User talk:Moalli

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of prestige dialects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Moalli! Thank you for your contributions. I am WeijiBaikeBianji and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German language

Hi, Please take note of my statement on the Talk page of the German language-article. --37ophiuchi (talk) 19:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry for being absent for a while but I have read the discussion and am glad to see it has been mostly resolved. However, I do have a question regarding the status of dialects versus standard German that has been posted onto the talk page. Thanks. -- Moalli 22:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese in EQG

Hello Moalli, I noticed you removed Portuguese from the Equatorial Guinea article, but it's been added back with some questionable sources, would you be able to chime in here? Thanks. Ukabia - talk 15:34, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to English language does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 16:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cantonese

Hello! Thank you for all your contributions. I saw your edits for Cantonese, and wanted to note something that may be a bit inaccurate.

While Cantonese is a major language in Southeast Asia, and dominant in Vietnam and much of Malaysia, it is important to note that the rest of its regions have a greater presence Min languages (esp. Hokkien and Teochew) or a plurality of dialect groups due to the historic mass-migration of Hoklo peoples. Thus, I fear it is incorrect to say Cantonese is the most spoken variety in Singapore (see this), or for that matter most other SE Asian countries (e.g. refer to Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nzo9 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Moalli. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Moalli. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Moalli. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion. Spanish language

Hi. If you wanted to trim sourced content, I suggest you to find consensus in the talk page and start with the section of the Philippines (or perhaps with one of those gigantic tables, such as the unmanageable and full of original research Spanish language#Spanish speakers by country), instead of deeming any attempt to provide a minimal insight elsewhere (geography, when, how, sociolinguistics...) with secondary sources in prose "fluff". Btw, what did you mean by "etymology"? Removing templates from the etymology section? What we need is secondary sources. A dictionary voice with 19 different entries is not precisely one.--Asqueladd (talk) 02:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. While I see that you good intentions in adding additional information on the background of Spanish and how it got to be spoken in the various locations, they are overly detailed for an overview of the geographical distribution. For example, there is no need to specify the specific parts of Spain in Europe because I'm sure the vast majority of readers know that its mainland is located in Europe (and it itself is a European state). The city-states and Canary Islands in Africa are already mentioned in the continent's subsection. I'll agree with your etymology section edit in that a better source is needed.
Regarding the consensus on the talk page (thank you for pinging me by the way), I will go over the article to see what should be removed and what to keep (with possible trims). The gigantic table of speaker figures is definitely something that should be removed in my opinion. Moalli (talk) 07:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
hello the world map of the spanish language page is not following the same patterns that the other languages do, all they have marked the territories that previously had cultural presence in its colonial period, languages like, italian , german, french, portugues and english, and so? why the spanish language world map doesn't follow that patterns? Mxph24 (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, of all the languages you listed, only Italian has former colonial territories highlighted and that is an issue that needs to be addressed. That category shouldn't really be there. On all the others, the former colonies where the language is actually used on an important cultural or administrative scale are shown. These maps need to reflect current usage and not former use. That's why on the French map, Syria is not highlighted despite being a former French colony but Algeria is. French is practically no longer used in Syria but its presence in daily life applies to most, if not all, of Algeria's population. The only issue on the Spanish map is how to highlight Philippines, where the language still has some niche cultural usage but not on the scale of the U.S. states or places like Algeria and French. Please see the proposal for that right here. Consensus on en-WP and es-WP has been that Western Sahara should not be included on the global map. - Moalli (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sorry but in all the other languages like dutch in indonesia, german in africa, also have highlighted the former use in the territories and and is alsmost non present in that terriotories today, just like in the philippines, that's why I made another category including the cultural use to avoid confusion with the UNITED STATES. And in the philippines still in the constitution is an optional language, so, why do you want to erase the cultural, and the status of the contitition of the language in the philippiens? also in the sahara still is a territory in dispute and pendent to be de-colonized and still the language is taught in school by the sarahwi people. , even minor languages are highlited where they had a historical and have minority comunities of speakers globally.
If you look at the map for German, Namibia is the only country highlighted and the language is very much still used there at all levels of society on a daily basis (e.g., government, education, media). So no, German is still very present in that African country. It's not "hidden"/spoken by less than 1% of the population like Spanish in Philippines or Dutch in Indonesia. The Dutch language map is another one that needs addressing. It doesn't make sense to have a "some knowledge persists/historical" category when that doesn't reflect regular usage, which is what these maps are supposed to show. Philippines is marked by a dot on the current Spanish map to acknowledge minimal cultural presence since highlighting the whole or most of the country misrepresents its scale of use. Frankly, that is already generous enough considering that its barely present in daily life outside loanwords and the Hispanophone community that forms less than 0.5% of the population. As for Western Sahara, go on WP-es and read the lengthy discussions about it. Most Sarawhis no longer use the language and the recognized administration uses Arabic and French, not Spanish. If in the future the place gains independence with Spanish as an official or major secondary language, by all means it should be included. But for now, no. - Moalli (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, but that little dot is so small that is almost imperceptible, and the spanish language in the philippines is still optional at the Constitutional level, as for the western sahara don't take in count the people in the no control area that still teach the spanish language in education. so you are taking just in count one side of the history in the sahara ignoring the other side of both present in reality, the pro-independence and the pro-anexation of morrocos . Mxph24 (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I had no say on Western Sahara and the consensus developed on es-WP or en-WP and am just following what was agreed upon. Take this issue to those respective editors if you disagree. As for Philippines, as indicated on the discussion, there should be no special treatment given that a dot or square is what is used when cultural usage is found in the country but speakers are scattered and the scale is not prominent enough to highlight it in full. Inclusion is already generous enough given the small amount of speakers and relevant usage there nowadays. Japanese is recognized in the constitution of Palau despite barely having any speakers and usage there as well. Should it be included on Japanese language maps? I do agree that the dot is an unfortunate result of the legend's colors blending in so it renders it almost noticeable. - Moalli (talk) 01:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
yeah it should be included in palau since it is official at some level in goverment as in the philippines , there's no generous thing in nothing, this is not a favor to anyone but descriptive thing about a language, that dot that you put there is almost invisible, that "agreed upon" is following the morocos point of view ignoring completely the western sahara reality, and so it is biased. Mxph24 (talk) 03:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, bring the Western Sahara issue to those editors on WP-en and WP-es who decided not to include it and for well-backed reasons. You want to be excessively descriptive? Why don't we highlight most or all of the world for English given that its cultural presence is massive even in places where it was never official. The presence and usage of English in say, Brazil or South Korea is even more prominent than Spanish in Philippines today. The maps are used to reflect reality and to accurately depict *widescale* usage. English is also "optional" in East Timor, but it's not highlighted on the English map because it's not a common working language or used in actuality by administration. I don't get this POV-pushing from Hispanistas who insist on highlighting countries where the reality of Spanish is nothing short of not even being secondary. Such biases have already been noticed by admin. This instance on some Philippine-based editors that the country is Hispanophone would be eye-rolling for most of the population there. - Moalli (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First i'm not hispanist, that's your first bias showing up, second, there's a big diference between a the facto international language or worldwide lingua franca which is english, and spanish is like a regional language that still is taugh in the western sahara and that even the wikipedia informs that, so? in one place it says one thing and the other negates completly the situation? wow so impartial, english is used everywhere yeah that's a fact too, while bringing the sahara issue is a still debatable, but holding to one side instead of pointing out the reality of both sides in their situation is a very biased way to show the data, just like the news and television moved by personal interest and money. And god No one is saying that the philippines is hispanist. "You don't get this POV-pushing like" what? are you serious? trying to use AD-HOMINEM instead of an argument? wow so impresive and informmative. , thinking in white and black instead of a scale of colors?, that's a real eye-rolling for most of the world population. Wow wikipedia is rotten if there's more people holding to one side forgetting completly the situation and using AD-HOMINEM thinking like it were an argument, just exactly like hispanists. Mxph24 (talk) 15:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on French language. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 21:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sacramento metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Right-of-way. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]