User talk:Mitrale89

Mitrale89, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Mitrale89! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Serbs of Croatia

Hello,

Please do not remove legitimate notices from the article without discussion (or at least some sort of explanation in the edit summary). Also, please do not add living people to the list without reliable sources - I'll remove such entries on the spot. If you have questions or objections, you're invited to discuss in the article's talk page. GregorB (talk) 11:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Argentine

Why are you adding Argentine people of Montenegrin descent in Serbian Argentine article? --MisterBean (talk) 18:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Because they Are Serbian descent not Montenegrin mitrale89Mitrale89 (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Montenegrins not exist Like nation before ww2 mitrale89Mitrale89 (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know they are of Serbian origin? Please give me a source before you add something you don't know if they are Serbs --MisterBean (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another source for Jorge Capitanich origin. Also, Montenegrins started emigrating to Argentina in the late 19th century. The latest wave arrived after World War II. --MisterBean (talk) 10:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbs in the Republic of Macedonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stip. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Local hero talk 15:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mitrale89 reported by User:Local hero (Result: ) for changing the number of Serbs in a large number of countries without waiting for anyone else to support your changes. You might consider WP:RSN to check the quality of your sources and get advice as to whether they support your numbers. If you continue to change numbers without anyone else agreeing with you you could be blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Balkans discretionary sanctions notification

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 22:06, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakr\ talk / 04:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015