|
User talk:Oneiros/Archive 1
Template:User girlfriend-wishHi, I notice that you are using Template:User girlfriend-wish, which has been moved to {{User:UBX/girlfriendwish}}. The link currently being used on your page is a cross-namespace redirect and will probably not last. It may be advisable to change the link. Thanks. —Mira 02:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC) TeX mascotHi Oneiros, you recently removed the TeX mascot image from the TeX article, which is probably a correct thing to do whoever the copyright holder is. However, if I remember well a exchange of emails that we had a few months ago, you were ready to provide this image under a licence acceptable for use in Wikipedia; is that still possible ? All the best, Schutz 12:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Your edit to WatchmenThanks for fixing that link! --Erik 01:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC) Sighrik's talk pageplease stop threatening me. it's a pretty lame way to treat new users. how are people supposed to know you can't erase messages after you read them? if that's not even just something you made up. Sighrik 17:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
UJREThe ticket from the 2002 farewell tour on my pinboard reads "The United Jazz + Rock Ensemble" ... Never mind ... --Pjt56 20:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC) I have changed the article again to indicate that PDF is an open standard and is not proprietary. I did this after reading both of these articles, to see how Wikipedia defines "open" and "proprietary". In Talk:Portable Document Format you'll find this has already been the subject of some discussion a while back – to which you may of course wish to add. Notinasnaid 14:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC) Oneiros, Did you get the rebuttal information on the "Brad Hines" talk page? Please do not remove this entry. Simply check up on the references. There person is a pivotal person in the domain name industry, the domain industry is not exactly going to suddenly have less signifigance, nor is the president of one of the leading companies within the industry.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Utzchips (talk • contribs) 2006-11-01T12:47:20.
Hi Oneiros, I see you are interested in the logo of TUG; as you can see, I have inserted it in the article so that it is obvious what it looks like. However, as one can see in the page http://www.tug.org/, the logo is not used in text, where the commonly used version "TeX" is the norm (as seen as well on Donald Knuth's homepage). There was been a discussion about this on Talk:TeX a while ago; while the TeX logo is very nice when typeset using TeX itself, it should probably not be used in other context when technical limitations makes it impossible to reproduce anyway. All the best, Schutz 23:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC) Regarding 142.151.175.39Sorry, but what WP:AIV deals with obvious vandalism. What 142.151.175.39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has been engaging in is a content dispute and I would hesitate to exercise my sole authority to block him/her. Edit warring should be brought up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for review by multiple administrators. -- Netsnipe ► 16:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Minor editsYou posted a comment on how you use minor edits on the talk page of my IP (User talk:83.227.141.19) which I sometimes post as when I forget to login. IP users can't flag edits as minor so the comment would only confuse a genuine new anonymous user (some one who is not just a registered user too lazy to login). The comment about that I should provide more edit summaries is very much correct. Thanks for the reminder, I have been too lazy lately. Jeltz talk 23:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) TeX trademarkHi Oneiros, you made an interesting addition to TeX about the trademarking of "TeX" by the AMS, referring to p. 1 of the TeXbook. In my copy, I can see the reference to TEX, but I don't see any information about the rejection of the TeX trademark — quite the opposite in fact, since my copy (which dates from after 1996) still indicate that TeX is a trademark of the AMS. Do you have any other source about this information ? All the best, Schutz 14:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Gulf War and minor editsOneiros's posting on my talk page, my response.Nwe 16:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Editing Peter PanHey man i never edited Peter Pan???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.132.15 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Ugh!Sorry for bollucksing up that revert on Sports Car International Top Sports Cars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.93.98 (talk) 23:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC) ahahauserbox in da mayn usre paig bostes bout 1300 edits? hahaha also, hao 'tis vandalism when I lief an invis'ble HTML editor's note on a'paeg? 71.227.26.32 02:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Your templatesWikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Thanks. Badagnani (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC) WikiProject Germany Invitation
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Issuing vandalism warningsThis is clearly not vandalism. Blnguyen, an admin and arbitrator, added content from List of Lebanese Australians to Lebanese Australian because it was short enough for inclusion in the main article. Please re-familiarize yourself with WP:VANDALISM to avoid similar mistakes in the future. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 00:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Opj logo.pngThanks for uploading Image:Opj logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Do you work there?I have worked there over 19 years, DO NOT erase my work please. If you do not work there I suggest you leave me alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.164.47.2 (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Friendly note regarding talk page messagesHello. As a recent editor to User talk:80.195.151.245, I wanted to leave a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk pages. While we may prefer that comments be archived instead, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors like this one- from deleting messages from their own talk pages. The only kinds of talk page messages that cannot be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppet notices, or IP header templates (for unregistered editors). These exceptions only exist in order to keep a user from potentially gaming the system. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC) Ole Nydahl and Diamond Way: My StoryMy name is Hannah. I am keeping my surname secret to prevent the harassment and death threats I have received from members of the Diamond Way cult since I left. I have a 5 month-old son after Diamond Way's leader, Ole Nydahl brainwashed me to have sex with him and forbid me to have an abortion. Diamond Way is a dangerous cult and people need to be warned of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexy spicy hannah bw (talk • contribs) 18:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've been working on this article for a while, and I guess that I'm principly responsible for its current length. Do you have any suggestions on how it could best be reduced in size? I agree that the article is rather long, but I don't consider it excessive given the scale of the events it covers - I am, however, obviously biased though, and the more eyes on the article the better! I'm planning to nominate this article for A-class status in the near future, and possibly a FAC after that, so this is a great time to trim it. Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Oneiros. I thought that instead of cluttering up the review page of the above, I would reply here. :) In response to your comment that nominations by a non-primary/major contributor are not mentioned in the official rules, it can be common place at GAN for some of the GA "supervisors" to remove nominations by a non-primary/major contributor, and such nominations can come under much scrutiny at FAC. I can't really comment for ACR though, as I have not seen it done there before. I appreciate that your nomination in this case was in good faith, though. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC) FYINot an experiment, an error. The nature of errors somewhat precludes the prospect of confining them to the sandbox. 143.239.1.153 (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC) ConTeXt polishHi, As you can see I improve ConTeXt article, putting essentially references and sources. But today I drop the section "features", because I think it's like an advertising section. I know you are frequently editing user of ConTeXt. Can you give some look for consolidating changes.: Remove section is a big change. For the other hand, can you improve the language of article. English is my non-native lang. and so many typos are produced. With my best efforts. Xan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xan2 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC) warning vandalsThanks for the heads up. I will take more care in future,. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC) GAReplied YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 07:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Thank you
Thank youOh okay, I'll remember that. I just joined Wikipedia a few months ago (even though I am an active contributor at Wikia), so I'm new to some of the MediaWiki. --Alxeedo TALK —Preceding undated comment added 00:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC). VandalsI do occasionally warn vandals when I believe that the vandalism is bad enough, but I try to avoid it at most other times. I think there is a potential that if you warn a vandal, the attention could encourage them to do more. Thanks, Hayden120 (talk) 00:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC) I'm not sure I understand what you mean that it's broken. Parameter 3 seems to be working ok on pages like User talk:65.88.88.202.--Pharos (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Yosi SergantWow, you're fast (and good)! I was just about to delete the vandalism on the Yosi Sergant page, but you got in there like a lightening bolt. Thanks. --Badums (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Adobe LifeCyle Reader ExtensionsThanks for your feedback. Could you comment on why FormRouter's external link is not considered spam. While "Technically" our service is not Adobe lifecyle reader extension, we do provide the functionality that most people who are interested in ARES are looking for, and at no charge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.110.124 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Elf Sternberg... huh???I'm a long-time friend of Elf's and it's a well known fact he enjoys sushi, in fact he has many blog posts about eating sushi. How in the world can you claim that including information about the foods he likes is considered "vandalism???" That's flat out ridiculous. 12.36.174.35 (talk) 07:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe deine Unterschrift gestrichen weil deshalb. --Euku 20:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Ebenso sind gestrichen: [2], [3], [4]. --Euku 10:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Hallo Oneiros, schreibst du noch, warum du eine Wiederwahl wünschst? Grüße --Zollernalb (talk) 22:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --GDK (talk) 22:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --Martin Se (talk) 23:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --12.151.174.6 (talk) 00:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, es würde mich interessieren, warum Du meine Wiederwahl wünschst. Gruß, --fl-adler •λ• 05:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC) WikiProject Java and PortalI recently posted the following text on Wikipedia regarding the creation of a new computing-related project:
Please support this initiative, AlainR345TechnoWikiGeek 06:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Hallo, die von S1 gelöscht Version bestand aus den Worten "Fuck You!" Worin siehst du da den Bedarf für eine Wiederwahl? Sollen Admins Vandalismus nicht mehr löschen? Gruß --Pfvmh 21:37, 19. Okt. 2009 (CEST) Im übrigen wartet eine Reihe von Leuten (siehe die Absätze oben) immer noch auf eine Erklärung. --Euku 09:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Nach meiner Ansicht versucht Kuebi deine Stimme lächerlich zu machen. Vielleicht solltest du dir das noch einmal ansehen. --Wikieditoroftoday (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC) SoulmateI've changed your 'nonsense' on this to 'web'. It looks like a plug for an Indonesian web something or other, written in Bahasa Indonesia (which used to be known as Malay until Indonesia became independent...). Peridon (talk) 00:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Wiederwahl 32XHallo. Ich habe nach Diskussion auf WP:A/N soeben die zu früh eingeleitete Wiederwahl von 32X abgebrochen, da dieser mittlerweile fristgerecht eine eigene Kandidatur eingeleitet hat. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, deine Stimme in der aktuellen Kandidatur erneut abzugeben. Viele Grüße --Leithian (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Daddy's Home.I really didn't appreciate being attacked like that. I have not edited a Pibgorn page and have no idea what you are talking about. This is my first edit and I saw that one of the hyper links were mistyped and corrected it. This will also be my last, since I will not edit again do to the "shoot first and ask questions later" attitude here. Best wishes.69.205.47.58 (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC) SULThis entry exists for the purpose of providing a diff on my home wiki to submit to the following projects for usurpation of the username oneiros there:
All of the requests were made from the IP 91.1.102.162.--Oneiros (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The asof tagHello, Oneiros. Why use the asof tag, as you did on the Pandorum article, when it is the British way of presenting dates? I get using it on British-centered articles, but not when an article is mostly or completely in American format. Flyer22 (talk) 03:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Noch glaube ich, dass de zu retten ist ...[5] Oneiros, es fällt schwer, Dein Urteilsvermögen über einzelne Admins, aber vor allem auch über die Entscheidungsstrukturen in der deutschen Wikipedia nachzuvollziehen, wenn Du Dich nur lesend (bzw. abstimmend) einbringst. Falls Du an einer Diskussion hierüber interessiert bist, könntest Du mir das in de mitteilen? Ich hab hier keine BEO. Gruss --Port(u*o)s (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Usurp on it.wikiDone. Open now your account. Bye. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC) WelcomeWelcome! Hello, Oneiros/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place ClueBotI guess we should take this as a friendly invitation for assistance. Want to do the honors or shall I? Rivertorch (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Need help with auto-archivingHey there! I've seen somewhere that you are experienced with the setting up of auto-archiving with the use of bots. Would be as kind as to help out with this page? Not sure why I can't get it to work. Thank you in advance. Talk:Islamic_terrorism--JokerXtreme (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Hi again, sorry to bother. I tried to setup auto-archiving for this page Talk:Macedonian_nationalism and it isn't working. Can you point out to me what am I doing wrong, so that I can work this out in future occasions?--JokerXtreme (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi...The Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab talk page does not seem to be archiving at 7 days. On another point, if I would like that done to a few other pages, do I request that of someone, or is there a way I should do it myself? Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
CanvassingThe editors whose position was soundly rejected at Wikipedia:Software notability are very active at AfDs, and they keep voting according to their own standards, even if the no longer link to that essay. The arbcom decided that such behavior is unimpeachable, so the only way to counter their actions is to counter-vote the delete votes when they are made for invalid reasons. Please add Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion_sorting/Software, and possibly Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion sorting/Computing, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion_sorting/Internet to your watch list. Pcap ping 15:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Talk archives, attitudeI've replied here. In short, in future you will take the time to examine the fuller contexts of edits before reverting them and making ridiculous assumptions of "vandalism". I've better things to do than waste time on people who cannot take five minutes to assume good faith. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
enWQ usurpationHallo, and sorry for delay but now usurpation you requested has done. Thank you for your patience, --Aphaia (talk) 12:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC) LifeHello. I noticed that the Mizabot performed its first Life talk page archive on Feb. 02, however it archived only one of many (all) old sections. Could you check it out please? Thank you. It seems too complex for me to do it manually now. Cheers, --BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Why did you put a section on my User talk page asking me to write a summary of my changes because I only edited spelling and grammar, not content? --Pgecaj (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Archiving at Talk:T. E. Lawrence: Thanks!Thank you so much Oneiros! I was away from Wikipedia for a month and could only just now get back to this. I thought that the problem might have been with the Archiving at Talk:T. E. Lawrence: QueryHi Oneiros. There is a section that is now at the top of the above-captioned article talk page — Introductory sentence — that is unsigned and to which there was never a response. Without a timestamp, it will never archive. I examined the complete history of the edits and cannot easily determine which edit it was in order to add a signature and timestamp with {{Unsigned}}. (Perhaps the editor did not use the New Section tab at the top of the page and merely added it at the then bottom.) However, when I look at a pre-archived version of the page, I see that it was then situated between an entry dated January 16, 2007, and another entry dated May 4, 2007. How do you suggest editing this section so that it will archive? Is there a protocol for such instances? Thanks! Sorry to be a pest … — SpikeToronto 20:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
The edit to the OpenBSD pageThe article was verified, it was carried by almost every major IT news site. The reference I provided was from DistroWatch which links back to an OS news story. Please take more care in the future when accusing people. 97.104.82.1 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC) Rockwell DiamondsBoss, could you explain why this company is not notable. I left a note on the discussion page. Could you respond there. Thanks a lot.--History Sleuth (talk) 01:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Please see the references added to the article and let me know if you still think that it is not notable. We can further discuss. Thanks --History Sleuth (talk) 02:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Editing a PageReceived your note regarding leaving a note when editing a page (Diane Carey). However, I have to wonder why you singled me out on this. I notice that almost no one leaves a note when they edit, including all the preceding editors of the Diane Carey page. I especially would have appreciated a note from the person who stubbified all my hard research work away. If others followed the practice of leaving notes, I would be more comfortable doing so as well. Dan Quigley (talk) 05:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC) I never edited Genghis KhanI think you made a mistake. On my talk page, you said that I edited Genghis Khan, but I didn't. Just letting you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.88.82.138 (talk) 07:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC) About Nattasha Singh - I would have declined the Speedy Delete nominationHello, this appears to be a new editor. He needs help on this actress Nattasha Singh. She gets ghits. Thanks, --Morenooso (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Hi, I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on this page. Although page itself wasn't well-written, being an Olympic athlete is a major claim of notability so the A7 tag didn't apply. I believe the subject meets both WP:ATHLETE and WP:N, but you are welcome to take the article to AfD if you disagree. ThemFromSpace 08:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC) GreeceYes it is a fact that Greek bond market auctions in 2010 have all been oversubscribed. If you want I can send you the FT references. That means that at auction there were many more investors bidding for the debt than debt was on auction. At the same time yields have risen on Greek bonds. Nevertheless every time there is a Greek Government primary auction investors have been lining up. Both of these statements are fact.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearieme (talk • contribs) 08:23, 24 Apr 2010 (UTC) Articles relistedSince a few other editors agreed with you, I've restored the articles and listed them over at AfD. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
DelsortingI'm not sure how you do that, but you fail to actually add the articles to the lists; you've only added the notices to the AfDs. Pcap ping 05:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
OvertaggingI know the article Carribean_Immigration_to_New_York is is bad shape, however 12 tags in not appropriate. Thank you.--moɳo 20:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
No humor allowedSo no humor is ever allowed again on Talk pages. Is that the new policy? If not, then revert please. Jidanni (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
More caution with tagging users behaviorOneiros, once again... Please pay more attention before tagging users for things like vandalism. It's a serious claim that needs to be supported by evidence. If you don't know what the rules are for vandalism, don't tag users for participating in it, thanks. OH! And here are your 4 tildes :) 70.178.128.166 (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC) TrueMy remarks about "Exchange and Mart" are true. It will be interesting to see your proof that they are not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.117.81 (talk) 13:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Rollback granted I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC) ArchvingI have noted that you have implemented auto-archiving lately. That's good. There is few issues where I hope you could improve your implementations:
I'm currently writting an essay about auto-archving. Feel free to contribute. Do not do major re-writting, if you have a different opinion about something. Instead put your critics on the talk page, so I can review your point. --Kslotte (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC) I really don't want to botherI edit wiki and I alays intend to make it better when I do. I never edit from a pov of vandalism, and a lot of the time I'm just correcting the English of non-English speaking as a first language users. Not as easy as you'd think. I have noticed a certain amount of vandalism. When I introduced a line saying that there was a theory that both the US and Iran were responsible for Lockerbie, it was altered by a registered vandal called Bert Stosser within half an hour. I understand theree are campaigns to alter the Wikipedia and the Slimvirgin case is a true one. But I don't know how to make my very reasonable changes stick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.147.133 (talk) 19:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
List of PDF softwareCan you explain your edits [6]? They look like simple edit-warring when you provide no evidence and none has been provided. --Ronz (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Re: October 2010Alter, ich lasse mir von jemandem, der – im Vergleich zu mir zumindest – ein Wikipedia-Noob ist, nicht im hochnäsig-besserwisserischen Ton sagen, dass ich für das Entfernen eines einzelnen falsch gesetzten Satzzeichens ein großartiges Edit Summary verfassen soll. Für so einen Pupskram schreibe ich so etwas nicht. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 01:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
AfDI went ahead and nominated this article for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate successions of the English crown. Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Why?What was that for? Slow down with the reverting please. Those tools make it too easy. 75.4.146.74 (talk) 05:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Please help me understandOneiros, What do you consider a "best link"? Filling PDF forms from Excel is a very common task that business users try to do. However, it is not well known at all how to actually do this. FDF plus a little VBA is the FREE answer that thousands of people are searching for. The article that you removed the external link to explains the process very clearly with sample files, and is non-commercial. That external link was this one: http://www.excelhero.com/blog/2010/04/excel-acrobat-pdf-form-filler.html Is there another location where this important information should instead be located? Regards, Xyrph (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC). Tagging talk pages and templating the regularsHi. I reverted this edit to User talk:JWB. I'm sure you meant well but adding a tag to someone else's user or user talk page is generally frowned upon. If you feel their talk page is too long then you may simple write a note in a new section asking them to archive it. Likewise your note about edit summaries was probably sub-optimal. While there is no rule against using a template to communicate a concern we generally feel that an editor with several thousand edits under their belt deserves a little more time and attention than is mustered through {{uw-editsummary}}. Often what happens in those cases is the user receiving the template becomes upset at the template and the follow-up discussion more often involves the means of communication and not the original act. Thanks for your time. Protonk (talk) 21:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Whoops, Thanks for ThatMy watchlist just erupted with all the talk page creations on the category pages, which I didn't think of. Thanks for taking care of those. I haven't created all the various class-level (B-class, Stub-Class, etc.) pages yet - what else needs to be created, or are some typically automatic once a page is placed in the category via the grading system? CycloneGU (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
What does ABQ mean? CycloneGU (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Regarding League of Extraordinary Gentlemen Volume III: Century EditTerribly sorry for the failure to detail edit reasons. Will do in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwk3 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC) MfD nomination of Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive indexTalk:Jodi Rell/Archive index, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive index and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Jodi Rell/Archive index during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 08:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Fu's response to the AfD convinced me that this article should be kept. Would you mind seeing if you agree? If not, I won't hound you to change your mind. It is your opinion after all. Joe Chill (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC) A cookie for you!
About your votesHello. I just noticed that you opposed a lot of candidates at stewards elections without any comment (including me). I think that a vote on such elections - especially an oppose - should be thought, and not decided in a short time, on the impulse. In my case, could you at least tell me in two or three lines what's wrong with my on-wiki behaviour, or what makes you think I won't do a good job as a steward ? Only feedback allows to improve. Thanks by advance -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Merry Christmas!
Han The Thanh has been living with his wife in Bielefeld, Germany, since 2006 [7] --94.79.135.231 (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Simulacron-3I removed the tag from this article because it has been there over a year without anyone fixing the underlying lack of reference. I have a copy of the book and I know original sources (the book itself) are not supposed to be cited. However, the article is accurate, even if it was someone's original review of the book. (And considerably better than the reviews I can find online.) Tags are useful if they attract someone who will do something about the tag. But at some point it should be clear that nobody is going to do anything about it. Simulacron-3 is a very important work, it influenced much of the work that came after it, including The Matrix. Your choices are to put the article up for deletion, find cites, pull the tag, or leave the tag and let people know that after more than a year no Wiki editor cares enough to find the cites (if there are good ones). I think tags should age out. Keith Henson (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Message on User_talk:140.203.220.190Oneiros, I read you comment on the talk page of 140.203.220.190. The change you reverted was Londonderry -> Derry. As there were no other changes nor comments in the summary it could very well be a simple mistake. Also it was the first edit of the user so there is no history of vandalism or "mistakes". I think 140.203.220.190 should then have the benefit of the doubt (assume good and be nice to newcomers and so).
Signing posts.Thanks for the heads up. --Rawlangs (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC) You reverted a question of mine. Please read the question before saying it is vandalism ! --AXRL (talk) 00:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Reverted edit on "LaTeX" pageHi Oneiros, I would like to dispute your reverted edit on the "LaTeX" page on 23:36, 16 March 2012. You say "Sorry, but CTAN exists and those templates should be submitted there." in response to the website www.latextemplates.com being added to the External Links section of the page. My dispute lies with your seeming bias towards CTAN as the only resource for LaTeX. CTAN is primarily a resource for LaTeX packages and has no clear templates section. I would argue that www.latextemplates.com has a completely different mission and there is no reason that both are not valid resources for different requirements relating to LaTeX. I believe you should reinstate this link on the External Links section of the "LaTeX" page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by VelimirNZ (talk • contribs) 00:04:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Request of clarification.Can I know what I did wrong? I'm not a vandal. While you flagged my edit at the pango article as vandalism. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmagR59R60R61 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Digital Visual Interface recent revertPlease see the discussion on the article's talk page and comment if necessary. —GoneIn60 (talk) 08:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC) far furture archive 2Don't see why it needs to be deleted; the archive page is getting long and the bot will start moving topics there eventually. Serendipodous 21:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Edit Deleted/ModifiedHi, I just got a message from wikipedia stating that one of my edits has been deemed non-constructive and thus has been removed on the entry on Ignaz Semmelweis. I would appreciate clarification of what occurred, so that I don't repeat it in the future, however I rarely (if ever) edit pages, so it is likely that it was someone else on my IP address. 86.167.12.85 (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:RichardHawleyStandingAtTheSkysEdge.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC) Thanks!Hi, thanks for your welcome. I will take your suggestions into consideration. (Likeype (talk) 04:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)) Orphaned non-free image File:Nina Hagen Band (album) backcover.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Nina Hagen Band (album) backcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Oneiros (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC) An RfC that you may be interested in...As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
re: edit summaryThanks for the note. I admit I am inconsistent with them and will try to get better. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your feedbackHi! cstross here. Thanks for your helpful notes. I will not normally edit an article relating to myself or my work; I'm aware of the potential for conflict of interest and seek to avoid it. However, in the case of the "Charles Stross" page, I noticed (a) a broken link (to a non-existent web page), and (b) an incorrect book title (the book is due for publication in 2015; the title has been changed recently, subsequent to the previous edit on the page). As I didn't have time to find and pester another wikipedia editor to fix them, I decided to apply a quick fix on this occasion only. Cstross (talk) 22:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Why do you want to double the size of the archives on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant? -- PBS (talk) 20:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC) Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Oneiros. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Oneiros. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Fame soundtrack.jpgThanks for uploading File:Fame soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Fame soundtrack.jpgThanks for uploading File:Fame soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Oneiros. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Oneiros. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Category:Category talk:WikiProject Republic of Macedonia articles has been nominated for discussion Category:Category talk:WikiProject Republic of Macedonia articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Your GA nomination of The Day Before You CameHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Day Before You Came you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of The Day Before You CameThe article The Day Before You Came you nominated as a good article has failed Your draft article, Draft:Silvio Berlusconi/Archive index Hello, Oneiros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Archive index". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
|
){kind=link}
_backcover.jpg){kind=link}
_backcover.jpg){kind=link}
