A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
@Ss112 But these “EPs” have 2-4 tracks on them which means the count as a single. By comparison earlier when Noel was in Oasis the singles had 4 tracks, the only difference is that those singles are named after the opening track, by all means Wait and Return for example is a single. The problem with lumping all these EPs in one chart is that some are eligible on the singles charts and others on the Albums chart. It’d be very confusing if one column refers to the Uk physical Singles Chart and the EP directly above it was charting on the Uk Albums chart. N1TH Music (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Contern, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eitermillen for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.
If you don't want Eitermillen to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Thank you so much, N1TH Music, for your highly informative article on Contern. You have included an impressive amount of detail, making it far more useful than the other language versions. I know Contern well as one of my daughters lives there. The article seems to me to be a good candidate for GA. Please keep me informed of your development of other articles about Luxembourg.--Ipigott (talk) 17:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott I greatly appreciate the support, however it's important to note in spite of how detailed the article already is, I'm still far from being finished (The sheer number of sources and information available was completely unprecedented when I started this article) Also I wouldn't nominate it for GA just yet, while the bulk of the information was written this year, some of it I added 2 years ago and needs some copy editing as I wasn't such a good editor back then to say the least. As for what else I'll do about articles in Luxembourg, well I'm mostly fixated on Contern at the moment, I decided focussing on one specific article would be best for me improving my writing and getting a better grasp on wikipedia's features. Why did I select Contern? Well because I live here therefore obtaining photography is significantly easier. N1TH Music (talk) 19:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your explanations. As you can see from my user page, a few years ago I spent quite a bit of my editing time on helping to bring articles on Danish cities up to GA standard. I therefore have a pretty good idea of what's entailed. I had noticed a few of the details were dated and am pleased to hear you intend to bring them up to date. I could continue copy-editing if you think it's useful at this stage. Up to now, there have been only nine GA-rated Luxembourg articles, mostly on the winter olympics. It would therefore be good to have one related to places in Luxembourg too. So if you need assistance with any particular details, just let me know. And please continue to work on your planned improvements. There's certainly no rush.--Ipigott (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott Well there's one thing that I could do with some help with in the Contern article in the Geography section there's a table of all the rivers and streams that run through the commune, I've made templates for each which have since been nominated for deletion under WP:INDISCRIMINATE while I agree that Template:Gaardebaach and Template are overdoing it a little as they are very small brooks with very little information available well anywhere about them. I think the rest of the templates are useful both within the Contern article and potentially within their own article such is the case with Template:Trudlerbaach albeit they could do with some cleanup and making them more streamlined. My point is the discussion is at a dead end at the moment with nobody other that the nominator and myself commenting on the discussion so perhaps you could share your thoughts, thanks. N1TH Music (talk) 11:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a compromise at this stage would simply be to add the names of the rivers and streams in running text, especially as there are no EN articles about most of them. One of my basic principles in editing Wikipedia is to avoid confrontation. As things progress, it may be possible to include some of them in List of rivers of Luxembourg.--Ipigott (talk) 16:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Recommendations for future work
After going through the article for copy editing, I must say I am really impressed with the amount of detail you have included. In addition to your efforts to bring the article up to date, there is a need for more citations (each paragraph or section should have at least one), if possible based on sources which are accepted as reliable. In addition, I think the main image could be improved. How about a picture of the main street in Contern? As for the content, as my daughter runs the café opposite the station in Oetrange, I certainly think it would be useful to cover some of the restaurants and cafés in the area. Ma Langue Sourit in Oetrange has two Michelin stars and there are certainly others worth mentioning. I won't bother you with any further edits to the article for the time being but please drop me a line if you think I can help you further. I could also help out with citations but only if you have difficulties yourself. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott Thanks for the help, my friend has a drone we were thinking of taking an Arial photo of the view from the water tower for the main image and I would add an image of the main street in the history section to show the distinction between the modern and older buildings on it. Or perhaps I could use multiple images similar to what you'd find on articles like London. As for restaurants I'm not exactly sure what to add because I don't want to add too much to the point where it seems straight out of Wikivoyage. Also in the history section I see you changed "Moulin de Milbech" into the Milbech Mill but actually "Moulin de Milbech is the official term for a separate locality similar to how you'd say "Brichermillen" not Bricher mill so I think it's best I change that back. N1TH Music (talk) 18:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't overdo it with multiple images but something a bit brighter would be better. As for restaurants, you could perhaps expand the Shopping section a bit without going into details. I've restored Moulin de Milbech.--Ipigott (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
No notice, no warning or anything remotely of the sorts, and the reason being seems to be to do with technical logs involving my alt account (User:Not N1TH Music).I’m confused partially because I have never made a single edit with that account and yet still have disclosed it. And partially because the apparent blocking administrator @Yamla was the very same administrator to have unblocked me last year in the first place and also back in December I disclosed this very issue, see: User talk:Yamla/Archive 42#My Alt Account. So surely this is a mistake right? N1TH Music (talk) 14:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla The address is 158.64.22.1, as I stated in the now accepted block request last December, this is the IP of my school and all the associated devices i.e. the government issued Ipad I am currently logged in. I thought this was all cleared up already though, seems weird for me to suddenly get blocked without warning or notice. N1TH Music (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That block is anon-only already and shouldn't be affecting this user. N1TH Music, please ensure you are signed in before attempting to edit. --Yamla (talk) 15:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla I’m definitely signed in, but I just tried again and it still says I’m blocked. However it seems to be referring to Not N1TH Music, even though I double checked I’m logged in at N1TH Music. Also this is a new phenomenon, I was editing no problem just last night. Do you know what the problem might be? N1TH Music (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note if you signed in to Not N1TH Music, you may be autoblocked. If that's the case, I'm afraid you'll need to wait a full 24 hours for the autoblock to clear. You were told to stick to one account in the previous discussion and that alternate account remains blocked. --Yamla (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello N1TH Music! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Can I make graphs on Excel, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eitermillen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
