User talk:NL19931993

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, NL19931993, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 14:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image processing tools

For images, there are free tools like GIMP and ImageMagick, and commercial ones like Adobe Photoshop that provide a variety of processing filters. The preferred formats are Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) for drawings, and Portable Network Graphics (PNG) for pictures. You may also use JPEG.

Vector graphics are preferred to raster graphics for drawings, because they can be scaled as needed without losing information, and because they can be more easily edited. Please remember to follow our guidelines and policies when uploading images.

Read more:
Become a Wikipedia tipster
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two comments on your AfD nominations

Hello, I noticed a few issues with your recent nominations at Articles for deletion:

  1. Please consider using Twinkle or another automated tool to nominated articles for deletion. At the very least, please use {{afd2}} template as described at WP:AFD ({{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~). The hand-crafted AfDs you created have created contain several broken links. Today's nominations point to the 2019 January 6 deletion log, not 2020. The "View AfD" link points to the wrong debate on 2nd nominations. See changes made to the Jiz Lee debate.
  2. Please use edit summaries. That is especially important when you tag an article for deletion. WP:AFD suggests: AfD: Nominated for deletion; see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NominationName]]. On a proposed deletion, "PROD" will suffice. Thank you for your contributions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NL19931993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am under total indefinite block for no reason, no notification of investigation, I have nothing but constructive edits here, IP does not definitively prove, edits history of account should be considered and there are no issues with my edits

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Note that the CheckUser tool provides more information than merely the user's IP address. Yunshui 雲水 08:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.