User talk:Mr Thant

Welcome!

Hello, Mr Thant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Simply south 21:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Underground lines

Hey, Thant, I can't find any broken links, so may I ask politely why are you making such a fuss? These are articles referring to specific TfL lines. Please consider this fact! BTW it wasn't me, but other users who actually changed the article names using the (move) button. So will you rename c2c to "C2C"? That's in small case! Sunil060902 13:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NEXG Template

Regarding your contributions to Template talk:NEXG, please see this for what I have written (my reply). Thank you -- Arriva436 (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Balham sta

I am just saying, please do not do the merger or revert of Balham tube station and Balham railway station until the discussion has at least had a few days. Simply south (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my comments here if you haven't already done so. Nevertheless, I second the above request. --RFBailey (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Balham

Was this you? I agree that things seem to have stalled, and would like to do something about it, but it might also be a red rag to a bull. --RFBailey (talk) 17:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Balham station edit war

Will you please stop edit-warring with User:Nick Cooper (who has also received this message) on Balham station and related pages. Please discuss it on the talk page instead. Otherwise I'll have to report both of you to WP:AN/I. --RFBailey (talk) 01:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heathrow Connect

I fail to see how my providing documentary evidence that counters what you have put (and which you don't seem to have provided any reference for) is "being unhelpful", but "whatever". I'll just leave it to someone else to make the changes I've made and get into an argument with you. But I notice that you seem to have a history of confrontation, so I'll take what you say with a large pinch of salt Hammersfan, 14/03/08, 16.15 GMT

Crossrail

I noticed you deleated the section about Crossrail 3 on the grounds that alwaystouch.com is not a reliable source.

I'm just wondering why you don't consider it to be reliable and if you'll be removing other references to that site's articles D-Notice (talk) 12:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

East London Line Extension to Clapham Junction

Mr Thant, have you heard anything recently about this line? Funding? Dates? North Battersea Station? Thanks.81.129.156.184 (talk) 21:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Outer South London Line for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outer South London Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outer South London Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]