and thus are OK to be shown per relevant Wikipedia policy. Of course, the accuracy of the licensing may be challenged by anyone at any time, but they seem OK (at least to me) at first glance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
        • @Marchjuly and Black Kite: I was told by someone at the city that the flag and image now officially belong to the city (and not me anymore), but I was free to put the image wherever on the internet that I wanted. I'm assuming this means it can be a free use image?
          • Lots of people upload images specifically for use on Wikipedia and claim that they have been given permission to use the image on Wikipedia; however, such a thing is unfortunately not really sufficient for Wikipedia's free licensing purposes. In general, the goal of Wikipedia is to provide content which is freely available for reader to use as they see fit; proper attribution is typically required, but otherwise the information is there for all to freely use in pretty much any way they want. So, the city giving you permission to use the image as you like is fine for you, but the same consideration needs to be given to others as well. Basically, the city needs to clearly give permission to everyone in the world to download the image and then use it pretty much any way they want, including using it to make money. That is why Wikipedia is going to need to have something explicitly from the city stating that they consent to such a thing before the image can be accepted under a free license. Otherwise, the best thing to do is treat the image as non-free content, which means that its use is subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi PCN02WPS, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Swarm ♠ 05:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Presidential elections

Red Link Removal Barnstar
for all your great work in creating so many articles on US presidential elections by state. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion review for 2017 America East Men's Soccer Tournament

An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2017 America East Men's Soccer Tournament. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PCN02WPS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Presidential elections by state

Thanks for creating all these articles. Could I possibly ask that you tag the talk pages with {{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}? Cheers, Number 57 23:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

@Number 57: No problem, sorry I didn't do this earlier. Thanks for getting in touch PCN02WPS 03:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Presidential election county results

The presidential election county results are sourced from several sources:

  1. Richard Scammon’s America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920-1964
  2. Edgar Eugene Robinson’s The Presidential Vote 1896-1932
  3. The French website Géoelections, whose files can be bough for fifteen euros per election (major parities only) and an extra fifteen euros for vote totals for major third parties (e.g. Perot, Wallace, La Follette,[1] Debs,[2] Weaver[3])
  4. [I will note that the basic election .xlsx files do include figures for Theodore Roosevelt in 1912, Fillmore in 1856, and all four candidates in 1860.]

If you want to update or add county tables, I plead that you do the following:

  1. Follow the basic formatting and party shading in the county table of United States presidential election in Maine, 1980#Results by county. Write-in candidates are in grey, as seen in United States presidential election in Maine, 1960.
  2. If results for all non-major party candidates are not given separately, shade “Other” candidates by the party shading of the most successful “other” candidate for the relevant election.
  3. If a third party finished ahead of a major party in any county, list the margin between the top two candidates and endnote those counties where such occurred (e.g. United States presidential election in Ohio, 1912).
  4. In some cases where multiple third parties poll significantly (for example in United States presidential election in Washington (state), 1912) it becomes impractical to list margins, so they can be omitted.
  5. The same is true in some cases where the third-party vote could not be differentiated.
  6. For your information, you can go to Category:United States political party color templates to find the appropriate shading colour.

luokehao, 31 December 2017, 10:02 (UTC)

  1. ^ Géoelections; Popular vote for Robert La Follette
  2. ^ Géoelections; Popular vote for Eugene Debs (1904)
  3. ^ Géoelections; Popular vote for James B. Weaver (1892)

DYK for 2018 College Football Playoff National Championship

On 30 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 College Football Playoff National Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Alabama Crimson Tide overcame a 13–0 deficit at halftime to win the 2018 College Football Playoff National Championship in overtime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2018 College Football Playoff National Championship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2018 College Football Playoff National Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Here, have a star. You did a gud. Sethclrk (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Game summaries

As far as I know, there is no standard when it comes to listing either W , L , or team abbreviations in the previous meetings. Yet you have converted a lot of them to W L citing "to keep consistent". Consistent with what? On the pages where I created the game summaries I referred to how it was listed on previous season articles for that team and used that "to keep consistent". I don't see any need to change how it has been listed on team pages for several years. Especially if it is for consistency. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 02:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Bsuorangecrush: The consistency I referred to was other 2018 pages that I had seen or created; the majority of 2018 pages use W or L and my plan was just to convert those that did not use W or L to that format. However, if this is not a sensible solution, I am more than willing to stop those conversions. Thanks for notifying me. PCN02WPS 03:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5