User talk:Michaelwild

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Michaelwild! I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

ϢereSpielChequers 11:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Trema orientalis

Hello! Your submission of Trema orientalis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michaelwild. I'm aware of the similar results. Thanks for the reminder, anyway. In Wikipedia, if you feel strongly that something should be mentioned in a particular article, you revise the article to include whatever you think should be mentioned. Please feel free to edit the Trema orientalis article the way you want. (Someone else may follow and edit it the way they want.) It's the wikipedian way! If I have to make a suggestion, I'd would encourage starting the Trema micrantha article, and when you're done, please feel free to nominate it for DYK. Go right ahead. Happy editing. Cheers! :-) --PFHLai (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Trema orientalis

Updated DYK query On March 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trema orientalis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Echinacea

Hi Michaelwild, Thanks for contributing to WP but I have removed your material from the talk section of Echinacea as the material you supplied was WP:OR. Talk pages are for discussing the article in question and not the subject itself. As the material you provided was original research it could never be incorporated into the article. You may also want to read up on double-blind studies and sampling size before you decided that echinacea is effective. Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. Happy to answer any questions. Cheers, Gillyweed (talk) 22:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Margaritaria discoidea

Hi. I've nominated Margaritaria discoidea, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. PFHLai (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC) BTW, please add more refs to the "Bibliography" section, as we don't know what "Kerharo & Adam 1974", "Weenen et al, 1990", etc. in the article are referring to. Some footnotes in the "Distribution" & "Description" sections would be helpful, too. Thanks in advance. Happy editing. --PFHLai (talk) 08:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well, Michaelwild, please do you can and what you think is best. I've tagged the article with {{refimprove}} for now. Contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check as you see fit. I'll be off-line the next little while, so good luck with the DYK nom. If it's not meant to be, it's not meant to be. Don't worry about it. (Maybe some expert can fix things for you.) Happy editing. --PFHLai (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Margaritaria discoidea

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Blouaapspoor adapted English.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sevenia boisduvali

Just wanted to say thanks for the great Sevenia boisduvali article! It so happens that user Dger and me are working on adding articles for all South African butterflies using the "Field Guide to Butterflies of South Africa" as a primary source. If you are interested in helping out more, that would be very welcome. Cheers and thanks again. Ruigeroeland (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That list is in the works! See: User:Ruigeroeland/SandboxSA. I will only add the names though and concentrate on making species pages first. If you want you could add info when I have put it live (it is now located in my user space). Best list I have seen so far is List of Australian butterflies. Would be great if we could get it up to that level, but we still need a lot of pictures. Maybe you can convince other people working on that project you were talking about to contribute some images and information? Cheers! Ruigeroeland (talk) 20:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The list is done! See: List of butterflies of South Africa. It is still a basic list with only the species, but it's a start. Ruigeroeland (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great work on the new article.. And thanks for the info on the name changes, I had no idea.. I am experiencing that our western EU education doesn't really learn us that much about African geography at all. Most of the names of provinces and small countries are more or less new to me..! Especially surprising since I'm from the Netherlands and we have some history in South Africa (not one to be proud of though). Anyway, I changed all entries for Natal to KwaZulu-Natal and Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. I also found that Transkei is now part of the Cape Province? Ruigeroeland (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the geogrpahy lesson! And thanks for all your work and great pictures. I moves all the Hyalites/Acraea species to Telchinia (there is no need to copy the acticle to a new page, just click on "move" and enter the new name). Could you give me the URL for that full list of butterflies of South Africa? I have been looking on http://sabca.adu.org.za/ but cannot find it.. Ruigeroeland (talk) 14:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, no worries then.. I have taken the names from the Field Guide I use as a source.. most should be okay wouldn't they? If not, we can easily move them to a newer name later. I did notice the field guide says there are 666 species (nice number haha) and I read there are just over 700 somewhere else. Are you aware of newly described species or species that were first recorded from South Africa recently? If so, they are probably not yet on our list.Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Next week should have been possible, but I will on a festival from wednesday to sunday, so you will have to work pretty hard on your own from then on..! :) Ruigeroeland (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perves 2010

Hi, could you provide more details, like the title of the paper, for the "Purves, M. (2010)" reference that you've used in Sclerocroton integerrimus and Sevenia boisduvali? I've had a look for it myself but can't find it. Nice work on the articles by the way. Smartse (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on my talk page. Smartse (talk) 19:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sclerocroton integerrimus

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dixeia pigea

Hello! Your submission of Dixeia pigea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 23:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL

Hi! I noticed that you uploaded a lot of files recently with the license GFDL. Wikipedia has changed license to also include {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Would you perhaps be willing to release your images under that license also? --MGA73 (talk) 19:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your answer on my talk page: If you choose Public Domain then everyone can use the image anyway they want - I doubt that this is what you are looking for. The CC-license and GFDL both allows others to use the image but they have to credit the author (you). So if someone want to use one of your images in a school book they have to tell that it was taken by Michaelwild from the English Wikipedia. The biggest difference is that if the license is GFDL then they have to print the whole text from http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html in the book but if you choose the CC then they only need to "make a link" to the license. I sould therefore suggest {{self|author=[[User:Michaelwild]]|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. If you decide to change the license it should be possible to do so with a bot so you do not have to change all the images by hand. --MGA73 (talk) 12:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KwaZulu Dwarf Chameleon.png

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:KwaZulu Dwarf Chameleon.png has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KwaZulu Dwarf Chameleon 002336-1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KwaZulu Dwarf Chameleon 002336-1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dark KwaZulu Dwarf Chameleon.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dark KwaZulu Dwarf Chameleon.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming pages

Hi Michael. You recently tried to rename Durban Botanic Garden to Durban Botanic Gardens, which is quite proper. However, you did it by copy-pasting the article contents to the new location and replacing the old article with a redirect. This ruins the edit history, which is a bad thing, since we want to be able to attribute contributions properly. I have now renamed the article using the "move page" feature in the "page" tab, and all should be well. Favonian (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery on Gloriosa page

Hi Michael, yes I did remove the gallery from the genus page. Certainly the photos can still be used, and they are more appropriate for the species page, but the Wikipedia policy is to discourage large galleries, in favour of a link to commons.wikimedia. See the policy discussion at [5]. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 15:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SA Moths

Hello there, it has been a long time, but I just wanted to let you know I made the page List of moths of South Africa. Seeing you are interested in South African Butterflies, I thought you might have some images of moths too. Cheers! Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, just wanted to inform you about it. Keep up the good work! Ruigeroeland (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ant-heap White 9177 Willis CK 2009-10-24 Limpopo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ant-heap White 9177 Willis CK 2009-10-24 Limpopo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Ant-heap White 9177 Willis CK 2009-10-24 Limpopo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ant-heap White 9177 Willis CK 2009-10-24 Limpopo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

You've Got Mail

Just thought I'd let you know here, too. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just replied to you again at the PUF discussion. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Michaelwild. You have new messages at Drilnoth's talk page.
Message added 14:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

–Drilnoth (T/C) 14:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Michaelwild. You have new messages at Drilnoth's talk page.
Message added 19:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

–Drilnoth (T/C) 19:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petunia axillaris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]