User talk:Nihonjoe/Archive 57

Archive 50←Archive 55Archive 56Archive 57Archive 58Archive 59Archive 60

Archives

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship#Changing the Requests for Bureaucratship promotion threshold?

As a bureaucrat, would you consider assessing the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship#Changing the Requests for Bureaucratship promotion threshold?? The request at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive 22#RFB Promotion Threshold for a bureaucrat to close the discussion has not been addressed. My request to Maxim (talk · contribs) was unanswered because he is inactive and my request to The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) was not answered. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. No promises. That page is a prime example of tl;dr. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 07:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Nihonjoe, for closing the debate when the other bureaucrats were loath to do so. Would you add to your close guidance on what should be done to determine where to lower the bar? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I added something. It's pretty obvious what needs to be done, though: another discussion to determine the new threshold. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 04:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the addition. Per the discussion here, discussion about where to place the RfB bar will be postponed until after the two bureaucrat desysoping RfCs are closed. Cunard (talk) 19:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: William Bliss Baker headstone

See here. upstateNYer 19:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

No problem; it was easier to find than I expected. Just needed some time to get over there. upstateNYer 02:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Nihonjoe, I have a euphoric announcement

Salutations, Nihonjoe!!! I hope that you are doing well for yourself because I have some good news . . . I am about to release an episode synopsis page out into the Wikipedia ether that I have exerted a gargantuan effort toward -- far more than what I have done with any of my other brain-children. Look forward to it!!!

Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 05:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Postscript -- this will lead you to my brain-child; please try to be gentle with it (^_^)

Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 06:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for creating that. I've removed all the bizarre formatting characters you had scattered throughout it and moved the page to List of The Story of Pollyanna, Girl of Love episodes. I've also linked to it from the The Story of Pollyanna, Girl of Love article. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

(Stumbles around dizzily and tries to recover himself) . . . Wow, that was fast!!!

Nihonjoe:

Glad that you took me up on my invitation! I am having a hard time coming to grips with how it only took you eight minutes to respond; were you hanging around on Wikipedia or something?

Anyway, what do you think of my latest creation? (^_^)

Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 06:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I was online when you posted the first comment, so I looked into it right then. The list will need some work to bring it up to standards, but it's good to have something to start with there. Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Pro-Wikipedia

Please help me think through a strategy to combat the contrived appearance of an WP:edit war. I propose to use words like this in all future edit summaries at Senkaku Islands and Senkaku Islands dispute:

This is a "PRO-WIKIPEDIA" edit. This edit is explained in detail and in advance on talk page

Please consider this pair of edits at Senkaku Islands dispute:

  1. diff 17:35, 19 July 2011 Tenmei (talk | contribs) (58,318 bytes) (Undid revision 440335859 by Lvhis pro-Wikipedia -- This revert explained in detail and in advance on talk page)
  2. diff 16:55, 19 July 2011 Lvhis (talk | contribs) (58,346 bytes) (Reverted 1 edit by Oda Mari (talk): This is a POV title. rv Japanese POV pushing. (TW))

The edit summary of Lvhis is an example of Framing (social science). IMO, we need to reject the false dilemma. Do you understand the meaning of the logical fallacy in a "false dilemma"?

Lvhis sets up a misleading pro vs con schema.

A better strategy is to emphasize a "pro-Wikipedia" foundation -- that is, to underscore that edits are not

In point of fact, an extensive edit history informs my belief that Oda Mari's interests are demonstrably "pro-Wikipedia" ....

The first and foremost question is: What is best for the long-term prospects of our collaborative editing project? What do you think? --Tenmei (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Signature

Hi, Nihonjoe; I just saw your comment at WP:BN and noticed that your signature seemed rather long: indeed it appears to be 355 characters, although WP:SIG specifies a maximum length of 255 characters. I feel slightly bad because it genuinely looks cool, but do you think you could see your way to paring it down slightly? Thanks, ╟─TreasuryTag►prorogation─╢ 15:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. I'll consider it. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Should these be deleted too?

Was browsing the 'what links here' on a page, and I was wondering if these should be expunged too? --Malkinann (talk) 07:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Nope. User talk pages (and related archives) are not usually deleted. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Ⓧ, Ⓨ, Ⓛ et al.

Hi there. I noticed you reverted my edit on Japanese typographic symbols (I confess removing it altogether wasn't really appropriate). What I was referring with "disputable" is a contribution on the talk page (I believe you can read, so I don't have to explain it). I don't know much about the Japanese language and even less about local habits, usage of symbols and such. I assume you know much, much more about these things than I do (looking at your user page and considering I don't have any CDs with Ⓧ or Ⓨ on them). Hence I'd be really grateful if you could make this topic clear in the article. Thanks in advance. –Matěj Grabovský (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm deeply sorry if I scared you or something. Though, I would really appreciate any kind of reaction (be it positive or negative). Thanks and I'm looking forward. –Matěj Grabovský (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Not sure what gave you the idea that you'd scared me. I don't have time to translate such a large document right now. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Your response

Hello, I hate to intrude, but I could not find your response to me, I think I already know what it is, but I would just like to have it, If you could please send it to my talk page or do it here, I would appreciate it, thank you. — Phoenix K. (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2011 (PDT)

Please keep the discussion at WP:CHUS. Name change discussions do not belong here. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 20:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Abandashake username

Hi, Nihonjoe. I was asking to change the name "Abandashake" to "AbaNDaSHAKE". You responded it is impossible because it is a name of a group, but it is me - one person, an author, songwriter and performer, official representative, so, please, change the username to "AbaNDaSHAKE" considering it to be my individual nickname. Thank you! Natali Dali — Preceding unsigned comment added by NataliDali (talk • contribs) 07:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

This is not the place to request a name change or to argue with me about your username change request. Please take your request and/or arguments to WP:CHUS (or possibly WT:CHU). I don't see that you ever made a request before, so you are welcome to make one there. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 08:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Omuta/Omuta, Fufuoka

You seem to be involved in a very slow move war at this page. There is a discussion here; your comments are invited. Moonraker12 (talk) 11:54, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

It's hardly a move war, but I've commented there. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

What the MOS:DAB says is: "Each entry should have exactly one navigable (blue) link to efficiently guide readers to the most relevant article for that use of the ambiguous term." An item without any blue link does not belong in the list. While a red link may be allowed, there must also be a relevant blue link for that item, one that links to an article that provides information/context for the subject of the item. A blue link to another article that also just mentions the man's name would not be sufficient. Please include such a relevant blue link in the item, or revert yourself. -- Donald Albury 14:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

You know, it's far less hassle to just create the damn article, which I have now done. Your interpretation is too narrow-minded and also incorrect. I'm not going to keep hashing this out with you, however, as there is no point. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes

Please see response at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm following that page, so there's no reason to remind me to check the page here. Thanks, though. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 02:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Dragon Quest: Dai no Daibōken

I could use some help for figuring out the English translations for Derupa! Iruiru! and Dai Bakuhatsu!!!, the first two mini-series titles that spawned the manga's series. There are some scans of it on the net, if you don't have access to it. If need be, I can email you a link. I haven't found anyone whose tried to translate the mini-series titles. Thanks.陣内Jinnai 18:45, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Well, the second is the easiest; it means "The Great Explosion!!!". The first, I'd have to see it in Japanese to be sure. "Derupa" is' probably the name of something or an odd way of saying another word. "Iruiru" could be an emphatic way of saying "Here! Here!" (as in "I'm here"). Do you have a link to a scan of the original Japanese? ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 20:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
[1]陣内Jinnai 21:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I didn't realize those were the first two chapters of the manga (I actually have the whole series in Japanese). So, it looks like the "Derupa!" part is literally 出る and the sound of a puff of smoke (like you'd see a ninja use), kind of like "poof!". It's a hard concept to translate into English. It's the phrase used to cause something to come out of the magical cylinders Dai's mentor gave him. The イルイル! is the phrase used to cause something to be magically contained within the magical cylinders, so it basically means "In! In!".
ダイ爆発!!! basically means "Dai Bursts Forth!", implying that Dai begins his adventure (the whole ダイの大冒険 thing in the title of the series) in an exciting or boisterous manner. Hope that helps! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 22:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Untimely deletion

The deletion of the Senkaku Islands mediation threads was unexpected. For me, the surprise was untimely. I hope that Feezo will be willing to explain this edit:

Regardless, please consider using your administrator's tools to provide me with a copy of the missing threads.

In order help make this possible, I have created a new sub-page. Please recreate copies of these useful diffs at User:Tenmei/Sandbox-Archive 1 --Tenmei (talk) 22:25, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

If it's due to an arbitration case, you will need to ask an arbitrator to do it. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 22:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. IMO, increased transparency in the dispute resolution process is needed. --Tenmei (talk) 22:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

For Nihonjoe's benefit - See Wikipedia:Mediation_Committee/Policy#The_privileged_nature_of_mediation. I wouldn't consider overruling that - the mediation pages will be made available again after the RFAR closes. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused. Did I somehow indicate I was considering overruling that? I clearly told him I wasn't going to do anything and referred him to an arbitrator. Thanks for the link, though. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 03:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
You did nothing wrong, nor were you misinterpreted or misrepresented. The specific sentence with your name incorporated a link for redundant clarity, e.g., here (Elen of the Roads), (Sir Fozzie), here (David Fuchs), here (Qwyrxian). My words are plain:
Nihonjoe suggested here that I may need to ask an arbitrator to do this.
Summarizing: (a) I asked a question. (b) You gave a very clear answer. (c) I followed your advice. (d) No one has any justification for guessing that your comment was anything other than what it was.

Please note: My surprise was not the result of careless inattention. Qwyrxian also found this unexplained deletion "surprising" -- compare here. When the diffs are restored, I will try to explain why my reaction was immediate, unmistakable, forward-looking and practical. For now, the bottom line is that no one thinks you did anything deserving of criticism. --Tenmei (talk) 04:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

FYI

The usurp clerkbot will only mark requests as 'done' for bureaucrats if they sign here: User:AnomieBOT/CHUUClerk closer opt-in. –xenotalk 04:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 08:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Invited

Been invited to be part of the discussion to share your opinion whether List of LGBT characters in film, radio, and TV fiction should be deleted or not. this discussion is here here.Bread Ninja (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Japanese architectural elements

I transcluded everything until "rooms". Did you do the rest? bamse (talk) 23:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

I've done from "Furnishings" down. If you haven't done "Rooms", I'll do those, too. Thanks for the help! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 23:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Looks like you did "Rooms", so we're all done. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 23:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. bamse (talk) 23:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

NameChangeRequest

Hello. I am a private individual. My area of interest is business and I live in the Ticino region of Switzerland. I intend to contribute to subject matter regarding business within the European economy, as is my area of expertise. I would also like to change my username because Swiss Business is the name of a publication and I do not want to be confused with it. Thanks for your assistance with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwissBusiness (talk • contribs) 08:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm not Nihonjoe, but still . . . please post your request at "WP:CHUS". -- Hoary (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes, please pay attention to the notice that appears when you add something to this talk page. It clearly states that "This is not the place to request a name change or to argue with me about your username change request. Please take your request and/or arguments to WP:CHUS." ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

An automatic move

On your well-intentioned automatic move: if you have five minutes, do please take a look at this. -- Hoary (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Not really relevant to the rename, but thanks. Feel free to take whatever action is determined there. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm tempted just to be "bold" (reckless): zap the user page, end the DRV, and tell the perp what's what. But it's a temptation I resist. So: the DRV can grind on, and when somebody closes it I'll attend to the user page -- or more likely I won't, because by that time I'll be away on vacation. Something makes me think that five, ten years from now I'll still be attending to encomia here to this or that Pandey. -- Hoary (talk) 03:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Well well. -- Hoary (talk) 11:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

My alternate account's rename

Hey, I see that you tagged it as done, but I don't think it actually got renamed...everything is still showing up under Ks1stm. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:22, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Per the message which appears when you edit this page: "If you have had a username change and the edits haven't been moved over to your new username, please note that it can take several weeks for them to be transferred over, especially if you have a lot (5000 or more) of edits. Please be patient. Thanks." ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Ahh, I didn't notice that, I just noticed the renames of all the accounts around mine had gone through. Thanks, and sorry to bother you. =P Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
FYI it seems it wasn't actually done the first time: Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#My alternate account's rename. –xenotalk 13:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Anyhow

I apologize for seeming harsh, but, I often have my patience worn thin by assorted wikidramas. Like, last night for instance, I was dealing with an editor on Talk:Behemoth who was insisting that a link to Fenrir be posted on the page because he thought the two beasts were similar. And it wasn't until I closed that thread that the editor understood that there needs to be other material beyond his own personal assertions to justify such an edit. I apologize for making that hypocrisy remark, I made a mistake, but, I wound up being admonished, while the anonymous editor is apparently content to be unable to go a single edit without making rude commentaries.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it's always frustrating when people act less than politely. The best we can do is to make sure we are always polite and also make sure we are sure of what we are doing before doing anything. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 05:11, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Your DYK nom for Tosa Yamauchi Family Treasury and Archives

Hi Nihonjoe, I have reviewed your nomination for Tosa Yamauchi Family Treasury and Archives at Template:Did you know nominations/Tosa Yamauchi Family Treasury and Archives and have a concern about notability. Could you please add some more third-party, reliable sources with in-depth coverage to show it passes the General Notability Guidelines and Notability Guidelines for Organizations and then reply on the nomination page? Thank you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

White House and Obama Castle

As requested, here is a source illustrating the fact that the White House is often referred to as Obama Castle. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110822220841AAqESgR

I will revert your edits to both articles. Please stand by factual evidence and leave the disambiguation be. Thank you! --128.59.102.55 (talk) 06:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Answers.yahoo.com isn't a usable source. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Tosa Yamauchi Family Treasury and Archives

Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


Your Warning on my Talk Page

Could you explain the warning you left on my talk page? What "disruptive editing" have I perpetrated? To me, this sounds more like abuse of power... or Japanese imperialism... --128.59.102.55 (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Your Obama Castle editing for starters, and then your editing of Tim Cook. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 03:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Kichō

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Previous edit-wars

Hi Nihonjoe. I recall you were the admin who protected Senkaku Islands and Senkaku Islands dispute numerous times in the past due to edit-wars. Recently, some editors in that article started an arbitration [2] and I wonder if you can offer a short statement on your involvement with the protection.

About Fg2

Dear friend Nihonjin. I noticed only after your assignment about Fg2 , thanks you.--Hot cake syrup (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Anime News Network

Hello, my name is Jerry and I need some help. I'm presently in dispute with someone over the List of hentai authors article. The overall majority of the list has been deleted by a user because it is claimed there is a lack of reputable sources and the user believes only authors primarily known as hentai authors should be included. In dispute resolution, it was decided all deleted entries could be re-added provided they have reputable sources. I began using Anime News Network as a source and my entries were deleted again. Before I decide on my next course of action, I wanted to ask an administrator in the Anime Project if ANN is reputable. If not, who is? Thank you. Alucardbarnivous (talk) 08:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

The discussions at the wikiproject have been clear; ANN is reliable, the ANN Encyclopedia is not reliable. This shouldn't be too difficult.
Also, you are misusing the 'minor' edit feature. Adding a section to a talk page is not minor (and looking at your contribs, this is far from the first time you have done that). --Gwern (contribs) 16:46 3 September 2011 (GMT)
(Sorry for talk page stalking, Nihonjoe. Hope you don't mind.) I'd have agree with Gwern. One reservation though: The discussions regarding ANN have mostly focused on the site's encyclopedia. As far as I've seen, little to no evidence has been brought forward to prove the good reputation of ANN in general. If an editor asks for that kind of evidence -- which would be a perfectly reasonable and justified request -- you'd be well advised to ask for help gathering such evidence at WT:ANIME. Regards, Goodraise 17:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
No, the ANN encyclopedia is not considered reliable as it can be edited by anyone and does not list its sources (meaning the information there can't be verified easily). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 07:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the responses one and all. I've been turned on to using Google Books as a resource by another editor. As far as I can tell, that doesn't seem to be in question. Alucardbarnivous (talk) 15:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
There are actually problems with Google Books. More than once, searching on obscure topics, I have run into what seem to be good hits... but on checking much more closely, I discovered that the restricted hits are only a window onto a print copy of Wikipedia! Apparently there are companies which simply print out bits of Wikipedia, perhaps on-demand, and some of those have made it into Google Books. Post-2000 anime hits need to be checked to make sure they are not these non-kosher sources. --Gwern (contribs) 16:23 4 September 2011 (GMT)

FP for JackXArik.png

Hi Nihonjoe, an editor at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/JackXArik.png has expressed concern regarding the androgynousness(sp?) of one of the characters in the image. I have given an answer that is true to the best of my knowledge, but I would appreciate more expert feedback as well. Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Nihonjoe, I would like your assistance

Salutations, Nihonjoe! Have you been doing well for yourself as of late? I have just undergone a RL relocation to another apartment because my former landlord has . . . to put it bluntly, lost his Satan trucking mind.

At any rate, what I need your help with is to locate some reliable sources about »Perrine Monogatari« that support my claim of Marie Doressany being the name of Perrine's mother along with Paindavoine being Perrine's last name so that I stay out of hot water. TheFarix has already deleted a reference from the »Ai Shoujo Pollyanna Monogatari« episode synopsis page that I worked so hard to create; I am not keen on seeing a repeat performance. My profuse proactive gratitude for any assistance you can provide.

Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

My CSE points to usagi.org, which is a RS run by a subject expert. --Gwern (contribs) 16:23 7 September 2011 (GMT)
Thanks for stalking my talk page! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Oh, no thanks necessary. My secret plan is to make you so grateful you will translate things for me. --Gwern (contribs) 16:05 8 September 2011 (GMT)
Who know? Maybe it will work one of these days. I know I have at least one or two things you've requested. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 16:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot

I started an RFC at WP:VPI#Linkrot - What to do? and encourage you to comment there. Thanks. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 22:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

YHM

Hello, Nihonjoe. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Anthem of Tokyo

Hi, 穣! I was asked to add the anthem to the article. But where is the appropriate place? In the infobox? See also this. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

If the anthem is not copyrighted (or has gone out of copyright), you can put the full text on Wikisource. If it is still within copyright, then we can't add the text. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Seemingly it's copyrighted. What about add the title to next to the bird in the infobox with the EL? See 他のシンボル in the infobox on ja:東京都. Oda Mari (talk) 07:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
I added the anthem to the infobox (it appears just below the symbols in the display infobox), though I wasn't sure of the reading and left it blank. Feel free to fix that. :) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 07:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank your. The reading is Tokyo toka. Oda Mari (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
That's what I thought of first, but it sounded odd to me. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Requests for bureaucratship threshold

Hi Nihonjoe. As the closer of Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 210#Changing the Requests for Bureaucratship promotion threshold?, would you assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Requests for bureaucratship threshold? Thank you, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

 Done ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! Cunard (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind

Dear Nihonjoe,

You have reverted my changing because you think that I have done of good faith. It's wrong. Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind is a Ghibli Film. In its original country, Japan (where you have lived during long time) Studio Ghibli considers "Nausicaä" as part Ghibli Collection and the first film from their studio. For example, Ghibli has begun to release Ghibli films in blu-ray and Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind is inside the catalogue. There are many references from several countries and continents (United States, United Kingdom, Japan (in its official page from Ghibli), France, Spain, Mexico, Germany, Canada, Australia, etc.) where "Nausicaä" is considered as part of Studio Ghibli films. Topcraft has no "Nausicaä" rights, Ghibli has it. What do you need to become convinced that "Nausicaä" belongs of Studio Ghibli and it's considered the first movie of Ghibli and part of the collection?--Blitz Lutte (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

This has been discussed many times. Nausicaa (released in 1984) is not a Studio Ghibli film because it was released nearly a year before Studio Ghibli was formed (in 1985). Therefore, it can not be a Studio Ghibli film no matter how you look at it. The reason it is in the Studio Ghibli library is because many of those who worked on it went on to form the studio after the film was successful at the box office. The rights to the film are actually owned by Hayao Miyazaki and Tokuma Shoten. You are simply incorrect on this issue. I'm not going to argue this with you as it's already been discussed multiple times. You can see the previous discussion in the archives of that talk page and the Studio Ghibli talk page. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 03:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)