User talk:Netmonger/Archive 5

Colombo

I think we are in a edit war due to the reverts done by me and you. Its most likely either one or both of us will be blocked soon if we keep it up. So if your are truly committed to constructive contribution to the article on Colombo, please write the comments or suggestions you have on my edits in the talk page and Id be most happy to answer them. If any refs are needed to what I have written put the tags I will provide the refs, but don't go removing the ones (refs included) I have put there already, just because I didn't get your permission before hand, which I don't need. I am also curious as to know why you are the only one who has a problem with my editing and refs, where as no one in else seems to be reverting any of my edits or even making any comments about it. ThankyouNitraven (talk) 13:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page NëŧΜǒńğerPeace Talks 16:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply, if you looked closely at your reverting you'd find its not just your edits that I changed you reverted, but many other editing I have done including ones I have added refs to. I don't consider my editing as that of "newspaper reporting style" but If you think so please point out the parts that needs attention. Furthermore you speak of my editing as POV, OR I can say the same of yours, I like to remind you that your edits lack refs and are also un-encyclopedic or should I say "newspaper reporting style".

Points for your consideration;

  1. Most schools in the city have some religious alignment, for example some of these schools are known to be Buddhist, Catholic, Hindu or Muslim schools.---- is nt the example a bit childish as what less could religious alignment mean.
  2. The religious alignment does not effect the curricula offered in these schools, except for the demography of the students. --- isnt this something for the article on education in Sri Lanka ?
  3. For example Ananda College is a Buddhist school with majority of the students coming from Sinhala Buddhist families. --- why Ananda College ? and calling majority of the students coming from Sinhala Buddhist families isnt as you said " only shows how divisive the stupid Sri Lankans we are, and as you say the reader can always go to through the schools articles to find out more about it"
  4. Majority of the schools in Sri Lanka are single sexed schools except for some of the international schools that follow a British of American curriculam. ---- How do you say most of the schools ? only the old and prominent schools are single sex schools all most all of the provincial schools are mixed. There is no mention of the private schools of the city they have a rich history associated with the city.
  5. Before asking others to add refs please make an example as you seem to make so often do, add a refs.

cheers Nitraven (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replying here for clarity sake:
Point 1: - I dont want to argue your inability for reasoning.
Point 2: - Yes by all means include it in the education in Sri Lanka article.
Point 3: - I didnt want the reader to understand "Religious Alignment" as some sort of religious school. Thats what the example is for
Point 4: - It is a claim that you added, I merely improved the phrase, because I didn't want to upset u by removing it.
Point 5: - http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl goto that site see who has contributed most for the Colombo article, by the way user Mystic is also my account. then decide whether I have added reference or not.

I prefer if we discuss this in the Colombo article talk page thats the purpose of the article talk page. Further comments by you in my talk page in this regard will be removed. NëŧΜǒńğerPeace Talks 19:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for that indifferent smiley you created w/ the other account. That N they used to use for Chrisgau reviews was really stupid. --211.31.173.139 (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notable versus non notable

If they are in Wikipedia then they are notable, so saying it is saying the obvious. Taprobanus (talk) 16:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:004 abdulbaset nisaa'.ogg

File:004 abdulbaset nisaa'.ogg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:004 abdulbaset nisaa'.ogg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:004 abdulbaset nisaa'.ogg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sun Ray Thin Client.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Sun Ray Thin Client.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:025 abdulbaset furqan.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:025 abdulbaset furqan.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:024 abdulbaset noor.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:024 abdulbaset noor.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ayyappan

See talk. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nanotech

Thanks again for making the new design for the Nanotech navboxes! I've updated the other four navboxes to conform to the new style - let me know what you think. Antony-22 (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:di-no spermission-notice|1=026 abdulbaset shu'araa'.ogg}} –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Velupillai Pirabaharan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Martin H. (talk) 07:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:LTTE Kattankudi Muslim Mosque Massare 18.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LTTE Kattankudi Muslim Mosque Massare 18.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 07:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Vesak Lanterns.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vesak Lanterns.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 07:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tablighi Jamaat

I found out that you made good amount of contribs to Tablighi Jamaat. I've been working on this article since some time. I just wanted to make a friendly request for article assessment. I will appreciate if you can comment on the quality of current article and any possible areas of improvement. Few lines here, may be. Hamza [ talk ] 17:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baddaginnie

Hello- there is a note on the talk page pointing out that the name existed before the railway and any possible Sinhalese railway workers (which never existed); can't see how edit can remain unless there is a reliable reference for the etymology. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Re: Portal:Qur'an

Dear Netmonger, I have to finish my study till December hence I do not have any free time these days. Good luck with your work and thanks for working for improving Islam related articles. regards, --- A. L. M. 12:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Netmonger, Thank you for your offer to help on Project Quran. Sure you can help! The articles on the Surah's are insufficient, need to contribute to them as per the guidelines in the project. If you can improve the guidelines as well, that'd be even better! HQEditor (talk) 14:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Islam/Things you can do. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 23:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:013 abdulbaset ra'd.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:013 abdulbaset ra'd.ogg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:078 abdulbaset naba'.ogg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:078 abdulbaset naba'.ogg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sri Lanka Matha in Sinhala.ogg listed for deletion on Wikimedia Commons

An image or media file you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons or altered there, Sri Lanka Matha in Sinhala.ogg, has been listed at Commons Deletion requests.

You can read and participate in the deletion discussion if you are interested or do not wish the file to be deleted. You may have to search for the title of the file to find its entry. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Spencer Plaza 100 years ago.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Spencer Plaza 100 years ago.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sun Ray Thin Client.jpg listed for deletion on Wikimedia Commons

An image or media file you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons or altered there, Sun Ray Thin Client.jpg, has been listed at Commons Deletion requests.

You can read and participate in the deletion discussion if you are interested or do not wish the file to be deleted. You may have to search for the title of the file to find its entry. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amelioration patterns

The article Amelioration patterns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable concept, unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pnm (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Some time ago you participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam. As the article has recently been recreated, and nominated again for deletion, you are invited to participate in the new discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam (2nd nomination). —Psychonaut (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Netmonger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Netmonger! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Community User Group Sri Lanka

 Dear Netmonger,

Thank you for your contributions to the Wikimedia Projects. As a Sri Lankan editor, you are warmly invited to join the official Wikimedia Community User Group Sri Lanka and to subscribe to its mailing list, Wikimedia-LK.

The user group currently includes volunteers from Wikipedia and other projects, from the English, Sinhala, and Tamil speaking communities. It is the Wikimedia-approved platform for editors from Sri Lanka to enable wider collaboration, for both online and offline projects.

With your support, we hope to organize cross-project content improvement drives as part of online projects, as well as organize in-person edit-a-thons, training sessions, photowalks, and other such activities, in the near future. The ultimate goal(s) of these initiatives is to improve the overall coverage and quality of topics relating to Sri Lanka, as well as encourage new editors to join the Wikimedia community, while simultaneously empowering and retaining our existing team of editors.

There are no mandatory obligations for members who choose join the community, other than the usual editing rules for online projects, and the friendly space policy for in-person projects. You may also (or instead) subscribe to the mailing list, where any member could initiate discussions with volunteers across projects, notify members of events and meetings, stay up to date with competitions, organize your own events, and so on.

See you on board, and Happy Editing!

Rehman 02:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Netmonger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Forest Reserves in Sri Lanka

Template:Forest Reserves in Sri Lanka has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rehman 14:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of nature reserves in Sri Lanka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of nature reserves in Sri Lanka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of nature reserves in Sri Lanka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Obi2canibe (talk) 17:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Netmonger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]