User talk:NHCLS/Archive 2

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baldwin Kho may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {dablinks|date=March 2014}}<
  • | The Journey (Decade of creative excellence || March 2007 || Kaisa Heritage Center

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)==

Hi

I might disagree with you but thank you for abstaining from actions and behaviors which do not honor wikis spirit. My talkpage is strong evidence of that , threads etc . I m not claiming I m right in everything and Im ready to change my mind if good arguments are presented. Best--George1935 (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Badr Bin Haider

Hello NHCLS,

I wrote an article about Badr Bin Haider, my apologies if I brake rules in promoting a person work, but I was not selling any thing its just a biography, just trying to create something new in my free time, now this name is written as spam or as in watch list, I want it to be deleted and kindly I need help cause as a business man its bad for my reputation to show as a spammer.

Thanks & regards, Deeboss123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deeboss123 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barry Karr

Hello NHCLS,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Barry Karr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ging287 (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NHCLS. You have new messages at Hell in a Bucket's talk page.
Message added 20:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Slawomir Kostrzewa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slawomir Kostrzewa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slawomir Kostrzewa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. M. Caecilius (talk) 22:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


Escape From The Shadow Garden

It's just the same text displayed on the main Magnum article. I only copied and pasted it. Delete it if you want. Arsenanuf (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sergei Verenkin

The article Sergei Verenkin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ging287 (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Sergei Verenkin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sergei Verenkin, NHCLS!

Wikipedia editor OccultZone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Add some citations.

To reply, leave a comment on OccultZone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Sean Connolly

The article Sean Connolly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the requirements of WP:NHOCKEY, as he never played in a top professional league (e.g. NHL), didn't play 200 games in a top-level minor league (e.g. AHL), received no preeminent honors in junior league or college, wasn't a first-round draft pick, didn't play on a national team, and isn't a hall of fame member.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Derrick Byfuglien

The article Derrick Byfuglien has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per the standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey/League_assessment, EHCL doesn't satisfy criterion #3.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NHCLS. You have new messages at Ahecht's talk page.
Message added 15:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of François Hardy

The article François Hardy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick, and QMHJL, UHL, QSPHL, and LNAH don't satisfy criterioa #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NHCLS. You have new messages at Ahecht's talk page.
Message added 15:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brock Hooton

The article Brock Hooton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick, didn't play enough AHL games to satisfy criterion #3, and other leagues he played for don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Gillis

The article Nick Gillis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick and college play doesn't satisfy criterion #4.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Dobben

The article Scott Dobben has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick, did not play 200 games in the AHL per criterion #3, and other leagues played in don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josef Vávra

The article Josef Vávra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick and other leagues played in don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Wikner

The article John Wikner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick and other leagues played in don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:22, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Don't get discouraged!

I know it can be discouraging to have your articles deleted or proposed for deletion, and I just wanted to let you know that your efforts to expand Wikipedia are very much appreciated. You might want to look over the guide at Wikipedia:Starting an article or consult the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Help desk. Thanks again for your efforts! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peer Hull Kristensen

The article Peer Hull Kristensen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Biographical articles about academics must meet the notability guidelines for Academics, with reference to reliable, third-party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 11:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karussell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karussell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall talk 17:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karussell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karussell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ciao Mane (talk) 11:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Southern Cross (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Southern Cross (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Drew neilson nz

Creator removed your db tags. I restored them. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

SEAN MOYSES

I was hoping that others would contribute to the article. Moyses is one of the greatest virtuosi of all time and deserves some coveraage in Wikipedia.


TRIKER1 (talk) 18:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jane Visvader

Hello NHCLS. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jane Visvader, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Simulacrum (band)

Hello, NHCLS,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Simulacrum (band) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simulacrum (band) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Copy editing Ajay K. Sood

Hi mate, you tagged the article I created today, Ajay K. Sood for copy editing. I have since done a bit to clear the ambiguities. Could you please have a look again and advise how we may better it? Cheers!!--jojo@nthony (talk) 15:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick revert. Much appreciated. Dr. Sood's contributions leaving a long trail, I would check up with other editors as well, just the way you suggested. Still, your intervention prompted me to have a second look and it helped a lot. I am also working on the other article you have tagged, Sunil Pradhan. Meanwhile, if you feel the grammar part of Sood article is taken care of, please remove the tag. That would make it look better. Thank you once again, cheers mate!!--jojo@nthony (talk) 16:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Evidence for Democracy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evidence for Democracy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Ernie Yard

Hello NHCLS,

Thanks for patrolling etc. Ernie Yard & for moving the page, (can't believe I missed the lacking capital!). I have added categories, which I was advised, when asking at the Teahouse, not to do for new articles, until they'd been accepted. However, I have a couple of questions. Firstly, the article already contains refs. for name date/place of birth & death & just about everything else is sourced from the neilbrown stats site, I.e. here, which is included in Ext links. It seems unwieldy to repeat the same ref. for each change of club & I've not seen other similar "stubs" (basically only a lead) referenced in that way. Perhaps you could advise what could be done to improve this point? Thanks. Secondly, I note persondata has been deleted, & again I was advised this should habitually be included so wonder if you could clarify for future reference? Thanks. Regards. Eagleash (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

  • First, sorry for the delay in my answer. In response to your questions:
  1. Why repeat the same reference for each change in club? I'm not entirely certain what you were asking here, so forgive me if I don't answer that question. The reason I added a refimprove tag to the page was not because of the lack of inline citations (there is a separate tag for that). It was more that the total number of references for the page (the Purkiss & Sands book & the neilbrown web site) is very small (2 references). The tag is there in order to prompt editors to find new references and add them.
  2. Why was the persondata deleted? As for that, I generally just delete persondata, to keep the page clean. I don't actually know if that's good editing practice or not... I didn't pass through the teahouse when I started editing; I pretty much just learned as I went along, essentially improvising... I would suggest consulting another editor (esp. an admin) as regards to that question.

I hope that I have answered your questions. Of course, if you have any other questions or comments feel free to contact me. Merci beaucoup!NHCLS (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello again NHCLS
Thanks for replying. (No probs. re time!) I think we are perhaps looking at things from a different perspective. Firstly, by way of explanation, my point re the “unwieldy” refs. was really more to do with in-line citations. Yard’s career details were all sourced from the neilbrown site, (which is something of a “go-to” source for obscure ex-footballers) so to repeat that as an in-line ref would be overdoing it a bit. I see what you mean by the lack of additional refs., but it’s only a stub article, with very brief details, for a bit part player from 50 years ago. Refs. other than Purkiss/Sands/King are probably a bit like hens teeth, & the basic details are referenced/sourced. Sands BTW is the official Crystal Palace F.C. historian and also co-wrote the -2011 book with King but declined credit as author. I will try to find other refs. or links though.
As far as persondata is concerned it says here that these should be added, so if you are deleting them, I guess that might be frowned upon by somebody! :) I’ve already restored them as it happens. Thanks. Regards. Eagleash (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the link regarding persondate; I will change my ways! As for the inline citations, I agree with you, I do not see the point in adding inline citations for every little detail; esp. since it's all from the same site. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 01:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks ofcourse

Thanks for the heads up! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChoiceNZ (talk • contribs) 20:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Empty sections

I'm assuming you mean empty section under general elections? Well I'm adding those sections for a reason. There was an election in 2013 and 2008. And so it'll be easier to add info from those years. Regards Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes, it would be easier to add information afterwards, but, in the meantime, they just add informationless clutter to the page. And so it would probably be better not to add them until they contain info. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Actually...it also keep the information about elections on constituencies the same. If you remove them, info added later on might be different on one constituency than the other. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Could you please clarify your point? From what I understand, you wish for the info across all ridings to be standard. That is a good idea, however, I don't believe that is sufficient reason to include empty sections. (In fact, if you look at other riding pages from other countries, you should find that they are generally not standardised). Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Exactly. I know its a good idea...thats why i added them. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
It is a good idea, but my point is that good ideas are still only ideas - they do not necessarily make good practice. I believe this is the case here. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 22:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Hey do you think the following makes good practice
Constituency. I have added "empty sections" under G.e 2013 and 2008. Can you please check them out and give me some feedback as to whether make the other const. like that or remove the entire general election section. (im going to add to those empty sections later -on my to-do list-). Saadkhan12345 (talk) 12:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, although I do prefer not to have any empty sections, adding that tag does constitute good practice (n my opion). HOwever, you might want to check with another editor, just in case... Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 14:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

How to join Wikiteam?

Hello NHCLS, I would like to know something: How do you join the Wiki team for the Editing and removing stuff? I would like to join.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Qwertyus. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Praveet Dara, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Story of The Odyssey

Read the description: "...an article about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organized event that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". That does not apply to the page Story of The Odyssey. You could have applied A10 (duplicate), or G12 (copyvio). Please read the criteria for speedy deletion, and apply them appropriately. —Swpbtalk 21:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that... Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Our lady of victory fort erie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Our lady of victory fort erie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://portal.niagaracatholic.ca/elementary/ourladyofvictory/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your message

Hi, I got User talk:Howicus#I have unreviewed a page you curated this message from you, and I'm not sure why. Is it an automated part of the page curation tool? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Page Deletion

Why did you deleted my page bruh?

Hello. I didn't actually delete the page myself (I'm not an admin). However, I did nominate it for speedy deletion. I did this because it has no content. An article needs to have some sort of content for it to actually be an article. (I assume your referring to the David Lauzier page). If you add some good quality content (with reliable sources), there is no reason why the page shouldn't be deleted. Of course, I would be happy to help. (And don't forget to sign your posts!) Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mingle2

Can you describe why you asked for a speedy deletion of mingle2? There are no promotional content, instead describe what this product does. What part of the content was considered promotional? How is that different than any other wiki pages describing a product such as plentyoffish, okcupid, match, etcetc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badddddbunny (talk • contribs) 01:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I replaced the speedy deletion tag on the Mingle2 page, not because I necessarily believe that the page is promotional, but instead because the tag had been removed by an editor with one edit (the removal of the tag). The user in question is Randy043015. I replaced the speedy deletion tag in order that an admin can review the page and decide if it is worth keeping. I hope you understand my reasoning... (And don't forget to sign your posts!) Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 01:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Dannenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Into the Bermuda Triangle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Into the Bermuda Triangle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Bermuda Triangle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanJoe (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

frustrated

all my articles are being deleted. --DonLandry2 (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Information icon Hello NHCLS. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Die Dame (The Lady) Magazine. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Eeekster (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NHCLS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Algonquin Students' Association

The article Algonquin Students' Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG. No coverage except primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —usernamekiran(talk) 07:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NHCLS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pissutsit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pissutsit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the SFUO.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the SFUO.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NHCLS

Thank you for creating C'est l'temps.

User:Ifnord, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Well referenced, thank-you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ifnord}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ifnord (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kateřina Mrázová (ice hockey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connecticut Whale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Mara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bray Ketchum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bray Ketchum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bray Ketchum. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Keren Landsman

Hello, NHCLS,

Thank you for creating Keren Landsman.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please try to fix the issue mentioned in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 10:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

NWHL Draft

Nice work on creating the 2020 NWHL Draft page. Mark Staffieri (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Frontenac Secondary School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NWHL

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boston Pride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sollentuna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Audra Richards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NWHL
Kate Leary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NWHL
Victoria Bach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NWHL

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Audra Richards
added a link pointing to NWHL
Kate Leary
added a link pointing to NWHL

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Madison Packer
added a link pointing to NWHL
Samantha Kolowratová
added a link pointing to NWHL

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Göteborg HC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Modo Hockey Dam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Modo Hockey Dam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

HV71 Dam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HV71 Dam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HV71 Dam has been accepted

HV71 Dam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of people from Oldham
added a link pointing to Nicole Jackson
Winthrop, Massachusetts
added a link pointing to NWHL

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Toronto Six players

Thank you very much for creating the Category of Toronto Six players. Looking forward to the start of the season. Mark Staffieri (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Oldham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicole Jackson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

WP:WHOCKEY News – October 2020

Women's Ice Hockey Task Force Newsletter: October 2020

Hello WHOCKEY editors!

The Women's Football/Soccer Task Force uses periodic newsletters to keep its members looped in on task force happenings and adopting the practice may serve useful for WP:WHOCKEY – let’s give it a try! If you have any feedback or ideas regarding the WP:WHOCKEY newsletter, please post on the news talk page. This newsletter is sourced and minimally altered from the WOSO April 2018 newsletter created by our own Hmlarson.

Drawing further inspiration from WP:WOSO, work has begun on a few initiatives that will emphasize making more WHOCKEY links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. The hope is that the initiatives will make it easier for editors to find the pages and topics of most interest to them.

Initiative pages are currently in the works and will be fully functional by the second week of the month. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, once the initiatives are up and running, you’ll be able to sign up on an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles. If there is a subject that you feel ought to have an initiative of it’s own, creating your own initiative is welcomed and encouraged.

beta
WP:WHOCKEY
Initiatives
International Tournaments
& National Teams
PWHL
Elite Leagues
League Initiatives
College Leagues
Diversity
Emerging &
Underrepresented
Sister Sports
Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NHOCKEY (which only includes players on women's national teams at the highest tier of IIHF competition)? Often times there is enough media coverage to meet WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. Be sure to tag the task force on the talk page of new articles with: {{WikiProject Women's sport|icehockey=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
This is the last month of the AUG-SEP-OCT spotlight on Diversity in Women's Ice Hockey

During the spotlight on diversity, editors are encouraged to celebrate the array of identities represented within the sport by improving or creating bio pages for ice hockey people of various cultures, ethnicities, heritages, religious beliefs, sexual orientations, gender identities, abilities, and other diverse characteristics.

Next month kicks off the NOV-DEC-JAN spotlight on Collegiate Leagues!



Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement?
Add them to the Open Tasks page.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WHOCKEY editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's ice hockey (WHOCKEY)!

Women's Ice Hockey Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Layout, design, and significant portions of content created by Hmlarson with additions from NHCLS and spitzmauskc.
Sent by: Spitzmauskc (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC); Updated by: Spitzmauskc (talk) 02:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  1. ^ Ransome, Miranda (2020-09-11). "Announcement regarding the Australian Women's Ice Hockey League". Twitter. Ice Hockey Australia. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  2. ^ "1. Bundesliga Damen - Grunddurchgang". eishockey.at (in German). Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  3. ^ "Soutěže žen - Týmy". hokej.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  4. ^ "EWHL Game Schedule". ewhl.com. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  5. ^ "Календарь 2020/2021". whl.khl.ru (in Russian). KHL. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  6. ^ "FFHG Féminin Élite – Formule". hockeyfrance.com (in French). FFHG. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  7. ^ "Ligen > Frauen Bundesliga > Spielplan". deb-online.de (in German). DEB. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  8. ^ "Italian HL W – Anno sportivo 2020-2021". fisg.it (in Italian). FISG. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  9. ^ "第9回女子日本アイスホッケーリーグ（１次リーグ）". jihf.or.jp (in Japanese). JIHF. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  10. ^ "New Zealand Women Ice Hockey League Competition Schedule". stats.iihf.com. IIHF. 2020-09-12. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  11. ^ "Liga Iberdrola de Hockey Hielo 2020/21". hockey.fedhielo.com (in Spanish). RFEDH. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  12. ^ "Women's League: Saisonstart unter speziellen Bedingungen". sihf.ch (in Swiss High German). SIHF. 2020-09-24. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  13. ^ Simpson, Craig (2020-09-30). "EIHA continues to work with government and other sports to bring hockey back". eiha.co.uk. Retrieved 2020-10-01.

Thanks for your help!

Saw that you added content to the diversity initiative page and wanted to thank you for the help! Since you’ve looked it over, do you feel like the format makes sense and is accessible? I worry that the amount of links and subsections might scare off new editors but I’m not sure how to make it easier to navigate without losing vital information. Do you think collapsible lists would be beneficial for the subsections of each country or am I overthinking this? If you’re interested, I’d love your input and feedback. Either way, thanks for what you have already contributed and a huge thanks for the incredible number of player bios you’ve been turning out – you’re really making an impact and it’s wonderful to see all the red links turning blue. Cheers, – Spitzmauskc (talk) 20:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Collapsable subsections might make sense, yeah. You could also always add a message at the top of the page saying something along the lines of "there's a lot of links, but don't be afraid to just start wherever you want" or what not. And thank you so much for all the work you've been putting in! It's great to have someone leading the charge for the project and for women's hockey on Wikipedia! NHCLS (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I’ll definitely test out some collapsible options. Thanks for the feedback and kind words :) Spitzmauskc (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020

WP:WOSO News: October 2020

Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.
Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.

Hello WOSO editors!

What a year to be alive. As usual (but perhaps even moreso since there have been unexpected quarantines), there has been a lot of activity on player, team, league and tournament-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of women's football / soccer. Great work!

Fall Focus: FA WSL articles

You may have noticed lots of great things going on for the top English league this year: the FA WSL. More (international!) broadcasts, top international player signings, improved media coverage, and increased viewership. Let's keep the momentum brewing, shall we?

Here's a sampling of articles that could use creation, expansion or updating. What will you commit to working on?

Historical Topics
Managers
Teams
Players
Other

See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors.

Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Spelling

Hello NHCLS. Thank you for your edits and updates in regards to women's hockey. I have noticed you use spelling variations common to British English on Canadian and American team pages. Please note that per MOS:ENGVAR and MOS:SPELLING, we use the language variation common to the sources primarily used for each subject. So in this case, it is fully appropriate to use "honours" in the Toronto Six article, but should be "honors" in the other NWHL teams that are all based in the United States. Furthermore, in this edit, it would be "organize" and "prioritize" in both Canadian (where both versions are fine) and American (only uses -ize) styles. It's not that big of deal, but it does help with maintaining page consistency on a specific subject. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 18:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brynäs IF Dam has been accepted

Brynäs IF Dam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Sagotreespirit (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leksands IF Dam

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hmlarson (talk) 14:12, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Modo Hockey Dam has been accepted

Modo Hockey Dam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 02:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Djurgårdens IF Hockey (women) has been accepted

Djurgårdens IF Hockey (women), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 08:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Misogyny in ice hockey

Long time coming. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Professional Women's Hockey Players Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hilary Knight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anissa Gamble has been accepted

Anissa Gamble, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo + c 01:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Neuchâtel Hockey Academy Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neuchâtel Hockey Academy Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AIK Hockey Dam has been accepted

AIK Hockey Dam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Women's Ice Hockey Task Force this month

WHOCKEY Task Force | Mid-November 2020


NOV-DEC-JAN Initiative: Collegiate Leagues!
College leagues are a huge part of women's ice hockey and over the next few months the task force is highlighting the important role these leagues play in the growth of the game. Naturally, the spotlight is on the NCAA Division I, but contributions related to any college league are welcomed – so long as they meet WP:GNG, go wild!

Though there are plenty of new articles to be created, current and former task force members have built up an incredible library of pages for conferences, programs, tournaments, and more, so there are plenty of ways to help – from small updates and cleanup to creating entirely new pages.
Check out the initiative page, where you can add any pages for creation, point out needed updates or additions to existing articles, and help us realize the collaborative power of the task force!

Cross-Project Initiatives

Join the conversation: Women's Ice Hockey Task Force talkpage
Initiatives: International | Elite Leagues | College | Diversity | Emerging | Sister-Sports

– Spitzmauskc (talk) 03:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collapse of the Canadian Women's Hockey League has been accepted

Collapse of the Canadian Women's Hockey League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 20:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Ridgewell has been accepted

Samantha Ridgewell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Meixner has been accepted

Anna Meixner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin Gehen has been accepted

Erin Gehen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:31, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breanne Wilson-Bennett has been accepted

Breanne Wilson-Bennett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Hanson has been accepted

Victoria Hanson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Ruggiero has been accepted

Emma Ruggiero, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominique Kremer has been accepted

Dominique Kremer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sydney Rossman has been accepted

Sydney Rossman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Alleva has been accepted

Rose Alleva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theresa Knutson has been accepted

Theresa Knutson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristin Lewicki has been accepted

Kristin Lewicki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elena Orlando has been accepted

Elena Orlando, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 11:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kayla Meneghin has been accepted

Kayla Meneghin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 11:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alyson Matteau has been accepted

Alyson Matteau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Greco has been accepted

Emma Greco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Kelly (ice hockey) has been accepted

Lauren Kelly (ice hockey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaimie Leonoff has been accepted

Jaimie Leonoff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devon Skeats has been accepted

Devon Skeats, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatiana Rafter has been accepted

Tatiana Rafter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 13:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bray Ketchum has been accepted

Bray Ketchum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul ❬talk❭ 16:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chelsea Laden has been accepted

Chelsea Laden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul ❬talk❭ 17:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadie Lundquist has been accepted

Sadie Lundquist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 05:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Curlew has been accepted

Amy Curlew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Connecticut Whale (NWHL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barre, Vermont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Tori Sullivan

I see that Tori Sullivan is the only remaining Boston Pride player without a published page and you've done most of the work already with your draft. Do you want me to add to that draft and see if we can get it published? Thank you for contributing to all these pages. Puffycoombes — Preceding undated comment added 23:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Please go ahead! The more people working on the drafts, the merrier. And thank you for your contributions to Boston Pride-related pages! I'm not a Pride fan, but they're going to be a hell of a team this season. It's going to be great. NHCLS (talk) 10:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I added career stats, honors, photo and some new links, etc. I'm not sure how to tie it to the wikidata and I think you still need to be the one who publishes it. Puffycoombes — Preceding undated comment added 15:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Becca Gilmore

Hello, NHCLS, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Becca Gilmore, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becca Gilmore.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 21:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Becca Gilmore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Becca Gilmore, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becca Gilmore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Scheer has been accepted

Amy Scheer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 03:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenna Rheault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Paul's School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allie Morse has been accepted

Allie Morse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

warmly, ezlev. talk 02:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Marisa Ingemi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marisa Ingemi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marisa Ingemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Omberg (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah!💬 18:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, NHCLS! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah!💬 18:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hope to edit with you again in the future

I was very sorry to see you have moved from active to inactive status with WP:WHOCKEY and I’ve missed seeing your username on my article watchlist and in the new articles section of the task force. Since you’ve blanked your user page, I’d imagine it is unlikely that you’ll see this message but I couldn’t leave without thanking you for all you have done to further women’s hockey coverage on Wikipedia – your contributions have fundamentally changed coverage of ice hockey for the better. I hope you will consider returning to active status if you are ever in a position to do so again. Best wishes and thank you a million times! – Spitzmauskc (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tori Sullivan has been accepted

Tori Sullivan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

warmly, ezlev. talk 03:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tamara Thiérus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamara Thiérus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Thiérus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zsófia Jókai Szilágyi has been accepted

Zsófia Jókai Szilágyi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

WHOCKEY News – April 2021

Women's Ice Hockey Task Force Newsletter: April 2021

Finland‘s defensive stalwarts Jenni Hiirikoski and goaltender Noora Räty stifle a goal attempt by Elin Holmlöv of Sweden during the 2011 World Championship.
Finland‘s defensive stalwarts Jenni Hiirikoski and goaltender Noora Räty stifle a goal attempt by Elin Holmlöv of Sweden during the 2011 World Championship.

Happy Spring WHOCKEY editors!

After more than a year without international women’s ice hockey, we’re finally just a month away from the 2021 IIHF Women's World Championship! The IIHF Worlds, in partnership with the Olympic Games, are the most watched annual women’s ice hockey tournaments in the world and spark more interest in the women’s game than any other events. We have a great opportunity to enrich the fan experience by offering up-to-date and informative articles about players, national teams, and other subjects related to the tournament.

The only women's players included in WP:NHOCKEY are players who have competed in the Top Division of the World Championship – meaning a bevy of player bios will get to be created in the next month. Hungary is set to make its Top Division debut and Denmark is returning to the Top Division for the first time since 1992. What an exciting time to be editing!

Articles related to the 2021 Worlds that are in need of creation, updates, or edits are collected at the National Teams & International Tournaments initiative page. Please add to the list if you find something in need of attention so we may collaborate and help one another in the coming weeks.

beta
WP:WHOCKEY
Initiatives
International Tournaments
& National Teams
PWHL
Elite Leagues
League Initiatives
College Leagues
Diversity
Emerging &
Underrepresented
Sister Sports
Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NHOCKEY (which only includes players on women's national teams at the highest tier of IIHF competition)? Often times there is enough media coverage to meet WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. Be sure to tag the task force on the talk page of new articles with: {{WikiProject Women's sport|icehockey=yes}}

2020–21 Season in Women's Ice Hockey Leagues

What a wild ride the 2020–21 season has been! Many leagues were able to complete the season despite the need for alternations and amendments with respect to COVID-19. Hearty congratulations to all of the league champions – 2020–21 is definitely one for the history books.

2021 League Champions


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement?
Add them to the Open Tasks page.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WHOCKEY editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's ice hockey (WHOCKEY)!

Women's Ice Hockey Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Layout, design, and significant portions of content created by Hmlarson with additions from NHCLS and Spitzmauskc.

  1. ^ "Aranyérmes hétvége a DEBL bajnokságban!-összefoglaló". KMH (in Hungarian). 2021-03-15. Retrieved 2021-04-01.
  2. ^ "Championnats et compétitions – Classement Féminin Elite". French Ice Hockey Federation (in French). Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  3. ^ "（試合結果のご案内）第９回全日本女子アイスホッケーリーグファイナル | 道路建設ペリグリンオフィシャルサイト". douken.co.jp (in Japanese). 2021-03-02. Retrieved 2021-04-01.
  4. ^ "2020 New Zealand Women Ice Hockey League". New Zealand Ice Hockey Federation. Retrieved 2021-04-01.
  5. ^ "Liga Iberdrola de Hockey Hielo 2020/21". RFEDH (in Spanish). Retrieved 2021-04-01.
  6. ^ "WNIHL Elite". English Ice Hockey Association. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  7. ^ "Women's Division III NCAA tournament". USCHO.com. Retrieved 2021-04-01.

– Spitzmauskc (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haley Mack has been accepted

Haley Mack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chelsey Brodt-Rosenthal has been accepted

Chelsey Brodt-Rosenthal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Brickner has been accepted

Jordan Brickner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hmlarson (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Christina Putigna

Information icon Hello, NHCLS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christina Putigna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ève Gascon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ève Gascon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ève Gascon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kncny11 (shoot) 18:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)