|
User talk:Nishkid64/Archive 28
SororitiesLambluv36 23:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Why shouldn't local sororities have a voice on Wikipedia? It could come of good use. If they are on Wikipedia, they could become colonized. It's valuable to girls on college campuses not only to see what is going on at other colleges, but also what's going on at their own colleges. According to the page you sent me, WP:ORG, an organization is defined as: "... all groups of people organized together for a purpose. Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities including, but not limited to, charitable organizations, educational institutions, institutions, interest groups, organizations, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, religious denominations, sects, etc." Local sororites meet that requirement. "This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment groups, co-authors, and co-inventors covered by WP:Notability (people)." Local sororites are not of blood relation familiy, entertainment groups, or any other example listed there. "Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice". It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education." Local sororities impact their communities, providing community service and philanthropy, which is much needed in some areas. How do justify those actions not being notable? They are notable in our societies and the history of our collegiate establishments. "... smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations." Local sororities should be allowed on Wikipedia
Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC) OXERASorry, could you bring back the OXERA page that you just deleted. I will appreciate if you did not use this dictatorial manners. Thank you.--Jorditxei 18:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Just in case you aren't aware, a policy was recently implemented by the Wikimedia Foundation, regarding access to nonpublic data (see [1]) Please note if you do not comply with these rules you should remove yourself from OTRS volunteering where your name is listed. Otherwise, please ignore this message :) Kind regards, Majorly (hot!) 18:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Unblock of Kelly MartinWhile I have no strong views on the validity of this block and agree it is more likely to inflamme things than calm them, I do think you should have discussed the matter with Mikkalai before unblocking. WjBscribe 20:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Revert my admin actionIt will not be tolerated. I am not a rogue admin running amok around here. `'mikka 20:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC) AeharrisCould you lend me a hand helping Aeharris understand that the articles he's creating are inappropriate? I've left comments on his user talk page about his articles MRSA Boil Homeopathic Treatments and MRSA Boils--Advice From Infectious Disease Specialists. I'm asking you because you "speedy deleted" the first one already. He's obviously new. Thanks! Jaksmata 21:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Subscription to Unblock listThere is an application in your name to join the unblock list. Could you please confirm an address as nishkid64 @ gmail . com as your email address. Capitalistroadster 00:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC) OXERAPlease could you bring back the OXERA article. I would appreciate if you left at home your dictatorial manners. Thank you. --Jorditxei 18:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
ThanksThanks Questionhow do u make a colored font? like this pink; hello??????? if not tell me please Sincerely Runescape playa
Hello
king apparelhi there, sorry i'm new to all this. i noticed that you had deleted the king apparel entry. i didn't realise that the rules were so strict so i have re-edited it and will upload again in the next 30 mins. should it need changing please let me know before deleting it and i can make the necessary adjustments. i can be contacted at tim@king-apparel.com too. i was wondering how brands like lrg get by when they are doing practically the same stuff as us? also, how do i get a nice box to put my logo in like those guys? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Timhoad (talk • contribs) 14:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC). Hello ... would you please SALT this page ... see the log ... thnx! —Dennette 14:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Please explainplease explain what you mean before you delete my article. Hsus 16:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)hsus
You deleted my page.I was trying to create a page for a band I like, Rest Among Ruins. You deleted it for a second time and now protected it from being recreated. I just wanted to know why. The page was legit and complied with all wikipedia rules. The band is even published in two places. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Awater3 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
Commentary to the Rome Statute not suitable for Wikipedia?Dear Nishkid64, You deleted the page Regulations of the Court which is a part of an attempt to provide the only online commentary to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Is this not suitable for wikipedia? If that is the case, I will not waste any more time on wikipedia and either do it on my own or with the help of a commercial sponsor. With regards, Mark Klamberg Rest Among RuinsRest Among Ruins is published in enough sources. Check out http://media.www.thetowerlight.com/media/storage/paper957/news/2006/11/27/Arts/No.Guitar.In.Qatar-2507487.shtml They are published in a school newspaper which is read by 19,000+ students. They have also played with bands such as Threat Signal which have their own Wikipedia page. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Awater3 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
TrivialI see that a college newspaper is considered trivial but it can be reviewed on a case by case basis. The Towerlight has its own Wikipedia page. Towson University is also a large, credible school. So, just let me create page. There are also rules on Wikipedia that states that before a page is put up for deletion that it should be given time to be corrected. I was not given such time.
Talk:Polymerase chain reactionPlease don't imply I'm in favor of "dumbing down" articles, I find it pretty upsetting given how much work I've been putting in to improving and adding stuff to wikipedia. Madeleine 22:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
blocked anonHi ... don't you think that this block was a little harsh? I mean, did anyone even bother to look at my Talk page, or give me any notice or time to respond? 68.239.79.82 (talk · contribs) 21:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Beat me to it by mere seconds! Regards, (aeropagitica) 00:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi ... would you please have a look at my new talk page? I have copied some of the material from the previously blocked User page into a section called Here about a speedy delete? ... one editor was very upset with my apparent disregard for WP:CIVIL with the tone of the previous version of my greeting, so I wanted to run it by someone before my IP address changes again. I have also created a section called What to do after your speedy delete has been restored ... I hope that I assume enough of the responsibility for Too Speedy deletes while explaining my lack of authority to "make it right". I guess I'm thinking of a tutorial with Examples, like I've collected on the previously contentious IP talk page ... I even documented a Dirty Dozen Newbies I have warned in a single hour while on Newpage Patrol one day ... maybe I could even work on the wording of some of the templates to avoid the "Please eject yourself from this website" replies to a nn-warn post. BTW, I figure that the "Please don't say I have to register ..." boilerplate will be my signpost, even if the "What to do about your Too Speedy deletion" greeting becomes an article of its own, like WP:TOOLATE, that could be referenced from the warning templates. Anywho, I figure you might as well just make any changes directly to the talk page, because I'll want to do a copy&paste to initialize the next one ... if I make another one. :-) Happy Editing! —68.239.79.82 21:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Could I get some help here?I'm having a constant issue over prices in articles. It started on one talk page: spread to the Video game project talk page, ANI, and also the talk page of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. An admin needs to resolve this, in my opinion. As it's just an endless fight back and forth between people wanting the prices listed and people not wanting the prices listed. I went to ANI on the advice of an admin: and it hasn't helped much. Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Not_a_sales_catalogue_or_price_guide,Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ongoing_issue_that_needs_to_be_resolved,Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video_games#Wii Points: to list or to not list? and Talk:List_of_Virtual_Console_games_(North_America)#Wii_Points_issues_.28again.29 is where it's taking place. Feel free to pass it onto another admin (or admins), because this certainly needs a solution. I'm getting very fed up with this, and I'm very sick of comments by people clearly thinking the problem isn't around. RobJ1981 04:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC) You must be doing something right :). Hope the recovery/APs are going well. alphachimp 05:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Serious Business Records deletionI noticed that you deleted the page for Serious Business Records that was recently created. As best as I can tell, it was deleted because a page existed some time ago for the label and was previously deleted. I'm not sure why the page was previously deleted, but I added the page because it's for a record label that has been getting a good deal of attention lately. The label had a showcase at the CMJ Music Marathon last year and was recently featured on SIRIUS Satellite Radio. Plus one of its founders is a member of OK Go. Thanks for your time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sanyc (talk • contribs) 05:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC).
Jan Kodes needs some important addition(s)Association of Tennis Players (ATP) started in 1972 and the milestone in its history and in pro tennis was their 1973 boycot of Wimbledon (81 men players joined in). That was the watershed in both men and women tennis and everything has been different ever since. Kodes and other players, mostly from communist countries did not joined in the boycot and, therefore, we also had Kodes-Metrevelli finals. The 2003 Guardian's article on the 30th anniversary of the W'73 boycot describes the matter rather well. Therefore I believe that the circumstances of the 1973 Wimbledon title ought to be mentioned here in some relevant way. I am completely new to Wiki editing, unfamiliar with page blocking and all the rules. Sid2007 05:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)sid2007 at sid2007@volny.cz
Log Bay DayActually Log Bay Day is notable, with an estimated 10,000 people that go each year. It has been written about in various articles which I plan to cite, and also the page would give attention to an event that Lake George holds annually. Lake George, New York as you may or may not know is a prime vacation destination in the northeast and it is on wikipedia. You have events on wikipedia such as the H.O.R.D.E. festival which is similiar in many ways to Log Bay Day so I do not understand how that is a notable contribution and my article is not? Also on wikipedia you have such absurd articles on beer pong, flip cup and many other drinking games, where is the notability in that? People play those games to get wasted and having them featured on this website is absurd.
Then why dont you go and delete the H.O.R.D.E. page, and the beer pong page, and the flip cup page? Those pages are garbage that only promote drinking, especially underage drinking. Log Bay Day is notable and worthy of its own page. It has been written about in many articles, and deserves its own credible page. If I have to I will go to administrators about this.
Thanks!..for the *. NawlinWiki 22:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Log Bay DayWell then how did such asinine articles like beer pong and flip cup gain notability status? Seems like a page like that should have been deleted as soon as it was put up. Oh, and I dont think you are "thee" administrator, so we'll see who else is out there.LogBayDayIsGreat 23:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Sarvabhaum vandalismThanks for the sprotect locks.Dineshkannambadi 00:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Thank you. I will think about it.Dineshkannambadi 01:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Sir, im not sarvabhaum. My series of ip is shared by whole city.it is unfortunate that u've deleted the cited info.anyway i do know that the only way to get justice is to do tit for tat.im sorry but kannambadi cant insult the history and go scot-free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.27.87 (talk • contribs) Chris YoungCan you help me understand this edit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 22:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
Looking for Adam- Dawn Wood-MoeloaI am looking for Adam Gilberti. I am an old friend, and I am having a hell of a time finding him. I noticed you edited his wikipedia entry, so I am hoping you have a way to get in touch. let me know: phynixism@hotmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.83.155.151 (talk) 12:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC).
VandalismFYI, I reported this on the vandalism intervention page, but user:Ni$hkid64:Ni$hkid64 has his userpage and talkpage redirect to you. In the meantime, he's been making destructive edits and blanking pages. Just thought you'd like to know... Dchall1 18:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC) You block of user:Lsi johnRegarding your block of Lsi john (talk · contribs), the user has admitted his violation and he is contrite (see his talk page). Given that blocking for WP:3RR is preventative and not punitive, would you consider unblocking him? ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 22:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 72.75.*.*Regarding your comments on 72.75.*.* I agree that 72.75.*.* merited civil warnings, not a block. I dispute that that I taunted 72.75.*.*. I dispute that I misled the readers of wp:an/i. I dispute that I "pestered" 72.75.*.*. Nishkid64's supposition that I was retaliating for 72.75.*.* deletion of articles I started was incorrect. 72.75.*.*'s two nominations for deletion were both quickly removed by other contriubtors. Speedy deletion is kind of a crap-shoot, in my experience. One can't count on the nominator bothering to observe policy, or bothering to give the article sufficient attention to detect whethe the concern that prompted the tag placement was a result of vandalism, not a lack of concern over quality on the parti of the original author(s). Similarly, one can't count on the closing administrator showing any more attention than the nominators show. 72.75.*.* nominated Kevin Sandkuhler for deletion, asserting the article did not assert notablity. The second sentence of the article states:Let me repeat the first three words of that second sentence:
72.75.*.* is fully entitled to disagree as to whether Sandkuhler is notable. But asserting that the article did not assert notability when it clearly did assert notability is, IMO, a clear violation of policy. 72.75.*.* is fully entitled to think that applying the phrase, "is notable" to an article is a stupid loophole. Neverthelss it is policy, and its presence on an article protects it from speedy deletion over "notability". I acknowledge that clearing the wikipedia of cruft is an important task. This task attracts dedicated volunteers who are careful; who are capable of following policy; who are capable of being civil to their correspondents; and who are capable of acknowledging when they make mistakes. However, in my experience, this task also attracts some people who are not careful; not civil; not thoughtful; not capable of admitting mistakes. In my experience, I am sorry to say, this task attracts some people who revel in know-nothingism; who feel free to be highly uncivil, who continue to use jargon that is opaque to their victims, the newbies whose contributions offended them. In my experience, I am sorry to say, a subgroup of those who frequent the deletion fora show a willingness to bend or break the wikipedia's policies. I think my concerns about 72.75.*.* were legitimate, and I think I was civil in how I expressed them. I don't think I owe anyone an apology for trying to remind people to express their concerns in a civil, collegial fashion. I continue to think it would be a mistake for 72.75.*.* to make their edits from anonymous IP addresses so that the repercussions of breaches of wp:civ don't blow-back on them. That may not be they meant. But I continue to think that is a valid interpretation of what they wrote. Cheers! Geo Swan 22:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, again ... since you're apparently my Guardian Angel, would you please let me know if I've been playing nice, or did I really "violate the integrity of Laaabaseball's epidermis," i.e., did I bite the newbie as charged? —68.239.79.82 22:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Parkdean HolidaysHi I recently uploaded an article about Parkdean Holidays which was removed because it was considered advertising. I amended the article so the information contained would be considered more factual but again it was deleted. I really can't understand why this was when Haven & British Holidays have an article structured similarly but it isn't considered advertising. Any help in distinguishing the difference between the two would be most appreciated. Best wishes Xenutoo
Continued TaggingHi. Thanks for sprotecting many pages from anon IP vandals. This anon user has now moved to other articles related to Karnataka, namely Badami, Kadamba Dynasty. Please protect these pages also. Looks like anon user:Sarvabhaum is trying to make a clean sweep of all articles this time. Also, obscene messages are being posted on the Talk:Kadamba Dynasty. I have been collecting his Anon IP's and putting them together in the talk page of admin User:Luna Santin to request for a mass block.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 11:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Sir i apologize for my obscene message but can u see ka'badi and other kannadi editors are vandalizing maharashtra's history? Sir, here is the obscene message left behind by a Vishal1976 (he has a user account which he supposedly quit) and later supported and accepted (above) by anon vandal (User:Sarvabhaum).[2] I will provide you all his IP's and request you for a block on all of them.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 14:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Your bock of Dharmender6767That new user has actually been the subject of some serious ganging up from other users who wish their preferred versions of two article to stay. Can you look at the comments on User_talk:Dharmender6767, it appears that one of Dharmender6767's opponents User:Miskin had also violated WP:3rr, so your block maybe giving an unfair advantage to one side of a content dispute. AlexanderPar 14:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Just to let you know, I undid your edit and I added a Underconstruction tag to the article. I just started working on the article yesterday, and the first thing I did was expand and rewrite the introduction so it conforms to WP:LEAD. Hopefully, I can bring this to GA-standards within a few weeks. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 20:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Barrapuntologo.gif)Thanks for uploading Image:Barrapuntologo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC) king apparelhi nishkid64, i just read your reply and appreciate where you are coming from. However, King Apparel's exclusive collaboration with the UK govt on the Want respect campaign has garnered press in over 40 different publications in the last two months, and has been commended by ministers including the current health secretary. I can by all means put you in touch both with the press agents of King Apparel and the Government Want Respect campaign to verify this. From the perspective of this campaign alone i would argue that a credible amount of notability has been achieved. Please let me know if this would assist in any way of rectifying the problems Timhoad 23:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC) ShowninnerJust happened to notice that Showninner blanked your WP:3RR notice [3]. Notmyrealname 00:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Hi Nishkid64, i have done a quick sweep and provided the following links most of which are news items and/or showcases about the clothing and also its collaboration with Want Respect? There has been a larger volume of published press across titles from One Week to Live, RWD Magazine and ATM to international titles such as Vice and Mens Health, particularly recently on the Want Respect campaign collaboration. Should you require documentation of these i can arrange for the PR company of King 'Canoe Inc' to forward these to you. If you require further information do not hesitate to say. cheers Wordonthescene[4] News item on the want respect collaboration HighSnobiety[5] News item on the King MP3 cap FUK[6]News item on the Want Respect collaboration Style Department[7]News item from Germany previewing the AW06 collection Month Rag[8] Click through to the showcase to find a brand showcase and interview Fashion Capital[9]Designer profile Rago Magazine[10]Brand interview Kingpin European Skateboard Magazine[11] News item for King skate team Fashion Capital[12]Press release Timhoad 00:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC) king apparel(sorry forgot to title the last post) Hi Nishkid64, i have done a quick sweep and provided the following links most of which are news items and/or showcases about the clothing and also its collaboration with Want Respect? There has been a larger volume of published press across titles from One Week to Live, RWD Magazine and ATM to international titles such as Vice and Mens Health, particularly recently on the Want Respect campaign collaboration. Should you require documentation of these i can arrange for the PR company of King 'Canoe Inc' to forward these to you. If you require further information do not hesitate to say. cheers Wordonthescene[13] News item on the want respect collaboration HighSnobiety[14] News item on the King MP3 cap FUK[15]News item on the Want Respect collaboration Style Department[16]News item from Germany previewing the AW06 collection Month Rag[17] Click through to the showcase to find a brand showcase and interview Fashion Capital[18]Designer profile Rago Magazine[19]Brand interview Kingpin European Skateboard Magazine[20] News item for King skate team Fashion Capital[21]Press release Timhoad 00:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC) WP:CSD #U1Hi, I was browsing through my subpages, and the number has increased yet again. Could you please delete the following per WP:CSD#U1?
Big list, but I'll be sure not to make to many subpages again. Thanks in advance, ~Spebi 05:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Bye.I have no friends here, and am leaving Wikipedia. :( --Defender 911 22:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Protection of KadambaA very unfair decision to protect Kadamba. It seems kannadi editors have made an unholy nexus even with admins. Any explaination? And whho said i am sarvabhaum? dont declare it by urself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.23.215 (talk • contribs) Hello, Nishkid64. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Barrapuntologo.gif) was found at the following location: User:Nishkid64/Sandbox2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC) king apparelhi nishkid64, did you have a chance to run through the links we sent over? Thanks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}
-2007-05-14T01:17:00.000Z-Image:Barrapuntologo.gif){kind=link}