User talk:Measl

Hi Measl,

I am amazed that not one of the obsessive-compulsive well-meaning Wikipedians gave you a welcome message, so I thought I'd welcome you myself.

Thanks for your input on the Twinkie Defense article. It's good to have more opinions (especially when they so neatly dovetail with my own).

And I love your userpage! Very provoking, in every sense of the word.

If you ever need any help here, drop me a line.

Jeffpw 12:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (who is still waking up after a long, stressful evening shift)[reply]

Twinkie defense Request for comments

Thanks very much for responding to the Request for comments. As your did seem to be clearly related to the RfC, I've moved the comment (completely intact) to an appropriate location within the RfC, with cross-referencing between the two locations so its apparent what I've done. Hope that is okay, as you had expressed uncertainty about where exactly it should go. Best wishes, & welcome to Wikipedia. --Yksin 16:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read your commets on kbh3rd - just so you know I support your stance.  Don't mind kbh3rd too much.  He's just a pissant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.39.106 (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] 

Paroxetine isn't rubbish.

I was surprised to see the statement you made in the beginning of the paroxetine page. i checked the study, it clearly states: "In conclusion, we found that paroxetine was not superior to placebo in terms of the proportion of study participants discontinuing treatment for any reason; in terms of depression measures, paroxetine exerted a modest antidepressant effect relative to placebo." perhaps its different because i read the study online (at cmaj.ca) I apologize if I sound offensive in criticizing you. I didn't intend to. Fdskjs (talk) 00:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of We Hold These Truths

I have nominated We Hold These Truths, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Hold These Truths. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ironholds (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of We Hold These Truths

A tag has been placed on We Hold These Truths requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. NJGW (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]