|
User talk:Omicronpersei8/Archive 6
October 2006Personal Attacks?What constitutes a personal attack? The use of the following words in a sentence: Fuck, shit, poop, sunnuvabitch, cunt, snatch, pussy, motherfucker, hell, balls, dick, penis? I don't get it. Telling somebody to "go to hell" is not a personal attack, rather -- driving instructions? Uh.. just kiddin'. Really, have a more liberal less bureaucratic attitude towards the usage of these words, not only is it free speech, but using these words, these expressions, constitutes freedom of expression. Freedom to express my anger and outrage through creative usages of words. If anger does not exist on wikipedia and this is essentially a thousand subhuman stupid monkeys at keyboards, well, is wikipedia something that I or anybody else would want to be a part of? This is a valid question, I feel that the admins need to discuss amongst themselves and their colleagues. Anger does exist, it is a valid human emotion, do not try to rubber stamp it and consider it a rejected application form. People get angry, allow them to express their anger creatively, not force them to submit to bottling it up. Thanks --Mofomojo 00:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the help
Hope you like it Jeffklib 05:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Spoiler tagsI posted a message on Talk:The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Majora's_Mask regarding your revert of my spoiler tags removal. I ask that you read it and comment on it. --TheEmulatorGuy 05:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thank you for the help. How do I upload a picture? And is there any way to sort of hide the site, so it does not get deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sinistercrx (talk • contribs) 08:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC) it seems to have been deleted even with the hang on sign. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sinistercrx (talk • contribs) 08:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Trolling?I don't think this and this could be regarded as trolling. It appears he was merely attempting to gain your friendship. Maybe this was exaggerated indeed. Raja Lon Flattery 08:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, this appears indeed to be trolling. However, this seems like this users is complaining about what he thinks is harsh language. And I'm not sure what a seaweavel is, but it seems to be an affective term. Raja Lon Flattery 09:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
yeah. Raja Lon Flattery 09:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! Jorcoga 10:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Most questionable questions?: How do you get the little boxes with the opinions and stuff on your main screen to pop up(i.e. the smily and stuff) I cant get it to work. *eep! help!* —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Da.Tomato.Dude (talk • contribs) 14:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Dr. Y.S. Raja Sekhara ReddyHi Omicronpersei8, Please let me reorganize and gather information on Dr. YS Raja Sekhara Reddy. Accepted that a lot has to be modified, but please don't simply revert, I'm open to discuss and will surely agree, but let us have enough information which can be trimmed down and biased information can be removed forthright. hope you co-operate, thanks harsha. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.118.38.2 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC) I love you 2 man. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Josiah1107 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC) ScientologyWhat is your connection to the church of scientology? And how can you deny that experts believe Scientology's numbers are based on fraudulent counting? I give you links: P.S. I object to your removing these on the grounds that other people edit those pages and might need to see them to understand our disagreement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ScienoSitter (talk • contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Don't tell me what to do. I hate Hilary Clinton. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.224.62.100 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
The Johnny Haynes entry on October 18Looks like a valid entry to me, he just messed up the formatting. I cleaned it up. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 22:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
So he's allowed to leave junk on my page, but I can't even reply back? ^Aftermath^ 23:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC) vandalism questionHi The Paint Shop Pro has been lightly vandalised recently but I cannot revert the article back to an earlier version. Could you please point me to an article where it explains how to do it? Or, if I need to have a special status to do that, would you do the restoring? Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Outsid3r (talk • contribs) 20:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC) framedi have the right to know what i did to get this message, along with the one i got about vandalising god, i do not recall leaving a message about god. I AM BEING FRAMED HERE!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.81.95.119 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC) SEND ME A MESSAGE I WANT TO KNOW WHAT I HAVE DONE!!!!! RIGHT AWAY!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.81.95.119 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Why do you delete my articles? Are they not spell enough? Conact soon please. TaxesPete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Texaspete (talk • contribs) 07:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC) I feel like i am being attacked. What did wikipedia think of it? The stories were good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Texaspete (talk • contribs) 07:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Removal of precognition research informationI would like to be able to add a section to the precognitive page covering some of the more recent parapsychological research, by both parapsychologists and skeptics to the precognition page. Could you perhaps give me some suggestions as to how to improve upon the initial one I gave to the page? Guthrie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chem student (talk • contribs) 08:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Got accussed of attacking wikipediaexcuse me, I did not try to change, delete, or in anyway attack wikipedia. Please remove your warning and do not address me in such a manner again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Your warning to 70.226.216.204I think that warning was a little harsh. That was that editor's first time editing. Maybe you could review WP:DBTN. Thanks! [[User:Nwwaew|Nwwaew]] 21:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I tried cleaning up the mess that this loser made earlier for you..he/she attacked my page also --Mikecraig 06:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the note, I've marked your request as withdrawn. Should the other bot not go through, and you want to reactivate it, just let me know. Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 18:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC) TBTAWell, Cronbot would have raised a lot less fuss but then it does force someone to be a monkey and bit block a lot. It's always interesting when this kind of proposal comes out, there's two groups, bot haters and bot lovers. Ok, 3, then there's the group that thinks Jimbo should just override community consensus and bypass RfA. In either case, thanks for getting Cronbot off the ground - I think it's going to have a great niche (read: checking WP:OP and automatically scanning them) -- Tawker 18:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 217.237.151.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 217.237.151.235 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 217.237.151.234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) I agree that it is difficult for an outsider to distinguish an edit war from vandalism, in particular because part of the argument took place on the German page. Regardless of the fact that informed people would not object to the claim that ebs was Germany's first private business school (as stated on the school's website and elsewhere), his posts (grammar, spelling, wording etc.) show he is extremely careless and aggressive. He reverts carefully edited text passges and inserts blunt statements with typos. He refuses to explain his position and only reacts to edits. His reasoning is erratic. Once you show him clearly that his argumentation is flawed, he simply comes up with a new way of rationalizing. Example: ... long history of annoying edits in the German version ... He suggest ebs is no research university by pointing out that it is not member of an important academic association. Obviously, he studies at some competing institution. I add some context by mentioning the most reputable national research ranking where the school is listed among the "strongest". Currently, it hosts the annual meeting of the German Finance Association. He asks for a source. I provide the source. (wrong, che does not say leading) I change "leading" to "strongest" to match the ranking document. He ignores the change and simply reverts. (revert, che does not say leading) I revert. (Revert vandalism. I deliberately chose the word "strongest" used in the CHE source cited. The anonymous user is not interested in content and does not even read my edits.) He reverts. (please stop your vandalism with random without context quotes from other sources, this is a advertisement platform) He probably means "not an advertising platform". Very funny, because his initial post was clearly out of context. My only reason to add the ranking was exactly to provide this context. I would never have added the reference if it hadn't been for his completely random membership statement. Another user reverts. He makes a minor edit with a smartass comment to disguise his third revert. Note that he keeps reverting to a version with an obvious typo. (there is NO research assistant doctorete or a senior doctorate) I am trying to be as friendly as possible, adding several requests for clarification on various user pages. No response. (Partial revert (close to vandalism). I do not care about advertising. It was YOU who started the DFG argument. You only keep facts that advance your own agenda. Tell the whole story or simply stop.) I admit an accurate translation would probably be "first state-accredited institution of higher learning" (http://www.ebs.de/index.php?id=1&L=1), which in fact sounds even more impressive. The current version is probably the result of edit wars he had with other users who eventually gave up. Standalone business schools cannot legally call themselves "Universitäten" in Germany. In English "University" is perfectly acceptable and commonly used by dozens of other vocational schools with virtually no academic standing. In this case, "university" is even part of the school's official name which was approved by the government (see logo in the upper right corner). He keeps deleting similar passages in the German version. It is clearly not about accuracy, wording or even facts. He just hates on the school. (revert, wrong facts (ebs is not the oldest private institution in germany), ranking is of no interest and citated out of context) Would it be possible to simply prevent editing by IP accounts? I assume the suspected vandal would not dare to reveal his motivation or any details about his background. Thanks for your consideration. -- 84.168.120.192 02:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Hey!First of all: my english isnt good... im from Argentina... Why you revert my messages in the page of languages!?!?!?!?!?!? is not vandalism!! im not looking for problems!! im contributing!!!!!!!!! the egypt heriogryphis are not in alphabetycal order in the list... i put it in the correct order. LOOK WHAT YOU ARE REVERTING! PLEASE! ... i ll wait for your words ... .... ! i.... really dont understand why you reverted what i did... please answer me in the user Busyman99 (es.wikipedia.com..) (en español) Guillermo —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.231.166.223 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC) my badprobably shouldn't edit when 1/2 asleep. grazon 08:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC) need helpcould you please explain to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Derex that yes Mark Foley is gay and that he needs to stop denying this. grazon 08:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC) foley is gayso what's wrong with writing that? Grazon 09:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Hey Omicronpersei8, Thank you, Conquistador —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djmakeout (talk • contribs) 10:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC) ThanksFor reverting vandalism to my user page. MER-C 11:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC) On assuming bad faithThis request was formulated 5 times by that user that you had him blocked. In this 5 comments, he was only following your suggestion you left him on his talk page along with the final warning. Blanking edits when someone is trying to communicate with you is obnoxious. No matter what that user did, he stopped vandalizing after the final warning and tried to contact you. Your choice to remove his edits and have him blocked is only assuming bad faith which it seems, as your case proves it, only normal users should avoid. 213.85.88.70 11:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
About Your Reverted EditOn the Barry Bonds page, I cited my sources for my edit and I don't understand why it was changed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Playaofthegame34 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 001.jpegI found the picture of Avril Lavigne Reverted Barry Bonds EditI put a notation next to Barry Bonds' stat of 734HR, and it was reverted. The Link stated clearly that Bonds admitted to taking steroids "unknowingly" and could have affected his home run total. I think readers of his article should be notified. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 19:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay, but I didn't cut the statistic number down, I put the notation in and it wasn't stealthy. It was a clear notation that cited a source which implied that he took drugs that could have affected his numbers. I think it should stay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 20:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
As far as the Bonds page, putting a link in is the same as Major Legaue Baseball has discussed doing with an asterisk. It's basically the same as putting in a small referral to call the numbers into question. The Giambi page was entirely truthful, being as he fully admitted to using steroids and all of his numbers should be eliminated or noted as ingenuine. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 20:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC) "By this I mean possibly adding a neutral, good-natured paragraph that discusses the allegations" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Giambi#BALCO_Scandal, apparently, there already is one, but most people aren't going to read the entire article down to that page and would be much more likely to see and click on a notation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 20:41, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't believe my notations were either off-topic nor non-neutral. Argue the neutrality of the links. I didn't write them, they were published in fact. All his numbers could be affected by his use of drugs and it is relevant to each statistic listed in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 20:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC) In addition, the "Balco Scandal" section of Giambi's article makes mention to the affair but makes no reference to the fact that "Performance Enhancing Drugs" may have enhanced his performance. Adding a notation next to all of his numbers as I did was completely acceptable, truthful, and neutral. I would appreciate a reply from you so we can come to an understanding before you completely eliminate my right to free speech on wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 21:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
If taking steroids doesn't classify you as a cheater, what does? He is a cheater by baseball standards and the links were next to his numbers which is the appropriate location.FatClemenza 21:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Just admit you've been dominated.FatClemenza 21:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Regarding your vandalism of my comments here, if you really wanted to "annihilate" my argument, you could start by arguing something based on policy rather than claiming that I'm suppressing your freedom of speech. Here are good policies to start with: WP:RS, WP:NPOV, and most importantly, WP:BLP. I also find it interesting that this is a game to you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Regarding the three policies you sent me: -Reliable sources: It is a clear fact that Giambi admitted to using steroids, that's not even disputable. It's in the wikipedia article itself that he admitted it. -Neutral point of view: See above. There was nothing biased about my addition, as performance enhancing drugs are often treated by baseball the same way, with a notation to signify the ingenuity of his statistics. -Biographies of Living Persons: See both of the above. Look, I have made my point clear and there is no question that these should stay. You took away information and without it, it appears to a reader that the numbers Jason Giambi put out were genuine and permissable. With a statement from Giambi himself that he used performance enhancing drugs, it seems irrefutable that his numbers were at the absolute least, subject to fabricated enhancement and should be noted as questionable.FatClemenza 22:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandal SnipeHey there, keep up the great anti-vandalism work. I noticed that you are using vandal snipe and I was just wondering whether you like Vandal Snipe or VandalProof better and for what reason? Thanks a lot. Wikipediarules2221 20:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Unfair Vandal SnipesI feel I have gotten a lot of unfair Vandal Snipes. I cited my sources as well provided educational information and provided it in a classy way. I would just like to ask what exactly I was warned for and for what reason? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Playaofthegame34 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
That's cruel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Playaofthegame34 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
MPOGDI've really said all about the site that I know. It's basically an online encyclopedia of multi-player/online games. HalfShadow 21:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting the blanking of my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 22:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Vpbot gone mad?Not sure if that's you lurking in the darkness of #vandalproof, but you may want to know that the bot picked up your name: heyhey yo my bot is going crazy on me sorry Maoribug83 23:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Dane Cook editWhat in the hell is wrong with you? You have your Dane Cook page that lists his birth place as Cambridge, MA on the right side, but lists it as Myrtle Beach, SC in the text. I edited it to make it right, and you reverted it you idiot. I'm right. You're wrong. http://movies.msn.com/celebs/celeb.aspx?c=227126&stab=3 That lists him as being born in Cambridge, as does your own site except for the text. You need to put your personal issues with me aside and let me make edits that are right and not just revert them you moron. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FatClemenza (talk • contribs) 23:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks about the userbox thing. I shall now try to compete with my computer on using those. Thanks again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Da.Tomato.Dude (talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC) More questions!!! tyGJ WITH YOUR WAR ON VANDALISM —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.152.130.39 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Toria wYou need to block the username Toria w. She is causing extreme vandalism to some of the pages and attacking other wikipedia users. I do not how to block her and hope you can help. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RichardMarcJ (talk • contribs) 02:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC) alright man I'm done.I just wanted to listen to my hero, Steven Colbert. But I'm done now. I thought I slipped it into the article rather nicely though? either way I'm through. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ddvorjak18 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Unfairly Labeled as VandalismTruth is subjective, and Wikipedia should be founded on that philosophy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.141.222 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia's Policy on Vandalism: Say please stop, then pretty please stop, then pretty pretty please stop, and it goes on for a while until finally a ban is set down. If you want to gain any semblance of credibility for this site (right now you have none, a research paper, a jorunal, or anything that uses wikipedia as a source will be immediately discredited) ban perpetrators the first time. Yeah, I just wanted to mess around to test out the site, oh and the 4th time, it was fun too, I'm practicing for serious scholarly input. Fat chance. And I will not post on wikipedia again, but I could, since I'm not banned, depsite the record of my tenure here. I hope you found this instructional. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.141.222 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[6] -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
To the honourable Omicronpersei8, This is LeeoryJenkins, the one who screwed ith Grizzly Bear. I was only attmepting ot add the fact that my gential region was once attacked by a Grizzly Bear, and that Stephen Colbert had a different opinion abut the Grizzly's rnage. Perhaps i should have put that under a new topic called "controversy". But anyways, my penis was in fact assaulte dby a grizzly,. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LeeroyJenkins1 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
SarahHello, I think you should put your reverted part to a more specific subheading. The info about Sarah can be put at the top. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.202.118.160 (talk • contribs) 04:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting the attack on my talk page, and for dealing with the vandal concerned. --Michig 07:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC) No statements or opinion on user page?Ahem, cough Wikipedians who don't wish to become administrators cough :) Glen 09:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
HELP!Erm, okay, I know I'm being a total annoyance but...
Oh wait now its better! Yay! --Da.Tomato.Dude 02:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC) *is very happy* Thanks Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. LittleOldMe 09:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC) cheershaven't been on the receiving end of vandalism to my user talk page before; thanks for the rv :) SMC 10:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks!Just wanted to thank you for reverting vandalism to my talk page and user page (the latter I hadn't noticed, I just saw the revert notice). I'm a newpage patroller, and I had never met such a swift and persistent vandal, the amount of reverts he did manually in a matter of seconds is amazing; it took three admins to finally block him (although he's now protesting the block). Still, thanks for putting my pages right. :) --Nehwyn 11:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Fair deal.I had no idea. Fair deal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.116.19.211 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC) RemarkThank you for your work on reverting of vandalism. It is, as I know myself, easy to get carried away when doing it. Please note that your edit summary here [7] might be construed as not being in the spirit of WP:BITE. Hornplease 08:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome.Popeye Doyle 10:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC) HelloRight... More questions! (Since you are the only person yet to help, you are the target of my annoyance for this short period of time till I find someone else as patient.) How do you get a new page to pop up (ie: "Talk" or "Archives"...)? Da.Tomato.Dude 01:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Reg: Popping UpBy popping up i meant like having new websites/pages connected to the original. --*SMILYS FOR ALL!* 02:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC) HelloTHANKS! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.18GB (talk • contribs) 03:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting my user page. (Sorry about this edit btw - I didn't read it properly!) --Casper2k3 03:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Get ThisThanks for picking up vandalism on Get This - keep up the good work :) --Mikecraig 02:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC) (p.s - I feel sorry for all the stupid people out there who are vanadalising your wiki's) Ed KavaleeAnd also good work on keeping an eye on this wiki also...I am always trying to keep it clean --Mikecraig 02:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC) I just figured I'd let you know that I'm on the situation. I've blocked the blanking, goatsing IP. Such conduct will not be tolerated, and thanks for reporting. I've placed a stern warning on the page (I called their behavior "idiotic") and it has been watchlisted. The issue stems from whether they can include their CS clan (called Flava Flav) in the article. Alphachimp 03:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
About your reverted edit about Maurice Claretthe is a dumb criminal and i think he should have a negative wikipedia page about him. Dont you agree —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.18.171.127 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC) WikiCookie Seeing that you have been working tirelessly on various wiki's relating to Triple M radio shows/personality - I thought you deserve a WikiCookie snack! --Mikecraig 05:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC) How do i Copyrate my photo?HEllo, you deleted the photo of marius moga that i'm the photgrapher of. I own the pic. How do i proove that, i didn't understand much from the step by step how to copyright a picture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.210.127.209 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks
EXCUSE MEexcuse me, are you racist? then stop reverting my correction of Borat's encyclopedic defination please —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.47.145.79 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Yeah, clearly this person is a racist! --24.77.216.252 20:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC) I did not vandalize the Mars pageClearly you're crazy. My sentence was sourced and everything! Yes, you are quite obviously a fool if you do not think Men Live on Mars while Women live on Venus. Where have you been, dude?? --24.77.216.252 20:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC) PleaseI am reverting vandalims on User:Illythr, back to the version written by User:Illythr himself. Please understand this, you aspiring admin, and look into things carefully before passing judgement. Blurb sock 21:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Blurb sock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --125.248.244.131 21:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC) CheckUser pleaseBlurb sock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)-please post a checkUser request in order to find the right vandal...--125.248.244.131 21:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Vandalismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economy_of_Romania&diff=81284730&oldid=81283467 don't you think?Blurb sock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Khoikhoi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)-125.248.244.131 21:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey, ThanksFor the double revert of my userpage. A couple angry annon vandals (obvious from the diffs). Keep it up! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 22:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC) apologiesI was trying to rvv the other vandalism on Reagan, and accidentally reverted back to the wrong version. Gotyear 01:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
may 16 pageI am attempting to learn about wiki, though I would do something harmless and nice for practice. However, if you are going to remove my harmless notation of a teacher, please also remove the birth dated 1993 that says: 1993 - Sinead, who is really rad, was born. It's sorta useless too. ThanksHey, just want to say thanks. I'm a new user who primarily reverts vandalism, nonsense etc. Half the time you manage to revert it before I do :) Pursey 03:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Page protectionHi Omnicron, I'd suggest a temporary semi-protection of your user and talk pages until the vandal gets bored. let me know if you'd like me to do this. Best, 03:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Hi, I've just received an automatic message I think is from you. I edited the Franklin D. Roosevelt article, specifically the link "[Historical rankings of United States Presidents scholarly surveys]" because it's not actually a link, it doesn't take you to any page. I put "[Historical rankings of United States Presidents]", which is an actual link. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.180.102.202 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Really?Yes, lets clall a truce while I look for a source. =) -68.202.16.122 04:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC) I'm finding it alot on fan sites, but I'd rather cite it on a sports news site. reason for changeHi,
not sure how to answer that last one and keep it in the same box...yes, i will be sure to pass on the message. i felt badly, so i went back and added something that is possibly of use about what happened to the Tories after the war was over. it's not terribly important, but it's kind of interesting. and it's true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.19.48.213 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
i have no idea if this is the right way to answer this...and i got your message on my talk page. didn't even know what that was or how to use it. maybe i should invest in a wikipedia account. you weren't preachy, i can see where you are coming from. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.19.48.213 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thanks!thanks so much for all your help. if it's ok, i imagine i will be asking you for advice on how to set up my account and what not, now that i have made one. Nate Stein, Pro Wrestling UnpluggedI'm so confused how people who are starting a deletion war against two entities, despite statements from those people that were hateful in message & support from other saying to not delete it due to being valid, yet those articles will still get deleted. It's absolutely insane. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.111.68.154 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Franklin D. RooseveltI was not experimenting with the Franklin D. Roosevelt page; someone had deleted roughly half of the article, from 1932 or so onwards, and I was restoring the original page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.116.64.166 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Billy MeierOkay, I see how that works. I agree ENTIRELY that the adding of 'fraudulent' under Billy Meier is a violation of neutrality. Seeing as how there's no conclusive proof either way, the photos may be real and they may be fake. This makes me wonder, however, if the same is not true for Al Qaeda? Al Qaeda and September 11....no CONCLUSIVE proof either way. Not a single shred of evidence on either side that hasn't been subjected not only to debate, but to EXTENSIVE debate. So, in just the way that Billy Meier's article can not be stated either way, Al Qaeda should not be either. It seems to me that pointing the finger at Al Qaeda without conclusive proof violates neutrality because it expresses YOUR opinion (which is just as much a violation of neturality as my opinion is.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by All5Horizons (talk • contribs) 18:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC) hiWHAT A NERD! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ninjafrog123 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC) chess linksHello, You removed my link from the chess page of this site. At one point my link was posted on this page and removed for the following reason... Since it showed up in the review of correspondence chess servers it was stated that it did not need to be listed. Since then Red Hot Pawn and Schemingmind have added their links however they also show up in this review. If the Chess Maniac link is not allowed than these two links should also be removed. Thanks for you help, DennisChessmaniac 20:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC) hi i'm sorry to i somtome just get carred away and i'm really bord so i do it i'll try not to do it more and well i have to do a projeck on paleo indians and i was bord so sorryangleoflove2 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angleoflove2 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Irrelevant?Not at all, especially if the person has no relation to Judaism, what makes him Jewish if one of his parent's weren't? 141.211.251.69 18:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
bigotThis user changes anything disagree with, even if it is truthful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Betterer87 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC) ElephantBut Colbert said that it did. I believe Colbert. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.163.65.156 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Umm...I was editting something completely POV... it said "a word used by homophobic men to make themselves feel more manly" that isn't even accurate and is vandalism itself. Revert it yourself or I will. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.83.1.185 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC) R.e:ThanksIt's no problem! Hopefully you'll get some peace after AiV has taken care of him/her --Casper2k3 21:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC) BarnstarI've never given a Barnstar before. If it doesn't go there pls put it where it's supposed to. Just figured you deserved one. --Home Computer 21:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Invest Sign on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Invest Sign. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aferistas (talk • contribs) 22:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Smile Alphachimp has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Thanks for the nice note on my talk. I responded there, but I figured it'd be dumb to smile on my own talk page. Alphachimp 00:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC) HelloYou can move any UserBox You want to User:Menasim/Userboxes/User X Your Friend --Menasim( discuss | I made an honest edit on the history of Baluchistan. I took out a line that was redundant and added some clarification. I think you should revert the edit that I made. Moin Ansari —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
No worriesIts ok mate, we all have to work together to make wikipedia a better place, thanks for the welcome! --Suicidal tendancies 17:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC) InfoboxTrying to reach an infobox consensus here: [10]. Please can you weigh-in with your opinion?129.127.28.3 11:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC) my brothermy brother was screwing with my computer so thats why all that crap was there —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.17.67.83 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC) So call attack on yamilaThis so called person threatened me, so I would remind you to warn her before you single me out —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Many thanksThanks for the revert on my talk page. More typical infantile vandalism... what would a day at Wikipedia be like without it? :-) Heimstern Läufer 00:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC) WowDon't blame me for something I didn't do. I'm not into politics, so really, I wouldn't change the John Kerry page. Check who it is your yelling at before you yell. Oh, and by the way, I'm NEW, I don't know what the heck a sandbox is. Bye.--Tishii 01:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
SupermanSorry about that... just had to do that as a bet to prove that it could be done. It won't happen again. My apologies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonakam (talk • contribs) 01:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I did. I had to print the page for proof and save it. Once again, sorry about that, but thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonakam (talk • contribs) 01:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Indonesia now Japan60.240.193.1 (Talk) has been given warnings and appears to be ignoring them, perhaps needs something more than test messages? SatuSuro 01:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC) and is now blanking sections in Indonesia SatuSuro 01:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks for that SatuSuro 01:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Your revert on CensorshipThank you for attempting to revert vandalism, but unfortunately your version still has vandalism from the version you reverted to. Please be more careful in reverting vandalism so that such an occurrence does not arise again. Thank you. PS I have reverted back to my version which contains no vandalism. --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 04:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Nomination for Adminship?Do you want to be nominated for adminship? If so, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 06:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC) edit on jack thompsonthe changes I made are vaid! please email me and discuss with me why you have removed my edit colesalewicz@hotmail.com there has been a media frenzy on this matter in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands. Please email me, I find this matter extremely important. People deserve to know the truth about this man, who describes himself as a 'goodwilling Christian' yours sincerely, cole salewicz —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.154.141.104 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Your edit to CatYour recent edit to Cat (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 23:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
TOAD (software)Could you temporarily lock the page due to ongoing feud over a paragraph, representing broad end-user opinion response about one of the software versions? I believe this is to be discussed prior to repetitive deletion of the whole para. Address at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOAD_%28software%29 Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.212.112.2 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Michael MooreMy good friend Omicronpersei8, Not everyone assumes that Michael Moore is anything more than a government schill whose movie "Farenheit 9/11" is meant to distract viewers from the truth about 9/11, which is that it was planned and carried out by the US government with controlled demolitions and remote controlled airplanes, and not 19 hijackers (something which Moore never mentions). Not everyone assumes that Michael Moore's true motive in making his film "Bowling For Columbine" was trying to raise attention to the problem of gun violence in America. No, some, indeed millions, of Americans, understand that Moore's films are precisely the type of films that a government which seeks to take away our guns and distract us from the most incriminating facts about 9/11 and the US government's involvement would put out to the mainstream public, in a way that would make many "dissidents" trust him, while making government supporters (who won't believe a word he says no matter what) enraged, effectively dividing the country, which is, once again, exactly what the US government wants. Divide and conquer. And distract with disinformation agents. Like Michael Moore. WE'RE NOT ALL IDIOTS DUDE, SO GIVE US SOME CREDIT, AND LET THE REVISION STAND. THANK YOU. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.125.101 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC) what about gloria steinem. Did you know she was a spook, Omicron? It was in Vogue magazine. She admitted it.You make me sick. Michael Moore is obviously a spook, and Wikipedia won't even let users suggest that he is what he is. YOU MAKE ME SICK! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.125.101 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC) CerebralI have reverted racist material from Cerebral's talk page. It is contrary to wikipedia rules to espouse hatred against a religious or ethnic group on ones user page. I will continue doing so until an administrator is contacted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Burgas00 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok but this user has been making racist remarks on articles in wikipedia which are getting on my nerves. I dont understand how you can defend the deliberately offensive content of a userpage of an individual who's only reason for editing wikipedia is to slander an ethnic/religious group.--Burgas00 23:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Pointing Out The Fact That Steinem admits she was hired by the CIA to found Ms. Magazine is NOT DefamatoryAlthough I wouldn't describe it as a compliment, either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.125.101 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia wont let me edit ANYTHING because my edits expose Gloria Steinem for the CIA agent she admitted she was in Vogue magazineI WOULDN'T PUT ANY STOCK IN ANYTHING YOU READ ON WIKIPEDIA BECAUSE THIS SITE IS EDITED BY USERS, AS IT CLAIMS, BUT BY ADMINISTRATORS WHO MORE THAN LIKELY WORK FOR THE US GOVERNMENT. JUST SO YOU KNOW, FOLKS. AND ALEX JONES CALLED JESUS A LIAR. AND STEVEN ADLER IS A BLITHERING COKEHEAD. IT'S AN ENCYCLOPEDIC FACT. "MY PEOPLE ARE DESTROYED, FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE" - GOD —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.125.101 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC) I KNOW WHAT IM DOING? I'M TRYING TO MAKE A SIMPLE, VERIFIABLE ADDITION TO THE GLORIA STEINEM SECTION OF WIKIPEDIAAND MEANWHILE, YOU'RE SUGGESTING THAT I'M ENGAGING IN VANDALISM. SHAME ON YOU! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.125.101 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC) I KNOW WHAT YOU AREN'T DOING, AND THAT'S LOOKING UP THE VOGUE ARTICLE ON THE INTERNET SO YOU CAN VERIFY IT FOR YOURSELF. GET TO WORK! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.125.101 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Michael Savage and ALFBut you do admit that Michael Savage and ALF resemble each other, right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Capnsaveemm (talk • contribs) 00:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC) User PageThanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page! I check my watchlist often, but always ignore my own page! Axeman89 00:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC) please block cubfan111this person cubfan111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is pretty obvious troll see image contributions [11] there are copyvio images with fake gfdl self not to mention the most recent attack images Yuckfoo 01:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Remember the three-revert rule. Now stop reverting my edits as I am trying to include a fair use rationale and you are vandalizing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The exclusive bad apple (talk • contribs) 01:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
You said: "I don't know a whole lot about image policy here, but I'm pretty sure "so people can see what she looks like" is not a valid fair use rationale. Am I right about that?"
Thank youThanks for stepping in and assisting me on Duhman0008's talk page; I'm considering taking things to the next level and asking for an abuse report to be filed because of his threats. In my honest opinion, that user and his IP address should be blocked from editing Wikipedia forever; there's no good in somebody who talks to people like that. Thanks again, - ¡Kribbeh!Speak!\Contribs 04:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Cerebral Warrior's UserboxesI saw where Burgas00 was admonished for editing the above mentioned page. I think the man should get a medal for removing hate material from a page on a not for profit educational foundation page. Take Care! Will314159 17:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Please don't edit my user pagePlease respect the request on my user page not to edit it to bypass userbox redirects. WP:UM is not a policy, does not have consensus, and I do not support it. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC) ???im sorry but i dont know what u are talkin about! i didnt touch anything, i never whent on anything that i changed.so get it right buddy. Have a cookieThe future test templates look great! Thanks for taking the time to work on these. And thanks a lot for your hard work playing cat and mouse with vandals :) -- lucasbfr talk 02:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC) calling Michael Moore all those other things without even mentioning the possibility that he is a government operativeIs a form of commentary and analysis as well. And no less so. The whole article is written from the dogmatic assumption that Michael Moore does not work as a propaganda agent of the US government and its interests. And therefore, the article's assumptive tone about Moore's civilian status, as it stands without my "commentary", is a biased commentary in and of itself. Perhaps you have the courage to admit that and let it stand, or perhaps you don't. I'm only trying to do what I feel is some much-needed and well-justified historical revisionism, which I feel is well within the spirit of Wikipedia's "neutrality" policy. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.27.45.48 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC) Element 118Everyone in the field will use "118" in their notation. I see no reason why you insist on using Uuo. Mitch —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mitchandre (talk • contribs) 02:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
As more nuclear chemists edit wiki pages that will change.
Help requestedHi I'm writing to you - and others - because you are one of several people who appears to have experienced the same thing as I have noticed and experienced. Namely a pattern of vandalism by an anonymous user. The IP # is 66.229.10.64 See this user's talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:66.229.10.64 This user has been temporarily blocked several times. I notice that the pattern is the same. The person doesn't seem to respond to polite community requests to engage in dialogue - or to desist from repeatedly making edits that several editors consider to be vandalism. I am not that experienced in these matters but can there be an attempt made to block this user permanently? Or at least for a period of time so that the person gets a message about respecting the community. Thanks. Davidpatrick 03:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC) Vandal action - Brittany+++Vandal action - Brittany There's a note added to the WP Brittany article by somone you have previously warned of vandalism (ISP user). Can you fix it, please? ___Vernon White 09:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
Smile! btg2290 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Re: [12]:
Branxton ArticleHey, i was just wondering if i could get an explaination as to why the branxton update was cleared, this is my home town and i wished to add some information about it. I would understand if there was something rude, impolite or false in it-but i cant identify what was the issue. Just a brief explanation would be apreciated. Thankyou Todd —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.167.52.213 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC) St Joseph's College Gregory TerraceI have been trying to edit the school page to show next year's college leaders but your VP tool is automatically deleting it. Could you please stop allowing your tool to do this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.107.228 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC) thankyouSOrry to be a bother- was just making sure i hadn't done anything wrong. Thanks again. Todd-ps-still getting the hang of this.LOL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.167.52.213 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC) how dare you i did research dont you know who i am —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.109.205.148 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC) Your edit to John Purchase Public SchoolYour recent edit to John Purchase Public School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 09:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC) You've tagged this up as G4 a recreation, please be careful G4 does not apply to recreation of speedy deleted items, either the original speedy criteria stands (in which case tag it with that), or it doesn't in which case don't tag it G4. I'll delete this one as nonsense anyway. --pgk 10:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC) Password emails?Hi, did you get a pile of password reminders from 211.26.126.68, an IP that you reverted the vandalism from? He attacked my talk page and your talk page. I got 12 reminders from it. How about you? Jorcoga 11:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC) I have a complaint.You're not online enough. GET 10K MORE.-- MaxDuo (talk) 05:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC) huh!!!um Omicronpersei8 this is confusing. who is talking to whom??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beberlos (talk • contribs) 17:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC) ....can some1 plz tell me what is going on!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beberlos (talk • contribs) 17:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC) TemplateWhich template did you use for this warning: [13]? -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 17:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I think I just might add that to WP:UTM. Where'd you find it? -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 18:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, it's already on UTM, but it's buried in the Miscellaneous section. Maybe some time I'll move it somewhere better. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 18:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC) street artthese are valid changes. reverting without a discussion goes against the grain of the collaborative nature of the wiki to share/build knowledge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.174.54.181 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC) no problemo you passed the test ace;) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.87.137.47 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Your contributionsHi; I just wanted to let you know I appreciate the great work you are doing on recent-changes patrol. Thanks and best wishes, Tom Harrison Talk 20:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
BatmanIf 70.119.141.147 messes with the Batman article again in the next few minutes, let me or someone else revert it so you won't have to push the 3RR limit. Doczilla 21:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism to User:BlarneytherinosaurHi OmicronPersei8, Thanks for dealing with the vandalism on my user page. Keep up the good work. Love the user name. Blarneytherinosaur talk 01:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Movie Gallery / GameCrazy / Asylum(I dont know the Proper Channels of Reporting Vandalism so applogies in advance) I have been made a Unofficial Representative of the Game Crazy: Asylum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movie_Gallery Information that has been officially verified continues to be deleted and replaced with nothing more than lies by people who have a Vendetta against the Site and would like nothing more than to infuriate current members The Information that should be up and mantained should read out like this In 2004, Game Crazy started the Asylum program for frequent costumers who have MVP accounts. The inclusion to Asylum is a company decision, and a customer can not request to join. The only requirements to be accepted into Asylum seems to be spending a certain amount of money at Game Crazy And Accumulating a certain ammount of points by purchasing High Ranked Games. However, the importance of Asylum is debatable- while the original intent of Asylum was both to offer online services and to distribute free bonus items to customers, it is currently an online Message board and Chatroom for members, and Exclusive Contest are held on a Semi-weekley Basis. No additional features of Asylum exist- it does not otherwise enhance membership in any way other than Bringing fellow Gamers Together. Asylum is hyped as being a "secretive" club, taking quotes from the movie Fight Club to push its image of being private- however, this seems to be little more than an advertising gimmick as Asylum is not in any way a secret to Game Crazy employees or most customers. In addition, an Asylum page link exists in plain sight on the Game Crazy homepage although a Password and I.D. Tag Number is required to get any farther into the Sister Site.
Sega Forever! 03:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Quick(er) on the draw =)I count at least 6 times you've beaten me to a vandal revert this evening. I obviously need more practice! --YFB ¿ 00:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Just spotted your interventions on behalf of the above. Thanks! Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 00:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC) HiGet a life, bot. Lol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.195.9.20 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC) SeriouslyStop hogging all the vandal reverts and give other patrollers a chance! Great work, keep it up! --Alex (Talk) 00:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
The bottom two Roman Heart External links no longer work, I was trying to update it to the one that does: http://www.malepornstars.com/stars/h/roman_heart/index.htm -- it is no more a commercial site than the other sites listed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.182.51.67 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC) Celine Dion SalesHi, I am a big fan of Celine Dion and I have spent days trying to complete her albums and singles discography. Albums worldwide sales has always been a problem. Nobody knows it for sure. I want these numbers to be accurate. The numbers you're talking about (before these pages were put) were also by me. But they were to low. I didn't change them knowing that I will soon create a new albums discography page. I'm a freak about Celine's chart positions and sales for many years now and I have gathered many informations. The last official info said she has sold 175 million till August 2004. It was official (Sony Music, IFPI, World Music Awards, Celine official website - they all said that). So after August 2004 Celine released only 2 more albums: Miracle and On Ne Change Pas. They sold together over 4 million copies for sure. And if we add Celine's early French recordings form the 80's which were not included in 175 million (and sold over 1 million at least), it will give us over 180 million. Now, all those totals from before don't give us 180 million. The numbers I posted now, give that. There can be misteakes, but these are the best numbers that can be. So please don't change them....Thank you.-- Max24 12:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC) Regarding your edit to Gibraltar:Your recent edit to Gibraltar (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as using a shared IP address to edit a page that experiences frequent malicious edits by users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of shared IP ranges or new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. To avoid this in the future, you can start by making an account. // VoABot II 23:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
It seemed to be suffering from some lag, which may have made it look like it stopped when it was still going; it reverted me four times, I think. Thanks for taking care of that! Thanks for running a very helpful bot, too (seriously – I know how these things can happen occasionally, no big deal). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Karl StefanovicThank you for your quick attention to the vandalism on Karl's entry. Roaming27 00:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I congratulate you on your extremely quick reversion! Bluglass —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluglass (talk • contribs) 23:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
I had no idea. Sounds like page protection time. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
unblock me because i only said things that were true —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.255.7.144 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Matt Bryant--- The recents additions to the "October 23rd" and "Matt Bryant" pages on my behalf are 100% legitimate. I understand why you might not want to include the addition to the "October 23rd" page considering the holiday is not a significant event, but the occurance marks a momentous point in Matt Bryant's Career. Here's the Link:
I understand you! Pardon the past vandalism, those were accidental jokes mistakenly submitted. Should I make the addition to the page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sirpinesol (talk • contribs) 02:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Spiffy! Thank you for listening! Sorry for the trouble! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sirpinesol (talk • contribs) 02:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Don't Let the Devil Get You, SonOmicron, Don't let the Devil get you, son. He's out on the prowl for men's souls. He wants nothing more than to see you flung headlong into the firey pits of hell. Won't you open your heart to Jesus? Won't you come and receive Him as your Savior? Regards From, Isaac NewtonI see the Cultural depictions of Isaac Newton article eventually becoming something like Cultural_depictions_of_Joan_of_Arc. Newton is easily a more prominent figure than Joan of Arc, so building up that article should (hopefully) be easier. Borisblue 05:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Kakivi vandalising Rugby World CupHey, I caught Kakivi again vandalising Rugby World Cup and see that on his talk page you have already reverted three of his edits. I think it may be time to block him. - Shudda talk 00:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
VandalSniper RejectionPerfectly well understood: I expected as much, anyway. I'm very new and, as you've said, I need to prove myself. Thanks very much for the consideration and polite rejection. I'll try applying again once I've got a few hundred more edits under my belt. Erich Blume 06:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
problemI did not vandalize this page, I havene't even been on wikipedia in like 3 weeks. It says I edited many different pages, but I didnt. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.101.10 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Compact CassetteHi. I'm the guy who took Compact Cassette through the Featured Article process. I've seen the terrible things that happen to the Featured Article of the Day (see my fifth rule) so I was actually kind of bummed when I heard it was going to be on the front page. Just wanted to drop you a line to say thanks for looking out for it, since I can't bear to watch. Kafziel Talk 02:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
vandalism-only accountHi, I saw your recent vandalism reverts at circumcision and thought you might want to look at the entire account for possible blocking; it seems to be a VOA that has been in use sporadically for several months. Here's the user contribution page [15] Dasondas 03:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Great work on the vandalism patrolRecently you seem to be cleaning up a number of the articles on my watchlist on a regular (hourly) basis before I even see them. In recognition of your work I award you:
Block 195.165.112.243I recommend that user 195.165.112.243 be blocked from editing Wikipedia based on his edit [[16]] of List of Resident Evil 4 creatures, the second time he edits the article to include extensive references to bacon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrostyBytes (talk • contribs)
questionOmicronpersei8, I find no reason for you to have made this deletion. Neither did you provide a reason, suggesting not only ignorance of Wikipedia's reverting procedure, but also the possibility of a personal attack. Please respond by listing and linking to the exact URL (or URL and anchor) of the infraction you allege that I committed. UK —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uberkuh (talk • contribs) 22:05, 27 October 2006.
Our computer friendMight not be a bad idea. I get the feeling that this is a student who's a bit slow in getting the message. I'd say go for it. - Lucky 6.9 07:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Say what?!? You aren't an admin? Would have bet a week's pay that you were. I'll gladly nominate you. - Lucky 6.9 07:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC) And you're far too humble. I saw the notice right after I offered the nomination. Offer stands firm if you ever change your mind. I sometimes wish that I didn't have the rollback button, but I'm far too fond of the site to see it get hammered by people who seem to think this is some sort of public chalkboard. BTW, I like that RC patrol mistakes template and the Barnstar page. I'd like to borrow those if you don't mind. - Lucky 6.9 07:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC) You bet. I'll rearrange the "mistakes" template into one of my own after my break. Definitely gonna stay away over the weekend since I need to pull the starter on my son's Buick, replace some power steering components on a '69 Ford Ranchero that I just picked up for peanuts (and which I can sell at a really nice profit) and finish hooking up a bathroom sink and vanity. I was suffering from a bit of insomnia thinking of the "fun" I'm about to have, which is why I'm here in the first place. See you soon.  Lucky 6.9 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! DevilmaycaresI'm putting together a RFC against this user. Would you be willing to co-sign? ---J.S (t|c) 17:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Devil has been quite smart about how he goes about editing as well. Always "near" the line but never crosses it twice. I fear this editor has more experience then is represented by contributions list. ---J.S (t|c) 21:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Sure, if that's what you'd rather do. I think the process is not entirely formal. (This is the first RFC I've been apart of) ---J.S (t|c) 07:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC) yo foo, wha tchu doin!?!?Why do you want to delete bens page, he has inspired me to do great and wonderful things with my life, he is my hero and i owe my life to him and his teaching! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nebby70 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Hey, Opie/....Wanna laugh?Now theres a guy what can't control himself. HalfShadow 05:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
To be honest, I was watching this too, and I was thinking "why doesn't Ryulong just wait til it's sprotected, then revert it?" Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 05:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC) SHUDDUP, HOE. stop messaging me your shit, i could careless. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scenekidsareez (talk • contribs) 05:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks again for the tip! Wikichange 07:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 217.43.18.66This user has gone and lost his/her cool and has started attacking User:Kittybrewster on his/her talk page. I've given the IP a warning but the IP seems too wound up to stop at this point. -WarthogDemon 09:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Bough BeechLeave bough beech alone! Do you live there? no. Anything written by me, as a resident, is factual not opinional —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.80.20.10 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
NaturelleMy bad. I wasn't aware of the notability tag or I would have used it for that page. Thanks for fixing it. -WarthogDemon 19:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the protection heads upThank you for informing me about the protect tag. I greatly appreciate the advice you gave since I just recently really started to put my account to use. I'll see what I can do as far as alerting an admin in the future :). Once again thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal 22:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC) mistake on RC patrola small mistake was made while on RC patrol. No big deal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brunky (talk • contribs) 22:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
The reference desk... as a general rule..People don't usually vandalize the RD, in fact, it almost never happens. So in the future, if you see an anon doing something odd to the RD archives, it's probably a valid change. Also, there's a pretty good chance it will be me, as I tend to do tedious maintenance work while logged out, in this case the edit you reverted was part of a change over to a new archive system, thus the redirect from the old Subpage, to the new one. No harm done, really more of a loose end, since the page wasn't in use anymore --VectorPotentialRD HAS A BOT !!! 22:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Ed Kavalee again (sigh)It seems like this wiki is going to be a pain today to keep an eye on. I was saying to Ninevah today that these anon IP people are getting annoying. I think she has asked for protection. Anyhoo..keep up the good work --Mikecraig 00:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Elliott TittensorRE:Elliot Tittensor...I wish someone would expand these kind of stubs. People go out of their way to keep the stub on wikipedia and not to have it get deleted, and then do absolutely nothing to expand the article. Because the way the article is right now, it doesn't really tell you anything about its subject. If the person is notable enough to have a stub, then there should be enough information available to write a proper article. --MonkBirdDuke 22:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC) --MonkBirdDuke 05:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
|
