User talk:Nmwalsh/Archive 1

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Your submission at Articles for creation: Citizenship Services Group (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Nmwalsh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Citizenship Services Group (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Skr15081997 (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Citizenship Services Group

The first three sources that have been used in the draft don't mention the above group. You should provide sources which not only mention the group but also talk about other aspects related to it.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Citizenship Services Group (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Zach Vega (talk to me) 10:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Nmwalsh (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Can you advise what more I need to allow the page to be published? Nmwalsh (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

I reverted your move of Draft:Citizenship Services Group to Wikipedia:Citizenship Services Group, as the Wikipedia space is reserved for pages devoted to Wikipedia policies, procedures, guidelines and other meta-ish material. Furthermore, there was no need to do so "to use the Sandbox for another article", since there is no theoretical limit to the number of sandboxes or subpages you may have as long as you're using them for purposes constructive to the encyclopedia. I see you've already started on another new article. Happy editing! --Finngall talk 15:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Manx to be precise, but close enough.  :-) Have a good day. --Finngall talk 16:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Creaden Head

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Creaden Head, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Craden Head. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


Hi,

I'm sorry if I moved the page without permission, I'm still finding my way in Wikipedia. I moved the page because the placename spelling was incorrect. I have not altered the page in any other way. Nmwalsh (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Since a reasonable argument could be made for either name, I think a better course would be to discuss it on the article's talk page before attempting anything drastic. --Finngall talk 17:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


Hi Finngall

This is a placename near where I live and it has only one spelling "Creaden Head" not Craden Head. Its the way we pronouce our words here in Ireland. If you try to Google both spelling you will see what I mean. Nmwalsh (talk) 18:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't doubt you, but I still suggest taking it to that article's talk page, with multiple proper references as evidence. We encourage people to be bold, but I recommend finding a way to come to a consensus on the matter. --Finngall talk 21:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Fingall,

Okay, I'll move my proposal to the talk page. If I don't do it correctly just let me know. I think that the proposed change of name will be obvious to readers. Nmwalsh (talk) 09:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Admiral Pest Control has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Admiral Pest Control. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Admiral Pest Control (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Sionk (talk) 12:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Promotional editing

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Jognog (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dunmore East may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The old church of Killea (Cill Aodha — Aodh's Church (Aodh is Irish for Hugh)<ref>Canon P. Power, ''Place names of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Nmwalsh. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Grupo Vidanta, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Grupo Vidanta, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Map of City wall.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Map of City wall.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't understand. Please delete the image. Nmwalsh (talk) 10:20, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Map of City wall.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Map of City wall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC) No problem, please delete the image. Nmwalsh (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC French Tower, Waterford was accepted

French Tower, Waterford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Watch Tower (Waterford) was accepted

Watch Tower (Waterford), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Nmwalsh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to French Tower. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! FireflySixtySeven (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Double Tower was accepted

Double Tower, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Double Tower
added a link pointing to Watch Tower
French Tower
added a link pointing to Watch Tower

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing

Hello Nmwalsh, I saw your drafts on the towers of Waterford. Several of them were very closely paraphrased, or copied verbatim, from the City of Waterford website. That's a copyright violation, and FireflySixtySeven had to do some major rewriting to resolve that issue. Please don't closely paraphrase your sources; summarize in your own words what the sources report. Huon (talk) 21:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Okay, point taken. Thank you for letting me know. Nmwalsh (talk) 09:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reginald's Tower has been accepted

Reginald's Tower, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 21:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Reginald's Tower

I thought Reginald's Tower, which you wrote, was an interesting article, and submitted it at Did You Know, where new, interesting content to be featured in the "Did You Know" section of Wikipedia's main page is reviewed. The reviewer had some comments on improvements the article needs before it can be accepted at DYK; would you mind addressing their concerns? I don't have access to the offline sources you cited, so I can't resolve, for example, the sourcing issues they bring up. Thanks, FireflySixtySeven (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC).

Thanks

Thank you for your interest in Reginald's Tower, it is one of the most famous buildings in Waterford and until now it did not have a Wikipedia page. I will continue to work on improving it and and to give a fuller description of reference sources. For instance our local library has some of the rarer items available online through their own site and its free access to all. Unfortunately, some of the books are out of print and not available online so far. Nmwalsh (talk) 19:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, with regard to the books, thats no problem at all. However, as noted the article would profit from some polishing as said and you still have to provide some sources for some of the claims - or just avoid them. I tend to avoid any superlative in my article, if its not dusted and settled. Cheers Serten (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Church, Waterford (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

(t) Josve05a (c) 18:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Church, Waterford has been accepted

French Church, Waterford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reginald's Tower may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • its Norse or Viking name<ref> McEneaney, Eamonn (2001). Discover Waterford. O'Brien Press.p. 70. (ISBN 9780862786564.</ref>.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Fogel (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Huon (talk) 21:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Reginald's Tower

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sire Life Sciences (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 03:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waterford Harbour Sailing Club (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Fiddle Faddle 10:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Zugme-wordmark.png

A tag has been placed on File:Zugme-wordmark.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yangyang Cheng (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Bjelleklang - talk 10:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Davis (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Proven Data Recovery Logo 1.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Proven Data Recovery Logo 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Proven Data Recovery Logo 2.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Proven Data Recovery Logo 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: White-Miskell Act has been accepted

White-Miskell Act, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Vrac (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BiennaleOnline, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ragnar Kjartansson and Chen Wei. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:E-Sign Live logo.png

A tag has been placed on File:E-Sign Live logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:E-Sign Live Logo 2.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:E-Sign Live Logo 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Fogel (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proven Data Recovery (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zugme (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. LaMona (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Admiral Pest Control concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Admiral Pest Control, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sire Life Sciences (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mahensingha was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Mahensingha (talk) 19:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Absent Minded has been accepted

Absent Minded, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 03:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cinemaparadiso logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cinemaparadiso logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Permission Requested

The image File:Cinemaparadiso logo.png. is a logo which will be used in a company infobox for an article about Cinema Paradiso. Permission is requested for it to be retained under Claim of Fair Use. Nmwalsh (talk) 10:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yangyang Cheng (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silanis (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Becky Sayles was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Macdonald (nutritionist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Mateo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Correction made. Nmwalsh (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nmwalsh. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 18:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nmwalsh. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 14:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leia Swanberg (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Becky Sayles was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smart Liposuction (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 15:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Nmwalsh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 15:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Admiral Pest Control

Hello Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Admiral Pest Control".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Admiral Pest Control}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pat Kearns (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Nmwalsh/sandbox/Smart Liposuction

User:Nmwalsh/sandbox/Smart Liposuction, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nmwalsh/sandbox/Smart Liposuction and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nmwalsh/sandbox/Smart Liposuction during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Leia Swanberg concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Leia Swanberg, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)