I mean i did give a valid reason the moroccan state itself views him as the founding father? What reason would you need more? Muasis (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anthem
he official name of the Moroccan National Anthem is "Annashid Asharif" nashid al watani just means national anthem and is obviously not the official name besides even the moroccan constitution gives it the name can you please quote the part of the constitution that you're referring to? M.Bitton (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I cant search right now but besides its quite known that it is the official name heck its even on the english as well as the arabic wikipedia page yall should be professionell enough to know that since you been editing here for years Muasis (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And ofc it will not always be called the cherifian anthem in every document just like the king will not always be reffered to as his majesty in every document think a bit smarter please Muasis (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You made a a specific claim (even the moroccan constitution gives it the name) that I'm asking you to substantiate. Can you do that or not? M.Bitton (talk) 17:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Im not Chronically online to find the pdf of the Arabic constitution to show you and idc atp anymore guys like you seem to prefer misinformation so do what you wanna do Muasis (talk) 20:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Father of the Nation
The "Sources" that proved he was considered the father of the nation somehow are random news atticles how do those prove anything? Ill guess you guys are seriously slow perhaps so ill just give up Muasis (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will not adress anything if people like you prefer misinformation good for you im not gonna waste my time like this anymore Muasis (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So adding the Situation from which they wanted independence from which was obviously the french and spanish protectorate just like the article itself says is poorly sourced? This must be a joke similarly getting rid of the "Bin Yusef" was a simple choice based on logic as he is barely reffered to as such but you seem to think that you know better than everyone so i will not even try to argue Muasis (talk) 21:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend being more cautious, as your contribution count is relatively low. Perhaps focus on working more on pages where you’re less likely to encounter these kinds of issues. Once you’ve gained more experience, you can return to Amazigh-related articles if you notice any problems. You’ll be in a better position to make meaningful changes by then. Keep in mind that you may not fare well if you’re not thoroughly familiar with the guidelines, especially when dealing with contributors who clearly have a higher contribution count—even if they’re in the wrong or talk in a similar fashion to you, they're less likely to run into issues. TahaKahi (talk) 10:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
