User talk:Meredyth

Archive
Archives

Welcome!

Hello, Meredyth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dampier burrup and flying foam

The burrup art is the more developed (if not over) the flying foam is the recent stub and the dampier is the indequately expanded (probaby should have more geog stuff in it) - so id have a close look at the burrup one imho for the anthrop material SatuSuro 01:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the burrup art was kept separate from the dampier for reason of the issues it raises - and the dampier is left skeletal and the flying foam could have been merged into either but they are three sep arts at the mo - SatuSuro 01:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We have these huge imposing not very helpful lists of islands for western australia - and maias did a great job on the islands of tasmania some time back - i have a very very distant fantasy to say the least to do an art of the fiction writing and islands in oz some time - maybe when all the other loose threads are finished :( SatuSuro 01:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Borges - you have pushed a button there - maybe some emails on some issues there - actually fictional and real could make a real good article - the whole thing of novels about rottnest here in perth - and i am sure all the larger islands off the south and east coast have novels written and or associated with ... SatuSuro 01:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is west australia has a substratum of very poorly known novels and stories that may well exist in the nla (was there too short time in january) and maybe the battye - about all of those - however the problem is finding em SatuSuro 01:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

islands

Hi Meredyth,

You rock. However, I put it to you that: Australia has a hell of a lot of islands; that List of islands of Australia is currently a crap list, and that it will never be complete, and nor indeed would we want it to be complete, because it would be astronomically large; that the only way List of islands of Australia could ever be considered a high quality list is if it is carefully scoped in such a way as to contain only prominent islands, while excluding boring two-bit islands, in which case two-bit islands like Pigeon Island (Houtman Abrolhos) would not be on it; that it therefore doesn't make sense to be linking to List of islands of Australia from every two-bit island; and that if you really really wanted to link to a list of islands from every two-bit island, the Western Australian islands would be better off linked to List of islands of Western Australia, which is complete; or better still, in the case of Pigeon Island, to List of islands in the Houtman Abrolhos. But you still rock.

Hesperian 06:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated deletion of Slashed

An article to which you have contributed, Slashed has been nominated for deletion. you may contribute to this discussion at its Article for deletion page and help improve the article per Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Australia

The incorporated association rules are at m:Wikimedia Australia/Rules for Wikimedia Australia Inc. Hope that is a little more transparent. I have not been involved in the discussions so I can't provide much help but you should be able to ask further questions at m:Wikimedia Australia -- Mattinbgn\talk 00:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

List of fictional characters ... pending deletion

Hello,

You may be interested in the discussion regarding deleting a list article regarding fictional Carpenters. You have in the past created a List of surname Burgess. I created a list of real and fictional Carpenter because other editors/admins told me to do so from the Carpenter surname page. Now others want to delete it. I was happy with the way it was and would be happy to merge the fictional Carpenters with the list of surname Carpenters. Any input, pro or con would be welcome.

See: List_of_fictional_characters_with_surname_Carpenter

Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cruciferous vegetable

Your work on Vitamin U wuz moved to a section in another article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.116.193 (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in Australian literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All That I Am (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 03:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 in Australian literature for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 in Australian literature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in Australian literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ninney (talk) 16:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2012 in Australian literature for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 in Australian literature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 in Australian literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ninney (talk) 16:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013 in Australian literature for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 in Australian literature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 in Australian literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ninney (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2011 in Australian literature

A tag has been placed on 2011 in Australian literature, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

As per discussion result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in Australian literature + Contents merged

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ninney (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation

Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation (August 2016)

I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Meredyth. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 06:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Meredyth! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 06:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15 January 2021

Paper released in Nature for you to add to the wiki

Paper released [1]https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05781-7 Mike J Hebblethwaite hydro-gen.co.uk 2A00:23C8:A6E9:BC01:1C8C:A7FF:FED9:8BEF (talk) 08:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]