Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! CpX41 (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bank of Jerusalem, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beer in Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bank of Israel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi O.maximov. Thank you for your work on Malka Beer. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Template:Economics and Business books, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Contentious topics alert for all pages related to post-1992 American politics
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Doug Weller talk 10:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 10:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see you haven't responded on this page yet. Doug Weller talk 10:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, Doug Weller, I have read those, thank you very much for all the info. I'll make sure I follow the guidelines. O.maximov (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for responding. Doug Weller talk 17:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It's good to know that there are policies in place when it comes to sensitive subjects... I bet this is a great challenge to ensure civility and neutrality around here. Again, happy to be here, and you can certainly trust me to uphold the rules. O.maximov (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi; at topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.
In the past 24 hours you have made several reverts:
- 11:00, 19 May 2024
- 11:01, 19 May 2024
- 11:10, 19 May 2024
- 11:18, 19 May 2024
- 11:53, 19 May 2024
Please self-revert all but your first revert. 03:26, 27 April 2024. Unbandito (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello @Unbandito, I don't think this is a revert, but one series of consecutive edits that alter the article. If it counts as a revert (and I'm doubtful it does), it probably counts as one. A revert means you cancel, or reverse, the edit of someone else, which I did not do. O.maximov (talk) 14:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand your confusion, I am still learning the intricacies of the 1RR myself. However, these are reverts. The edits contain strikethroughs, which means you are wholly or partially undoing the work of another editor, and these strikethroughs are not mere grammatical or copyediting changes, but changes that impact the meaning of the article. Therefore, they are reverts. Please self-revert these edits. Unbandito (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page All Eyes on Rafah appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The slogan pre-dates "Where were your eyes on October 7th", it was not created as a counter to it. Belbury (talk) 12:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand, overall the content added was based on the Jewish Chronicle and YNET article if my memory is correct. From my understanding both posts grew viral silmotenously, if most sources show otherwise, so be it. Thank you for texting me this explanation. O.maximov (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you used any other account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 20:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Who are you? Why are you asking this? O.maximov (talk) 10:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nableezy is a very experienced editor. I'm also interested and I am an Administrator and WP:Checkuser. Why aren't you answering the question? Doug Weller talk 10:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no problem answering this. This is my only Wikipedia account, which I opened after having read Wikipedia for many years. It looked strange to me that a user I do not know wrote to me a personal question. It is important to exercise caution on the internet, especially with strange questions. Better safe than sorry. O.maximov (talk) 10:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arab–Israeli alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Reichman University, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:High-technology has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 22:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this ignores a clear cut consensus in an ongoing talk page discussion. I suggest you self revert. Selfstudier (talk) 11:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no consensus, I looked in the talk page. O.maximov (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I count 5 to 3. It was 5 to 2, until your POV revert. Selfstudier (talk) 11:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- At least 5 different editors have reverted and others opposed in the talk page. Read 916crdshn comment in the talk page Talk:Zionism#Use of term 'colonization' in opening sentence / definition. My edit is not POV, please tone down. O.maximov (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Your edit has been reverted, quite rightly, too. Selfstudier (talk) 12:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- That account was compromised and blocked. Doug Weller talk 19:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Statement by Levivich (Nishidani) Levivich (talk) 05:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is O.maximov. Thank you. Levivich (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not handle on-wiki issues via email unless there is a privacy concern that makes handling it on-wiki untenable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I see, I did not realize it was an issue. Sorry for bothering you in private. Thank you for informing me directly. O.maximov (talk) 14:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You messed up your signature, fyi. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, O.maximov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ha'Aretz Brewery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
