User talk:Noyster/Archive 3

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

Joe McHugh

Hi Noyster, I deleted a paragraph from the Joe McHugh page as the article it was based on is no longer available online and was inaccurate in it's view, which appeared as fact on the webpage. If you have any questions regarding the deletion, or if there is additional follow up I need to do, please let me know. Thanks, Koconor Koconor (talk) 10:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Understood Noyster and apologies, this was my first time editing a page so was just following the steps that were outlined. Agree with this policy as it seems very fair so in future, will ensure I give a reason to any edits. Thanks, Koconor Koconor (talk) 11:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The One Man Band Festival (Montreal) (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Noyster, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Christian Carl Andre was accepted

Christian Carl Andre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 21:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Net Technologies (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Zach Vega (talk to me) 09:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Police of Peru, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Department and San Martín. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Noyster, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Andrej Pejic

Thanks for the note: What's your opinion on how it's suppose to be published? perhaps as a quote? Let me know. And although FB is questionable as a resource - it had became one primary broadcasting tribune

Well unless you can find a reliable source that has reported that Pejic expressed these opinions, it cannot be added to Wikipedia. Relying on a Facebook page will not be sufficient to support such a claim as this, as we cannot ensure the authenticity of the page. Wikipedia has learnt to tread very carefully around controversial statements about living people, which can damage our reputation and in the last resort can result in costly legal action. Hope this explains it adequately: Noyster (talk), 20:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


Message from Purgy

Thank you for the welcome. I'll try to do all my deeds correctly, and will start with reading your supplied literature. I hope this is OK. I had to edit already for broken layout. :( Regards,Purgy (talk) 19:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rucha Pujari

Hello! Your submission of Rucha Pujari at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 09:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Human Rights Tulip may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/mensenrechten/mensenrechtentulp ''Mensenrechtentulp (Human Rights Tulip''], Netherlands Government webpage

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Classen (surname) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Claasen's law]] (formulated by Theo A. C. M. Claasen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Concerns for Diode logic article

I am sending this to you since I have no idea who it should go to and you are the one that has offered me your help and guidance. If someone else needs to address my concerns hopefully you will know who that is. I don’t know how much you understand electronics. If you need help I can offer more detail or you can just ask another electrical engineer to look at the article.

I have removed my initial comments because of their personal nature. If this was inappropriate I know you can restore them. (see my comments below)Thingmaker (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!Thingmaker (talk) 19:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Thingmaker. I'm sorry, I'm no expert on your field. I think it may not be worth challenging material added in 2011 to the article talk page: I would recommend using that talk page to express as concisely as possible your concerns about the article itself, bearing in mind that it has undergone many changes by many editors over the past three years. You might also consider raising the matter at WikiProject Electronics, where other specialists can be contacted. Try not to be too personal in your comments, addressing only matters of article content. Best regards: Noyster (talk), 07:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I have decided that the best approach might be to simply add to the article. I plan to insert the following introduction and then add the conventional description. If you think this is not appropriate please inform me soon.

The original portion of this article is a philosophical description of how one might think about diode AND and OR logic circuits and their relationship to each other. The section to be added has been added at the end that provides a more conventional description of these fundamental computer logic functions.24.163.119.91 (talk) 13:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes, do add your new section to the article if you so choose. But please use the article's talk page for your explanation and comments, such as the paragraph immediately above this one: Noyster (talk), 13:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
I have added my description of the Diode Logic article. If you read it and object please let me know. I believe it makes more sense.Thingmaker (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
It appears someone removed my contribution to Diode Logic. Can anyone tell me why?Thingmaker (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I need help! --Wtshymanski removed my Diode Logic addition saying I should just edit the original article. It is not possible to merge the two discussions. As I said before, the original article is nonsense. I believe my effort solves the problem. It would be better to just delete the original article. Can you help me or can you suggest someone who can?Thingmaker (talk) 21:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Well it appears that Wtshymanski is willing to engage in further discussion (see user's talk page) so I think this should be tried: Noyster (talk), 16:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fields Medal

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fields Medal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sci-Fest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Blue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife has been accepted

Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 16:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

RESTORE BALANCE DEAR NOYSTER (MAHARAJA AGRASEN COLLEGE, JAGADHRI)

Dear Noyster

THIS IS ABOUT MAHARAJA AGRASEN COOLEGE.

In India you know women rights are violated and the society see the women who tell their story with suspicion. Pramod Kumar Bajpai is a man against whom criminal cases are pending. This is true and true and the reference was from the website of the district court of the government of Rajasthan.

The Principal did the crime in Rajsthan and got a job in Haryana. Only a few people know about his past. The truth must be stated in clear terms.

But he himself is sitting on the computer and making changes whenever someone edits to tell the truth.

(NOW WE LEAVE IT TO YOU)

A person committed a crime. The case is pending. He is working as Principal. "WHERE IS THE DEFAMATION"?

The law of the land is that such a person should not be appointed on a government post because he can use his position to influence the proceedings of the court.

Our intention is to state the TRUTH just truth.

PLEASE RESTORE BALANCE>

(Request on behalf of Indian women who are ill treated by the men). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Admnlawwiki (talk • contribs) 05:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

It has been drawn to my attention that a Wikipedia policy, WP:BLPCRIME states that "A person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law. For people who are relatively unknown, editors must give serious consideration to not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured." In addition, the court records are regarded as a "primary source" (see WP:WPNOTRS) and thus cannot be drawn upon here. The page has been Semi-protected for two weeks by Ged UK due to repeated addition of material that violates BLP (Biography of Living Persons) policy. I fully appreciate the concerns you express, but unfortunately you must find another forum to publicise them, as it is against Wikipedia policy to pursue them here until and unless a conviction is obtained. Please also refer to WP:SOAPBOX: Noyster (talk), 14:45, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Rucha Pujari

Noyster, you nominated this DYK early last month, but have not yet responded to a ping on this page indicating that the nomination had issues that needed to be addressed. It has been over three weeks: please stop by right away to let us know what your plans are: will you be addressing those issues, or are you giving up on the nomination. If we don't hear soon, we'll regretfully have to assume that you've given up on it, which would be a shame. Thank you for your response. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kevin Sorbo

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kevin Sorbo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gina Rinehart

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gina Rinehart. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jorge Guillermo Cano Tisnado may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • educación y cultura en el mundo globalizado. Notas para la discusión de una problemática en curso)", in ''La Universidad Pública. Problemas y Desafíos de fin de siglo'', UAS, Mexico, 2000, pp. 121-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:09, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Wolpert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Los Alamos and TXN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

TI36x Pro Programming Problems

Dear Noyster, hi, you not only deleted my 'update' but you also deleted the previous post and reference to on-line source. All of that was absolutely valid for wiki and should not have been deleted. All I did was to clarify the confusing parts of the original post so that the documentation would be absolutely clear. My entries were not original research but were merely confirmation and clarification of existing wiki material. Is there a way that you can restore the page before I began editing, then allow me to edit to your satisfaction? Thanks Marcushh777 (talk) 10:20, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I removed some previous original research and unsourced statements as well as those added by you. We don't accept YouTube as a source, as anyone can post to that without checks on accuracy. Even what remains under "Programming errors" after the first sentence is open to question, as referenced only to someone's blog. May I suggest you re-read the guidance I linked for you, and bear in mind that we do have to be careful that all statements we make can be firmly supported when publishing statements about defects in some firm's product: Noyster (talk), 10:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)