User talk:Mollifiednow

Welcome

Hello, Mollifiednow, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Thanks! Mollifiednow (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James D. Ewing

I saw your note at the Teahouse, and looked in on your article. I hope you don't mind, but I added some paragraph breaks. Also added some items under awards, which you can change, of course. Looks very nice, indeed, very good work! Best of luck to you, Sincerely, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 01:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added a section on Philanthropic works, re: "The James D. Ewing Lecture on Ethics in Journalism, at Duke University, endowed by Ewing", with a new source! Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 01:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 😊 I had those on my list! Great idea for the new section, I have been trying to decide how to write/describe the. There are so many. I've actually been inspired by his contribution to society and find it difficult to leave out some of my personal thoughts about him :) I appreciate your input. Mollifiednow (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Glad you are here! Even if the going gets rough, kind kittens await you.

Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awwwww...thanks for the purrrrfect welcome! You made my evening😁 Mollifiednow (talk) 02:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't want you to be swept away by a mop, heh, heh...Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so laughing out loud right now 😏 

Mollifiednow (talk) 02:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI... I submitted my first draft and its been a interesting journey from my first "experience" ; ) I guess you could say that I went from being knocked out of the baby carriage, in just my diaper and into the sandbox. So I suppose you could say I'm now in my big kid "pull-ups. Where will I go from here? It Depends😏 Mollifiednow (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could I borrow your eyes?

Hello Mollifiednow. It seems we've had a few similar experiences. We are both on here with good faith and are enjoying the editing, but have been surprised by some of the feedback.

I'm wondering if you might look at a draft I'm doing and give me your suggestions on my talk page? I know I've done a few things incorrectly and would just like advice without a gigantic sign on the draft page. :^D Katherine311MH (talk) 01:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm humbled that you asked me to help :) I just logged in for a moment to tag an article for deletion. I'm a newbie as well, so as long as it doesn't take me FOR-EV-ER ;) to figure out how to do it, I will take a look afterwards. Otherwise, I will definitely take a peek tomorrow. Hopefully, I can help, but I am a newly minted Wikapedian. You made my evening 😁 Mollifiednow (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks for agreeing to look! So, this subject has a long list of credits as a producer and is famous in the experimental and commercial animation world. Otherwise, he's published/curated a big film collection, and edited a book. I wasn't 100% sure how to cite the published section and am not sure if I should continue adding credits. What are your thoughts? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ron_Diamond — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katherine311MH (talk • contribs) 11:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just took a look and I think you've done a great job. My suggestion is to draw on your experience with your previous submissions and/or post your question at the Teahouse. I posted there and it was a great experience :) I appreciate you reaching out to me for advice, but you have more experience at this than I do. I have only submitted one draft for review, just recently, and I don't want to steer you in the wrong direction. Best of luck! Mollifiednow (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that is promising! I appreciate you taking a look. Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katherine311MH (talk • contribs) 13:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just an fyi, I just learned about this, and thought I'd pass it on. It's a way to get that second pair of eyes. You can request a peer review. I'm adding a link, not sure if it will work, if not, search for peer review :) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PR Best- Mollifiednow (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Carollo

Because its prose hasn't undergone a fivefold expansion in the last seven days, it doesn't qualify for the Did you know (DYK) process. When submitting for Mears, please use this corrected link instead. Thanks! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Very Much! You have been so helpful. Best Regards - Mollifiednow (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! For Carollo's article, you can request a peer review instead. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cool beans! Will do :-) Mollifiednow (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fyi: after I stumble my way through the Walter Mears DYK process, I'll try the peer review on Carollo (I may be a little slow on the learning curve, but I'm determined (or stubborn) :-) Mollifiednow (talk) 02:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I owe you an apology for my unclear answer to your original question on Talk:Walter Mears. I suggested "Did you know" (DYK) over peer review because in my personal experience, peer reviewers do not get to every request, whereas much fewer DYK nominations lapse. Having Mears' article appear on the front page will also give it more visibility. That is the answer to your original question: the vast, vast, vast supermajority of articles do not go through any kind of review process. The ultimate review is more eyes on the article: the more well-trafficked, the more likely someone with the skills to improve the article will come along. The less traffic, the more likely the article languishes. I've caught errors that've gone unnoticed for more than a decade simply because no one ever looks up the article subject on Wikipedia. So this DYK serves the purpose you want in two ways: first, it is a review because we have to make sure whatever makes it onto the front page passes muster, especially if the article subject, like Mears, is a living person. Second, it will (hopefully) attract the attention of people who see it on the front page, some of whom will offer improvements. It just isn't as straightforward as my initial answer had suggested; I'm sorry about the lack of clarity in that response. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your explanation. I'm new and want to do my best, especially with a BLP. I understand now and see why you recommended the DYK nomination. I welcome any input and critique. It's the only way to have to know if I'm doing a good job. I'm a little "skittish" right now, I don't want to do the wrong thing and I don't want to bother others too much. You and User: Mandarax have been so patient, I can't thank you enough. Hopefully, one day, I can PassItOn Mollifiednow (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my nomination. You have been so helpful! :-) Mollifiednow (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Walter Mears

Hello! Your submission of Walter Mears at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I have added content to the article and added an additional citation. I see that an alternate was added and I like it. I attempted to add an alternate and I have no idea why it isn't shown(?) Please excuse my inexperience. Thanks again :) Mollifiednow (talk) 00:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Walter Mears

On 22 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walter Mears, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Walter Mears has compared Donald Trump to populist senator Huey Long? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walter Mears. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Walter Mears), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :-) Mollifiednow (talk) 13:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help- Question on using information from one BLP in another BLP

I expanded the article for Margie Mason (Journalist), and part of the work I did includes a list of a series of articles that won multiple awards, and a list of the awards.

I'm currently updating and expanding the article for Esther Htusan and I'd like to copy the same lists into the article for Htusan. Htusan was part of the staff who wrote the award-winning articles and shared in the awards.

Question: Is that acceptable on Wikipedia? Since I did the research and created the lists, it's not "plagiarism." Right?

Thanks in advance for your help. Mollifiednow (talk) 00:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're more than welcome to use the same content you've written in multiple places, assuming it's relevant. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mollifiednow (talk) 00:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James D. Ewing has been accepted

James D. Ewing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Beans :-) Thanks! Mollifiednow (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes

Hi Mollifiednow and thanks for your contributions. I have set your account as a Pending Changes Reviewer in case any articles on your watchlist wind up under WP:Pending changes Protection. I think you are ready to approve or reject other people's edit on such pages. Cheers and happy editing! ϢereSpielChequers 16:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am truly humbled. Thank you. I'm too new, to understand exactly what that means, but I will read about this and learn. May I ask you, if I have any questions? Thanks again, nice to know that someone has seen my efforts and appreciates them. Best- Now Im off to read about my new super-power :-) Mollifiednow (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're waiting patiently for "tons of awards, prize money" on your page - well the wait is over

You can come play ball with us anytime
Because it's not right to have an empty awards section on your User Page - Happy editing JW 1961 Talk 21:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

just wow... Thank you! You made my day! :-D Now how do I add this to my user page? B-) Mollifiednow (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mollifiednow, Copy this without the nowiki thing at each end (start at { finish at })
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" :|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:2 spaniel puppies 3 months old.jpg|100px]] :|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''You can come play ball with us anytime''' :|- :|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Because it's not right to have an empty awards section on your User Page - Happy editing ~~~~ :|} JW 1961 Talk 22:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(I can do it for you but I'd like your permission to edit your own user page as it's not good manners to edit someones own user page without) JW 1961 Talk 22:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I copied and added O:-) I'm also doing a happy dance 💃 Your userpage is really nice, nice to meet a fellow military member. Happy Thanksgiving. Thanks for making me feel so welcome;-) Mollifiednow (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Mollifiednow! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can an item added to my (user) talk page be deleted?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

-) Mollifiednow (talk) 19:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello Mollifiednow:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I have no idea how you found me, but you absolutely made my day! Thanks, I needed that :-) PS, love your user page! Mollifiednow (talk) 23:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[[
Baby Weddell Seal
|100px]] 		Happy New Year
Thank you for the lovely and kind Christmas present! As a New Year's gift, here is a sweet, innocent creature, wide-eyed with hope and wonder. I am so honored to have met you, and I wish you the very best of love and good fortune...and happy editing! Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 03:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Looking at January 20th as the beginning of a New Year, and hopefully great change! Best-Mollifiednow (talk) 03:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]