This is an archive of past discussions with User:Milowent. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adeline Trafton may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
id=SCo-AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false World Biographies], ''The Literary World]]'' (July 1878, p. 35)</ref>
article/2004/11/3/harvard-affiliates-lose-in-local-races/ Harvard Affiliates Lose in Local Races]], ''[[Harvard Crimson]]''</ref><ref name="blue2">Beam, Alex (19 December 2006). [http://www.boston.
Before I send it to AfD, which I really hate doing, can you give me some specific example of notability within WP:MOVIE? I concede that I may be missing something here since sources are likely in Turkish. But "it seems notable to me" doesn't quite meet WP:RS or WP:GNG. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
I am going by WP:GNG, I was able to discern it is covered in Turkish film sources (and books), without even counting a huge amount of internet coverage we wouldn't normally cite. Granted, I'm no master of Turkish cinema, have only created Kareteci Kiz to this point. If you put the tag back I'm not going to protest further, perhaps it will prompt someone to add additional sources, though that rarely seems to be the prompt for doing so.--Milowent • hasspoken22:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
While I'm not sure I'm a good adminsitrator, I think I can help you with your request. Normally deleted articles can be restored to a user's subspace to allow them to address the reasons for the deletion. In this case however the article was deleted as a copyright violation and therefore cannot be restored anywhere on Wikipedia. It will need to be rewritten from scratch in your own words.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots18:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks guys
Thankfully another admin emailed me this article. I then built upon this article. The enforcement of wikipedia copyright is draconian, and many of these copyright deletions should never occur. If someone else asks for an article, please email it to them, or get an admin to email it to them.
There should be a little template that every admin who will email alleged copyright articles to editors can post on their user page. Good editors are being discouraged from editing because of bullies and editors completely ignorant of copyright law. Igottheconch (talk) 07:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! also
The Barnstar of Diligence
You see like a good editr who trreats editors with respect and kindness.
' (1931), ''More Boners'' (1931), ''Still More Boners'' (1931), and ''Prize Boners for 1932'' (the last being illustrated by Virginia Huget.<ref name="cata">[http://books.google.com/books?id=
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to A Winsome Widow may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
/www.loc.gov/jukebox/recordings/detail/id/2768/ 1912 recording of ''Be My Little Baby Bumble Bee'']] at the U.S. Library of Congress
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Svitlodarsk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
It is an [[factory town|industrial]] [[urban-type settlement], built as the home for the [[Vuhlehirska thermal power plant]].
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donetsk City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thank you for posting the Belle Knox link, I do suggest you consider refactoring or disabling the comments that are outing her real world name. Sportfan5000 (talk) 03:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Virginity auction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
in northern Hungary who threatened to rape her, she pulled out of the auction.<ref name="austrian">(2 September 20100. [http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Around_the_World/2010-09-02/26490/Miss_Spring_
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Virginity auction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
in northern Hungary who threatened to rape her, she pulled out of the auction.<ref name="austrian">(2 September 20100. [http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Around_the_World/2010-09-02/26490/Miss_Spring_
local police in [[Krasnoyarsk]] said no laws would be violated.<Ref name="shat">(5 November 2013). [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/05/siberia-virginity-auction-shatuniha-27000_n_4219720.html
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Inside of the Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coniston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I am both pleased and honored to present you with the Researcher's Barnstar in appreciation for your superb work in finding sources showing Un'amore e una vendetta as notable enough for THISWikipedia. Some may ignore your efforts and disagree and dismiss an Italian television series even with WP:GNG being met... and that simply shows an unnecessary bias... but excellent work! Thank you. Schmidt, Michael Q.22:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Honeydogs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
major label debut album ''Seen A Ghost'' in 1997.<Ref name="ghost1">Horak, Terry (19 July 1997). ([http://books.google.com/books?id=qA4EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA11&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false
*''Everything, I Bet You'', 1996 (released March 12, 1996, on October/TRG<ref name="popularup96">Borzillo, Carie (23 March 1996). [
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lotty Hough may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
1871 she gave a lecture tour on "Popping The Question".<ref name="popping">(22 November 1871). [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2481&dat=18711122&id=O-szAAAAIBAJ&sjid=
Foul language? What was truly foul was your prod of Notre Dame College (New Hampshire), a completely laughable prod that really made me question your worth as an editor. I made a neutral comment on your talk page about the how it was a poor prod to make you consider whether you erred, and you simply deleted the comment. I self-reverted an aggravated comment I left after seeing your behaviour.--Milowent • hasspoken17:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm stopping the top 25 report
It's too much work for nothing except the occasional complaint. If you want to carry it on, I wish you all the best, but you seemed more eager to drop that snake than I did. Serendipodous23:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Serendipodous, you deserve major kudos for all your work on this. I prepared reports for this week, but I'm honestly not sure I have your stamina! I really do think its an important project, but from week to week it is indeed a bit of drudgery to get it done. You've done the reports for the Signpost for over a year now (since June 2013), and took over sole responsibility for the WP:TOP25 since late February 2013. That's amazing. I'll try to do what I can and recruit additional help if possible. The only thing I'm looking forward to is smacking down any haters.--Milowent • hasspoken14:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry if I was a bit terse; it's all down to WikiStress. I've been in some rather nasty battles recently, and I need to step back from editing. Anyway, thanks for pulling through; that was nice of you to do.Serendipodous14:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
No apologies needed to me, I totally understand. I've had many battles on Wikipedia in the past, and sometimes they have quite annoyed me.--Milowent • hasspoken14:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Why should I has just told me to see here. Nothing further to add except a section link would be very useful in future - as you may have noticed, I am one lazy editor! --Launchballer17:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
That's at least the second or third time I've seen you pull something out of the fire in the last week alone, Milowent, please accept my appreciation for your thoughtful and thorough participation at AfD. --j⚛e deckertalk19:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate the response. [4] Could you elaborate so I can get some idea of where you think I should draw the line? --Ronz (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I see that in your comments about Hamas, you said that "[T]he bloodshed causing it" (the word it refering, of course, too Operation Protective Edge); sadly, the people who are complaining about the bloodshed are mostly the same people who truely caused it - by hiding missiles inside UNRWA schools and other civilian structures; by telling residents not to leave areas Israel warns it's going to attack, etc). I would hope that you would try to be more neutral in your explanations about these articles. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu16:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
The bloodshed of the conflict is contributing to the popularity of the article; I made no comment about what who is blame or what is causing the bloodshed so it is ridiculous to say I wasn't being neutral on that count. It doesn't matter whether Hamas is the reincarnation of Satan dropping infants onto missile dumps to ensure certain death; or whether Israel wants to turn Gaza into a megamall by bulldozing away everything and everyone there. I made no comments either way. The conflict and bloodshed of the conflict makes it a popular article. However, while the numbers are neurral on the Top25, the commentary is commentary and based on the observations of the chart creators.--Milowent • hasspoken03:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for rescuing the Cayman Motor Museum page. When I visited Cayman, I was disappointed with the scarcity of pages on the island, and visiting the museum was such a cool experience that I wanted to share it with the world. Mhults7791 (talk) 00:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scruffy The Cat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
rodeo-charlie-chesterman/ King Size Talent: Charlie Chesterman, Scruffy Sweetheart of the Radio], ''RPM, Life In Analog''</ref> in the late 1970’s along with future [[Young Fresh Fellows]]
278466/scruffy-cat/chart Scruffy the Cat - Chart History], billboard.com, Retrieved 29 August 2014)</ref> The first single from the LP, also titled ''Moons of Jupiter'', reached the Billboard
Hey Serendipodous, a proposal ... you could do it, but keep it off your watchlist, and I'll deal with any of the crap that comes up? I'm used to doing the latter, but I don't have the time during a normal week to do the former. :-) Ed[talk][majestic titan]19:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
i am away from town and my internet is horrible - typing this from my phone. Seren has done the top 25 already, this can easily be truncated to make the top 10, even if author name is unattributed? --Milowent • hasspoken03:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
WHAT?!? That is clearly not true, Ed urged me to keep this up because the Signpost feature is popular. It only became so because you did it, and your insights are usually more complex than mine. Its rather unfair that you had to do it all yourself for so long, I would be much more likely to keep it up if you'd like to work out a team arrangement?--Milowent • hasspoken15:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, [5] was an attempt to link this article about a river to an article about the same river under a different article name which doesn't exist. Why did you revert me?--Jac16888Talk10:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
dont blame me for the pathetic losers worshipping boobs more than live women via comics. If you didn't understand my defense of women, oh well. Fuck hipsters,I'm too old for them.--Milowent • hasspoken02:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Milowent, I wish you would take some responsibility for your actions here. There's no need to be dismissive towards editors who bring legitimate concerns to your talk page. What you are characterizing as your "defense of women" was insultingly sexist and contributes to an already negative environment for women on Wikipedia. When you used a random picture of breasts to represent Power Girl, that was demeaning towards women. When you wrote that her "ability to fight villains with a large chest is apparently another one of her powers", that was also demeaning, in addition to being false. gobonobo+c00:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Gobonobo, I am fully responsible for all my edits. I didn't contest the changes made w/in a few hours of the article going live. I'm not likely to tread into this same minefield again, so you can not worry about that. The picture was of cleavage, not exposed breasts; I thought little of it, it was one of ten thumbnails and didn't really strike me as provocative, Lord knows the commons is full of much much worse stuff requiring brain bleach to wash out of my head. Perhaps I am not aware that cleavage is apparently considered provocative in more of the world than I ever thought about. I've learned from this experience to that extent. I certainly know not to add photos of women with exposed heads on the Arabic wikipedia for example, though most of the world thinks that quite absurd. Power Girl is not a well known comic heroine, yet it makes it into the Top 10 most viewed articles of the week on Wikipedia, ahead of major news stories going on around the world? Its very clear to me why that is happening. It was not "false" to claim her "ability to fight villains with a large chest is apparently another one of her powers" -- it was obviously commentary not intended to be taken literally. But I can see and do understand my intent was not completely clear, and some thought I intended it to be sexist. And since words belong to their readers, its important that I realize that's how some took it. But I do think that article was in the Top 10 due to "pathetic losers worshiping (comic) boobs more than live women." Aside from that, in my opinion, the "negative environment for women" on Wikipedia comes primarily from the way editors are treated, by male editors with limited social skills. I saw that first hand last year when I was one of the editors very involved in opposing the Amanda Filipacchi category problems last year. Again and again editors were creating yet more "female author" categories, digging in despite the vast outcry against the sexism inherent in the treatment of female biographies it was causing.--Milowent • hasspoken00:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
News Alert: This image has absolutely nothing to do with Power Girl. Added by Milo: It has EVERYTHING to do with her.[1][2]
Thank you for your response Milowent. You seem to be missing the point though. The problem isn't that cleavage is provocative, it is that you used an utterly unrelated image of cleavage to illustrate an article about a female superhero. I understand that it was perhaps a misguided attempt at irony, but as Kaldari pointed out, ironic sexism/hipster sexism is not wanted.
I wouldn't have brought this up with you if I hadn't noticed an ongoing difference in the way that women are treated in the Traffic Report. Whether it is the implication that traffic is driven by the fantasies of male internet users or referring to twerking as "girls waggling their bottoms", there are recurring themes of sexism and heteronormativity on the Traffic Report that you perpetuate. On August 6 two women made the top 10 list and you made comments in regards to both of them that they were "a likely fantasy of many male internet users, let's be honest." As much as I appreciate the cheeky irreverence of the Traffic Report commentary, too often I come away from the report feeling that women are disrespected and objectified there. I look forward to seeing Traffic Report commentary in the future that treats women with more respect. gobonobo+c02:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Gobonobo, the image has EVERYTHING to do with power girl. Power Girl is EXPLOITATIVE, and objectifies women using cartoonish exaggerations. I'm sorry to hear you found women being disrespected in the traffic report, especially so since it has been authored by a female editor [ETA: I was wrong about that. That editor is male, I really can't recall why I felt otherwise.] for almost all of its existence, aside from a few recent weeks by me. Yours is the first negative feedback on the "likely fantasy" comment I've heard (I got a few positive comments on that; that week was mine, ETA: hey, that barnstar above was from a female editor for that same report! Go figure! I'm not about to trot out "my black friend" every time, I just happened to check to see who posted that barnstar.); so I appreciate hearing feedback because I don't know about the negative comments otherwise. Negative comments (not about sexism as far as I am aware) helped deter the prior lead editor from wanting to do the report, but I don't really mind them, I know yours are intended in good faith. You can usually find the draft report posted via the signpost newsroom between Wed to Friday sometime, you're welcome to review it before publication.--Milowent • hasspoken02:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
You received a Wikipedia email about access to Newspapers.com about 2.5 weeks ago about access to WP:Newspapers.com access through the The Wikipedia Library. We currently don't have record of your response on the Google doc. Please make sure to follow the instructions in that email for obtaining access, Sadads (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Top 25 report
Do you want to alternate? That way we can deflect the flak from each other. Anyhoo, regardless, I've locked down every article on the list (four Reddit threads this week!) except rock music; not sure how to even begin searching for that one. Serendipodous09:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
It MIGHT have to do with the controversy surrounding Lorde's winning "Best Rock Video" at the VGA's, despite not technically being rock music. Serendipodous09:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Serendipodous, alternating would be great! Sounds like you a jump on this week already, so take it away. Wow, the Ice Bucket Challenge got quite high numbers! And the Mona Lisa isn't under copyright, so no cleavage-gate concerns should arise. The German article on rock music shows no jump [6], that one looks suspicious to me, it goes from 2000 a day and has remained high.--Milowent • hasspoken13:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
So if you two are switching off, you'll be doing the 9/17 Signpost, right? Rcsprinter will have a time-sensitive interview with WP:Scotland members that will need to be published on the 17th, as the independence referendum is on the 18th. Is that doable? Thanks! Ed[talk][majestic titan]06:05, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
On a related note, can either of you come over to 25 report talk page to double check some uncertainties? grok.se seems to be down now, so I'm a bit in the dark. Serendipodous08:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but Wikipedia emails for some reason aren't arriving at my new email address. Could we hash things out here or is it too private? Serendipodous13:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
No problem -- I got a note from Tony at the Signpost letting me know they hope to publish early (on time?) this week, late on Wednesday, and was hoping the Traffic Report could be ready by then. I let him know we are switching weeks and this is yours, but that I'd make sure it was ok.--Milowent • hasspoken13:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Carol showed me the link to the Wales video, and if he and the WMF are even mildly serious then someone should hold their feet to the fire about following through. There has been far too much tension on that page, so please don't try and stir shit up. You made me look at my sig and tweak it a bit btw.Two kinds of porkMakin'Bacon05:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Listen, we both know you're being a fuckin turd over there. We're big boys, we know how this works. You've been here under this username for over a year and have never created even one article? Come on now. Get the fuck off their page if you're going to keep up this crap, you're clearly intelligent and could contribute more meaningfully to Wikipedia if you wished to do so. Comment on the GGTF when they contribute outside their group; if they ever promote proposals outside the group, it will require consensus to be adopted anyway.--Milowent • hasspoken05:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to see them make some plausible proposals. I'm sick of the accusations of mysogeny directed towards me as well. Frankly I'm sick of you. Maybe a nights sleep on it will change things. Good night.Two kinds of porkMakin'Bacon05:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello Milowent/Archive 6! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!
Thanks for the invite, I will check it out. I've seen a number of articles I've created on female authors being tagged by some bot for that project in the past day or so, and I was surprised to see how many I've written. It wasn't an intentional thing, but I kept finding authors who didn't have articles, and I guess most of them were female. Hmmmm. :-).--Milowent • hasspoken17:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your exercise of discretion. The discussion is collapsed so I don't want to touch it at this point. I couldn't find the hilarious diff again where the ANI against him was briefly closed, saying we all know he's impossible to discipline.--Milowent • hasspoken01:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Hello, Milowent. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 04:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
There was a recent documentary released on the subject of that article. I think it is quite plausible that they just saw the documentary, went to Wiki to read more, and found that there was no article on the subject. You really think they are a sleeper created a year ago to create a page on someone who wasn't even famous yet? Thanks for removing the edit, though. You might consider weighing in on the AfD. VQuakr (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Maybe you're right. There are accounts which get created for this kind of purpose by people with far too much time on their hands, but there's no way I can know for sure.--Milowent • hasspoken04:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Got the info from Oliver at last! Could you explain what he does? I'd like to thank him in the summary without mentioning him by name. Serendipodous18:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
I believe he can see (at least) the hourly info and IP source location of hits, the sort of info which is not shared for privacy reasons.--Milowent • hasspoken19:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
BTW, while I'm assembling it, there's something I've been meaning to mention: if you want to track the numbers week to week, look at the views, not the position in the chart, because chart positions can rise while viewing figures fall, and vice versa. Serendipodous22:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Certainly I know what you're saying. Comments I make about dropping from say #2 to #8 are just a throwback to Billboard reporting style, which has the same problem.--Milowent • hasspoken02:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Sure! Any thoughts on exclusions would be helpful -- looks like there will be a ton, and that "last spike" one suggests someone could even be intentionally screwing with us.--Milowent • hasspoken23:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I've seen some talk online about 100s of new editors threatening to join the project and start doing things like create articles. They will start joining today, on and off, over the the next few weeks. Some will leave and some more will come. This threat seems very severe.--Milowent • hasspoken19:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Help me create a Request for Comment asking that Jimmy Wales step down
I want to create a request for comment with some long term members of the Article Rescue Squadron.
This request for comment would argue that the only way to reverse the negative trend of deleting other editors good faith edits would be for Jimmy Wales to step down.
I misinterpreted your comment on my talk page. I jumped to a conclusion based on a flawed reading of your comments caused by my half-dead sense of humour. Sorry for pouncing on you. BethNaught (talk) 17:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Sphil, interesting! After some looking, I have an educated guess. It appears #313 is a monthly number that hasn't been updated since March 2014, see [7]. In March 2014 the article got 384,083 views[8]; in Sept 2014 it only got 101,823 views[9]. If you look at the WP:5000 for the past week, it is only ranked #3134. That makes more sense.--Milowent • hasspoken19:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
April 18 was also an odd day, although some have reported some one-off oddities. The March traffic isn't a single spike. Not a big deal, but it does appear the rankings are not updated monthly.--S Philbrick(Talk)22:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Azerbaijani places
Thanks for starting that AfD on Gasaneri, I presume due to the cool "Ә"s in your name you know your stuff. There are probably more stubs like that for Azerbaijani locations - is there official census information for each rayon that could help us improve our coverage? Regards.--Milowent • hasspoken13:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello my friend thank you for attention. Yes there are a lot of villages which abolished a lot of years ago, but today all of them in English and Bahasa Wikipedia. I will start to work on them. You also can help me to delete them because I am not an administrator and I do not have permission to delete them. If you are administrator or you have a friend who is administrator help to delete them. There are documents about changing of places villages and municipalities. I think I can find this document. If I send you can delete all extra places?--Nəcməddin Kəbirli (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Friend, I am happy to help. If some have been consolidated, we can mention that in the current location article. I am not an administrator, but I can help "prod" (request deletion) articles that need deletion.--Milowent • hasspoken13:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
They were exist bu population of some villages went to another places, such as Sukhtakala and Kazmabuduq. Other was fixed with other villages. And most of this actions happened during Soviet times. It means that they cancelled many years ago You put this source [[10]] to all deleletion requests and there are all districts, municipalities, and villages of Azerbaijan, it is official source. You can find Quba rayon (disrict) and see wich places are extra. Good luck.--Nəcməddin Kəbirli (talk) 06:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
1898. He was buried in [[Laurel Hill Cemetery]] in Philadelphia.<Ref name="triboti">(1 March 1898)( [http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1898/03/01/page/6/article/the-lesson-of-a-life The Lesson of a
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joyce Kirby may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
id=kEJAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xYQMAAAAIBAJ&pg=5665,1956340 Films in Glasgow], ''The Glasgow Herald]''</ref>
amp;q&f=false Mayors of the City of Brooklyn], p. 94, in ''The Pictorial History of Brooklyn'' (19160</ref> When consolidation occurred on January 1, 1898, Wurster addressed a reception at
You have em too? Today I just discovered they have been billing me 6 months for equipment I already own. Hopefully one day there will be an article about Comcast losing a class-action lawsuit with "billion" and "fine" in there.Two kinds of porkMakin'Bacon02:18, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I think it's time we revise the exclusion criteria
From now on, I think we should just say that any articles with less than 1% or more than 95% mobile are automatically excluded, because to list the exclusions this week would take almost as long as the report. Serendipodous11:55, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
I really enjoyed the Traffic Report this week (like I do pretty much every week :) Thanks for doing such a great job at it and bringing a keen eye to popular topics on Wikipedia! Best, Jake Ocaasit | c03:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Hello, Milowent. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 18:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Scalhotrod, nice work. That dad-camp article has caused some controversy; until a major paper takes on the cleavage issue firsthand that will continue to be an area to monitor. Cheers.--Milowent • hasspoken13:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought about that, but there was a User that was adamant about adding the material. So rather than Edit War over it, I just added it neutrally and sourced it properly. Personally I think the blogger's "observations" we're creepy and not "Dad like" at all. If the guy had wanted to criticize her about something insightful, I would have commented about her song choices. Rock classics or not, they deal with some fairly mature themes. That's why I added the additional note about her age, she's just an adolescent girl that happens to be quite attractive.
That said, he's not the only one to comment on her cleavage and at least he did it in a relatively tactful manner. The other sources I have found about Greenberg just blatantly talk about her cleavage and might mention that she sings. I hope she tries out for The X Factor or a similar show. --Scalhotrod(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 18:51, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Serendipodous! Sweet sassy molassey! Could you find it in your heart to still do this week's before any break? I now see your deleted comment at the Signpost[15]. Wikipedia is a haven for complainers, those of us who are do-ers just need to do. Many people love the commentary, indeed just last week someone called your report "one of the best-written entries in this Signpost series" which made me feel quite unloved. haha. I know it can be a drudge but I do think we are building up a historical resource of value. Of course I'm an editor who studies 100+ year old top-selling book reports in the Bookman so perhaps I'm daft, but I certainly hope not.--Milowent • hasspoken16:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Milowent, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing, NorthAmerica100014:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Mendiola
Hello Milowent, I send you very best wishes for Christmas and the New Year, too. But I also want to bring up the matter of Mojo Mendiola again, whose entry you deleted this morning arguing that it had been started ten years ago when notability standards were still in flux. Yet, the fact that they were and the fact that they changed is neither the subject's nor the original editor's fault. And it is a principle of civilized and constitutional societies, never to apply new laws and rules retroactively. I'd therefor be grateful if you could rethink your decision and reactivate Mendiola's entry which only got into your special focus because I did what is usually desired: added more information and sources which demonstrated that the subject's notability has been and is growing. Thank you for your kind attentionBudybla23 (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Budybla23, I am sorry the article was deleted, I favor an inclusionist viewpoint and don't like to see editor's work deleted. The "law" is not being applied retroactively in that we can't change the past, the article was permitted to exist long beyond what policy permitted, and no doubt other articles like it lurk throughout the project until people find them. If you can cite to me the three best sources that you think show notability, I will take a close look at them and consider whether a new article could be created that would withstand deletion.--Milowent • hasspoken19:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Pine, Serendipodous created the Top 25 earlier this week, so I just did the formatting changes necessary for the Signpost version and submitted it.--Milowent • hasspoken21:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Ah, Mike Schwartz, the nature of the problem was checking my watchlist on a mobile device, where errant rollbacks occasionally emanate as a result, and I am sorry for that. I haven't had time to investigate your suggestions, but I did some work on that article in October 2010[16] because I thought it in poor shape, and the "emeritus" wording was there then. It should go, go at it!--Milowent • hasspoken22:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
OK, if I understand your response, it sounds like, it is now OK for me to either [a] make certain changes to the article Daniel Bell, or -- (is this correct?) -- to [b] first, ["start out" by doing this]: reinstate a certain change (a new section) on the "Talk:" page Talk:Daniel Bell. Oops, wait a minute! I wrote the above before I saw this [edit]. Now, "[b]" has already been done. (Good! on to [a]) PS: Now it makes sense that your reply to me [above] seems to mention [a] but skips even talking about [b]. Thank you. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 21:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
_by_Ron.jpg)
_Anbetung_des_Kindes.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}