|
User talk:Mountain157
March 2019
ReminderHello Mountain157, may I please remind you that you are encouraged to share a statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mountain157. Regards, MrClog (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC) March 2019 If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GoldenRing (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)I am willing to unblock you if you demonstrate that you understand the problems with your editing so far and are willing to change. GoldenRing (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC) Blocked for sockpuppetry
 Mountain157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I admit that I engaged in sockpuppetry to avoid blocks. I want to be able to rejoin Wikipedia again and become a productive editor. At first, I did not have a proper understanding of Wikipedia, but now after seeing how other experienced editors work together to improve articles, I wish to do the same. Mountain157 (talk) 01:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC) Decline reason: I suggest you follow the advice in the standard offer. Go six months without any block evasion or sock puppetry, and we'll consider unblocking you. If you continue to flout the community's trust, you will likely be site banned per WP:3X, which means any articles you create will be deleted on the spot, and any edits you make will be reverted. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock RequestMountain157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I read the standard offer. However, it also mentions that The six-month threshold can be adjustable under special circumstances. If an editor shows an unusually good insight into the circumstances that led to the block, and sets out a credible proposal for how they will deal with those issues in future, then a return might be considered sooner.I have explained the reasoning for why I was blocked in my previous request, but if need be I can go into more of the specific circumstances below. Mountain157 (talk) 23:43, 26 June 2019 (UTC) Decline reason: No. You worked hard to destroy our trust in you. You can start to earn it back by following WP:SO. You are eligible to apply under WP:SO no sooner than Thursday, December 26, 2019. Yamla (talk) 00:31, 27 June 2019 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Your draft article, Draft:Tartarian language Hello, Mountain157. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tartarian language". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC) Unblock RequestMountain157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I would like to apply for the Standard Offer since I have passed the date December 26 2019. Decline reason: Note that per the standard offer, "This is not a get-out-of-jail-free card, and administrators are not forced to unblock you, especially if you have not provided any reason why you should be unblocked other than your avoidance of Wikipedia for six months. You should still provide a clear reason why you should be unblocked." You still need to indicate that you understand what you did wrong and won't do it again, and describe what constructive contributions you will make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. @331dot: I accept that whatever actions I did were wrong. I will never do it again. I believe that I should be unblocked because I have alot to offer. Whenever I am viewing certain Wikipedia articles that I feel are lacking some information or need to be corrected, I feel sad that I can't do anything because I am blocked. Mountain157 (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
@331dot: The actions I did that were wrong is Sockpuppetry/Block Evasion. Mountain157 (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Mountain157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I am appealing that the block on my account should be removed. I accept the fact that I engaged in Sockpuppetry/Block Evasion which is a big violation of the rules of Wikipedia. I will never engage in that kind of behavior again. Whenever I am on Wikipedia, I see so many different articles that may need some work or additional information but I feel sad as I am not able to edit it. In the time that I have been blocked, I have been able to read all of Wikipedia's rules more clearly as well as see how other Editors on Wikipedia improve articles so that I can learn how to better the Project. I want to be able to move past this and show the potential that I have to offer. Mountain157 (talk) 01:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. unblock discussionHello, it's been a while. As this is a checkuser block, only a checkuser may unblock.
That's enough for now.-- Deepfriedokra 02:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Should I propose the changes right here on my talkpage? Mountain157 (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC) @Deepfriedokra: What I would do differently for India,Pakistan,Afghanistan topics is refrain from aggressively editing. I will do compromises with the editors that I might have disputes with or ask another experienced editor for input.
|
