User talk:Maxwhollymoralground

Non-free rationale for File:Emil Schnell.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Emil Schnell.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "non-free content" and I did NOT upload it under that banner, it has been published by the German Bundestag with explicit permission to be freely used in non-commercial settings: "Dieses Bild darf für private und kommerzielle nicht-werbliche Zwecke genutzt werden." Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Klaus Reichenbach 1990.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Klaus Reichenbach 1990.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "non-free content" and I did NOT upload it under that banner; it has been published by the German Bundestag with explicit permission to be freely used in non-commercial settings: "Dieses Bild darf für private und kommerzielle nicht-werbliche Zwecke genutzt werden." Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Klaus Thielmann

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Klaus Thielmann you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Klaus Thielmann

The article Klaus Thielmann you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Klaus Thielmann for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 03:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA

Hi, if you can fix up a few references as brought up in the review of Klaus Thielmann I can pass the article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll let you know when it's done. Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I added a source for the Sorbian School and clarified the Bezirk comment, I hope that is all. Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Klaus Thielmann

The article Klaus Thielmann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Klaus Thielmann for comments about the article, and Talk:Klaus Thielmann/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jürgen Kleditzsch

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jürgen Kleditzsch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jürgen Kleditzsch

The article Jürgen Kleditzsch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jürgen Kleditzsch for comments about the article, and Talk:Jürgen Kleditzsch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]