User talk:OccultZone/Archive 6

Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8→Archive 10

Request

Hi OccultZone, I hope you are doing well! I wanted to ask if you would review Dianna Gernatt Saraf, an article that I created a couple of days ago, when you have a moment. Thanks as always, Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 01:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, :-) Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 18:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Article

Kranti Road Transport, is this article not promotional.--Vin09 (talk) 03:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Not really promotional, but it can be expanded a bit. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

review

Mangalagiri railway station.--Vin09 (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Potential superpowers

The article Potential superpowers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Potential superpowers for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Review

Alluri Sitaramaraju district--Vin09 (talk) 11:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Nominate

How to nominate an article for GA?--Vin09 (talk) 11:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

One more review

Repalle mandal--Vin09 (talk) 12:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Check WP:Good article nominations/Instructions. Explained step by step. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:17, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Mutations

It is stated: "It is believed that the overwhelming majority of mutations have no significant effect on an organism's fitness." But I think this requires a citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stjohn1970 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

@Stjohn1970: I have never edited that page but I've added a tag for you,[1] next time you can add {{fact}} tag to any sentence that requires a citation. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Shelia LaBarre

Hiya, I see you added a 'NPOV' to this article Sheila LaBarre. What issues do you think should be addressed please?GiraffeBoy (talk) 23:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@Alligators1974: No I made one edit to the article, just for removing {{unreviewed}} tag. Check again. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 02:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Reviews

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Inform

Hi, This is just to inform you that Daniel R. Gernatt, Jr., an article you reviewed, has been nominated by another editor for deletion. Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 17:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Rfa

Hi there.

I would like to nominate you for adminship. What do you say? You may also nominate yourself if you wish. With 140k edits+ here I think you would make a good admin. Cheers. A2 22:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Surely I have those few edits but I joined on 23-08-2013, I am working on a few backlogs and after editing thousands of pages I have got huge list of the pages that would require many changes so that they can pass some good rating. Then there are at least 5,000 pages on my list that have to be created. There is a lot more to do and I wouldn't require any admin tools for that, I am not going to give up these tasks for any new opportunity. So thank you but there is no need of RFA. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

S-Line

S-Line template is used in Railway station pages or Railway trains pages?--Vin09 (talk) 04:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Autobiography

I want to create my own Autobiography. I know you can't find anywhere in any Encyclopedia the name "Dian Diack DIAKITE" because is not in. I just want to create my Autobiography so that people could know me better. I don't want for the page to be deleted, I'll always update the page at any convenient time Please. Dian DIACK --Dian Diack DIAKITE (talk) 17:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Subject should be notable, or else the page will be deleted by some admin. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Review

Tadepalle mandal, Guntur district, Duggirala mandal.--Vin09 (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Review

List of cities in Andhra Pradesh by area.--Vin09 (talk) 11:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment

Another user and me have some references on the officio language of state. But some other user has other opinion. I said for waiting on that issue, so that senior editors like you may have some say on it. I asked other users too. So that a consensus can be reached. Check my talk page and Andhra Pradesh. Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Älgen Stolta

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo

Hallo! I am a new editor. I've asked some questions to this editor, but he hasn't responded me yet (I think currently he is busy). I believe that all of those questions that I've asked him are known to you. So could you respond me on his behalf? I also have other questions. How can I become a rollbacker or administrator as you? I'd like to create a few articles about religious leaders, who are really known as famous people, but I haven't understood yet how could I create them permanently. Can you explain or help me? If I shan't reply, I'm apologising from now. I might be away from computer this week, so I shall try to get back to you as early as possible. Thanks. --115ash (talk) 09:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

@115ash: Check WP:Administrators#Becoming an administrator and WP:Reviewing#Becoming a reviewer. If you want to create article, you should confirm that the subject should be notable and supported by reliable sources. Thanks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, now I've understood. How have you made over 140.000 contributions? --115ash (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
I have mostly worked on the backlogs, if you are going to work on them just be aware and read carefully about every backlog before you edit. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Infobase

You might want to read [2]. And Rosemary Ellen Guiley has books published with Infobase, they'd only be reliable sources for her article probably. Dougweller (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for informing. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Help

Quiet an age my friend. Occultzone? I hope these vandals doesn't stress you too much? As for me, I will always be here to filter them and recommend their block. Please I need your assistant regarding Transcription Activators in Eukaryotes, an article I recently created. It has been reviewed but to my suprise still not reflect on Google search engine. Pls. Take a look at it and help me on that. Thanks in anticipation. Wikicology (talk) 08:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I had the same question before, I got to know that sometimes it can take 2 months to enter in Google search. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dogs in the United States

Hello! Your submission of Dogs in the United States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Skr15081997 (talk) 11:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Review

Bapatla railway station.--Vin09 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
@Vin09: I describe what you've just done as WP:Canvassing. From a WP:NPOV editors are not expected to invite another editor to review the article they had created. You don't have to be hasty, it will surely be review.@OccultZone: keep your good work going. You are the best. Wikicology (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
@Wikicology:, I do not know it comes under canvassing, he did some of articles, so as he is experienced editor, I asked him. Anyway I'll obey your words.--Vin09 (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Wikicology. Vin09, I know that it has been going on for months and mostly because of the backlog of NPP. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
fine.--Vin09 (talk) 05:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Help

Could you please help me out in filling the coordinates. The India district pages have wrong infoboxes, I started correcting in Andhra PRadesh districts. But coordiantes not able to do so. Guntur district is the first one, please guide me.--Vin09 (talk) 05:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: There are almost 150,000 articles without coordinates. Check Category:All articles needing coordinates, I may work on them but only after I am done of the current tasks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
@OccultZone:, now not required that has been sorted out by another user. Anyways Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Sarandeep Singh

Sarandeep Singh is an Indian Born, motivational speaker, International Master Trainer, educator and a soul healer. While studying in the United States, he chanced upon reading the Holy Bhagavad Gita in Chicago University and was inspired by the teachings of the manuscript and followed its motivational teachings. He researched on the subject more and started motivating others through his talks based on the learning's from the holy Bhagavad, linking them to the daily challenges that people faced and helping them in identifying solutions from within.

Discovering the source of happiness

He further researched the source of happiness which seemed to be eluding people most of the time, while most of them wanted happiness. His research led him to survey numerous people across various countries. He was finally enlightened by his guru on the secret source of happiness- "Gratitude". Gratitude towards self before feeling gratitude towards others. Gratitude towards people not towards their actions. Since then he has been spreading the message through his talks across the world. He is also a professional leadership trainer and an executive coach.

Early life

Sarandeep Singh was born in a family of Army officers and was inspired by the army life from the very beginning. He was educated at the Army Public School in Delhi, where he got his first exposure towards debating, theatre and other extracurricular activities in which he excelled at various forums.

Professional Training Expertise

Sarandeep Singh is a Certified International Master Trainer for various programs and an Executive Coach. He has trained people across levels of several Indian and multinational organizations, nationally and internationally. He believes in delivering with high passion, in-depth knowledge and gives complete commitment to all his training and consulting assignments through his learning organization called Speed Leadership.

Career

During his career, Sarandeep has worked with various Fortune 500 organizations. He is also a Master Black Belt in Six Sigma and an International Master Trainer in coaching and consulting. He has created two programs- Out of the Box Leadership and Speed Execution. Sarandeep has extensive training experience in the areas of Leadership Excellence, Productivity Enhancement, Laser Sharp Execution, Source of Happiness, Unleash your true potential amongst many other learning initiatives.

Key Areas of Expertise

  1. Leadership Development, Emotional Intelligence and Decision Dynamics
  2. Executive Coaching, Understanding Human Behavior
  3. Effective Parenting
  4. Turning “NO” mindset into a “YES” mindset and Spiritual Intelligence
  5. True Source of Happiness

Clients

Numerous organizations of varying sizes have benefited from Sarandeep’s expertise, including: Ernst and Young, PWC, KPMG, Vodafone, Pepsico, Coca Cola, Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco, Samsung, LG, Titan, Airtel, Infosys, TCS, Nokia, Wipro, Agilent Technologies, Bajaj India, AON Hewitt, Walmart, Microsoft, General Motors, Deutsche Bank, Yes Bank, Royal Bank Of Scotland, Asian Paints, DSP Blackrock, Bharti Infratel, ICICI Prudential, MRF, Apollo Tyres, DLF Pramerica, Apollo Hospitals, GSK Pharma, ITC hotels, Taj Hotels and Oberoi Hotels, Shell, GSK Pharma, BNP Paribas, Max Life, Future Generali, HDFC Standard life, Bajaj Allianz, Bharti Infratel, Reliance UTI, CISCO, GENPACT, WNS, Shoppers Stop, British Council, Verizon, Asian Paints, MRF, Apollo Hospitals, IFCI, Essar Oil, Citibank, Barclays Bank, Yes Bank, Royal Bank Of Scotland and American Express amongst many others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarandeep.singh288 (talk) 10:50, 23 August 2014‎ (UTC)

1 year passed

Finally it has been a year since I registered on en.wiki. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations! -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ilias chelidonis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {db-g8|rationale=Redirect of a deleted p[age}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Antifeminism tags

Hello,

I appreciate that you thought my bold was good enough to remove the pov tag on antifeminism (really I do! :) But I put it back on for now until we know other editors agree.

Cheers,

- A Canadian Toker (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Finland - Rape statistics

If there is no concensus on removing a faulty source, then why isn't the source removed to begin with because there obviously was no "concensus" when it was added either! This site and its mods that favor veteran editors over newbie editors are awful! You do realize my IP changes once in a while and I don't bother signing up. On this IP I had an edit on the soccer ball page before this that no one had any problem with. It was a similar ridiculous source where the source itself had already corrected itself yet no one here had noticed. --80.220.107.202 (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Also, this is the first time I have had to resort to talk pages. Seems like people are VERY biased over this matter. --80.220.107.202 (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Following a post on ANI, page was protected. We can continue on talk page. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I did and he simply wrote that I need to come up with a source to prove that his non-existent source is wrong. That's ridiculous, as my source is his source, which doesn't state the things it has been stated to state. And I did quote the Finnish police's Facebook page, which says something completely opposite to what the "statistic" claims. What more do you want? A word from god? --80.220.107.202 (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reviewing my article Stella Bain. I have finished reading a book in early August, but decided to write an article just now. Can you copy edit the synopsis, or it looks fine in your opinion? Many thanks in advance.--Mishae (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Everything looks fine, just one </blockquote> code was missing. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Dogs in the United States

I'm concluding my copy edit of Dogs in the United States. I may continue to add substance to the article, but my editing of existing work is essentially done. If there is any additional work on the article you'd like me to do, or have a concern with anything I've already done, feel free to reach out! Thanks! PeteShanosky 03:17, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@PeteShanosky: Thanks a lot for your contributions to this article. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! If you ever want to collaborate on another article, just leave a message on my talk page. PeteShanosky 01:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Andrey Valentinov

Hello, Thank you so much! I like the place, it’s very friendly!

Best wishes, Otomie1 (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Otomei1: You are welcome! OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:45, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 84.13.33.81

Why no, I've never heard of the Sandbox. I've only been editing here since early 2005, during which I've accumulated only 101,000 edits. What's the Sandbox, Geppetto? ;-)

Seriously, I accidentally wikilinked a user's talk page without writing "user talk:" in the wikilink, apparently. Thanks for tagging that page. Nightscream (talk) 18:11, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Special:NewPagesFeed shows those details. I know it was funny, welcome anyway ;-) OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Inline citation

Inline citation means citing using cite in the edit box? that means providing ref name, author, newspaper, date etc?--Vin09 (talk) 05:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

It means using citations with appropriate code, for website it is {{cite website, for book it is {{cite book| OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Need help

In Tirupati (Rural) mandal, R is caps or small for title?--Vin09 (talk) 13:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

==Suggest bot== What does X suggest? in this page User_talk:Vin09#Articles_you_might_like_to_edit.2C_from_SuggestBot.--Vin09 (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)--Vin09 (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: R should be small. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Birdwell Primitive Methodists F.C., OccultZone.

Unfortunately SantiLak has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Don't forget to expand in the future.

To reply, leave a comment on SantiLak's talk page.

@SantiLak: I saw you had reviewed back, but remember that I am not the creator of that article. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Super sorry that was my bad I hit that review button on accident and it sent the automated thing. Total mistake, sorry again. - SantiLak

Previous Speedy Deletion of World Spiritual Foundation

@OccultZone. I noticed you marked a page, World Spiritual Foundation, for speedy deletion on the talk page of User talk:Lordmehershivpuri. It appears to be back in the last five days, by the same user. Did the speedy deletion not go through? I just nominated it for ordinary AfD. Did not know it may pass as Speedy Delete. Can you take a look? Tajudin69 (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

instrumentalism

Hi. You appear willing to talk content, while I--a newby--have gotten hung up in editing technicalities. Please tell me if you found something interesting in my now-reverted edits of Instrumentalism, or in my talk explanations of my edits, or in the restored version. Then tell me what you found interesting or questionable. Many thanks.TBR-qed (talk) 14:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Jacob Rinne

Hey OccultZone,

I noticed that you approved my creation of the Jacob Rinne English wiki page. Thanks!

When I try to link his page with the Swedish version it tells me there is an "An unexpected error occurred. $1" and then in the Details it says "invalid token". Surely it doesn't cost money to link pages in another language right? Am I doing something wrong? Thanks for help. Rupert1904 (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

@Rupert1904: What you were actually copying? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

I clicked on the add links button in the language section, selected Svenska and then typed in his name in the box provided. It found his name/Swedish page and then the unexpected error occurred. Rupert1904 (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

@WereSpielChequers: What you think about this ^^ ? It is a bug? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Greetings to both of you. The English and Swedish articles on Jacob Rinne are now linked so the problem has been resolved. Invalid token in computing terms doesn't mean they don't like or even want your money. It is an error message you sometimes get when two computers fail to talk to each other. So some sort of transient bug, but unless you can repeat it, probably not worth trying to report to bugzilla. ϢereSpielChequers 17:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you :@WereSpielChequers: and OccultZone! Rupert1904 (talk) 18:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Lt General Marion Boswell

You wrote an article about Lt General Marion Boswell. Could you please contact me -- I knew him. Are you associated with him in any way (e.g. family?). He didn't have any children. Thanks. 122.61.196.246 (talk) 20:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Gregg Smith

Reviewed the article about him, someone else wrote. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 02:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Railways

Using time table for timings of arrivals and departures in railway related articles, is it correct?--Vin09 (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

They keep changing, so I don't think. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Help

If you can see page history and this edit the user is not able to understand my point and kept on reverting, I even reported to admin, he is removing the referenced content and adding his own research. Could you tell how to deal this one? The admin told to talk with him but he is not able understand and performing those edits.--Vin09 (talk) 02:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Request for page protection. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Mufaddal saifuddin article , recently published information was removed by COI people like rukn, md_iet Comment

please read the following link , which refered on that page but was removed:

[3]

Hence request you to put this information as it appeared as a front page coverstory , people want to make others believe that Mufaddal has majority support conviently wants to hide this.

Also refer to my diffs and do let me know what incorrect information was added by me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Summichum (talk • contribs) 12:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I had reverted to the version from 7th September. It seemed non-controversial and Qwertyus agreed with that version. I know that number of editors have got special interest with this article. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:46, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Q for U

I posed a question at Wikipedia_talk:Persondata#Overlinking_in_Persondata. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and I had replied about 2 minutes ago, I had the ping, just thought of replying later. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

  • OccultZoneThank you for your help today. Am so sorry that I couldn't get back to you immediately, after you provided a solution to my problem. I had been worried and disturbed for the past two days, due to a report filled against me at WP:ANI. Its nice to here from you.Wikicology (talk) 22:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Welcome. I had wholly read it, what I had to say has been said. You don't have to feel discouraged because you have the access to edit. Just be careful. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Sock?

I have reasons to believe that Ipooll7 is a sock of Ravishyam Bangalore. The only edits that Ipoll7 has made are to Talk:Aadhaar and Ravishyam's talk page which was the first edit. Any thoughts? — LeoFrank  Talk 12:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@LeoFrank: There is some difference in their behavior. Ravishyam Banglaore's writings could be considered as WP:ATTACK, he frequently used words like "vandalizing", "corrupt people", etc. Ipoll7's first edit, as seen here on User talk:Ravishyam Bangalore#Please leave it, it appears to be civil. Ipoll7 is just concerned about Aadhaar and its related issues. Thanks for checking the page. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Well. My doubt is how Ipoll7 landed on Ravishyam's talk page and ended up giving advice on Aadhar. FWIW, Ipoll7 could still be a sock by trying to act different (I have seen such socks ). Ipoll7 could also be a WP:MEAT. Only a CU would be able to confirm this. :) — LeoFrank  Talk 13:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
He had been brought there, check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhutes/Archive. Behavioral evidence was compelling, technical investigation made it clear that IPs are not matching. Even then it could be insisted that meat-puppetry may have been carried out. Lets wait, I am sure he will try again. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Murder of Helen jewett

Hello, Please help, can you or would you kindly answer these questions on your page for the "Murder of Helen Jewett"?

1) What is the masculine youth culture that Cohen describes? Why is it important for her analysis of Jewett’s murder?
2) What role did newspapers play in the narrative?
3) What were the expectations for women during the early 19th century? What were the realities for women in an urban center like Manhattan?
4) What were the different reactions to prostitution? How did they impact the reactions to Helen Jewett’s murder?
5) Why was Helen Jewett’s personal history so fascinating for 19th century readers?
6) What kinds of things did the lawyers focus on during the trial? Why? (Pay attention to things like class and “respectability.”)
7) What was the outcome of the trial? Do you think that the jury came to the right decision? Why do you think they came to the decision they did?
8) What is Cohen’s argument? What kinds of evidence does she rely on to prove it? Is she successful? Why or why not?

There are no spark notes and a few students could use it in women's history classes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enr1g (talk • contribs) 14:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Can be read from here → [4], Cohen was talking about Jewett's background. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dogs in the United States

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Coolie (1983 Hindi film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[[[Amitabh Bachchan]], [[Rishi Kapoor]], [[Rati Agnihotri]], [[Kader Khan]], [[Waheeda Rehman]], [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

webstats

Since January 1st

  • Total hits: 2,191,512
  • Total hits from WPCleaner: 1,765,020

Bgwhite (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes WPCleaner is an amazing software. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Take it with a grain of salt. Each error WPCleaner fixes counts as a hit which is not true for AWB or manual. Latest WPCleaner can now query Checkwiki in realtime to see if article has any new errors. Bgwhite (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OccultZone. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 04:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NorthAmerica1000 04:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Al jadiid supermarket

Hi. I've declined your speedy as it's not nonsense. I've retagged it as spam, however. It's in Somali, and advertises a supermarket very badly. (Doesn't even say where it is...) Anything with lots of w, x and double vowels is likely to be Somali. The x is a hard h sound, so the Prophet is Maxamed in Somali. Peridon (talk) 11:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I have read the deletion summary. I had thought of A1, but wasn't sure. Just tagged Zgara Korçare "aroma e shijes" with G11, check? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 13:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
That one's Albanian and definitely spam. Nonsense at CSD means things like 'gutfyfthggfcgfgg' which are unpronounceable in any language, or things in English like 'grimly pothole fourteen archaic pasta downflux' which wouldn't even be acceptable to a Surrealist poetry club. You do have to be careful with machine translations. The further from English the language is, the worst it gets. You can usually get enough to tell what's going on, though. Peridon (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Sounds to be right, thanks for the heads up. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Help with edit

Hi there,You revised the edit I made on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arvind_Iyer&action=history .All I did was change counter-intelligence to counterintelligence which is the right term and filmmaker to Film Director and Political Analyst to Counterintelligence analyst which are the right terms. The term Brahmin added to Hindu alongside Religion is an important ethnic identification for Indians.It needs no source ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iyer) the subject's last name identifies his case which in this case is Brahmin.Is it possible for you to change it back?thank you.(Chriswilkins (talk) 03:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC))

@Chriswilkins: Nothing wrong with other counterintelligence, but if you are talking about using the term "Brahmin" for describing him, it will require self confirmation. Furthermore, Brahmin is not a religion, it is a caste. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

What exactly is self confirmation ? How is that information relayed to you? thanks (1.39.2.240 (talk) 08:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC))

You need a source where Arvind Iyer has himself confirmed that he is a Brahmin. Just having a surname is not enough. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

If there is some information that needs to be added to the page,how and where must it be sent?Thanks (1.39.2.240 (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC))

You can write on Talk:Arvind Iyer. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

(Chriswilkins (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC))

Hello

Hello, how is it going? Do you remember me? I've learned many things on wikipedia so far. A little question, where can I find the new articles just created? --115ash→(☏) 14:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@115ash: Yes I remember you. You can check Special:NewPagesFeed for finding the newly created articles. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paolo Budinich may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Paolo Budinich''' (1916-2013} was a theoretical physicist. Born from a sailors' descent from [[Losinj]], grew up and studied in [

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1920 Chicago White Sox season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • to have three players with at least 200 hits each: Jackson, Collins, and [[Buck Weaver]].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Letters to the Editor|journal=Baseball Digest|date=March 2001|volume=60|issue=3|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:56, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Astronomy

Resolved

I have a question. Are you sure WikiProject Astronomy tags redirects? Because you did this. And I also want to ask about this importance=redirect. I ve never seen something like this before. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Check Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy/Article ratings, this wikiproject accepts the redirects. I had at least 3 of them on my watchlist because I had solved multiple errors of those pages. Later I got to know that some of the users had created many non-notable minor planet pages. Fram redirected each of them to the main article. They cannot be classified as 'stub/low' anymore. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I did some research. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Astronomy/Importance_ratings#Importance_scale the correct importance for redirects would be "NA". -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Correct. It is automatically assessed as "NA", even after adding as "redirect".[5] Same with the importance of categories. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes. We have to remove "importance" parameter from all pages in "Redirect" class. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
@Magioladitis: |importance=}} should be removed or the parameter should be replaced with |importance=na}} ? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
It should be removed from redirects in any case to allow auto-detection and auto-set. I will do it probably. Don't bother. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

My fingers still hurt but I fixed everything. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Duplicated parameter

Check this. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for removing blank parameter. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
In fact you added living=no while a blank parameter existed and then you removed the value. I guess this is rare but I reported just in case they are more. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:26, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, never happened before or after. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log)

Franziska Fischer

Resolved

Hello, thanks for posting a message on my talk page with regards to the article Franziska Fischer. I've re-reviewed the page using curator and tagged the article for improvements. st170etalk 00:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Case#Review_of_policy_that_led_to_the_blocking_of_Carriearchdale_in_order_to_avoid_repeat

Case#Review_of_policy_that_led_to_the_blocking_of_Carriearchdale_in_order_to_avoid_repeat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob the goodwin (talk • contribs) 01:30, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Help

Resolved

How are you doing occultzone? I will be glad if you can fix Olusola Bamidele Oyewole and Ladipo Ayodeji Banjo. I have some challenges with my reflink (tool) since yesterday. I don't mean to put you through that stress and I understand that the burden should be on me. Thanks in anticipation. Wikicology (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

@Wikicology: Some pages take long to load, that's why refllinks can't always fill references. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Consensus

The edits I made were relatively minor. Can you be more specific on your reason for reverting? Kaynow5 (talk) 04:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

6 years of marriage is more appropriate. Article is about her, not her husband. Partner parameter should be left empty because it is unclear if Marco was first and only partner. I have also read about Stone, Edward, among others. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
You don't need to say "6 years of marriage" in the introduction. The infobox says the length of the marriage (and considering that their courtship lasted longer than the marriage, that statement leaves some ambiguity). "Best known as the only wife of Elvis Presley" sounds more appropriate to me. Partner parameter should definitely not be left empty, not only because she lived with Marco for 22 years, but because she had a son Navarone with him. Marco was not her first or only partner, she had others (Stone, Edwards) but the argument is that they were more boyfriends than life partners. For example, on Madonna's infobox, the only man listed in the Partner parameter is Carlos Leon (her daughter's father, who she never married). She had other relationships that lasted longer, but the admins don't allow them to be in the infobox. Marco definitely fits the criteria for the partner parameter. Let me know if you agree, I would like to see it changed back. Kaynow5 (talk) 05:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
You can write something else for the lead, I have changed the partner parameter for you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 05:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I am glad we were able to resolve this. Kaynow5 (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For the accurate and well-presented sockpuppetry evidence that you have generously provided at Sopher99's investigation. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much! OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Belated response to your email

I have already apologised via email for not replying sooner, but here are my further comments on the matter.

Firstly, in direct answer to the question you asked, repeatedly unarchiving could be regarded as disruptive, but I can't think of any specific policy violation, except possibly edit-warring, but I think treating it as edit-warring would be unreasonable, under the circumstances.

Although you didn't ask, here are my further thoughts on the matter. Personally, I would have been in favour of giving you another chance. However, there is no reasonable way of reading the discussion as reaching a consensus to restore AWB access, so if I had formally closed the discussion it would have had to be "no consensus to restore AWB". I wondered whether to reopen the discussion by posting a comment myself in support of you, but I thought perhaps that would be unconstructive, as the discussion had been given long enough for a consensus to be reached, there had been no consensus, and there had been a significant amount of opposition, so perhaps it was unconstructive to prolong the matter. I meant to think more about the matter and come to a decision whether to reopen discussion or to close it and come back to it, but I then moved on to other things, and this incident slipped away from my thoughts. When I eventually remembered to come back to the matter, I looked at the discussion at the point in its history where you had just unarchived it for the last time. I re-read it, and rather reluctantly came to the conclusion that I had to close it as "no consensus". When I went to the current version of the page to close the discussion, I found that someone else had already done so. Well, I suppose two of us coming to the same conclusion about closing the discussion at least shows consensus that there was no consensus to restore AWB access.

As I said, I would myself have supported restoration, but I should emphasise that both I and also at least some of the others who supported did so not because we are convinced you are ready to go back to using AWB, but rather because we think you should be given a chance, so that we can see whether you are ready or not. Some of the things you said in the discussion do give reasonable grounds for doubting that you do, and while my own attitude is to give you the benefit of that doubt, I can quite see the point of view of those who opposed.

Once again, sorry for not replying to your email sooner. Whether it is any help to you to read my thoughts on the matter now, after the whole incident is closed, I don't know, but I offer you my thoughts in case they may be helpful. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I will be contributing for a longer period, before making another request. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination

You recently nominated someone for a weekly award which I really appreciate. I wonder if you could take the added time and put a little more "meat on the bones". The instructions state: "... with a 100-200 word description of how you think they meet the criteria....." It is suggested that the nominator "describe the tasks and behaviors you feel are worth recognizing, as recipients appreciate hearing it." As you might notice the other nominations are quite lengthy when compared to yours. This request is not meant as a critique and I hope you don't read it as such. Thanks for the nomination and for understanding this request. ```Buster Seven Talk 17:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)