|
User talk:MddkppBritish Rail Class XPer consensus (or rather lack of consensus for anything else), all trains in use on the British network are called "British Rail Class X", eg the new Turbostars are BR Class 172. I accept BR doesn't exist anymore, but this is the way we classify them on Wikipedia. If you wish to argue this (really, please don't, it will go nowhere, very very slowly) take it up at WT:UKRAIL. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited British Rail Class 395, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hornby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC) LogisticsHowdy. Thanks for spotting the copyright problem with the material at Logistics. After reviewing the book, which was self-published through Lulu on 4/11/2011, this appears to be an all too frequent occurrence of someone stealing from Wikipedia - the material in question certainly existed before "publication", and has organically grown on the page. It looks like you were in the process of making improvements and trying to source the material; great job - I'll try to help. There's also a template for reverse copyright vios; I'll try to find it and add it to the talk page. Kuru (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC) ReplyAnd "Age of Humans" is also an opinion because no lore in the game (Dark Souls) mentions Age of Humans. So in turn, I've removed all interpretation from that article. As for KUF2, all the information was referenced. --82.12.216.204 (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC) NSB Di 6As far as I am aware, everything in the GA review has been seen to. Could you please either elaborate any further issues or pass the article. Thanks, Arsenikk (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC) LogisticsI agree with you about the deletion of the 1st, 2nd and 4th party logistics articles. But third-party logistics has had over 400 edits and lots of incoming links. If you really think it should be deleted, it needs an AfD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Per your comment, I have closed the deletion discussion as nomination withdrawn. If I was in error, you are welcome to revert. Best, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Over categorisation Category:Logistics in the United KingdomHi, I hope that this finds you well! I note that you have been adding your new category Category:Logistics in the United Kingdom to a lot of existing articles, especially those to do with the rail industry. I'd suggest that inline with WP:MOS you only add the category to articles where the rail yard is also a road transport point, and not ust a rail freight yard. The existing category Category:Rail yards in the United Kingdom covers all rail freight yard articles. The result of your current activity is gross over categorisation. I have hence: (1) added the category to Category:Rail yards in the United Kingdom; (2) removed the category where you added it to yards that are rail freight only. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC) A belated welcome!  Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mddkpp. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Wikih101 (talk) 23:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC) thanks...I just wanted to say for the fast reply on File:DIRFT1.svg. Maybe you could do the same to File:Speculative_DIRFT3.png? -- Kr51-2 (talk) 10:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC) UAV CatsYou appear to have created a load of cats related to UAVs and have been removing existing cats from articles, I presume you have agreement or consensus for these changes. Can you please point me to the discussion as I cant find it. If this has not been agreed it may help not to remove or create any more cats as it might save some work if we have to revert all your changes. If you can please comment and provide a link to any discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Category:Prototype and development unmanned aerial vehicles of the United StatesCategory:Prototype and development unmanned aerial vehicles of the United States, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 22:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Magna Park, Milton KeynesJust for the record, I originally created the article as a redirect, but found that the geodata wasn't appearing in the title line. Putting some text there made it happen. Now that you've reverted, it's gone again. I agree completely that it doesn't deserve an article (other that it is one of a chain of Magna Parks) but as it puts quite a splodge on maps it ought to have a wikipedia tag. So do you know how else to assert the geodata in #redirect articles? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:04, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Railway accidents in Vietnam / Rail transport in VietnamThanks so much for your kind comments about Railway accidents in Vietnam and Rail transport in Vietnam! I've worked a lot on both articles and have been working on getting the former ready for GA status-- you can see my progress in that article's peer review. I've had to put my work on WP to the side for the past little while due to personal time commitments, but your note inspired me to put a little more effort in. I don't really know what's involved in GA nomination apart from addressing issues raised in peer review, but I'm willing to help put finishing touches on both articles if you think they'd be ready. I'll keep a watchful eye on them in the next couple of months. I did fix one little point on the "accidents" article relating to the Hai Van Pass, but apart from that, I'm not aware of anything missing in that article. The "rail transport" article, on the other hand, still has a couple of definite shortcomings, mainly surrounding the structure of Vietnam Railways (the company) and a few historical points. If you'd like to discuss these a little more, I'd welcome the opportunity, as I'm neither an expert on rail transport nor on the GA process. Cheers and thank you once again! --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 05:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Categorization of Qalat (fortress)For the Qalat (fortress) article you changed the category from the general to the country, but you left out countries like Syria, Iraq, Libya, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Where there are multiple countries where the term is applicable, why is not the general category the appropriate one? --Bejnar (talk) 07:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Railway accidents in VietnamThe review of railway accidents in Vietnam has been placed on hold. Arsenikk (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Edit summariesHi! I notice that many of your edits do not carry edit summaries. Just a friendly reminder that edit summaries are very useful to other editors. The more detailed the edit summary, the less likely that another editor will need to spend time opening the diffs to see what changes were made. Thanks! - Alarics (talk) 08:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Category:Unmanned aerial vehicles by manufacturerCategory:Unmanned aerial vehicles by manufacturer, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 18:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC) March 2012 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --John (talk) 23:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)  Mddkpp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I should appeal because in reality it is me who is being harrassed by the arseholes at wikiproject aircraft, who are undoing all the perfectly reasonable work that I did on the categories. I guess that because they are clearly children or at least have the mentality of children I will just have to take the shit (as usual) because nobody else has enough self respect to tell them to fuck off. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_2#Category:Unmanned_aerial_vehicles_by_manufacturer and tell me that's a good faith category merge request. Thanks for your time.Mddkpp (talk) 23:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: {{subst:You clearly do not understand the reason you were blocked. Telling people to "fuck off" is not civil, and this kind of behavior will not be tolerated.}} Parsecboy (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Disambiguation link notification for March 4Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC) KUF2The edit included the official site (with the information) in the references. --Ajsitian (talk) 13:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Edit: Oh. I see you're blocked now. You talk about people undoing work but you were undoing mine so you deserve the block. I suspected you were a troll. --Ajsitian (talk) 13:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Category:Fortification by EraCategory:Fortification by Era, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC) Renaming of Proposed rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom subcategoriesPlease see my proposal to rename Category:Proposed rail transport in England, Category:Proposed rail transport in Scotland, Category:Proposed rail transport in Wales, Category:Proposed rail transport in Northern Ireland, Category:Rail Infrastructure projects in the United Kingdom Category:Transport projects in London & Category:Proposed transport projects in London; all subcategories of Category:Proposed rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom Hugo999 (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Carillon towers in the United States A tag has been placed on Category:Carillon towers in the United States indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Carillon towersA tag has been placed on Category:Carillon towers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC) |