User talk:One Among Many

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, RM-47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Grand Pier, Weston-super-Mare. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Rod talk 07:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

1000% apologies, I'll fully admit I just saw a red-named user making subtle edits without changing sources and I assumed you were vandalizing. Entirely my fault, really am sorry. The data had been there for a while so I just assumed it was correct. Staxringold talkcontribs 00:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon and Born This Way

In your edit summary of the article, you said "It is incorrect and incredibly biased to claim that ALL 440,000 of Amazon's sales were down to the 99 cent deal." That source came specifically from Billboard, which said that "AmazonMP3 sold upwards of 440,000 downloads of its 99-cent "Born This Way" album." I interpret that as saying that the $0.99 contributed 440,000 to the album's total. Entertainment Weekly also said "Of course, Amazon.com’s controversial (and intially botched) decision to sell the record for just 99 cents no doubt helped goose the numbers, as it’s estimated that the online retailer sold upwards of 440,000 of the album at the cheap price." How do you interpret these claims? Orane (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=70963565 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal. As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Research Participation Barnstar
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Goon's Deed in a Weary World

Hey One Among Many, I wanted to let you know you've done outstanding work on the two 30 Rock episodes you composed and wanted to ask you a favor. I absolutely dread authoring plot synopses for new articles and was wondering if you could take a crack at one for the recently started article for the most recently aired "A Goon's Deed in a Weary World". Most of the other work is done, but I'm hopeful to pawn off this chore if possible. Jg2904 (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; glad you've enjoyed them. All done. One Among Many (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you! I absolutely detest writing those, and yours are far more detailed anyway. Jg2904 (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hogcock! and Last Lunch

I keep re-reading these articles with great pleasure. You did a superb job. Jg2904 (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Took me a couple of attempts to get the plot summaries right, but I'm glad you enjoyed. One Among Many (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]