This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mushroom. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. On 1st of March you edited the Embryonics Project page with the two tags copyedit and wikify. As I'm quite new to wikipedia, i.e. only 2 pages written and the first without many comments, I would like to know if you have some suggestions to improve the Embryonics page. Thank you in advance for your response. Tarpedien (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Dates that are given as ranges should follow the same patterns as given above for birth and death dates. Ranges that come up to the present (as of the time that the information was added to the article) should generally be given in ways that prevent their becoming counterfactually obsolete, e.g. from 1996 onward (as of October 2007), not from 1996 to the present; "the present" is a constantly moving target. In the main text of articles, the form 1996– (with no date after the en-dash) should not be used, though it is preferred in infoboxes and other crowded templates or lists, with the caveat that they may need to be examined by editors more frequently to see if they need to be updated; it is helpful to other editors to add an HTML comment immediately after such constructions, giving the as-of date, e.g.: <!--as of 10 October 2007-->. The form since 1996 should be used in favor of 1996–present in article text and infoboxes.
It does not say which one is better. First it says you should use onward or a similar form, then it says you should use since instead of –present. I think both are acceptable, however it would be a good idea to ask at Wikipedia Talk:DATE. Mushroom (Talk) 22:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
So, despite the fact that the documentary about Fawcett Farrah's Story was viewed by 8.9 million individuals the night it debuted and the documentary's popularity increased by 1,888% [1] in the week following her death, she is not important enough to be included in current events? I mean, i know 8.9 million is small in comparison to the total global population, but she was kind of a big deal to a LOT of people. (RFL8188 (talk) 07:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC))
Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for persons of extreme prominence, such as Ronald Reagan, John Paul II, or the Queen Mother.
This shows an inappropriate move from "political crisis" to "coup". To use admin tools in pushing a POV has lead to desysops by ArbCom before. I ask you to restore the neutral title instead of this having to go through the next step of in dealing with an inappropriate admin action. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Consensus does not apply, BLP does. A coup is a crime and no international courts have made a judgment on the matter. Ottava Rima (talk) 11:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Campo del Cielo
Thank you so very much for catching my errors in the Campo del Cielo article today (23 July 2009). Of course I should have not have added "squared" at the places I did. Writtenright (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Writtenright
Campo del Cielo (continued)
By the way, since you seem to be such a bright fellow, perhaps you can tell me whether this sentence (in section 2 of the article) needs editing (and if so, how), or do you find it acceptable as you left it: "The size of the main body is estimated as larger than 4 meters." It seems to me that a simple linear measure is inadequate here. Is the main body estimated as larger than 4 cubic meters or is it estimated as larger than 4 meters in diameter? Writtenright (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Writtenright
Question
I am new to Wikipedia and enjoy it very much.. I always have used it as a reference in the past but being able to edit and comment with other users is so fun! Anyways, On my watchlist, I see the name of the article, (diff) (hist) <name> and then (+/- a number) ... what does (diff) and the number mean? And the numbers are green for positive and red for negatives but they seem to be all over the place. Thanks for your help! Tdinatale (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
The numbers are used to allow an editor to quickly determine what an editor has changed on the watchlist by how many charaters or either added or deleted by their edit. If the change is +1 or -1 it is unlikely to be watched as closely as if one show -1638 or even a large removal of information from an article such as -23000. You will soon get the hang of it. Thanks ♠B.s.n.♥R.N.contribs13:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Hi Mushroom, was looking for The Frank Popp Ensemble entry and saw you had deleted it. I recall having read it back in 2007 or so and found it useful. Would you mind explaining your exact objections or undeleting? Thanks!Panthera germanicus (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Question
Hi Mushroom. Thank you for welcoming some time ago! I have a question. I just uploaded the picture Beigang Tourist Bridge.jpg on Wikimedia Commons and want to use it on Beigang, Yunlin. But the picture does not show up. Can you help me? (Is my first time using Wikimedia Commons...) With kindest regards (Ketchupheinz (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC))
Hello Mushroom. thank you for inviting me to the wikipedia page, I do hope I make alot of friends here and be able to know how to edit my own page and have fun here. Again thanks very much.Wood900X (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I've got a couple of questions, admittedly a little embarrassed I don't know the answers to.
1) What is the story with the "points system" that follows each edit, and who determines this?
2) I happen to have recently deleted some comments on my personal page. I noticed that this edit incurred a rating of some -2900 points or so! Thing is, I left these comments unmolested on my page for a good six months to demonstrate my own neutrality. I did figure it was about time to remove these out-of-context irate comments from another user who thought I was accusing him of bad faith. How can I archive these comments so that they do not appear on my page, but are saved in a way that shows that I'm not trying to hide any conversations?
Any help is appreciated! Thanks! Accipio Mitis Frux (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi! There is no "points system", that number is just the number of characters you added or removed. So if you remove some text it will be negative, however that negative number is not a judgment on the quality of your edits. About talk page archiving, the correct procedure is explained here: Help:Archiving a talk page. Feel free to contact me again if you need more help. Happy editing! Mushroom (Talk) 12:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Hello,
I thank you for the invitation but I am French and I already contribute on Wikipédia Français. It is just that from time to time I come to look for new information and that I see bad or not ended contributions. I know I would have difficulty in making both Wikipédia.
Thank you. Still Friendly.
--Skarock (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC) (^_^)
Susanna Maiolo
Mushroom if you fully read the article on "Pope Benedict XVI meets and forgives assailant Susanna Maiolo" it clearly states "While at Subiaco she was visited by Pope Benedict’s personal secretary, Monsignor Georg Gaenswein. The Vatican said that the Pope had wanted to show his “concern for her wellbeing”. So the title that I use is correct. Changing it again would be a vandalism against the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.56.247 (talk) 20:36, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please read the article fully. She met them both, the pope in Rome and the secretary in Subiaco. The news is that she met the pope. Mushroom (Talk) 20:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
I was referring to the times, it seemed more factual. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.56.247 (talk • contribs) 02:00, January 15, 2010
Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Hello Mushroom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks for the welcome, but actually the IP User talk:67.247.204.64 is me [2]. I forgot I wasn't in a secure login tab. That said, I was quite glad to see it - if I were a genuine new user, being welcomed would make me feel much more inclined to stick around. -- Pakaran14:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
An article about "Trisha Krishnan" has been edited in a very wrong way. Also he is been using abusive & non- sense words. I tried reverting that page back, But he is editing it back, If possible, you could revert that page to old version & block that page from editing it. Below is the link for it , hope it helps.
Yes I looked at your edit. Do you understand what a reliable source is? Do you understand what notability is? A couple of references to a MySpace blog, (of unknown authorship) and promotional bumph from record companies are neither. Lame Name (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes I do. That MySpace blog is written by the band itself, so your claim that its authorship is unknown is patently false. Blabbermouth is a notable and reliable source, BBC is of course even more notable and reliable, Candlelight Records is a notable label. Given that the article already has these three sources, adding a fourth primary one is consistent with WP:RS. And by the way when you revert my edits you should keep the improvements I made to the article instead of reverting everything just to remove the MySpace link. Mushroom (Talk) 15:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Nonsense! I have taken the article off my Watch list as I am not particularly bothered either way. What is of concern is the undermining of the overall quality of Wikipedia by crap articles such as this one. Wikipedia has a requirement for verifiability which is only interested in "verifiability, not truth". Anyone can set up a MySpace page without some verifiable sources we have no way of knowing who they are. Do you think Jimi Hendrix wrote "Jimi Hendrix's Latest Blog Entry" on his MySpace page? The BBC page says "We currently have no biography for this artist." and then refers back to this article. Which is about the measure of this band and this article. Where are the "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself"? Lame Name (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
That MySpace page is confirmed as official because it is linked by the band's official website, their current label's website, and their former label's website, so there is no doubt about the author. I also think the band is notable according to WP:MUSIC (#5 two albums on a notable label, #6 a notable musician). However I'm not saying the article is OK as it currently is, and it is my intention to improve it as much as possible in the next few weeks. I suggest you visit the page again in two weeks or so and if you still think it's crap feel free to nominate it for deletion. I will vote against it but in the end it's not up to me to decide. Mushroom (Talk) 06:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Anne Ryan Article
Hi I just wanted to say that you deleted an article I created about Anne ryan. It is about a very famous prostitute here in Ireland and her case was heavily covered by the Irish media at the time. Everyone in Ireland knows who she is so I don't think it should have been deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EFS Ox (talk • contribs) 17:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits on List of sole survivors of aviation accidents or incidents? I spent several hours researching Google Archives and the ASN database to update this list. There being no article in Wikipedia on specific plane crashes does not mean that these crashes never occured.
Rather than reverting edits, you should take the time to verify yourself, through Google Archives, whether the information I put in is accurate. In the meantime, I cancelled your reversal and I plan on referring to the sources I used to get the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.204.34.216 (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the wellcome
I already have a long-term experience in Spanish Wikipedia. I must probably wont bee editing much of English Wikipedia cause is not my native language, except may be for some ocassional cosmetic edit here and there. But thanks for the wellcomming. --Lucifer2000 (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing that up
Thanks for the warm welcome and for explaining the images policy. I created my account a while ago, but hadn't started editing until pretty recently. Again, thank you for your help!
Thanks for uploading File:Atheros.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
YOu blocked 202.159.203.0/24 indefinitely back in 2006 with the reason '256 Indian open proxies'. I don't see any suggestion that they are still proxy, they're in a residential ISP range with Mahanagar Telephone. If you have any evidence or objection to my unblock I'd appreciate it if you could weigh in, since you made the block. ~Alison C. (aka Crazytales)19:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mushroom. I'm planning to write an article about an early Australian aviator. If I create a sandbox in which to write and test my article, can anybody else access that sandbox for either reading or editing purposes?Lexysexy (talk) 03:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, the sandbox will be publicly readable and editable. You should create the page in your userspace, for instance at User:Lexysexy/NAME where NAME is the name of the article, then when it is finished move it to article space. Most people won't edit the page while it is in your userspace, since it is good form not to do so without permission. Mushroom (Talk) 09:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm intrigued by the "most people"! However, I'll try to have it textually finalised before putting it up.Lexysexy (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MFVF5wu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:MFVF5p.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MFVF5p.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Request undeletion of page on the writer and sociologist David Robins
I would argue that he meets the notability criteria based on the following facts:
His obituary appeared in the UK national press:
www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/david-robins-397606.html
www.guardian.co.uk/news/.../guardianobituaries.pressandpublishing
Hello. The article I deleted was about a different, American David Robins. Feel free to create a new one about the notable writer. Mushroom (Talk) 14:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Sudan Oil War
Hi Mushroom, it looks like the article at Sudan Oil War got moved but not its talk page. Could you move the talk page as well? I believe I'm not able to do it because of the edited redirect at the original location. Thanks much for your help with this! Khazar2 (talk) 07:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
It appears that I accidentally reverted one of your edits, and, worse still, called it vandalism! I have no idea how that happened, at all ... I certainly didn't mean to do that! My most profuse and grovelling apologies; please forgive me! Pesky (talk) 06:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! It's my first (hopefully of many). I know it's the oldest excuse in the book, but it's actually not beyond the realms of possibility that I left that page open on history, and a wandering feline trod on my mouse ... I shall have stern words with them! (And, more to the point, remember not to leave pages open on the history tab, with Twinkle available, lol!) I positively cringed with mortification when I saw that – what a horrible shock to wake up to! Pesky (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Actually I have cats too, so I understand completely. Just the other day one of them sent some incomprehensible, apparently random (but who can tell?) Skype messages to a friend of mine. She probably thought I was out of my mind! Well there's not much you can do to stop the mighty felines – when you're away, the cats will play! Mushroom (Talk) 17:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
You have to love them, though :o) We have one 17-year-old moggie, and two gorgeous Maine Coons, the bigger of which is just a shade under 4ft long, nose-tip to tail-tip, and weighs around 10Kg ... he's a very big cat!
Also, I was wondering if there was any sort of community I could join or participate in. I do not want something too intensive, but if I could contribute a half hour a couple times a week or so, that'd be a good group for me. I have a decent background, knowledge, and interest in politics, law, and history, so I would prefer if it could relate to something along those lines. Anyways, I just want some way I can feel a little more involved in things. Thanks! --~ScholarlyBreeze~01:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello there, would you please be able to help me ? Previously you have deleted a page called "Ecoute". I would like to create a page with the same title but for a software application. I am not sure I did it correctly as i called it "Ecoute_(application)" and it can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecoute_(application). Are you able to assist ? Should I delete the one I have created and recreate another one with the simplest title "Ecoute" (and easier to search for readers) ?
Furthermore it is the title of the software (as opposed to Ecoute Application). Thank you for your input. :-) Ludopedia (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
I do thank you so much for your help, as I am a newbie and this was my first article. THANK YOU. I am a bit converned though because since yesterday there is an IP address (23.23.86.226) that keeps vandalizing the page. Actions for the past 48 hours evidently indicate vandalism (removes all content of the page & by adding sexual content (words) that are out of place and not appropriate with the subject). I am not sure what to do and have logged the Ip address to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism I am not sure what else to do. Ludopedia (talk) 12:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The page has not been vandalised since your intervention, so I wanted to THANK YOU. Also, I see you have improved the article: fantastic. I have studied scrupulously your edits, one by one, and this is was a great learning exercise for me, since I am new to Wikipedia. Thanks. All the best. Ludopedia (talk) 11:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
The source I used does not seem innappropriate to me although of course better known sources can be found to be used as references. My sincere apologies for any trouble I may have caused. That was not at all my intention. Mythic Writerlord (talk) 22:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Well I think it is inappropriate because it is not a well-established news organization as defined in our reliable sources guideline. The website was created just a few months ago, it doesn't name its editorial staff, and the owner of the site self-identifies as "a journalist in training". Please don't add it back. Mushroom (Talk)
You seem a bit overzealous. The source isn't really all that bad is it? It can be used to reference some articles. Maybe not when better sources are available but still. Mythic Writerlord (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
I spent a fair amount of time trying to figure out whether the accent should be acute or grave. Both versions are attested. Probably I went with acute because a grave accent on an e at the end of a word really looks pretty strange (the single-letter word è has a grave accent, but I can't immediately think of another exception, and all the conjunctions that end in ché have acute ones). Do you have a particular rationale for this choice?
The "è" in Santanchè is pronounced /ɛ/. Italian grammar mandates the use of the grave accent for /ɛ/ and the acute accent for /e/ (though, as you can see, not everyone follows the rule — often not even the newspapers!).
Hi Mushroom
I have changed the date for the death of Mae Busch to 20th April as this is the date clearly indicated on her death certificate, I have given the reference numbers in the article.
Drnoakes (talk) 01:27, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Takahiro Iwasaki, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Reflection and Site-specific. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for uploading File:Path Finder.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archivio di Nuova Scrittura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siracusa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I wonder why would incometent people intervene and, even worse, remove edits they understand nothing about? Sigwald must apologize or, at least, present a substanial argument, not in the least, similar to his psudoargument. Have him make his point at the talk page, or he must never ever edit a page he does not understand!Expresser (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Secondo te un redirect come questo, scorretto in italiano e non attestato in alcuna fonte, va mantenuto o no? Lo chiedo a te, così so come regolarmi in futuro qui su en.wiki. Grazie mille, --Epìdosis19:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
@Epìdosis: Ti chiedo scusa per il ritardo. Il motivo per cui non si può fare la cancellazione immediata è che dal criterio R3 sono esclusi i redirect che risultano da spostamenti di pagina. Questo perché è possibile che ci siano siti esterni che contengono link al vecchio nome, e in caso di cancellazione smetterebbero di funzionare. Volendo puoi comunque fare una richiesta di cancellazione alla pagina Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, perché in effetti è un errore e nessuno usa quel nome fuori da Wikipedia. Detto questo, l'amministratore che ti ha risposto è stato decisamente poco gentile, perciò mi scuso a nome degli amministratori di en. Mushroom (Talk) 21:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Pinheiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. damiens.rf17:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martine van Loon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Mushroom.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Mushroom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Mushroom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
