If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
This page has archives. Sections older than 183 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi Onmyway22! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
I don't understand why tagging other accounts as my socks. It's been months Ive been waiting to edit Wikipedia and get unblocked under SPO. Got a mail that two other accounts are tagged as my socks. Onmyway22talk17:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I was blocked because of a sockpuppetry spam ring and I have admitted and confessed the evade. It's been six months since I have not been editing and using Wikipedia. I really miss editing articles and requesting to get me unblocked. You can check my contribution and all are constructive and I assure that I will never ever repeat the same mistake again, I swear. Please do the needful to get me back to Wikipedia!! Thank you!! Onmyway22talk10:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Don't use the expression, "Please do the needful", it's quite offensive outside of India. The last sockpuppet was blocked on 2022-08-22 meaning the soonest you can apply under WP:SO would be 2023-02-22. At that point, you'll need to drop your ludicrous claim that all your contributions were constructive. You were blocked for being part of a spam ring. It would be more accurate to say none of your edits were constructive. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Pardon. I gotta mail that some account was suspected to me for WP:SOCK. I do not know why? At that point of time, logged and requested for unblock. Sorry I thought it is been six months. Onmyway22talk17:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Requesting unblock under WP:SPO, I haven't been editing Wikipedia for six months. I understand my fault and I swear that I won't involve in any editing violations in the future. I am requesting a last chance for me to continue as an editor in Wikipedia. I assure that my future edits will be constructive. Give me a last chance please! You can keep an eye on me. Onmyway22talk20:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
We don't necessarily have volunteers who can monitor you and clean up after you if need be. We need to be convinced that your prior behavior will not repeat. I don't really think you have addressed the reasons for the block. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Checkuser data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. I think this user needs to deal with their prior ludicrous claim that all their edits were constructive. Given they were blocked for being part of a spam ring, I think they need to convince the reviewing administrator that they would no longer edit like that in the future. --Yamla (talk) 20:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My future edits will be in neutral point of view that will never ever involves in any activities that violates Wikipedia terms of use and edit. My edits will be fair and I will edit wikipedia to improve my language. I swear I will not involve any violations. Give me the chance! You won’t see me in any of the Wikipedia violations. Onmyway22talk10:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop pinging admins. It is inappropriate and will count against your unblock requests. If nobody is reviewing your unblock requests, that's your problem. Make them more convincing, address the concerns that lead to your block. --Yamla (talk) 10:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Requesting under WP:SPO, I am requesting a mercy chance for me as I haven't been edited about six months in Wikipedia, As per the last reviewer, I understand that there is no volunteers to look after me, I here by assure that I will not repeat the prior mistakes again and I will never ever involve any of the activities that violates Wikipedia policies, I swear.
Decline reason:
This is unconvincing. I've read the below discussion, and while you seem to think that the problem is that you created a sockpuppet after you were caught being involved with a spam ring (and to be sure, you shouldn't have done that either), the main problem is your involvement in the spam ring to begin with. You really don't address that in any way at all. SeraphimbladeTalk to me23:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock discussion
Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. I won't decline so maybe someone will have a more favorable opinion, but most consider this a minimum requirement. Best-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra I started editing Wikipedia for improving my written and reading English skills. So I decided to start editing and creating articles, starting was little hard. I mostly pick the topics which I am familiar with. So I chose Indian Music and films mostly.
Then after learning basic things, I was getting interested in guiding new users and Volunteering. So I welcomed new people, cleared spam and promotional edits from recent changes, participated in AfDs.
Then I got a chance as AFC reviewer in probation for 3 months I think. During that time, I reviewed drafts mostly Indian films as much as I can and I loved doing that.
During this time I got blocked for Sockpupppetry spam ring, and I requested for an unblock and didn’t get unblocked. So I created an another account Mcstark and I really guilty about this evade. Because the Wikipedia was almost a daily routine for me. So without editing Wikipedia, I was probably Fed Up. So I created this account.
Then that account got blocked and I accepted the evade. Then an admin advised me to try unblock request after six months without editing Wikipedia. That is why I am requesting it here.
I make sure that I will edit the articles constructively and I won’t involve in any activity which violated the terms of Wikipedia policies.
@Onmyway22: The backlog of unblock requests is very long, and administrators are all volunteers. Unfortunately, you will simply have to wait until your request is reviewed, however long that is. --Drm310🍁 (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"sokkerpuppet" consistently demonstrates a complete lack of respect for fellow contributors. They engage in relentless personal attacks, harassment, and hostile behavior, poisoning the collaborative environment that is vital to Wikipedia's success. Their actions intimidate and drive away valuable contributors, leading to a decline in the quality and diversity of knowledge shared on the platform. @Drm310@Deepfriedokra@Onmyway222001:8F8:1735:485C:A1C9:879F:B88F:3426 (talk) 09:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
