User talk:Mr. Lefty/Archive 2

This page is an archive. To leave me a new message, go to User talk:Mr. Lefty.

Archives:

Final Entry from Mythology8

Mr. Lefty, I will gladly update, remove and/or edit the page as you so wish. I will state to you directly that I adimantly disagree, but will not push this issue. I will simply leave a link to a recent article where Mr. Murtha himself is quoted. I don't think there is anything wrong with a direct quote. Respectfully, Mythology8

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page

A quick thank you for reverting the vandalism by User:172.144.192.236 on my talk page. Much appreciated. Gwernol 16:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

do your research

Mr. Left, please do your research before you modify other people's work (the redirect on newly created Horham page). Horham England is NOT Horam England. Horham is in Suffolk, Horam in East Sussex.

Page moves ON WHEELS!!!

You might want to act a bit more appropriately than moving things to titles with ON WHEELS!!! in the pagename. You were blocked automatically for pagemove vandalism by Curps' bot. I've unblocked you... please don't do it again. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 20:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. It's just that the page title said "move this," so I did. I figured it was a joke page, and you know me and joke pages...anyway, I'm really sorry, and it won't happen again. Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 20:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No need to apologise. No harm done. I like being immature as well. It's just I don't want you to get blocked again. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 20:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was testing to see if I moved "movethis1" to "movethis2", and I moved "movethis2" back to "movethis1" would work. --GeorgeMoney T·C 21:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Oh, by the way: Deskana, or any other admin, can you unblock autoblocks? If so, my autoblock is #186181. Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 21:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unblocked. You should be good to go. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 22:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unblocked #186294 try now. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You don't appear in the Block log. I left another message at ANI. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I unblocked another autoblocked address; try it now. — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Theft

Huh?! How'd you find out?? Anyway, the Jimbo vs Willy userbox is a template, produced by {{User Jimbo v. Willy}} Cheers, The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 10:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A rant about Ann Coulter

Coulter. facts are not vandalism. Coulter chose 06/06/06 as the date to release her book. Coulter continuously and repeatedly makes venemous, outrageous, mean-spirited remarks aimed to do harm to people. She fits the warnings in Matthew 7 verse 15 through 23 perfectly. She ignores facts in the remarks she makes and attempts to recreate the truth through her unsubstantiated comments. In conclusion, venemous lies, claiming christian beliefs while working as a hate monger and attacking widows and orphans in addition to anyone working for their beliefs which are consistent with New Testament values all while claiming divine assistance. If that doesn't describe the Whore of babylon I don't know what does. Suffice it to say the text should at the very least read, some believe her to be the whore of babylon should be included.

Additionally, her remarks about President Clinton are very serious charges against a former head of government. They should be qualified as unsubstantiated remarks and changing that text is vandalism in a Coulter style attempt to make something true just by saying it

There is nothing neutral about ann coulter or her remarks. Her quotes are extremely provoking and slanderous. If wikipedia is going to giver her quotes life then some criticisms should be allowed. Let her defend the Babylon thing the next time she goes on television. She gets a heck of a lot more coverage than anyone else in this forum.

Telling children their mothers are happy their fathers are dead. Accusing a former president of rape. These comments are beyond reasonable. Some reasoning for her outrageous behavior should be discussed. After all these comments are something you would expect to here from a person with serious pych disorders. Television media does not play rantings and ravings of mentally ill people and provide them a forum. Some investigation into why she is given a forum is legitimate. One explanation could be she is the whore of babylon. Perhaps not the only explanation, but I haven't heard any strong arguments for other reasons her statements are aired. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.251.179.41 (talk • contribs).

she is herself a string of wild conspiracy theories and her quotes are not npov. If nothing else a see also to Matthew 7:15-23 Warning against false prophets should be included.

"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheeps clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathere from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit. A sound tree cannot bear evil fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will kmow them by their fruits.

Not everyone who says to me lord, lord, shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name and do mighty works in your name? And then I will declare to them, "I never knew you, depart from me you evildoers.""

Cite Jesus Christ, King James, Matthew 7:15 - 23. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.251.179.41 (talk • contribs).

I don't understand

I don't understand ho to upload a picture. I did what you said, but it said that the file was empty! Every time I try to upload a pic, it says that! I am clearly doing something wrong! Could you please point out whatever is wrong with what I'm doing?

Ddrfreakddrfreak p.s. it won't sign right, so I'll put the info in manually: ddrfreak came on june 13, 2006 at 4:20 p.m. to Mr. Lefty's talk page.

Congratulations

Congratulations on becoming a Willy on Wheels sockpuppet. It is expected that you move pages on wheels "for a laugh" more often. Help bring Wikipedia on its wheels! Willy on Wheels! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.188.152.16 (talk • contribs).

I'm not Willy on Wheels! I moved a test page and Curps's bot blocked me. Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no category Diptera

Hi. Just to let you know - there is a well-established category "Flies", and "Diptera" is not used - that's already in the Taxobox. Peace, Dyanega 18:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

are you monitoring all redirect pages?

within 30 seconds of me editing a redirect page i do not think it is coincidence you have reverted the edits immedatly please my i ask why you are doing this and if so please can you tell me how to redirect to the real page without you reverting my edits.Lucy-marie 19:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC) fine if you want to be autocratic why not lets have no redirects and one plage in British english and one in american english.Lucy-marie 19:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... Good work at the ambiguous page i created.. liked that speed of 30 sec!!--Sartaj beary 23:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. IrishGuy talk 19:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uhhh

Taco bell is on me is a slogan where I come from, you Deuchebag Mcgee. Do your research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.6.59 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the talk page revert

Thanks for the talk page revert. I only unprotected yesterday and already my favorite vandal is back... Appreciate the swift action. Gwernol 20:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you

No problem! Luckily, my pages haven't been vandalised much lately (partially due the fact that I'm recently busy and wasn't able to do that much anti-vandalism work), but when it was, it wasn't pretty at all. (See User:GHe#Personal Vandalism Count) :) G.He 00:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chimera

I see you moved and renamed... um, it... to Laburnocytisus Adamii. Are you sure about that, given the conventions at Graft-chimaera? Melchoir 01:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reconsider Java?

Java is well known as a programming language only among IT workers, or people with some connection with IT... Admittedly Java may only be well known as an island among people with some geographical knowledge (or the 250+ million people who live in Indonesia), but I think that's still a much broader base. And consider that python, c, lisp, etc. are also well known as programming languages, but none of those articles default to disambiguation pages. -- Danny Yee 01:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaaaa

Aaaaa a aaaaa:

  1. A
  2. Aa
  3. Aaa
  4. Aaaa
  5. Aaaaa

Aaaa, aaa, aaaaa. [[Herostratus|AAAAAAAAA]]

My user page

Cheers for sorting out my small penis problem! Budgiekiller 20:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page, and helping to clear up the "confusion about my sexuality." :) --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 20:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, user:195.112.34.175 came after me next, and I gave them a short block. DVD+ R/W 21:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Article:Yahweh issue.

Mr. Lefty

On June 6, 2006, an editor cut and pasted almost the complete Wikisource Article:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Jehovah Wikisource into the Wikipedia Article:Yahweh.
Wikisource rules state:
The wiki pages on most Wikimedia projects are designed to evolve forever.
Typical examples are Wikipedia articles or Wikibooks study guides.
By contrast, Wikisource is a library of static texts that have already been published elsewhere.
In many or most cases, these texts are not meant to change and evolve,
and it would deeply hurt their integrity if they did!
Does Wikipedia approve of a complete ["almost" complete] Wikisource Article being brought into a Wikipedia Article, and then having that Wikisource article freely edited by Wikipedia editors?
Wikisource would not approve of edits being made to that article while it was posted on their site, if those edits resulted in changes being made to the actual original text.

Wikisource:General disclaimer


Seeker02421 21:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Mr. Lefty/Archive 2, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.

--Pilot|guy 22:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michaellovesnyc RfC

Hi. from reading this draft RfC I see you were involved; I thought you might want to add your comments. Thanks, --William Pietri 17:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing anything

I keep getting these messages saying that I changed pages and I didn't even do it. This is so gay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.100.67 (talk • contribs).

Well, if you look at the notice on your talk page, it says that your IP address is shared and often changes. So, there are plenty of innocent bystanders being affected by warnings and blocks. If you didn't do it, just ignore the warnings, and there's a rule here that says AOL IPs can only be blocked for a maximum of fifteen minutes. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Steven Gao Controversy

I nominated the article for AfD. Adam Wang posted his vote faster than I could complete my nomination; that's why you saw only his vote and not my nom yet. I've since posted that, replied to you, and disclosed his stake in the discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 02:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

she invented the =) smiley face that is pretty notable

JustKidding... you can delete it =) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kee-oh-kee (talk • contribs).

Bring Back Peppers!

I saw nothing wrong with the Brian Peppers wikipedia site. I demand it be brought back, or actions will be taken to ensure his return!

My Userpage

Thanks for the reverts on my user page. I caught this vandal doing the same to another user, and it seems he's moved on to me... --Llort 17:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though I see he was just blocked for 16 whole minutes. Be still my beating heart. :-) --Llort 17:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent vandalism

Why did you create an unencyclopedic category? Matthew Fenton [t/c] 18:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a category for user pages with the {{User AAAA}} template on them. But I guess you can delete it if you really want to. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 18:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To form a category for people who had that userbox. Almost every userbox adds the people who have it to a category. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 16:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Sorry about that. All I saw however was something like "Call me 1-800..." Jack Daw 19:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A short Esperanzial update

As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Michaellovesnyc

Hi Mr. Lefty. Having finished my exams for the semester, I finally got around to submitting the RfC against User:Michaellovesnyc. Sorry it took so long. The page is at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Michaellovesnyc. Please help by signing the "Users certifying the basis for this dispute" section, since you were one of those who tried and failed to resolve the dispute. (I know you signed the draft version, but I figured you should sign the final submission so it will have the current time on it.) You can also add other evidence if you want to. Thanks! --Grace 23:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

No problem, I just seen that he was editing your userpage from the Recent Changes link, so thats how I found out he was vandalising it. °≈§→Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈°Talk 20:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, anytime, though half of the credit goes to the great anti-vandalism bots on the IRC channel #vandalism-en-wp. :o) EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 20:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The validity of my page is being questioned. You say that the article entitled Immanuel Phillips is unworthry of inclusion in your encyclopedia. I have to disagree. Immaunel Phillips is a very prominent figure. He may not have international renoun, like other people, but he is a major contributor to his community and the state of Georgia.

Yup.

No problem. -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake {Prophesize) 00:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for returning the favor. - The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake (Prophesize|Witchcraft) 21:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You now totally have soap. This soap is slippery, and thus good.

Why do you put warnings on my talk page?

Those are fake warnings, i do not break the rules. Please delete them! --Comanche cph 16:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on Industrial Revolution. - Robbie Medford

cleanup

Thanks for cleaning up White River Amphitheatre after I thought I was done - I got distracted halfway through and hit save when I came back, you jumped in right away and did all the things I forgot! Keep up the good work! Inner Earth 19:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know

I think there might be something fishy going on here at User talk:213.184.220.253

Check it out. -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake (Prophesize|Witchcraft) 22:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Fishy"? - 85.210.176.196 23:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirects

Hi, I did Editcountitis. WP:ASR actually says "Any article in the article namespace that links to one in the Wikipedia namespace" ... "should at least be acknowledged or marked", although I don't know how to mark it. If it is nevertheless a long-standing policy to interpret redirects as "articles" and avoid cross-namespace redirects, it's a strange one - nobody would type "Editcountitis" unless they meant "Wikipedia:Editcountitis". I think the policy was actually intended to say it's unencyclopedic to include comments that belong on the talk page in the middle of an article; they didn't have redirects in mind at all. Art LaPella 23:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks for reverting my userpage yesterday.  ; ) AdamBiswanger1 02:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage. DVD+ R/W 20:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KOS-MOS

Yeah, I didn't meen to revert your changes; we edited within 20 seconds, so it got mixed together. — Deckiller 03:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting that vandalism left on my user page. BTW, my page is still being vandalized and so is Daishokaioshin's. If you could look into the problem I would really appreciate it. Thanks. --3bulletproof16 19:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks -- i'm new to this -- just learning Saul.alan.cunningham 05:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

I don't know too much about the blocking process, but this IP has vandalised the Ozzie Guillen page at least 8 times now with anti-Venezuelan racism, and something needs to be done about it. Do I post a line or two at Wikipedia:Abuse_reports?

He has recently posted under... 4.142.168.183 4.142.168.3 4.142.228.174 4.142.171.203 4.142.168.69 4.142.168.176 4.142.171.65 4.142.171.43 4.142.171.177

Thanks Teemu08 20:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

(db-rediruser)

Hey, Thanks for reminding me about the (db-rediruser) code. Completely overlooked it when redirecting P. Sganga's page. Targetter 00:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought 64bitscomputer.com is relevant to topic if you don't feel the same, I am sorry!!

triple smelly sock

You let me know if you see. Do not go to RFCU, do not collect $200. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

The recent edit summary on Poop made me laugh. So few people around here seem to have a sense of humor; it's nice to run into something a little silly. Joyous! | Talk 18:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for explaining why I blocked the user at User talk:WP:ASR. If they had only read the entire message, I initial left them, I think they would have understood. It frustrates me when such users know how to use an unblock template, but don't bother to read instructions or policies. Thank you for explaining it to them. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the message. I still don't understand why that username (or User:WPASR) is inappropriate. It frustrates me when admins use templates which are utterly inappropriate. Wasr 01:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your explanation makes sense as to why User:WP:ASR is inappropriate, I suppose. But User:WPASR was also blocked. Wasr 01:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your meaningful explanations instead of throwing automated templates at me! I appreciate it. Wasr 01:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for your message, rgds Jothishkumar

Your RfA

I am sorry to inform you that your Request for Adminship (RfA) has failed to reach sufficient consensus for promotion, and has now been delisted and archived. Please do not look upon this outcome as a discouragement, but rather as an opportunity to improve. Try to address the concerns raised during your RfA and, in a few months' time, resubmit your request. Thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity! Redux 17:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad luck Mr Lefty, better luck next time... Budgiekiller 17:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE

Hi, this is Kate again, actually, many of those videos were the ACTUAL/ORIGINAL video for the artist in question e.g. Fatboy Slim "Santa Cruz", Prince "Pink Cashmere", Moby "C'Mon On Baby" etc. Check the new Fatboy Slim CD/DVD best of release which has the "Santa Cruz" video on there, directed by James Hyman. I understand you all have to do your jobs round here but I'm only trying to maintain a listing for James + his work!!!! Phew!!! There is this grey area on what's allowed/not allowed/notable. I can give loads of other examples for similar presenters on here which is simply their bio. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.228.4 (talk • contribs)