User talk:Minkythecat/Archive 1

Archive 1

WP:TABOO

Hi. Interested in your thoughts on this. Peter Damian (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC).

Highly interesting. Minkythecat (talk) 21:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Toddst1 (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi There, I wrote up an Article My Local News. I was hoping that you could email me a copy of the article so that I can change it to make it more suitable? My email is jenjendub@hotmail.com Thanks, Jen —Preceding unsigned comment added by MyLocalNews (talk • contribs) 12:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Frodo3819 (talk) 12:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC) This is maddening! I am trying to add a page again for PSNext, a project management package my company uses. We found many packages through Wikipedia on Wikipedia pages like this one and almost missed finding out about PSNext since there was not a page for them like all these other packages. I'll flesh it out with more information, once I know it won't be deleted again while other tools articles can remain. I've had to call it "Sciforma's PSNext" to differentiate the article from a networking protocol that has an article already in Wikipedia.

Why are the other companies allowed articles, but I cannot add an equally valid one? -- August 14, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frodo3819 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Frodo3819 (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Thank you for responding. I was modeling my entry on this article. I just think my article should be treated as these many others have. I'll add material, and resubmit.

concerning Chess Sphere

hi minkythecat. i'm new to doing things on wikipedia, so i'm not sure if this is where i am supposed to message you. i think you suggested the article i wrote for Chess Sphere be deleted, i don't understand if perhaps it was because there was no sources for information. if so, there wouldn't be any sources. writing that article was my way of making a "poor man's patent" for that game. i am using other means of publicity for doing so also, but i think wikipedia is a great place to start. i am just now about to upload pictures of the chess sphere on the article page. is there anything else about the article that is lacking? i would like to fix those things to keep the article/page up. thank you for your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epilepticradar (talk • contribs) 20:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Citizen - you have been accused by the sockmaster general

Citizen, you have been accused by the sockmaster general (Abd) of being the criminal fredrick day. If you are innocent... well... nobody is innocent to the sockmaster general. you need to watch out as he will start spreading slander about you to all and sundry. I suggest you put a stop to it by asking him to put up or shut up. --193.35.132.149 (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments. I'm sure that should Abd find enough evidence than a SSP will occur which would clear my not so good name. Whilst I somehow feel there's a backstory to you posting here, unfortunately, I've no desire to be privy to a "war" between yourself and Abd. Minkythecat (talk) 12:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Yo

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm new so sorry for not putting in a referance. ^^ Hyperpixie (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback

Thanks for your input at my successful Rfa. I'm already thinking about working on my content creation. Hopefully in a few months, I'll have passed the point where you would've !voted Support. If you have any more suggestions on how I can improve myself as an editor, I'd be happy to hear them. Happy editing!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 21:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

hi

I removed a cat from your page. There are enough cats about! 96.232.11.55 (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Cardiff City Stadium

I am not at all happy at the way your have twice reverted my edits to this page. I have now explained fully my reasons for doing so on the discussion page. Perhaps you should actually read WP:OWN. I am not the one introducing bias to the page - I am attempting to remove it. Could you please take a look at each of the points I have explained on the discussion page, and explain why you reverted wholesale my edits. I am not attempting to engage in edit warring, as I am not trying to hide behind a dynamic IP as the other editor is. I look forward to your explanations. Nouse4aname (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, I am not "wound up" and am certainly not going in like a "bull in a china shop", and I suggest you stop accusing me of such. Every edit I have attempted to explain my reasoning, only to be reverted with no sound logic or reason. I suggest you look at the Old Trafford page yourself. Look how even as owners, the Football Club are still listed as tenants. This needs to be changed as CCFC are currently listed as "landlords" in the infobox - a field that does not exist and so does not include CCFC in the infobox. Nouse4aname (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
As far as the 18 game figure is concerned, I do not personally care if it is true or not, but without being able to verify it, the statement must be removed, as per WP:V and WP:RS. Nouse4aname (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
To repeat. I am relaxed. I am calm. I appreciate your efforts to tidy up the page, but I request that you don't try to lay the blame of this on me. I have consistently explained my edits providing valid reasoning and precedent where required, only to be reverted because someone has their own biased opinion. Nouse4aname (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
No, I can't. This person needs to realise that this is an encyclopedia, and not a place to express their own annoyance at such things. I find it rather disconcerting that you have not posted a single message to this other editor, despite comments such as: [1]. Have you noticed the correlation between the editing of the IPs 79.69.83.202 and 81.157.84.112? When one edits, the other is not far behind to finish the job, with User:Spike1927 making the same edits as well. It seems very much like a single user to me. Nouse4aname (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for actually engaging in some constructive editing. However, referring to me as an “egger” who is “being annoying”, as you did here is hardly helping matters is it? I suggest you read WP:Civil, and try to understand that at no point have I been attempting to introduce any bias into the article. Yet it is clear from this site [2] that this is what the other editors are attempting. I could not care less that the Blues are tenants and CCFC the landlords, it is the constant twisting of this to belittle the Blues at the expense of accuracy that I am attempting to combat. Nouse4aname (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Nouse4aname

Hi there. You're quite right. He is marking all edits as minor, one where he even deleted all material from a page and redirected it. That's not minor. 2 blocks for edit warring, to which one of his reponses was how dare you![3] and says he has done nothing wrong (except break the 3RR). The arrogance on Talk:Bmibaby is certainly not a one-off.

In spite of this, he is making a sensible case on bmibaby (although most don't agree with it) and seems genuinely motivated by Wikipedia policy, as this seems to be why he has been blocked - reverting vandalism but still broke 3RR. Welshleprechaun (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I certainly agree with you on his behaviour, I was only talking about his motivation. The same could be said for User:Zaps93, saying pathetic! OPEN YOUR EYES. Perhaps we could leave the children to their games and try to close this thing on the talk page? Welshleprechaun (talk) 18:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hopefully a new consensus can solve it - Talk:Bmibaby
Good idea, but I think the first resort would be WP:3O. Welshleprechaun (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Minor edits

Ah yes. Apologies for that, had it saved in my preferences from when I was doing lots of formatting changes months back. Didn't realise it was still on. Thanks for the heads up. Nouse4aname (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Orlady RFA oppose

Just dropping a quick note to inform, as part of your vote was due to her having not answered my questions (among others), that she has now answered those questions. :) لennavecia 13:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback

 Unfortunately, my RFA was closed today with a final tally of 75½/38/10. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your participation in it. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral !votes and see what I can do to address those concerns. Special thanks go to Schmidt, MICHAEL Q., TomStar81, and henrik for their co-nominations and support. — BQZip01 — talk 20:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association

The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are here - suggestions welcome.

If you wish to be elected, please notify me here. If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them here

Please put all discussion here.Peter Damian (talk) 10:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Darren Dennehy

As this ref proves, he has returned on a six month loan deal. Kosack (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, no worries. He's definitely been training with us, hadn't heard or read anything on our side about it. Minkythecat (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
No problem. It does seem to have gone under the radar somewhat. Kosack (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)