User talk:Mboverload/Archive 6

Re: User talk:71.75.8.12

No problem. I keep an eye on WP:AIV, so I saw the report, saw the history of vandalism, and realized the block was rather appropriate. —C.Fred (talk) 03:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One of these days I need to rack down a client and get back onto IRC. How much am I admitting my age to say that the last time I was there regularly, it was to play #initgame? :) —C.Fred (talk) 05:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

justinfr

Hey, Thanks for fixing my talk page. justinfr (talk) 12:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! If you need any more help with vandals let me know. mboverload@ 18:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Rollback granted

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! PeterSymonds (talk) 22:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle mistake

With this edit you reverted my edits to Lord Voldemort. You reverted my additions of periods and commas when Huggle is only supposed to be used for blatant vandalism. Useight (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Also posted on your talk page) Sorry about that - I have been having some technical problems with Huggle. I'll go review my other editing. Thank you for alerting me and sorry for reverting you. --[[User:Mboverload|mboverload]][[Special:Emailuser/Mboverload|<font color="red">@</font>]] (talk) 23:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian Army

History; Last paragraph - Since the History's books used in Brazil as well as quotes from new generation of army's officers in media refer to the events of 31 march of 1964 as a coup d'état and it's effects, I don't known were it could be a partiality in my edit, it seems the contrary... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.228.172 (talk) 00:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply on Talk:Brazilian_Army. Thank you! --mboverload@ 00:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Well done

Thanks, I will! ... discospinster _talk 01:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page Code

Hello, I appropriated some of your user page code for my own page. I hope that's all right. I noticed you got the code from somebody else too, so I figured it's probably kosher. Let me know if not though! :) justinfr (talk) 02:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to my talk

My edit was reverted by a bot, which left a comment. You had no reason to leave a comment there. 62.30.169.162 (talk) 03:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myself and the bot do the same job. It just so happened that we both reverted and gave the warning at the same time. mboverload@ 03:39, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in your Wikipedia, editing your articles. 62.30.169.162 (talk) 01:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tracking ur IP. In ma speed boat. --mboverload@ 04:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

o hai ?

i r the ninja deletar? –xenocidic (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Xenocidic. I appricate that you work behind the scenes on these things. It's a thankless job until now =). --mboverload@ 04:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - just try'na keep up! =) –xenocidic (talk) 04:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of rules...

Hi, saw your comment at editor assistance. Here's the short of it (from Policy trifecta):

• Neutral point of view
• Don't be a dick
• Ignore all rules

Being that there are too many rules, #3 is of particular importance here: you don't need to memorize them, or even be afraid of making mistakes, as you'll be corrected over time. There's also simplified ruleset, which has the quick summaries of all the policies. and here's a nice essay! Anyway, feel free to message me if you have any questions :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the simplified ruleset is nicely printable :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 03:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diff postings on AIV

Hi, re: the postings on AIV, they're generated by Huggle after a level 4 warning. Davewho2 (talk) 04:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My VandalProof doesn't do that =(. I still love it though. --mboverload@ 04:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Violette

First I ask you how many other singing pirates in television commercials have had such a rush of people attempting to write about him? I say Eric Violette is on par with the likes of "The Burger King" in his notability within the television realm. Not only does "The Burger King" have an article, he's even getting a feature length movie of his own.

I have different arguments on behalf of Monseiur Violette but I shall present them one at a time. Homotlfqa83 (talk) 15:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling correction mishap

Hi there. Thanks for stopping by Automotive lighting to fix such spelling errors as "whereever" and "alligning". Your edit also changed every instance of "signalling" to "signaling". Neither is incorrect, but the double-L variant is generally preferred in international English while the single-L is oftener found in American English; because this article is written in international English, not only does WP:ENGVAR prefer that we leave the double-L, but an important reference (Regulation 48; scroll down to find it so you needn't yank down the whole PDF) uses the double-L spelling. I've changed "signaling" back to "signalling", but I wanted to let you know I do appreciate your efforts to clean up the genuine errors in the article. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 20:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. The whereever" and "alligning were done by AWB and I manually fixed signalling with Microsoft Word so this will not happen again. Thanks. --mboverload@ 20:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Birch Society Page

Hey Mb--thanks for getting involved. Before I got into this mess I thought *I* was third party (you can see from my handle-less-ness that I'm generally a pretty casual wiki user). Anyway, I might have gotten carried away but I don't think I'm the problem. If you read the talk page over there it seems like that one guy is holding the page hostage to an intro that cites only the JBS website (which is obviously not good wiki policy). Thanks again for helping out! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.199.22.152 (talk) 19:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oops forgot to sign, although you seem to have taken care of it for me... 151.199.22.152 (talk) 19:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sectioned

Thank you for all the typo fixing on the weapons catalog, Im surprised the spellbot missed them all. I am a dsylexic typist. anyways kudos to you. --Bloodkith (talk) 02:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sectioned

Why were you bugging me about my thoughts on erich violette if you weren't even going to respond to my post(which was only made because you asked). Not even a thank you ! Homotlfqa83 (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Homolfqa, what post are you talking about? I asked on your talkpage but I don't see a response there.  ???

I answered on your talk page. its now archived. I laid out some arguments in favor of E. Violette. Homotlfqa83 (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your "fix" at Brazilian hip hop

Hi, I am wondering why you chose to change the properly spelled Portuguese word "comando" with the improperly spelled "commando" at Brazilian hip hop? Thank you for letting me know, Badagnani (talk) 05:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was my fault - I should have seen that it was in another language. --mboverload@ 15:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Stargate

Hello, Mboverload/Archive 6! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Stargate, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for update the activity of the wikiproject. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list. Thanks! – sgeureka ^t•c 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

jewelery typo fixing

When doing these, please pay attention to whether the article uses American or British English. For instance, in Hip hop fashion, the correct way to fix it would have been jewelry (American), not jewellery (British). Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work!

Good work with AWB my friend! Tip: Try running RegExTypoFix as you go through - unless you're in bot mode. --mboverload@ 22:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mb. I may give it a try. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 22:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

capitalization

Please exercise more case. In this edit [1] you incorrectly capitalized a species epithet. These should not be capitalized. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of your edit to German cuisine

"Marmelade" is the German spelling, not a typo. Lars T. (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hello Mboverload! Thanks for saying hi! --CupPup (talk) 07:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)CupPup--CupPup (talk) 07:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! If you need anything at all let me know. This is how I got started - someone said Hi to me and I asked some questions. 4 years and 30,000 edits later here I am =P --mboverload@ 07:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umm?

So this is the way to talk? --CupPup (talk) 07:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)CupPup--CupPup (talk) 07:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, sections, shown as == Topic == in the code are for specific issues. It's best to add any additional comments to each section like I am doing here. I'm going to bed right now but please - leave a list of any questions you have and I will be more than happy to give you all the answers you need. --mboverload@ 07:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling notice

Not sure if this was done with some automated script, but a recent edit changed "revalued" to "reevalued" in the article Domitian. The word is most definitely "revalue" however. When the exchange rate of a currency is revised upwards, it is called a "revaluation". Just thought I'd let you know.--Steerpike (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with AWB

The bot changed spelling inside a quotation and broke the name of an image so that it no longer appeared at Mary Shelley. I have reverted here. Please try to fix the bot. Awadewit (talk) 12:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Posted to your AWB page

I have posted several messages which demand attention to your AWB page. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 13:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey?

Whats an AWB page? --CupPup (talk) 06:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh - that is just the name that I gave to a subpage in my user space. User:mboverload/AWB. I made it because I make a lot of edits with AutoWikiBrowser and the project I founded, RegExTypoFix. I put that page there to explain to people what I'm doing if I made an error. --mboverload@ 06:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mb?

How do you get that big box of contents at the top of the page? Please answer. --CupPup (talk) 06:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When your talk page has about 4 different sections it will make it for you. Neat huh? --mboverload@ 06:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering! --CupPup (talk) 06:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you...

Hey Mboverload. Have you met Sportie dog? You can see her page by going to my talk page!!! --CupPup (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you??? --CupPup (talk) 04:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"imbetweener" is a misspelling

This AWB edit seems to be an error and has been corrected (cf. Animator#Inbetweeners_and_cleanup_artists and the article on tweening). --Bwiki (talk) 21:25, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE ANSWER!!!

Have you met Sportie dog? --CupPup (talk) 05:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to shout. I saw his user page. Who is he? --mboverload@ 05:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SHE is a friend of mine. --CupPup (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can...

Can I anything else besides editing on Wikipedia? --CupPup (talk) 06:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Wikipedia's community is all built around improving the encyclopedia with quality, well written content. Using it for anything other than that is discouraged since there are sites like MySpace, Facebook, etc. --mboverload@ 06:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mboverload?

Since all I can do is edit (which you said) is their anything else you can do? Please explain some of the stuff I could do. --CupPup (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From CupPup

Since I can only edit. What else can I do? Please explain what else I can do!!!--CupPup (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is always in need of people to work on problems on this page Wikipedia:Community_portal. --mboverload@ 05:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Megabyte Overload!

How it is, buddy! How do you vanish for two years! --harej 05:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats between me and the CIA =) How U doin? --mboverload@ 05:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see from the post you're a little bit famous!

The debate weighed overwhelmingly toward closing the organization, with many current and former members and leaders endorsing its end; however, much of the debate was about how the closure should take place. While some favored outright deletion of all Esperanza pages, others felt that simply marking the organization as inactive was enough. A compromise that gained steam was the "Messedrocker solution" (named after its creator, Messedrocker), to redirect the subpages to the main page, but keep the pages for their edit history. The discussion was closed on Monday, January 1, by Mailer Diablo. The decision was made to close the organization, and replace the organization's main page with an explanation of the organization's history and demise, while retaining most of its pages per the Messedrocker solution. In his closure,

--mboverload@ 06:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was famous in 2006. I'm a wash-up now. --harej 10:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hi, and thanks for saying hello. Welcome back. Nothing much has changed in three two years, same old stuff goes round and round. Date auto formatting has gone out of fashion. Good to see you. Oh, I stole the code for your talk page archive template, thanks for that too! --John (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eskimo

Little error there, the correct name is "Imtuk" not "Intuk". Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 05:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the hassle CBW. Not sure how that slipped through.. --mboverload@ 05:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. It shows why a source is important though. Without that I would have had no idea which was the correct spelling. It's caused by the spell checker in AWB. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 06:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the?

What the heck happened to youour talk page? --CupPup (talk) 06:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mboverload/Archive 6 --mboverload@ 06:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Did you do that so you can have a shorter talk page? --CupPup (talk) 06:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License

Yeah, I saw that, thank you. It could be very confusing if someone think that he/she can use code, but in reality licenses are incompatible. TestPilot^talk to me! 12:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: IP editor

Hi and, first of all, thanks for your time. :) The IP's been a nuisance for months and has managed to cause a semi-protection. I could certainly use your help as I'm starting to lose it with this guy, though I'm unsure how you intend to divert him? He knew earlier that his "edits" will be immediately removed, but wasn't exactly discouraged. He may go away for a few days and come back to insult people and disrupt again. Oh, and don't think you can "sway" him with actual arguments and Wikipedia policy, I tried that, all it did was cost me nerves :( --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 01:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine/Argentinian/Argentinean

That's a great question that you asked about when to use which word. Basically, Argentine is the standard and most common demonym (also called denizen label) and adjective in the English language for someone/something from Argentina. Argentine is about 7 times more common than Argentinian and about 9 times more common than Argentinean. The grammar, usage, and style guide Garner's Modern American Usage (by Bryan A. Garner) gives Argentine as the standard and Argentinian as the variant, but it doesn't list Argentinean at all. This would indicate that it's deemed as the least desirable of the different forms.

Both the Random House and American Heritage dictionaries list Argentine as the main entry and Argentinean as the variant form but not Argentinian (Argentinian is also marked as an incorrect spelling on Microsoft Word). Basically, this means that it's safe to use Argentine in all instances: Argentine tango, Argentine American, Argentine Antarctica, Argentine people, etc. Using Argentinian or Argentinean isn't absolutely wrong because some people do use them not knowing what the standard is, but when I've had time, I've been trying to make it consistent throughout Wikpedia to use the standard and most common form. Hope that made sense.

On a side note, have you seen the movie Buenos Aires 100 Kilómetros‎ yet? I have a bunch of movies from Spain, but none from Argentina. Kman543210 (talk) 06:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Sneaky Oviraptor18

^[citation needed] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneaky Oviraptor18 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I am not sure what you are referring to. I accidentally reverted your edit thinking it was vandalism but then I noticed it was your own talk page and reverted it. Sorry about that! --mboverload@ 18:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Olympics attack on American nationals

I have re-nominated this article for deletion. Please provide your input to the discussion. --Elliskev 17:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Democratic National Convention protests activity

Don't you think then the 2008 Republican National Convention protest activity should be deleted to then? --B64 (talk) 22:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps but that article is well written and is just facts. The democratic page is just a political ad.--mboverload@ 22:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags

Hi, just so you're aware, CSD G4 should be used only when the article in question was previously deleted via AFD. If it was previously speedy deleted, just use the CSD tag you would have used if you had never seen the article before. Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 23:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! And thank you for patrolling the waters with me! --mboverload@ 23:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mpiri

Wow, that Tarira guy so led us to it ;) I love it when this happens. Wasn't 'prod' enough, though? Stijndon (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kill it with fire. =P --mboverload@ 00:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, CSD got denied, and then my new prod was reverted because "prod is not shoot-till-you-win." Now I feel like I cannot start an AfD because "I have been chided." Sigh. I guess I'll just try and Be Bold? Stijndon (talk) 22:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G4 tag

As J.delanoy has already warned you above, please stop using page has already been deleted as a deletion reason. CSD G4 only applies to recreation of material which is substantially identical to material deleted via the AFD process. – iridescent 00:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am truely sorry - I am not trying to misuse it purposely - I don't remember why I chose it. --mboverload@ 02:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all; especially if you're using Twinkle, it's very easy to hit the wrong "tag" button. Given the time you've been round, I assume you know the policies... – iridescent 14:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Social Law

Hello Mboverload. Why did you put {{original research}} on Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Social Law? It is a part of the Max Planck Society. Do you know the significance of research institutes affiliated with the Max Planck Society? Please check facts. You can check references. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wait

I have about 30 additional ones to send through now. I'll try to space them out a little more. Biruitorul ^Talk 05:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historic

I noticed that you're changing instances of "an historic" to "a historic". I haven't looked at the specific instances that you're changing, but this seems to be regional spelling/usage (analogous to British/American spellings) -- see [2]. I'm not fussed either way, but as with all things on Wikipedia, you can be sure that there will be someone who will be. Just thought I'd let you know. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 06:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Flyguy! I have talked with the English experts on the #english IRC channel and they say this is wrong. They were quite fervent in their statements that "an historic" is never correct. I have also discussed with the person who created the articles, and they changed their bot to use "a historic" on all the new articles they make. However, I respect your concerns and I'll research it some more tommorrow. Please let me know if you have any more comments. --mboverload@ 06:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with mboverload and so does the OED. --JD554 (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sq km vs km^2

Hi, I've noticed you're (correctly) making changes such as sq km to km^2. However, I have also noticed that you're using the unicode character for the 2. Please can you use the ^and tags instead as per WP:UNITS, this makes it easier to read on the screen. Thanks --JD554 (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! --mboverload@ 19:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weird edit

Hi, mboverload. A user's come and asked me about this edit. I'm a little perplexed. Why did you make that edit? You seemed to be in the middle of an AWB run at the time. I'm particularly concerned that it could have been a compromised password. — Werdna • talk 13:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no - I know IceFlow and I was just messing with him. =D Sorry for taking your time! --mboverload@ 15:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey mboverload, just a quick thanks for catching a couple of my brain-cramped typos. I swear I proofed the articles more than once and just blew right past them. I are a good spelurr, jest gits bleaery-eyed at times. lol. Thanks again. R anderson1966 (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RETF

Thanks I already have it, but right now I'm just doing misspellings that can't be wrong (i.e. I don't want to have to think about it at all.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing grammar

You sure fixed that grammar. Fixed it good. --Closedmouth (talk) 08:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have never in thousands of edits with AWB seen anything like that. Thank you for reverting it and I'm sorry for taking your time. --mboverload@ 15:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Members of Parliament Pages need a link to Whipped (Party Policy) Votes--Please help, Thanks

Your technical expertise will be fantastic for this.

--Please help, Thanks

On Aug 11, you reversed a deletion on MP Michael Ignatieff page.

Because of that, I am sure you will be interested in both the technical and philosophical end of the discussion now taking place in the discussion page for MP Rick Dykstra.

Participants to the discussion are

User:vidioman

User:CJCurrie

User:Bearcat (an admistrator)

and myself.

With an election coming up (See http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080807.welections07/BNStory/National/home ) a linking device like this may save a lot of work for the people (like CJCurrie) who are on the watch for vandalism.

Please join the discussion. Thanks.

Boyd Reimer (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bamako Bridge

Hi, I was just in the process of creating the stub when you tagged it with several problems. They should be fixed shortly, but if you could check it in an hour or so, please re-apply any tags that you think still will help, and point out on the talk page what needs immediate attention. Thanks, T L Miles (talk) 03:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curried nonsense

Pretty blatant violations of WP:NOT#WEBHOST. A userpage has to be taken to WP:MFD rather than AfD. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Vickers

You're prod was left at the wrong talkpage; I just moved the page (It was originally vickers). Leonard^(Bloom) 04:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A wiki page I made was unfairly deleted by you, sir

I made a page for "Stan Burdman," a famous radio dj, political commentator, comedian, and video game reviewer. It took me a while to research and remember all the stuff Stan Burdman did, make external links to Stan's work, and then the page got deleted the second it went up. Almost like automatically. I don't understand, Stan Burdman is a fairly famous public figure and I would appreciate the page be brought back from the dead please.Braddj1977 (talk) 08:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedits to direct quotes

...should generally be avoided. Thanks for all the other copyedits, though. Happy editing, siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 12:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to stalk you, but I noticed that you are self-reverting a bunch of changes. You might be happy to know that "a historic" is preferable according to the standard rules for English as laid down by that biblical text, Fowler's Modern English Usage. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 13:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=) Yes, I am sorry about that. I meant to do only a run of these certian articles that a bot just made but I included some other articles, which is why I had to go back and check them all. I guess I missed that one. Thank you for reverting it and being understanding. =) --mboverload@ 15:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes mboverload, it would be really cool if you can get an admin to bring back the Stan Burdman page I made

I pretty much added all I wanted to it but you can add more if you think I missed something. Braddj1977 (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Workin on it. --mboverload@ 04:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]