User talk:Muzilon/Archive 1

Archive 1Archive 2

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Muzilon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 05:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hard Meat has been accepted

Hard Meat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Moss Cardwell has been accepted

James Moss Cardwell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 00:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

February 2016

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:James Cardwell (actor), from its old location at User:Muzilon/James Cardwell (actor). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Cardwell (actor) (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Cardwell (actor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Cardwell (actor). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: And Baby Makes Three has been accepted

And Baby Makes Three, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RadioFan (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Cardwell (actor) has been accepted

James Cardwell (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 InsertCleverPhraseHere  23:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harpoon (film) has been accepted

Harpoon (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Behind the Mask (1946 film) (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Imaginably notable and acceptable but still needs any further available amount of in-depth third-party sources overall (books, news, magazines, etc.).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Missing Lady has been accepted

The Missing Lady, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Behind the Mask (1946 film) has been accepted

Behind the Mask (1946 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 TT me 15:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


Sorry about the Undo

For some reason I couldn't undo the three IP vandalism edits without undoing your edit too. Devilmanozzy (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

@Devilmanozzy: No problem. :) Muzilon (talk) 06:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Muzilon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2017

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Thomas P. Lowry, from its old location at User:Muzilon/Thomas P. Lowry. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas P. Lowry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas P. Lowry. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas P. Lowry has been accepted

Thomas P. Lowry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmen Nigro has been accepted

Carmen Nigro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 16:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Florence "Florrie" Dugger merge

The admin objection to the merge isn't a strong one, nor is it based on any policy, MoS, etc. It could withstand a BOLD merger I think. Very little of the non-notable personal info needs to transfer over also. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 11:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

@GenQuest: Thanks for the response. Is there some subtle distinction between "merging" and "redirecting" that I should know about? --Muzilon (talk) 21:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
The merge should result in a redirect when you are finished. Merging of content should be confined to what is notable and actually referenced. A one-flash wonder may deserve a line or two regarding her (due to Weight) in an over-arching article such as would be the case here. The alternative is to simply bring her article to AfD for a deletion discussion (half of which will result in a decision to merge into the main article anyway). You can see the detailed directions of the merging process at the top of the proposed mergers page, or I can help. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kirsten Childs has been accepted

Kirsten Childs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 22:10, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

|}

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Muzilon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Pervo has been accepted

Richard Pervo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Caorongjin (talk) 22:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Randall (photographer) has been accepted

Robert Randall (photographer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

  — Jeff G. ツ 11:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spivy has been accepted

Spivy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Hanna (writer) has been accepted

David Hanna (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 12:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lynne Sue Moon has been accepted

Lynne Sue Moon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Help me!

Hopefully a minor formatting query. I am improving the article on Annette Carell. I have split her filmography into two tables: film and TV appearances. The formatting of the second table (TV roles) has turned out rather tricky. It looks like "cellpadding" or double line spacing has somehow been applied, and I can't figure out how to make it single spacing like the first table.--Muzilon (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

There seems to have been some unnecessary spacing, which I've now removed.[1] Is that what you were looking for? The two tables look pretty much the same now. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 12:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Perfect, thanks!--Muzilon (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Muzilon: Hullo, Muzilon! Part of the problem was your style="background:#ccc; text-align:center;" business. Based on where you placed it, the table was not actually affected by the style change. For the record, I think that aligning the text to center wouldn't actually help you in this case, but if you want to change the table style, here's how to do it:
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- !Year ! Production ! Role ! Notes |-
Obviously, that example is condensed (I couldn't get the nice spacing to show up, but it does in the source to this talk page). If you want to copy my example while you are editing the source to this page, just don't use the <nowiki> or the <code> bits... The background:#ccc business doesn't actually do anything in your current setup because the style tag represents CSS and CSS only supports a background-color property. Adding the nonexistent background tag is what prevented you from seeing the results of the text:align tag. I would just delete the background color thing anyway since the default table color looks just fine. I went ahead and made the necessary changes to the table in your article, just to make it a bit easier for you to see what I meant. I would recommend setting some default spacing definitions for your table rows (in px) just so that your tables are easier to read. For more information on tables, see this help article and for stylistic considerations, see this manual of style (MOS) article. Hope that helps! Let me know if you have any more questions! - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 13:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@ZfJames: Thanks! I didn't actually create the markup, I just attempted to split the existing table into two separate tables because the film and TV appearances were jumbled together. One thing I do notice is that the 1961 short film "Wings of Death" in the first table still has the "padding" - how do we remove it?--Muzilon (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Muzilon: There was a line break after the | in the 'short film' notes section, which I removed. That should fix it.  :) - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 13:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
You didn't remove it. You might've tried but I was there first and so the credit in the article's history is mine.[2] Not that it matters but believe me when I tell you that you wouldn't want anyone to think this IP is you. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 13:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teo Savory has been accepted

Teo Savory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

You don't need to use AfC

Hi, the sea of green above shows you're a very competent editor, you don't need to submit new articles to AfC you can just create such article directly in main-space yourself. You obviously understand the notability and referencing guidelines etc. In fact it would look like you were more the calibre of editor we could do with helping out review the AfC backlog (See Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants if interested). Keep up the good work. All the best, KylieTastic (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I like to have my submissions reviewed by another set of eyes before unleashing them upon Wikipedia. :) I am also not very familiar with "advanced" WP features like adding Authority Control boxes, so I appreciate that the AfC team usually does things like that.--Muzilon (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for May:

Women of the Sea Villains Women in Sport Central Eastern European women #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shootings of Alfred and Rosemary Podgis has been accepted

Shootings of Alfred and Rosemary Podgis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EROS message 12:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Help me! (Columns)

Is the {{Div col}} markup no longer supported? It isn't working properly on the bibliographies for Thomas P. Lowry and Paul Goble, for instance - the lists of their books are displaying as a single column, not two columns. --Muzilon (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Both appear as normal (i.e. two columns) to me. Feel free to re-open the helpme if necessary, but I think it might be a display issue on your end (try a cache purge?) Primefac (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
@Primefac: Hmmm, after some experimentation with different web browsers, I have found that the two columns magically turn into a single column if you increase the font size on your web browser. (I normally have my browser "zoomed" to about 120% because of my middle-aged eyesight!) --Muzilon (talk) 02:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, I suppose that's the upside (and downside) of based-on-your-browser column configuration - if the page isn't wide enough you don't actually get columns! Primefac (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Help me! (Tables)

Is there any simple way of centering all the tick boxes in the Filmography table of my draft article on Simon Nuchtern using visual editing? I can't see any option to do this with visual editing, and I'd rather not have to code each "tick" manually.--Muzilon (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

I think (in wikitext) you need to add style="text-align:center;"| before each {{aye}}. You could copy the wikitext table into something like notepad / wordpad / winword and then do a search and replace (ctrl-h) for {{aye}} to style="text-align:center;"|{{aye}}. I'll leave up the help in case there is another way. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
The short answer to your question is "no". In order to centre every column, you will have to follow the instructions (using source code) as described above. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 20:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Newspapers.com

Thanks for posting the question about Newspapers.com citations in the Teahouse. I use Newspapers.com almost daily in working on Wikipedia articles, and I did not realize that wording for citations had been changed from "open access" to "free access".

I don't know why an editor removed the "open access" template (rather than change it to "free access") or why the editor who responded to your Teahouse post considers "free access" to be inappropriate. I think it is good to let a reader know that he or she can see the original article without having to be a subscriber to Newspapers.com. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@Teblick: Thanks for your feedback. I found the Helpdesk response rather confusing too. I've now raised this matter at Wikipedia talk:Newspapers.com. --Muzilon (talk) 01:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the alert about the discussion at Newspapers.com. I have modified my Newspapers.com macro to eliminate any reference to access. I appreciate your help. Eddie Blick (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome. People who grumble "You shouldn't ask the same question on 2 or 3 different messageboards" don't seem to realise that sometimes that's the only way to get a straight answer on WP! Muzilon (talk) 23:12, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Roger Watkins Page Edit

I just wanted to thank you for the clarification on the Roger Watkins page. I didn't realize that it was a working title - hard to believe that the film was in production for so long.

Have a happy holidays!

100.1.84.146 (talk) 04:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome. Another one of those B-movies where the story behind the film is more interesting than the film itself. Season's Greetings! --Muzilon (talk) 07:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Cobb & Co. (restaurant) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cobb & Co. (restaurant). Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cobb & Co. (restaurant) has been accepted

Cobb & Co. (restaurant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 02:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Question

I just uploaded a company logo[3] using the upload wizard ("Fair Use"). Am I now supposed to fill in the WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#2 fields on the image's information page? Or is this not necessary for logos? Muzilon (talk) 08:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

It's necessary for all non-free files. Better yet, use {{Non-free use rationale logo}} instead of the generic template. 78.28.54.83 (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
A pity the Upload Wizard doesn't make that very clear. Muzilon (talk) 08:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Help me!

Where is the best place to ask for technical help with Wikipedia's mobile (Android) app? (Specifically, how to "purge" the cache.) Muzilon (talk) 03:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't use the App, so cannot answer your question. You can however ask this at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). – Ammarpad (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Detective Barnstar
For your crucial work in finding this reliable source for the Natalia Dyer article. Congratulations. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 01:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Wyngarde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Gazette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nancy Hsueh has been accepted

Nancy Hsueh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Redalert2fan (talk) 10:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iles Brody has been accepted

Iles Brody, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Sagotreespirit (talk) 03:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Walsh (writer) has been accepted

Walter Walsh (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Walsh (minister) has been accepted

Walter Walsh (minister), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 02:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emil Van Horn has been accepted

Emil Van Horn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)