User talk:Noble fan

Nomination of AS One for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article AS One, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS One until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Melaen (talk) 20:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:ASCFGT002.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. dave pape (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

‎Cone (Volcano Type)

Hi there!

I saw ‎Cone (Volcano Type) while doing New Page patrolling. It wasn't clear to me that it refers to anything other than a certain type of volcanic cone, so I made it a redirect to Volcanic cone. If this was a mistake, please find a source that explains more completely what the basic essence of the subject is. If you need help with this process, please drop a note on my talk page. --Slashme (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,
The current situation is that ‎Cone (Volcano Type) is a redirect page to Volcanic cone. If I understand your reply correctly, this is acceptable. Please let me know if I misunderstood you! --Slashme (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paricutin and 'new volcanoes'

What annoys me about Paricutin and the new volcano stuff, is that most of it isnt true, paricutin is part of a larger and older volcanic field fed by the same, basic magma source.

'NEW VOLCANOES' 1. Izalco, El Salvador, Formed in 1770 2. Waiowa, Papua New Guinea, Formed in 1943 3. Cerro Negro, Nicaragua, Formed in 1850 4. Novarupta, Alaska, USA, Formed in 1912 5. Dallol, Ethiopia, Formed in 1926 6. Tor Zawar, Pakistan, Formed in 2010


Tecnically Tor Zawar is the newest volcano in the world (tor zawar is not a mud volcano, it is a magmatic volcano)

by contrast to the volcanoes above, the volcanic field that paricutin and jorullo were born in is pliestocene in age.

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tor+zawar2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Zubair+group+aerial.jpg

Hello, Noble fan!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Zubair+group+aerial.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Zubair+group+NASA.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zubair+group+NASA.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Manda+hararo+2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manda+hararo+2009.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Chacana2.jpg

Hello, Noble fan!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Chacana2.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Morne+watt.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Morne+watt.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Sumaco-Volcano 3761.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sumaco-Volcano 3761.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:St.+andrew+strait.jpg

Hello, Noble fan!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:St.+andrew+strait.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Volcano pages i started and i'm going to start

A List of Volcanoes that i created articles on, in wikipedia.

Turfan Zubair Group Tor Zawar Manda Hararo Waiowa Chacana Sumaco St. Andrew Strait

Some Volcanoes i'm going to do.

Yucamane, Peru Michoacan-Guanajuato, Mexico (includes jorullo and paricutin) San Martin, Mexico Lolobau, PNG Bam, PNG Kunlun Volcanic group, China TianShan Volcaic group, China Numorous Japanese volcanoes, Iwate, niigatayakeyama, Kurikoma etc..

Hi. When you recently edited Turfan volcano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Ashi-san+kulun.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashi-san+kulun.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Yucamaneperu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yucamaneperu.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:San+martininnit.jpg

Hello, Noble fan!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:San+martininnit.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tambora last eruption

I reverted your latest edit at Tambora, then undid my own revert and then added the gvp cite. The thing is, think about what it means. We know the last eruption was between 25 and 65 years ago, but we know no more than that? Sounds doubtful. Either that's a typo on the site or Global Volcanism Program is not doing a very good job and it shakes my confidence in the source. Also for some time last year the wiki Tambora page had 2011 for the latest eruption. Know were that came from or was it left over vandalism?--Racerx11 (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate the explanantion. That would make sense if we are talking about hundreds of years ago. Example: Last eruption 1750 +/- 20 years. Completely understandable. But there is no way I can believe that if they know there was a recent eruption that they can't tell whether it occurred in the 1940's or the 80's. Unacceptable error margin for something that recent. I just can't buy that one, sorry.--Racerx11 (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am not planning on reverting it or anything. It is properly cited now and such. Just venting my own doubts and opinions.--Racerx11 (talk) 00:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hotel Trubble. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I just realized you were writing about a fictional character. I thought you were talking about a real person! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of info in volcano articles

Some volcano articles should be improved on. Sangay for example has to be on of the most fasinating volcanoes in South America, but there is no info on it at all.

More information needed about File:Izu-tobu+eruption.jpg

Hello, Noble fan!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Izu-tobu+eruption.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Izu-tobu+eruption.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hiuchi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hiuchi.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Lake+Ozenuma&um=1&hl=ja&client=seamonkey-a&sa=N&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:unofficial&biw=1366&bih=500&tbm=isch&tbnid=1v3KXgyCh6yWjM:&imgrefurl=http://plate-tectonic.narod.ru/japan34photoalbum.html&docid=wSQjcDrh8g8ruM&imgurl=http://plate-tectonic.narod.ru/108_x_1k.jpg&w=600&h=392&ei=Y-EpT6qGMabT4QTb9rSDDg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=193&vpy=113&dur=1339&hovh=181&hovw=278&tx=85&ty=124&sig=114259184871170051862&page=8&tbnh=148&tbnw=224&start=125&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:125. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Izu-Tobu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please note the word is References, not Refrences as you used in Unnamed Syrian Volcanic Field, Jabal Yar -and possibly others
Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Picos+volcanic+system.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Picos+volcanic+system.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Picos Volcanic System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sao Miguel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Katla

Hi - thanks for replying in the edit summary. Do you have a link handy that we could use as a reference in the article? de Bivort 19:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes here it is: http://volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1702-03=

Noble fan

Mount Lassen eruption end date

Hello, Noble fan. In Wikipedia editing, it is generally futile to state "do not undo this edit" in the edit summary. Wikipedia editing is collaborative: everyone tries to improve the article together.

Now, as to the specific end date: I did a Google Books search, and found that some of the references said that the eruptions ended in 1917, while others state that it ended in 1921. The reference that explained this discrepancy was Ann Harris' book on the Geology of the National Parks, which stated that, indeed, there were major eruptions that ended in June 1917, but that activity continued until 1921. I think it's simply a matter of differing definitions of when an eruption ends.

When sources are contradictory, then Wikipedia should describe the controversy, rather than take sides. This is one of the fundamental pillars of editing the encyclopedia. Another pillar is using reliable sources --- we simply cannot make controversial assertions -- they have to be backed up with sources. Your last edit left the article contradicting the source that it was taken from, which is not how we work.

Hopefully this is helpful: let's work together to make the article have a neutral point of view about the end date. —hike395 (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. When you say activity ended in 1921 do you mean fumarolic activity?
The Smithsonians Global Volcanism Program states that eruptive activity ended in June 29th, 1917. If that is the case the article should read "Eruptive activity ended on June 29th, 1917, but fumarolic activity continued until 1917"
Is that OK?
Regards, Noble Fan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble fan (talk • contribs) 09:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Both the Harris book and the NPS website state that (minor) fumarolic activity continues to this day, so I suspect it was something larger. The sources do not specify what type of eruptions/activity happened between 1917 and 1921, so we should not speculate in the article. —hike395 (talk) 16:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Victory (volcano), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trafalgar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lokon-Empung

The article Lokon-Empung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references - no categories - no projects - technically an orphan

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SatuSuro 01:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Nishino-shima Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited McDonald Islands (volcano), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing on "2013 Formula One season" Page

Hi, Just giving you a friendly reminder about your editing on the above page. You shouldn't put items on the page that you can't back-up with appropriate references. Also, please don't edit page instructions again. I'm telling you this before some of the other people who edit these pages, who get very angry and upset over it, get you reprimanded by Wikipedia. Please try and observe these things and all should be good! Cheers! --Brody59 (talk) 07:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And just to build on Brody's comments, VW have made it clear they will not be entering Formula 1 any time in the future, so your edits were also incorrect in addition to being unsourced. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 23:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Turfan volcano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turfan volcano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turfan volcano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lava cone

Notice

The article Lava cone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Barely any sources mention that "lava cones" are their own type of volcano

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]