User talk:Michaeldsuarez/Archive 2

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Feel free to browse through this archive:

Hi!

If you're not gonna delete the ED entry, at least delete that stupid cat from the bottom of the page. See I just did, and one of your fanny moderators went and reverted me. Also, LEAVE the Maja Schmidt page alone. I don't care if you want to be an immature fanny and edit Grace Saunders, but Maja Schmidt is not your concern. I'm not dictating to you, but I don't see why my edits keep getting reverted when "I" initially wrote it. Also, why do you even come on Wikipedia if you never add anything?45g (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?

So what about ED? I think you should delete the persinal info.

Also, what's this about Pokémon and Bulbapedia?

hi u fgt wut is rrong wit u.

im grace suanders fuk u and snaisybel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.16.73 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 30 April 2010

About User:45g

I'll try every method to coax him into having a free discussion. Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 18:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC) Looks like a smelly sock. Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 18:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 00:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also fear that he's watching us and trying ban me too. Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 00:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who's Maja?

Maja was this cow who used to have a blog where she badmouthed me on behalf of an admin from Silent Hill Heaven, who banned me after I was ratted out on her forums. There were a lot of people who found Maja annoying, because she thought she was right about everything she would put on her blog, or some people's blogs.

When I tried to get even, she tried to sue me. I got letters from an Edinburgh solicitor about it. After a while, she sold her blog to someone (or so she says) and got a new one. Then somebody registered on ED and gave away the fact her new name was Zoey.

She basically was doing what Snaisybelle is doing now. Only Maja was doing it 3 years before I knew Snaisybelle.45g (talk) 02:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The cat is from Incredimail. You can add it as a notification, with sound. That's just a .GIF from the website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 45g (talk • contribs) 02:35, 3 May 2010

I haven't seen Maja in ages. I'm not convinced she really did sell her blog. People are quite capable of beginning their own blog without her help. Why would they want to buy hers?45g (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dowan.org was the domain. Also, on her ED page, you need to format the text on her page a bit better.45g (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess.45g (talk) 22:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes. What a mess. Makes me wanna cry when people cannot even slag someone off properly.45g (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://edyouknowwhat.com/Talk:Grace_Saunders

Put the Grace Saunders talk shit in the right dated order, please. 45g (talk) 16:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's your affiliation with Miss Ob?

Besides ED, what else is she to any of us?45g (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're now reduced to being a cry baby NYC journalist?

http://www.google.pl/support/forum/p/youtube/thread?tid=009d7e0cba7230aa&hl=en&fid=009d7e0cba7230aa000484995536f645&hltp=2

45g (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad To Hear It

Thanks for everything you have done with all this- It is very much appreciated Snaisybelle (talk) 13:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike?

That u man?! 15:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.44.84 (talk)

Re:Impersonator

Been so long since I last logged in and only got the message now. Well, I would say it is him. He seems to have a dislike for me too now after I told Wikia to decline his admin request on Central. Solar Dragon (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'grats

Congratulations on your new appointment. Awesome :3 - Alison ❤ 05:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly lay off harassing me.

I got a new Wikipedia name and I ain't telling you what it is.24.184.229.242 (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gay Nigger Association of America up for Deletion Review

Hello! Since you participated in The MfD, you might be interested in participating in the Deletion Review, as well.

LiteralKa (talk) 04:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback 1

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 16:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback 2

Hello, Michaeldsuarez. You have new messages at Dwayne's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

AfD discussion of Goatse Security

Just to let you know that an article you created, Goatse Security, is currently being considered for deletion as part of wikipedia's articles for deletion process. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goatse Security. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 14:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GOOD THING THE PERSON ABOVE NOTIFIED YOU INSTEAD OF THE PERSON WHO CAME OUT OF 5 YEARS OF HIDING TO PUT THIS UP FOR DELETION. LiteralKa (talk) 08:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

chris abad

Christopher Abad, a goatse security member now has a wikipedia article. It is pretty well sourced but I am not too hot with the mediawiki markup and it was mostly cut and pasted from other sources. jfyi. --Truthseeq (talk) 09:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Operation Payback

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFD notifications

Hi, Michael. I was asked on my talk page about the notifications you made here and here for the GNAA redirect discussion. If those are the only notifications you plan to make, I don't see an issue. However, if you make additional notifications, you should be careful to follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Canvassing. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --RL0919 (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From Peter (MallowMeltsBA)

Good news: The ED page is gone. Don't bring it back once it is gone.

By the way, you should be relieved from your duties as a sysop. This can be easily arranged by putting a loaded gun and pulling the trigger to your head.

Don't you see that every time you ban me or try to get me banned unfairly, fairly or in between your ass cheeks, that I just come back 6326 times to tell you to get a damned life!? Not ard to figure that one out, m8. So kindly take your bullshit somewhere else! K thanks, cheerio.MallowMeltsBA (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your comments

Your comments here are incorrect. As the discussion is closed, I wanted to let you know. My WT:CSD discussion is based on the policy, not on JimmyPitt. I disagreed with Jimmy, sure, but the problem is that admins treat G1 inconsistently, so that's why I went to WT:CSD. (In fact I thought Jimmy and my conversation on his talk page was friendly.) Still, there is no one at WT:CSD even answering the question; I simply want to know if WP:NONSENSE applies for {{db-nonsense}}. As Blade has stated at WT:CSD, we NPPers don't even know what the policy is, and it's a huge source of frustration. I don't care what the policy is either way... I just want it to be consistent. — Timneu22 · talk 00:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Th3j35t3r

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Th3j35t3r requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JV Smithy (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Th3j35t3r

Thanks for the wiki-article Victuallers (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gay Nigger Association of America

It's up for deletion review, again. Thought you would be interested. LiteralKa (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uyghur people

I have blocked the other user in the edit war, but I should remind you that you are also dangerously close to crossing the line as well. You attempted to participate in the discussion whereas Secularhumanist did not, which is why I blocked him and not you. But now that you have both reverted one another several times, it would be best to avoid reverting again for the time being (even if he reverts as soon as his block was up) and limit your contributions to the talk page until a consensus is reached. If he reverts without consensus, other users can take care of it. Best, rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SOZ

i know ur busy being a nerdand stuff but i need to apolagize for my friend who has edited quite a few pages on wiki with my laptop srry:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.175.118 (talk) 17:11, 14 March 2011

Alright. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi i do not understand the message you have sent me as i have never edited wikepedia... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.175.118 (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't sent the message to you specifically. You're probably one of several users who use that IP address. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:GoatseSecurity.png

Thanks for uploading File:GoatseSecurity.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ED/OE

If Oh internet is not replacing ED, then why do the Google links for ED all now go to Oh Internet? Inquiring minds want to know. Try the URL on the Encyclopedia Dramatica page. Bielle (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The whole website has been redirected, I'd like to know why this happened also...--Corevette789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.42.132.249 (talk) 03:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, ED won't come back in it's old form?

That's a shame, since I was a EDiot myself. I think you and me can both agree the redesign is shit. Takeo™ 23:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Do you know if they have an archive of the previous articles from ED? Takeo™ 00:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say try the Wayback Machine. And ditto on what suarez said on your page - I'm an ex-ED sysop myself - Alison ❤ 00:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, the article I was looking for would have been too recent. Takeo™ 00:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sad. ED was fun to read at times. --Guerillero | My Talk 02:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hai

You still into this whole "Joseph Evers is real" thing, or has that gotten old by now? Just curious. You seemed pretty convinced back then. --Conti|✉ 17:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for being honest now. :-) Your trolling at the ED talk page in that regard was quite well done. --Conti|✉ 18:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks

Hello, Michaeldsuarez, In regards to your complaints about personal attacks, such as the one I did to User:Dr._Pizza, thank you. However, I cannot see how my actions did fit into wp:personal. If you could, please tell me how it fit into wp:personal, and I will be happy to rectify my problem, thank you, user:Purplepox01 18:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Implying that someone is autistic is a personal attack. And your question here comes across less as genuine confusion and more as disingenuity: it should have been obvious to you that this was a personal attack. Don't do that, and more strongly, don't go editing other people's user pages or refactoring their comments. Also don't go around making WP:POINTy retaliatory actions to people who point out your misbehavior. Any more questions? —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ohai! I have a question: Why don't you grow up and accept that freedom of speech is a reality on the Internet? I don't care if someone calls me an autistic ninety year old lesbian. I'm not any of those things and if I were, I doubt that being pointed out to me would offend me. Obai. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.80.139.102 (talk) 09:05, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History lesson

"Santorum" is by no means to Rick Santorum as Hooverville is to Hoover. Yopienso (talk) 04:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting...

So, Zaiger, the other half of the military branch, ended up deleting my page as "terribly non-funny". He then deleted all of the pages on my stories, but he didn't delete the page that has a transcription of the hacked emails from FA. I just find it interesting that he deleted everything except for the one thing that was really the main privacy violation (and an example of why we shouldn't link to .ch). Not that i'm talking about anything important on there, except about "cockroach-megawolf babies". Oh god, that still cracks me up how stupid it is. SilverserenC 20:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Internet screenshot

Hi, I see you're doing a revamp at ED and removed File:Oh Internet homepage screenshot.png from the article. I'm not currently following what's going on with the article, but if you think you might want to use the screenshot then you should put it back in the article somewhere for the mean time or else it will get speedy deleted (fair use claimed images get speedy deleted if they're not being used in their supposed articles). Jolly Ω Janner 18:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edlogo2.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edlogo2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

referendum numbers

Michael, thanks for replying. No time to check out other people before publication: your "5 + neutral" is useful, and I'll insert it. Tony (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's up with ED?

Site's down, forums are down. I'm sorry to bug you here, but I forgot ED's IRC address. Also, lol. I don't see Schlafly using the dubious website's shroud of choice to bolster Conservapedia. Thanks for any info -brxbrx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.225.194.245 (talk) 03:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://forum.encyclopediadramatica.ch/threads/ed-news-up-to-the-minute-lulz.2398/. Concerning Conservapedia: I just hate how every time I try to see what's going on, I can't connect. There were interesting things occurring in that wiki's RecentChanges that I wanted to view for fun. There's also that hilarious Devil's Dictionary project that Schlafly started. Also, why would I miss an opportunity to add another website to CloudFlare's list of infamous clients? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you sir

for the warm welcome to this wonderful and prestigious website. all hail lord jimbo! --Weev 4real (talk) 00:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate your constructive edits to Bluegrass Fiddle. GeoBardSemi-retired 00:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Strictly as an FYI, in regards to your suggestion: both CheckUser and Oversight permissions (available to sitting arbitrators on request) have been granted the requisite bits to view deleted revisions. –xenotalk 17:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Ctrl + F

It's not how I roll. :) --♣thayora♣ 14:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pakistanism

The DYK project (nominate) 00:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)