User talk:Oshawott 12/Archive 3

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Norfolk Island Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  • South Carolina Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  • United States Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Call for clue

Oshwah, according to a box on User:Oshawott 12, you've adopted this user. Could you please take a moment to give him or her an emergency clue injection? See WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 29#Wikipedia:SANFRANJANBANSFRAM and WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 1#Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM? and now WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 7#Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM. Thanks. EEng 12:55, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EEng - Thanks for the ping and for letting me know. It looks like Oshawott 12 just needs to understand that he can just tag redirect creations like these for deletion under G10 if done by sock puppet accounts. I don't see his creation of the redirect discussions that were closed as 'speedy keep' as completely out of line. He just needs to read and understand this part of the redirect guidelines and make sure that he cites a guideline directly when listing redirects for deletion discussion.
Oshawott 12 - make sure that you take some time and follow the recommendations I stated in this response. Read through the redirect guidelines and make sure that you understand them before listing any more redirect for discussion. This recommendation applies to anything on Wikipedia (obviously), but make sure that you ask someone for input or help if you're not 100% sure how to proceed or if you should proceed with something... this will save time and frustration for everyone. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I sure will. Thanks for the suggestions and tips. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 11:05, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C South Horizons station (talk) Add sources
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Hong Kong Maritime Museum (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Shouson Hill (talk) Add sources
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Big Bus Tours (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Lei Tung station (talk) Add sources
97 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Sha Tin (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Prehistoric Hong Kong (talk) Cleanup
31 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Fortress Hill (talk) Cleanup
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Hollywood Road (talk) Cleanup
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Public housing estates in Sham Shui Po (talk) Expand
215 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Central, Hong Kong (talk) Expand
641 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Hong Kong Island (talk) Expand
100 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Discovery Bay (talk) Unencyclopaedic
48 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kowloon Bay (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Route 10 (Hong Kong) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
25 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Hong Kong Express Rail Link (talk) Merge
40 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Rail transport in Hong Kong (talk) Merge
249 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Nüwa (talk) Merge
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pok Fu Lam Fire Dragon Dance (talk) Wikify
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Vladimir Lenin monument, Kiev (talk) Wikify
244 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Western imperialism in Asia (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dawn markets (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pak Sha Wan (Chai Wan) (talk) Orphan
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Street performance in Hong Kong (talk) Orphan
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sau Mau Ping (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Villa Esplanada (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Man Kam To (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C City One station (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pok Fu Lam Country Park (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Tai Shui Hang station (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The King of Random

Hey Oshawatt, in my opinion, all of the information you removed (with the likely exception of the merchandise), was encyclopedic and belonged in the article. And per some policy which I'm forgetting right now and don't want to look up because it's nearly 2AM for me, primary sources can be used in specific ways. I feel like the second paragraph of the controversies article, especially, belonged there. Thanks, WizardKing 07:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think that a Reddit post could apply as a source on a BLP page. As the WP:BLP page states:

Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.

I would assume from this that primary sources, such as a Reddit post, is a poor source then. Please correct me if i’m wrong. Thanks! ;) Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 08:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I believe WP:REDDIT would qualify. WizardKing 14:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If we used the Reddit post, 2 of the 5 sources would be from the same citation. In fact, the literal page you directed me, which I quote, says:

Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field.....

Your source is not an extremist view, nor is it self-published. I don’t think it would apply here. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 14:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read the section "Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves " WizardKing 17:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it may be wish to continue this discussion after the emotions have passed regarding Thompson's death. WizardKing 21:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Pamela Geller

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pamela Geller. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
readded Floquenbeam • Lectonar
removed DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes

removed Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Manhattan Hill (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Ishtiaq (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Sheung Shui station (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Che Kung Temple station (talk) Add sources
77 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Kaunas Airport (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sha Tin Wai station (talk) Add sources
99 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kowloon Tong (talk) Cleanup
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tin Hau, Hong Kong (talk) Cleanup
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Robinson Road, Hong Kong (talk) Cleanup
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Public housing estates in Sha Tin (talk) Expand
194 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Causeway Bay (talk) Expand
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Tseung Kwan O (talk) Expand
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mira Place (talk) Unencyclopaedic
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Victoria Park (Hong Kong) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
16 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Hong Kong bus route numbering (talk) Unencyclopaedic
85 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong Express Rail Link (talk) Merge
280 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Hawker (trade) (talk) Merge
83 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Route number (talk) Merge
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start The Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital at Sandy Bay (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jockey Challenge (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Hong Kong Jockey Club College (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start History of transport in Hong Kong (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ladies' Purse (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Civic engagement in Central and Wan Chai harbourfront development (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Shek Mun station (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Metroplaza (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Tai Ping Shan Street (talk) Stub
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The Gateway, Hong Kong (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bonham Road (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chatham Road (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Right-wing politics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Right-wing politics. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1. Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3. Norfolk Island Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4. Wales Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5. Washington (state) SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6. Antarctica Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7. United States Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8. Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
removed Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]