|
User talk:Nakon/arc13To add a new message, please click HERE
Your edits are appearing under Vandalism in HuggleThis is fyi only. for Encyclopedia. Clearly bot mistake. --AmritasyaPutraT 06:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Product dataYou recently closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Product data record where you say "Should additional references become available, I would be willing to review this close." I don't understand why you didn't accept the existing reference which I supplied but, anyway, here's another one: Product Data Record: The heart of PLM. This source goes on for pages discussing the product data record which is an essential in a manufacturing administration system. Andrew D. (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
just rich gatesHello. Can you please reconsider that article deletion? It was re done and one of the delete votes states that their reason was that the subject did not fit criteria.....but actually the artist does fit. On case my IP changes again I am the IP who keeps voting keep on that article. Thank you2601:C:6783:6A01:E1C0:CBAF:775F:268C (talk) 00:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks......for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Here's a question: I wasn't able to open the page to see what the 988K bytes were that the vandal posted there (or, rather, I didn't have the patience to wait until it loaded), but do you think it could be related in any way to this, in which an editor named Moxy_reborn's user page wouldn't open because of the million bytes of images of Angela Merkel which that editor had posted there? My understanding is that "Moxy" is the username of a banned or indef blocked editor, and I'm wondering if these things are all connected. BMK (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Re:ISUPsychlawThe account was blocked after I had a look at the subject matter from which they were editing, a psychology and law professor from Iowa State University. Iowa State University would abbreviate to ISU, and psychology and law would abbreviate to psychlaw. The latter part wasn't an issue, but the ISU part suggested that this could be a corporate account or an account with a shared editor base, hence the block. It was, in fairness, a judgement call on my part, so I am open to a review of the action. Don't be shy to ask if there is anything else you'd like to know. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Assuming you're an adminRegarding correction tape, it looks like there's more than enough images there, especially since they're all of the same tape model. Moreover, they're all uploaded by a user named "Fullmark," which seems like a "subtle" advertising attempt... Is it alright to remove all but one of those images? If it's okay, I assume you'll do it, since you would be able to delete them at the same time (assuming you have that power). -- UltimateKuriboh (talk) 02:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Insect related articlesCan you move all of them to my userspace? I agree that they were made by a blocked user, but they weren't bad and I can take the responsibility. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Disruptive IPWith regards to Special:Contributions/109.78.189.99, this IP seems to be denying making personal attacks after making them (indirectly while on talk page). Doesn't seem to take my warnings seriously (or the encyclopedia itself). Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Death ThreatsThere are revisions starting with this one that need to be hidden from public view due to their content. - Amaury (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
HiI greatly appreciate the "cleaning up" you have done on Jewish refugees, but might I remind you that the guy in question usually do the same edits to the talk-page? @Ymblanter: will the next sock turn up? Will the sun rise in the east? You tell me. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Miniature portrait of George Washington, by PealeHello! I am the author of Miniature portrait of George Washington, by Peale article! I am new to wikipedia, could you make it clear for me why this article was deleted?
AfD QuestionHi, I am not questioning your closes on the Deathcentrik albums but for my own information I would like some help. My understanding of significant coverage is more than one or two reviews in RS. If that is not the case I would like to know what the community considers significant coverage for music so I do not AfD things for mo reason. A person with a couple minor articles would never pass GNG and ir uses the same criteria. I am still learning and prefer to not repeat mistakes. Thank you for your help.Jbh (talk) 10:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
DRV Heads upSome IP has asked for a DRV, but since they didn't let you know I'm giving you a friendly heads-up. Reyk YO! 13:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2015_April_13#Centre_for_Women.2C_Ageing_and_Media Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Invitation
Hi, Just wanted to pop by to say thanks for deleting the AFD - As soon as I Speedy Kept it it was deleted
Archamia fucataGreetings. I was following up on a new article that I patrolled and found that it has been deleted because it was created by a band user. Obviously, I thought the article was worthwhile enough to be part of the encyclopedia but I understand that you probably have to enforce the ban on this user. Is there any way to resurrect this article put it onto a draft page in my user space and allow me to submit it as a new article? I don't even know this person who created the article and so there is no conflict of interest and I am not a sock puppet as you probably can tell from looking at my contribution history. Also I'd like to know if any other articles that this band user had submitted have been deleted and I would like to ask for the similar courtesy of resurrecting these articles so that I can submit them into main space. Let me apologize ahead of time if I'm asking something that goes against Wikipedia policy because at this point in time I have no idea whether I'm doing something wrong by even asking you to do this. I am submitting this request to you in good faith with the goal of improving and expanding the content of the encyclopedia. Best Regards,
Joseph2302 Block - Speedy DeletionI just came upon a page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=For_muy_bien&action=history) that, as you can see through the linked history, Joseph put up for speedy deletion. This tag appears to have been removed by one of the original authors, but in my opinion the tag is valid. This is especially given the content in the last section which states information about two random people in Spanish class. I was going to bring this to Joseph's attention, but as it appears he cannot do anything about it currently I was unsure of where to turn. As you were the admin who blocked, I am making the assumption that you can do something or pass it along to an appropriate admin. Thank you very much for your consideration! WhistlingZebra (talk) 04:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you please redelete this article? The result of the discussion was delete and it reappeared. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 10:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Responding to Nakon's deletion of the article "Learning-Disadvantage Gap"Hello Nakon, I consider your deletion of the article "The Learning-Disadvantage Gap" a hasty and inappropriate decision as it was based on a single quote that was taken out of context from a 25 March 2015 talk page response in regards to the proposed deletion of this legitimate and informative article. Please note in my quote, “The Learning-Disadvantage Gap is a collection of original articles,” of which you focused on, I was referring not to myself but rather to the authors of the two hundred verifiable reference articles. The seventh paragraph of the same communication went on to address specifically these two hundred references as shown here. Here’s the quote: “[t]he collection of two hundred plus references to the Gap consists of works by the U.S. Department of Education, K-12 teachers, principals, and district superintendents, university professors, and studies, parents and students, civil rights groups, court cases, constitutional attorneys, statistical groups, arts advocacy groups, and more. Just one reference alone includes a list of five hundred university professors who as a group are petitioning the U.S. Department of Education…” The rest of my quote, “reliable separately published articles not yet compiled in a format easily accessible to the public,” explains that while these independently authored articles are currently and verifiably published and accessible to the public through various online and traditional sources, they are now compiled as a quick-read and convenient WP article. I'm not making an appealing your decision here, asking only for future editor/administrator fairness and to be judged solely on how well the article itself abides by WP written policies. For all that has been said, I appreciate the opportunity to rewrite the article in our user-sandbox which will hopefully establish itself as a legitimate standalone WP article in the future. Thank you, as well as to Audacity, Four Violas, and others. JCharlesThompson (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Deletion review for 2015 Los Angeles train crashAn editor has asked for a deletion review of 2015 Los Angeles train crash. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Juneau Mike (talk) 01:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Your recent removal of my editHello Nakon, After careful review I understand that the external links may not coincide with Wikipedia's terms, however the body of my edit did improve the previous description of the topics.
ToradexHi Nakon, I'd like you to reconsider your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toradex (2nd nomination). There was no consensus to keep. AfD should not be judged on head count but on truthful policy based arguments. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Gobonobo Edit reversionIn the Minnesota section of "Education", I deleted the Quitno press' 'Smartest state' survey information from 2006. They are a publisher in KS that conducts data surveys of various data criteria of state governments, among the major categories are "Smartest State", "Most Dangerous State", "Most Dangerous City", "Most Dangerous Metro Area", "Most Livable State", "Healthiest State", and "Most Improved State". Further, their ranking of jurisdictions in terms of "safety" has been criticized for faulty methodology and inappropriate use of data by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the American Society of Criminology, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors.(1) Their methodology used in benchmarking educational systems is no better. And the title of 'Smartest state' is dubious at best even with only a minor glance at their 21 criteria of 'statistical analysis'--rather limited in scope: http://www.morganquitno.com/edfact06.htm#FACTORS More importantly, it is outdated. The 2009 information combed from the U.S. Census is hardly more current but it is reliable, accurate, and relevant. Even more noteworthy are the results of the survey conducted by National Center for Educational Statistics that I included. It proves that despite lower per student expenditures, the state of MN does provide sufficient skill in teaching Math and Science proficiency--an area that has recently garnered negative press for the country as a whole. Additionally, many states in the upper Midwest (including MN) can boast high marks in the SAT exams---this was not included in the original pre-edit section. However, I updated the ACTs average composite scores for MN students to reflect pertinent data as recent as 2014. User 'Gobonobo' reverted all of my edits, and explained in their summary that I had not included an explanation for my initial edits. I thought the edits spoke for themselves: they are accurate, current, and relevant. All sources were cited and are totally accurate and verifiable. You the be the judge. (1). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_Quitno_Press
Duluth501 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duluth501 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Hi Nakon, I'd like to know why am I still remaining in WP:PERM/RV neither being approved nor being denied... I can also see that you have accepted the request of the editor who had asked two days after me. Please make your intentions clear. Regards --JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 19:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of the page Ingele Juif GenialGood day dear Nakon. I would like to know what was wrong with the page you deleted. I have never created an article before so I might have not followed the rules. I would like to know them. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leon1778 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC) OccultZoneHi Nakon - I've made an offer to OccultZone, which I believe is in keeping with your re-block. If he agrees to that, I'd be willing to unblock - but would like to hear any thoughts. WormTT(talk) 07:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Page protectionCould you semi-protect the article on Kai Budde. It seems to be our IP hopper's next target. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 08:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Restorethe hailey Baldwin page that you deleted should be re-instated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.228.73.77 (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Krank AmpsHi, it looks like you deleted the Krank Amps page with conflicting reports about it being open or closed. the business has been reacquired by the original owner and is OPEN. ANy change you can undelete? You can contact owner Tony Krank at tonykrank@krankamps.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krank_Amplification Thanks 71.209.189.90 (talk) 03:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Tony Krank
Sahil Rayyan at AfDNo problem with the deletion of Sahil Rayyan, as done by you per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sahil_Rayyan. However, I must have missed the preceding events involving a contested PROD as well as the AfD nom, despite it being on my watchlist - too busy elsewhere, I guess. Is there any chance you could let me know (a) who contested the PROD and (b) what rationale they used (if any). I'm not intending to go have a word with them but there is some background stuff going on and the info might prove to be useful at a later date. - Sitush (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
AdminYeah. No problems re: Adminship. --One Salient Oversight (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/CaseYou are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Review of admin actions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use. Thanks OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Re: RFA NominationI'm flattered that you decided to nominate me for adminship, even though I don't update articles much. Thanks for the compliment. While it's my own desire to be admin myself (to thwart vandalism and other mumbo-jumbo), someone else has seen that same vision too. So, be my guest. You can go ahead and nominate. Again, thanks for the compliment.- 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Why not delete User:Vandal~enwiki?Why not delete the page per CSD criteria U5? Past versions of the page are full of WP:NOTWEBHOST content, that too added by a banned user. A user with name Vandal would obviously be vandal, there's no need for that template notice. 103.6.156.167 (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC) My user pageAfter you deleted my user page I have found myself unable to edit it. Can you sort it out. Onion quality (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
FYIFYI, just in case you again happen on Pallava dynasty and some related articles. Noboru Karashima is being misrepresented by a bunch of caste pov-pushers who are engaging in a form of sanskritisation. Karashima is using the term vanniyar in its medieval regional sense of warrior; the pov-pushers, who are of the Vanniyar community, are attempting to conflate the two, conveniently ignoring the pseudo-history that their community has been establishing since the British Raj era, when they were known as Palli rather than Vanniyar. Theirs is a complex piece of synthesis but Karashima himself has said on several occasions (one of the more accessible is p. 15 here) that connecting the ancient names to modern communities is a very dodgy thing to do. - Sitush (talk) 06:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC) srrysrry i didn't know and i was just trying i was going to take it down after any way — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batmanpatrick (talk • contribs) 23:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move DiscussionHi, This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question. Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC) NoticeOccultZone made an edit to a sock puppet investigation since you warned him to stop editing the Wikipedia article space. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 23:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC) TalkbackHow why on earth did you deny the name change request for Billy McKay it not Mckay like the other users say ... Lukeno thought Portsmouth had won the Premier League so he's not exactly a good source. There is even an article for the surname McKay, but funnily enough I don't see an article for the surname Mckay ... which is because there is no surname Mckay only McKay or Mackay for the Scottish. Do some research on this because this is clearly an abuse of power, your attitude is right that one guy is obviously wrong because one source claims McKay to be the incorrect spelling and yet the BBC and other websites say McKay! I don't understand why they let user like you dictate what others can and can't do (fine for actually vandalism) but not when the consensus is wrong and the wrong decision has been given by User:Nakon (yourself) a user that probably thought okay well the consensus says no so it's no, without actually doing some research on the name using the internet. Like I've said before, the Chrome spell-checker doesn't accept Mckay and wants to correct me with McKay. I am not Irish but I know a person with Irish heritage and that person's surname is McKeown - so are you trying to say that if a footballer comes along with that surname that you and the others are going to have the same approach and dismiss McKeown in favour of Mckeown? PellèLong (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
YGM It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. VirtualAvi (talk) 18:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC) If you look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra N., you'll see a very similar sort of AfD (created by me, no comments after 23 days), but a different outcome, namely a soft delete. While it's certainly within your discretion to close this as a "no consensus", it does seem a bit random that one was deleted and one wasn't, based simply on who the closing administrator was. Moreover, given that I plan to renominate this, I do wonder if another AfD will really help anyone, as opposed to simply having this soft-deleted. - Biruitorul Talk 18:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Support request with team editing experiment projectDear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta. Article for Creation: InfoBeansThanks Nakon for your inputs, I made the suggested changes and submitted the article for creation. It is under review. Would you be the one reviewing it since you removed it last? Regards, Avinash VirtualAvi (talk) 11:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration CaseThe arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone_and_Others has been opened. For the arbitration committee, Robert McClenon (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC) You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 15, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/OccultZone and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Robert McClenon (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Robert McClenon (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Removing backlinks after AfDHi, I noticed that after closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna and Brittany McConnell you left backlinks in place in various lists. (I have removed them now.) Please note that WP:AFDAI encourages admins to remove red links after deletion, either by unlinking or deleting the list entry as appropriate. If you normally do this and overlooked it on this occasion, please pardon my intervention; otherwise, I hope this is helpful. – Fayenatic London 09:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
AWB UsernameHello. You added me on the list for AWB, but entered my username wrong into the check page. Here is the check page where it says I am approved amd here is the edit where you added my username, without the final word, "Julio". If you could fix this, it would be greatly appreciated. SAJ (T) 11:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Rush page deletionHello Nakon, the deletion of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Rush seems like vandalism or at least an organized effort to attack the artist Ed Rush. The reasons given for this: " Obscure self-published musician, without a notable record label. www.residentadvisor.net is pretty much the only non-performance announcement/advertisement source found. This guy doesn't even have a website on a non-free site. The Dissident Aggressor 18:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC) " These are blatant lies or misrepresentations. Ed Rush and his label, Virus Recordings do not have a website right now, because like many artists, have rather moved to platforms like facebook:
His partner DJ Optical: https://www.facebook.com/deejayoptical Their label, Virus Recordings Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/VirusRecordings
"•delete It's not a requirement that an artiste's label be notable. However we do need independent coverage, and I can't see it. There's about as much coverage on Soundcloud etc. as we'd expect from a musician who's been busy making stuff, but we want more than this - reviews. Can't see those (Which isn't to say they aren't out there for those who know better where to look than I do). Andy Dingley (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)"" I have prepared the following links to show you that this is simply not true. In-fact, and Drum n Bass (their genre) fan or DJ who knows anything at all know that Ed Rush, Optical, and Virus Recordings has been instrumental in the evolution of this genre making significant contributions to the sub-genres of Tech Step, Rollers, and Neurofunk. Wikipedia page mentioning Ed Rush, Optical, and Virus Recording quite prominently: "The first sounds of neurofunk's early evolution - when diverging from techstep - can be heard on Ed Rush and Optical's Funktion single for V Recordings and on their first album Wormhole LP for Virus Recordings in 1998." (Ed Rush and Optical's Record label) as an example of nbeurofunk": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurofunk Outside of Wikipedia land....... Ed Rush Interviews: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ed%20rush%20interview Ed Rush Reviews: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ed+rush+review Ed Rush Live Videos (look at the size of those crowds!): https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#tbm=vid&q=ed+rush+live Ed Rush & Optical rank 57 in DJ Mag's top 100 Drum n Bass tracks of all time (frankly, they should have scored much higher with several more songs in this list) ---- ****Please go down a couple link to view, because Wikipedia has blocked me from entering the YouTube entry directly***: https://www.google.com/search?q=top+drum+n+bass+producers+of+all+time&oq=top+drum+n+bass+producers+of+all+time&aqs=chrome..69i57.6143j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 Also, Virus Recordings, his record label's page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus_Recordings?oldformat=true ) was also deleted by another admin, further pointing to something fishy. Thank you for you time. Please take this into consideration and please restore the page. If need be, please consider banning the user who cause the problem in the first place. For goodness' sake, look at the take-down originator's handle (The Dissident Aggressor)! Christiannoir (talk) 20:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Christian
User:Roshan014Hi Nakon Thanks for your attention at WP:RFP/PCR. However, I'm aware that you granted the Pending Changes Reviewer tool to Roshan014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Having gone through their edit history, I discovered that Ansiba Hassan, an article they recently created, 2days ago was deleted as Unambiguous copyright infringement of this website and had been deleted accordingly here by Chrislk02. This is a suggestion that they have a partial understanding of the basic policies and guidelines and that they are yet to know what is acceptable for inclusion. I think Pending Changes Reviewer user right should be granted to trusted users who can identifies contents that are acceptable for inclusion. I also want to point you to the fact that this editor don't really know the uses of all this tools, they just wanted rights, as they had requested for 4 different right within 3 days, Template editor here, rollbacker here, Autopatrolled here, Pending Changes Reviewer here including Autowiki Browser here only Admin tool they had not requested. I really don't feel is a good idea to grant them this tool (PCR) but if you feel they should have the too, I have no choice than to agree with you, Nakon. Thanks. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Regarding recent deletion of page : Ed RushEd Rush is actually one of the first artists mentioned in the Neurofunk article, alongside Optical. While I appreciate that Neuro isn't exactly a well known subgenre of a somewhat obscure genre it seems a bit rash to delete an entire article instead of tagging as a stub/needs improvement/whatever. He's contributed a lot to the development of neurofunk along with Optical, alongside contributing to the soundtrack of Studio Liverpool's WipeOut, one of my favourite video games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.231.195 (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Fix birthdate on Brandun DeShay pageHi, you reverted back to an incorrect revision on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandun_DeShay The birthdate should read "May 10, 1990" This is the correct revision date-------> [[37]] Can you please fix this? Thank you!
While I am pleased the article has been retained (since I !voted Keep), I'm curious about the "No Consensus" conclusion at the AfD when the !vote was about 15 to Keep versus about a half-dozen to Delete (discounting the nom's second vote in the survey). From this noticeboard discussion, the canvassing appears to have been on the Delete side (which means that if his friends are discounted, the !vote is more like 15 to 2 or 1. — Unless there was some Keep-canvassing on the other side that I don't know about, could you change the result to a clear Keep rather than no-con? (That way the delete-minded won't be able to make any "It could barely hang on the last time!" arguments in future AfDs.) Pax 07:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Clear consensus to delete? A nomination that only looked at the sources in the article, a Delete !vote that ignored the sources identified within the discussion and argued that it should be deleted because the band has an article on Wikibands, and another Delete !vote from someone who mistakenly believes that we need English language coverage. How can that be read as a clear consensus to delete? --Michig (talk) 06:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
SporkHi! in 2010 you semiprotected Spork with the edit comment "PC not working".[53] I suspect the problem with PC is fixed now, and in my opinion this page would be a good candidate for PC protection rather than semiprotection. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Nobody has merged this article, and I don't think we can per WP:UNDUE and per ThaddeusB's comment at AfD. I think it might be worth revisiting this. Would you mind if I opened a new AfD, or can we relist the one you closed? I'm not sure the best way to move forward. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 06:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
RFPPAbout Template:Chembox Identifiers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs).
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 16:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Proposed decision posted for "OccultZone and others" arbitration caseHi Nakon, in the open OccultZone and others arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
RevDel-ing logsPlease note that, when RevDel-ing logs, you should only do thosew parts which are, in fact problematic. This includes:
For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Block-evasion by IP-vandal.Smalljim blocked this one about an hour and a half ago. Now a new IPv6 comes around--with the same provider and the same geolocation, at that--to vandalize my talkpage. I smell block evasion. Asking you because you were the admin most recently active in the block-log when I checked. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Don't full protect page protection request pageYou should not full protect Wikipedia:Requests for Page Protection permanently because no one will be able to protect pages. You can semi protect it though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Es715 (talk • contribs)
Renew pending changes? --George Ho (talk) 18:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for reverting/revdelling/protecting my userpage and then reverting/revdelling the new bunch on my talkpage! (And out of curiosity, could you confirm if the edits on my userpage were the same kind, as I strongly suspect?) AddWittyNameHere (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
AfD for 3737 BeckmanYou closed this AfD with no comment. Ignoring one "per above" keep and a procedural one ("too many AfD"), there are two redirect !votes (including nom) and two keeps, all four of them reasonably argued. I would respectfully suggest you add a reason for closure as keep and/or close as "no consensus" instead. Tigraan (talk) 09:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC) An arbitration case regarding OccultZone and other editors has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC). Question regarding an account you blockedHi Nakon, it's a pleasure to meet you. I have a question about an account you blocked back in 2013 per {{username}}. I was wondering what the actual username violation was? I'm asking because I am evaluating a request, and this account came up as similar. Just wanted to get your insight before I decide to proceed. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
A bit extreme fully protecting the article until the album comes out, no? The dispute hardly reached a level of needing protection. — Status (talk · contribs) 23:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I noticed you changed visibility of several revisions on Josh Duggar page. I'm guessing it's stems from my teahouse post. If so, then same issue exists on Talk:Josh Duggar. Thanks, 14nights (talk) 09:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Request unprotectionTalk:Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) You semi'd this for three days yesterday, per my RFPP request. Per the BLPN discussion, the talk page protection is no longer needed. Discussion of the BLP-related content is under way in talk, but IPs are adding the content to the article. I can't require them to discuss because of the talk page protection. It's a big mess. Can you unprotect the talk page? ―Mandruss ☎ 15:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
My request for rollbackDear Nakon, the other day you reviewed my request for rollback priviledges [71], deeming I wasn't ready/experienced enough for them yet. Whilst I understand this consideration (and especially the part apart mainstream edits, which I have now fixed), I am wondering if it would be possible for you to reconsider your choice. Not only do I now meet the edit count requirements, but furthermore I believe I have demonstrated in my edits the ability to deal with vandalism in a responsible, careful and effective manner. I have been able to revert, warn and report with a great deal of accuracy and care. Although there have been periods of editing inactivity, I've been on this site for 18 months and I do know the ropes more than what meets the eye. I hope this won't be too troublesome to ask, all the best. TF92 (talk) 09:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hilary Duff Breathe in Breathe Out Target Exclusicve TrackHello, just wanted to let you know that it's been confirmed on Target's website that they're getting the same two exclusive tracks that Australia and Germany are getting...."Belong" and "Rebel Hearts". I can't edit the page, so please add this in. Thanks. Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 16:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Slade HamThe Slade Ham site was deleted. Slade Ham is a stand up comedian, West Brook High School graduate, spent 30 years in Beaumont, TX, owned a comedy club there for 5, and has since moved on to tour throughout 26 countries. He has also appeared in film, radio,and TV projects listed on IMDB. Why the deletion?
You've got mail!Message added 07:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Group message sent outside of Wikipedia's email function. —cyberpowerChat:Online 07:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC) Pending changes reviewer request - Josu4uVery curious... There was a recent request from a different user which had eerily similar wording. I can't find it now as I am on the road, but this struck me as quite odd. Could this be something? Or perhaps it happens often that people treat it like an MMORPG... I could be imagining things too, in which case I deeply apologize and ask you to ignore this message. :) -Pax Verbum 22:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
xToolsI see you're active on wiki but are not active on xTools, or the group discussions taking place there. Anything the matter?—cyberpowerChat:Online 22:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Renew PC protection? --George Ho (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Doubt Clarification NeededHello Nakon,
X mark.svg Not done, Wikipedia is not an MMORPG. A user's "status" is not upgraded based on these permissions. Nakon 21:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC) HBC AIV helperbot5Good morning Nakon. I have been made aware of the bot malfunction occurring with HBC AIV helperbot5 which you blocked. I have taken a look at the code and infrastructure and believe there should be no further issues. Would you mind unblocking the bot? Kind regards, — JamesR (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Auto Wiki BrowserCan you take a look into this? I don't know why my request was rejected unspite of 900+ mainspace edits. Also read MusicAnimal and Dustin's comments.--Cosmic Emperor 00:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
BlockCan I communicate with you privately about the block on Offender9000 please. You have my email address.219.89.46.189 (talk) 02:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I cannot see how one would do that on that page. Can you be more specific please.
Page protectionYou have protected a page wherein I have repeatedly undid policy violations. You have protected its wrong version. Undoing policy violations isn't edit warring. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Your signatureHello there! I'm working on a project trying to bring most of the coding on Wikipedia up to the most current standards (HTML5), and I noticed that your signature is using [[User:Nakon|<span style="color:#C50;">'''Nakon'''</span>]]
with: [[User:Nakon|<span style="color:#C50;">'''Nakon'''</span>]]
which will result in a 59 character long signature with an appearance of: Nakon compared to your existing 52 character long signature of: Nakon — Either way. Happy editing! (t) Josve05a (c) 23:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks very much......for your support over at my RfA. I shall do my best to be worthy of it. By the by: I've got plenty of issues, but I try to keep them well-hidden around these precincts. If you don't believe me, ask my therapist. If you don't believe him, ask his therapist. If you don't...oh, forget it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Review my requestHello, I am waiting since a week about review of my request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer, you have reviewed late comers but not mine yet. Kindly review it as soon as possible. Thank you. --Human3015 knock knock • 02:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Protect90.207.105.160 (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Can you Unprotect Dragon's Fury (roller coaster)?90.207.105.160 (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC) REVDELSince you got the ones on Bishonen's talk page, might you also revdel this edit? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC) 1stPayPOS ArticleHello! I wanted to see if there was any way to get the article for 1stPayPOS recovered. Unfortunately I didn't see the proposals to delete it when it was being discussed, and am just now seeing the problem after it's already been deleted, but I thought it was worth discussing. Here's what seems to be what the moderators were saying about it that made it worth deleting: This spammy software article that Graeme approved at AfC is not supported by any reliable sources. It has three badly formatted footnotes, and a list of external links, to 1) a local radio station - 404, 2) a local newspaper (?) - article available after payment, visible part doesn't mention the company 3) an article in a digital magazine that seems self-published ([1]), 4) few more brief mentions on dubious-looking spammy websites, likely PR/self-published pieces. We require reliable sources showing significant coverage, not links to few websites and promo pieces.
Courier-Post is a Gannett company Gannett Publishing Services (GPS), a business unit of Gannett Co, Inc., manages the production and circulation operations for Gannett’s 80 domestic daily newspapers as well as USA TODAY and the former Gannett Offset company, with operations located throughout the United States. Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE: GCI) is an international media and marketing solutions company that informs and engages more than 100 million people every month through its powerful network of broadcast, digital, mobile and publishing properties. Spammy Websites: The Goemerchant.com URL dates to 1995, which is because GoEmerchant has been a company since 1995 as is noted on their homepage and in various social media descriptions. The 1stPayPOS software is up to date with the last version released on the Apple App store on June 10, 2015 with a 4+ Rating, as can be seen in the iTunes link below. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/1stpaypos-point-of-sale/id641725563?mt=8 Please let me know if you can do anything to open the discussion back up, or if perhaps I should recreate the article for a fresh round of reviews. Thanks, John.smith7867 (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
A barnstar for you!
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC) Rollback Rights
On my request for rollback right, you exclaimed that I didn't know what the rollback tool was meant for. I know exactly what Rollback is meant for, I don't appreciate being lectured on how the tool is used. I was describing an example of how the rollback tool MIGHT be used in my discipline (TV); I'm not saying that I would ONLY use it for that. I also clearly stated that it would be helpful for me to quickly restore pages damaged by vandals; I didn't say that I would delete misguided contributions. About a year and a half ago, I was a new editor who wanted to do small edits to my favorite shows, and naturally, they were less-than-perfect. Many editors helped me learn the ropes so I could make better edits, and now I'm creating my own TV pages. I have no interest in rolling back a series of good-faith edits, made by interested first-timers because I'VE BEEN THERE BEFORE. I clearly know the difference between a series of good-faith and bad faith edits. Let me use The Big Bang Theory as an example: Good Faith: Dr. Sheldon Lee Cooper (Jim Parsons) is a theoretical physicist, who is really smart, but misunderstood. Bad Faith: Dr. Sheldon Lee Cooper (Jim Parsons) is a theoretical physicist, who eats pig turds for breakfast every morning.
b. Show off to their teenage friends c. Just be an ass
Follow-up questionHi Nakon! I just thought I'd follow up and see if you'd made any progress updating what used to be this? Just curious... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Updated message for NakonRE: Ubiquiti Networks Please allow us to undo the edits of Neon and Orthogonal1 who are posting bad content to our Wikipedia site for Ubiquiti Networks. Urgent. Nakon, I noticed you locked Ubiquiti Networks from edits; unfortunately, you've locked it on the incorrect revision. Please lock in after our undo edits of Neon and Ortho.
Nakon, I just want to clarify that I did not add content to the Ubiquiti page, but simply revert it back to a version that did NOT post incorrect information, which I am unable to do now. Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Infogroup Page DeletedHi- I would like to update the content for a deleted wiki page under the name of Infogroup. I have reliable content with enough references to add. Thank you. AlexThePiatt (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
That would be great- thank you. AlexThePiatt (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
|
