User talk:Nihar SWelcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Nihar S) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
citationsI have given the references you sought. Nshuks7 (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Walky-talky is here only to vandalise. My guess is, he is a puppet. Look at his editing style. I am sure he is not a new user. Unspokentruth (talk) 00:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
RSSThanks for the warning. But please note that , it was you who started undoing my edits , before discussing it. IF you have any valid reasons for not undoing your undos, lets discuss it in the discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupkc (talk • contribs) 12:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
talkback on taelus' talk pageHello, Nihar S. You have new messages at Taelus's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. GedUK 14:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Hi, Hi, Nomination of Third Way, The Hindu Way for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Third Way, The Hindu Way is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Way, The Hindu Way until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gazoth (talk) 18:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Litigation-Free Model for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Litigation-Free Model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Litigation-Free Model until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 18:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC) |