en User talk:Nsaa User talk 2017

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nsaa. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

February 2017

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.

- Mr X 19:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC) - Mr X 19:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Why do you post this on my talk page MrX (talk · contribs)? Nsaa (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

So that you would know that Breitbart News and all other post-1932 article related to American politics are subject to discretionary sanction. Specifically, so that you would know that you should not perform more than one revert in 24 hours, and you should respect consensus. You would be surprised at how many people seem to miss the prominent edit notice at the top of the edit page.- Mr X 20:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Please provide a reliable reason to revert before you do that. You argue that it do not make any sense. Please don't attack other editors at Wikipedia! Nsaa (talk) 20:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nsaa reported by User:MrX (Result: ). Thank you. - Mr X 20:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Redkonf listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Redkonf. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Redkonf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Evalp

Template:Evalp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Norwegian Media Authority

Template:Norwegian Media Authority has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nsaa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.