User talk:Nuggetboy

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived to User talk:Nuggetboy/Archive/Archive-Jan2025. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Welcome!

Hello, Nuggetboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 16:55, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

PBIA and SKBO

Sure you can add the line. I've never flown there, but my heritage is Colombian and I once worked for Avianca at FLL. Try to add the airport code template anywhere you don't see it. It's format is: (( Airport Codes | XXX | XXXX )) - replace (( with {{ Without the space of course (IATA 1st, ICAO 2nd) - PRueda29

High Voltage

Hello NuggetBoy, Why can I not keep in the bit about S&C Electric (pioneers in high voltage switching)? Regards, NorthernLad65

Image source problem with Image:Meillon John.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Meillon John.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

Re: this edit, according to the server time of your edit, you were mistaken. He became president at noon eastern time. Powers T 17:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that has nothing to do with when he assumed office. Powers T 17:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
His term began at noon, regardless of whether he'd yet fulfilled the requirements to execute any of its duties. And even if it didn't begin until 12:05, that's when your edit was made; you really wanted to quibble over a few seconds? Powers T 17:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We'll just have to disagree. And you came here to quibble. Thanks for stopping by. (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 17:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
CNN even displayed the information that according to the U.S. constitution, the presidency changes precisely at noon. There is no agreeing to disagree over facts. You were wrong, period. Be more careful in the future. 78.34.164.53 (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The 20th Amendment states that the end of the terms of VP and president come to an end at noon, but it says nothing about how it "changes precisely". Read my first reply above about what is says about the oath. Be more careful next time you state someone is "wrong, period." - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 20:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, I missed the "and the terms of their successors shall then begin". I admit defeat. :( - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 20:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't come here originally to start a fight or to laugh at you for making an error; in retrospect, I probably should have let it go, and so I apologize. Powers T 23:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. Sorry for the dickishness of my wording. Civility and using the preview button are not exactly my strengths (but I'm slowly learning). 78.34.139.232 (talk) 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

I don't mind at all; it's something of a compliment! It's based on this template; I just tweaked the colours and added an image more to my liking. I'm quite pleased that you liked it, actually. :) If you don't mind my asking, are you reading the Dan Simmons book, or just interested in Wilkie Collins? Kafka Liz (talk) 22:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I'm reading it. I guess my recent contributions clued you into that. :) It has kept my interest thus far, although I'm not crazy about it. I didn't even know about Collins until I started reading this. I'm embarrassed to admit that the only reason I even picked this up is because my brother has the same name. (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 14:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please tell me your brother isn't named "Drood".;) I'm reading it too, and feel pretty much the same. Not bad, but could be better. Kafka Liz (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hah, no. Sorry, I mean the author. Although my brother calls himself "Danny." Yes, for a book that's supposed to be so creepy (I believe it says that on the dust jacket flap), I am rather non-creeped at the moment. (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 21:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! –Juliancolton | Talk 16:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mika Brzezinski

Ya know, you could just take it to talk instead of running off to BLP and essentially lying about the 3RR. I am at my 3 and made two other edits. You could just take it to talk and we could hash it out there. I am not that hard to work with, but when you run off unnecessarily to a noticeboard without notifing me after (which is SOP), it is just kinda rude. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. I totally agree that a source like ABC for example should be used and I don't think Kos is the greatest source in the world (since they do slant "left"), but I think they do check their coverage. I think while other sources are found (again, like from ABC for instance) it is "good enough" to stand for the moment, but shouldn't stand permenately. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the back-and-forth here, but I hope you'll also appreciate my differing opinion here. I feel I still need to remove this, drawing your attention again to RS in the context of BLP. We have to ensure that sources are rock solid in the cases of an article on a person. If you revert, I won't re-revert. I still plan to follow-up on the discussion we have started at WP:BLPN. (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User:SpaceFlight89 reverted it out as it was a diary by a Kos user not a Kos journalist. So, I am in your corner now (sorta) that it isn't reliable. If it were a journalist writing it, I would say so, but a everyman (everywoman in this case) is not notable. We would have blogs clogging en.wiki up if we allowed that. So, I think we can (I hope) call this closed. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Closed indeed. (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 18:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet. Sorry things got a little testy there. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(out) Don't be. We're here to make a good encyclopedia, but we're gonna butt heads every now and then. And make bone-headed assumptions about policy! (D'oh!) :) (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 18:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Nuggetboy! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi Nuggetboy! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22nd

Greetings!

Seeing that you're a member of WikiProject Florida, on the off chance you're in our neck of the woods, I'm inviting you to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus in Gainesville.

If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL.

Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nuggetboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Nuggetboy! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]