User talk:Neveselbert/Archive 5
Clinton gets TrumpedYeah, the pollsters had me fooled. I really thought the Clintons were gonna return to the White House --- albeit as President & First Gentleman :) GoodDay (talk) 22:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC) Privy CouncilHi Neve-selbert. I just wanted to let you know why I reverted your edit on the Tony Blair article. Blair should have 'PC' after his name on occassions when the style 'Rt Hon' is not before his name. Appointment to the Privy Council is what grants MPs the use of the style 'Rt Hon' and therefore if the style is not used then the post-nominals should be used instead. As suggested by your edit summary you already are aware that members of the House of Lords are automatically afforded the style 'Rt Hon' and therefore always use 'PC' even when the prefix is used. I'm sure you probably know this all already but just thought I would give you a quick reminder. Ebonelm (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
GroverCleveland listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GroverCleveland. Since you had some involvement with the GroverCleveland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC) @Tazerdadog: Feel free to delete them, can't exactly remember as to why I created all those redirects anyway (probably out of boredom). I apologise for creating them (if only I had known at the time that CamelCase redirects now render redundant); by all means, please go ahead with getting rid of them.--Nevé–selbert 00:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Living PMsAny interest in reformatting the list of Living Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom, which I see you've had some involvement on. And any comments on my recent change in font size and line spacing on the list of Living Presidents of the United States? I realize it isn't as pretty, but I thought it would be definitely helpful to enable the reader to see more context at a time. YBG (talk) 07:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Neve-selbert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Request for feedbackYou have recently contributed to the discussion at talk:Living Presidents of the United States about changes I have made. I initiated that discussion and have tried to drive it to consensus, in the process making more recent talk page edits than the other editors combined. For your participation in that discussion, I thank you. I am, however, wondering about my participation in that discussion.
You may answer me here, on my talk page, or by e-mail. Thank you for your desire to improve this online encyclopedia! YBG (talk) 05:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Talk page refactoringNeve, on talk:Living Presidents of the United States, you recently made two edits (here and here) in the section § Headers after implementing date range which I think aren't really to germain to the discussion of headers. I plan to move them (and my response) to a new subsection called "wikilinks and/or tooltips", either in § Date column or in § Event column. It appears per WP:RTP § Refactoring overview that "moving a comment to a more appropriate place in the discussion" is considered OK, but I wanted to let you know. YBG (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Partial title matchesHi. You recently created Bhumibol (disambiguation), but it consisted only of Bhumibol Bridge and Bhumibol Dam as entries. These are partial title matches, which should not be listed on disambiguation pages (because neither the bridge nor the dam is referred to by the King's name alone). It's unnecessary to create a disambiguation page in this case. Paul_012 (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject PoliticsYou are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics#Succession box template on selective US presidential articles. Greetings Nevé. A discussion has been started on the WikiProject Politics talk page by an editor who's advocating that the succession box at the bottom of each "Presidency of ..." article be removed, and I thought that you may want to express your view on this. Thank-you. Drdpw (talk) 18:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |