User talk:Nixón

Yeah it can go to the article now SuperSilver901 18:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add top your monobook.js file, you need to add it to User:Nixón/monobook.js Passportguy (talk) 17:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Jenna Jameson: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -MBK004 03:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a vandalism warning, but information on how to appropriately warn the vandal that you are reverting so they can be blocked once a sufficient number of warnings have been issued. -MBK004 03:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Pugs has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 17:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tide rolls! I do not know if it is wrong but could you direct me to vandalism?. Thanks. Nixón〃 18:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is the second time in two days that this situation has occurred. I offer my apologies. I was attempting the revert you made and instead reverted you. The tool that I use is supposed to warn me if I am about to revert a whitelisted editor and it did not in this instance. However, the resposibility is mine and I am sorry. Please let me know if my "warning" causes you any problems. Thanks for your patience Tiderolls 03:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plantilla:Nihogo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Plantilla:Nihogo. Since you had some involvement with the Plantilla:Nihogo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 23:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic mails

Hello, Nixón. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--DO IT THE CHILEAN WAY!!! (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I have no any mail. Nixón〃 02:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chad Johnson (cornerback)

The article Chad Johnson (cornerback) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence he meets WP:ATHLETE, never played 1 NFL game, lack of sourcing for GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]