Speedy deletion nomination of Indian Numismatics Association
Hello Muhammad Abul Fazal,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Indian Numismatics Association for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:
If you had intended to make a personal user page for yourself, you can do so at User:Muhammad Abul Fazal. However, you don't need to submit it for review to Articles for Creation; this process reviews drafts that are destined for the main article space. Thanks!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Muhammad Abul Fazal/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Muhammad Abul Fazal,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae/tlk11:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
)
Historicity of Muhammad
Have you read the above mentioned article? Don't you think we should do something about it? I'm new to this editing stuff. I don't understand why i can't get it deleted. Even if i'd try to edit it with valid sources, the administrators would revert it. And even if this article's Subject line matches the so-called policy of Wikipedia, the content it contains is nothing but hoax! Haxeeb1987 (talk) 19:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free image use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Kendriya Vidyalaya BHU, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Muhammad Abul Fazal. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. There are 10 non-free content criterion that each use of a non-free image must satisfy for it to be considered OK to use and it is the responsibility of the editor who wishes to use a non-free image to provide a non-free use rationale which clearly shows how these criteria are satisfied. So, if you want to use File:kvslogo.jpg in Kendriya Vidyalaya BHU, then you need to provide the required non-free use rationale. Please be advised, however, that this may not be as easy as it seems because in general the non-free content use policy does not automatically allow the use of "parent-entity" logos in articles about "child-entities" as explained in item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI; in other words, Kendriya Vidyalaya BHU seems to be one school (a child entity) in the Kendriya Vidyalaya school system (the parent entity). In such cases, Wikipedia does not allow the use of the school system logo to be used for identifying individual schools and logo specific to the individual school should be used instead.
Perhaps you did not notice the edit sums I left the previous times I removed the image; therefore, I'm posting this here to provide more explanation. Please do not re-add this file again to the article without addressing the non-free issues I've mentioned above because doing so is clearly in violation of relevant Wikipedia policy, and continuing to do so will eventually lead to an administrator being asked to intervene. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask as WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:47, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome!
Hello, Muhammad Abul Fazal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caucasian race, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Page time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Page (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
