User talk:Ninja Diannaa



Further edits necessary

Hey User:Diannaa, Thank you for removing this vandalised copyright content in the Land Reform in North Vietnam page: “Concurrently with the land reform campaign and the end of the First Indochina War, over 12,000 people starved to death in Viet-Minh controlled zones by the end of 1954 due to economic turmoil in combination with natural disasters, floods, and crop failures.[35]” Your edit I’m referring to is this, where you also listed the original webpage source. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Land_reform_in_North_Vietnam&diff=prev&oldid=1254509431…

However, this exact same paragraph is still up in two other relevant pages. 1. The Land Reform in Vietnam page, in the North Vietnam section. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_reform_in_Vietnam#North_Vietnam… 2. And the North Vietnam page, under the Results section of the Land Reform. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Vietnam#Land_reform… When you edit and remove the edit from public archives, please add the vandalism and hoax tags in your Edit Summary as well! :) WP:VANDALISM and WP:HOAX.

The copyrighted entry does not match with the actual original source and is inappropriately placed in these pages. For example: -The original source never said people starved to death “in Viet-Minh controlled zones.” -It never said “concurrently with the land reform campaign and the end of the First Indochina War.” -This copyrighted entry is inappropriately placed in sections that talks about the results of the land reform. Natural disasters caused the famine in the Red River Delta and Central Vietnam, not the land reform. Etc. Besides citing copyright issues, adding the Vandalism and Hoax tags in your edit summary will help deter attempts to add it back again, such as re-wording it as a loop hole. (No need to reply to my message - this is just a heads up. Thank you for reading this! ). Notaciabot (talk) 06:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's not the content I removed. The text I removed was The land reform cadres, eager to fill their quotas, began to denounce those members who disagreed with their harsh methods. Communist party members who proved unwilling to classify peasants whose land did not exceed 1–2 hectares as landlords, or refused to declare patriotic landowners ‘enemies of the revolution’, were disciplined. On 25 November 1955, Deputy Premier Nguyen Duy Trinh informed the Hungarian diplomats that, by that time, 46,600 communist party members had been disciplined during the campaign, of whom 32,200 were expelled from the communist party, of whom, 60% were innocent -- Diannaa (talk) 10:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]