User talk:Maxbmogs

Maxbmogs, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Maxbmogs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Why did you change the name of this place? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Penton, Mississippi on Google Maps.png

Thanks for uploading File:Penton, Mississippi on Google Maps.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Penton, Mississippi on Google Maps.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Penton, Mississippi on Google Maps.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!, you may be blocked from editing. Laplorfill (talk) 22:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning iconAlso, please stop doing the same over at the 2021 Dune page. You are clearly a troll who is in the habit of this. 2601:280:1:4F80:837:6FB3:32E7:6E4A (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Going to have to agree on possible troll status. Removed my expansion brand and term information from history on a term page that needs a majority of data moved to a sub section page for a related company. SONICR2K (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of The Casagrandes characters. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Resident Evil characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Mercier. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Encanto (film), you may be blocked from editing. Meticulo (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Encanto. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Meticulo (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter

The article uses the American title because WB is an American company.--JOJ Hutton 19:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was unnecessary

You reverted edits in reel fx.

August 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Reel FX Creative Studios. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas the Tank Engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Forster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dune lede

Agree with your take. Plus it is less wordy. Good job. 73.95.134.231 (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Amy Sweeney

Hi. A belated welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Madeline Amy Sweeney, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced content

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Matrix Resurrections, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Future Boy Conan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroshi Masuoka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Loud House Movie draft

The heading you added to the draft for The Loud House Movie was not the type of heading you can add to a page. I also noticed that you tried to do a submission tag that @Magitroopa: reverted. If you have an issue with it's submission, you can take it up on the talk page of the draft started by the last person who rejected the draft. --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Warner Bros. films (1918–1929), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sonic the Hedgehog (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Sonic the Hedgehog (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Standing Liberty quarter, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ZLEA T\C 16:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Standing Liberty quarter, you may be blocked from editing. ZLEA T\C 02:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. wizzito | say hello! 12:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Raya and the Last Dragon. wizzito | say hello! 21:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Arthur characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Naylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Loud House Movie has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Loud House Movie. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man (2002)

So For Spider-Man (2002 film) movie in cast, I put speed and agility for Peter Parker/Spider-Man cast, because based on the character of the same name Spider-Man, he doesn't only possess strength, enhance reflex, spider sense only, but he also gains agility and superhuman speed. So this is why I add that to the cast. (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Maxbmogs reported by User:Wizzito (Result: ). Thank you. wizzito | say hello! 21:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clifford the big red dog film article

I believe you got something wrong on the Clifford the big red dog film article. Bopit1998 (talk) 04:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kelsey Minick

Why did you remove my proper and true edit of Kelsey Minick in the 1 UP cast listing? Her real name is Kelsey Minick. The name Lolita Milena is a stage name and not a true name. I provided correct and proper linking to the source which you also removed. Draynor9 (talk) 04:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1 UP cast member editing of Kelsey Minick / Lolita Milena

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Draynor9 (talk) 04:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reported

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Draynor9 (talk) 03:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply to the edit warring complaint about 1Up (film). Can you respond and explain why both of you should not be blocked? This war has been going on since November 11. EdJohnston (talk) 01:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinocchio

Please do not move Pinocchio (2022 film) or Pinocchio (upcoming Disney film) until the RM discussion at Talk:Pinocchio (upcoming Disney film) has concluded. I've requested for the former page to be moved back to its original title. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb score removals

Why have you been removing the IMDb scores from lists of films pages? Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 19:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added them myself, I might as well do whatever I want with 'em. --Maxbmogs (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That isn't really a reason to remove them. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Some Dude From North Carolina. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Magitroopa (talk) 03:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

School for Good and Evil

Author tweeted it, and was retweeted by Netflix, it's an official poster, so please don't revert me again. Rusted AutoParts 23:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

“Since when does Disney own its own competitor?”

I get what you were trying to say and your reversion was obviously correct, but well, they did buy 20th Century Fox--CreecregofLife (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop or I will block you

Stop it LathanBarbinTheFanOfYoutube (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note I have started a discussion at WP:ANI#User:LathanBarbinTheFanOfYoutube. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michael Rooney. WP:DOB is a very serious WP:BLP issue. Toddst1 (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IPs and block notices

Please don't edit war with IPs who remove block notices from their talk page. This is allowed under WP:BLANKING and simply causes more disruption. -- ferret (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Loud House Christmas (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HenryTemplo (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hellraiser cast

Hi there - just wondering why you keep deleting my credit on Hellraiser. Take a look at IMDb Nikola Kent is listed. The film is coming out soon.

Thanks Nik NikolaLA9 (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The film comes out in two weeks. Do you need me to send you my contract? I’m in it and listed as such.. If you don’t see me after the film comes out, please do remove it.. NikolaLA9 (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Maxbmogs! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Joyce-stick (talk) 02:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

Just letting you know that you should be careful about how many times you revert the same change, WP:3RR still applies even if the reverts are justified. I have requested protection for the article to try put a stop to it that way. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring notification

There is a discussion on WP:ANEW in which you are involved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:68.93.182.117_reported_by_User:Uhai_(Result:_) Uhai (talk · contribs) 22:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Reverted your edit and here's why

I reverted your edit in "My Son Hunter" for several serious reason:

1) The Source used in the article calls it a "Debut FICTION" (not "biography") In fact, NO Source calls it a "biography." So I removed the words "biographical drama" and replaced with the words from the Source "fictional video."
Remember, if the Source says one thing, (like "FICTION") then wiki editors cannot make-up their own words that have different meanings than the word used, like "FICTION."
2) You gave NO explanation for your edit.
Remember, when you edit, you need to include an edit summary in the small field below the edit box - which you did not do.

BetsyRMadison (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Doraemon (2020–present) episodes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of abandoned and unfinished films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yellow Submarine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragon Ball: Mystical Adventure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masato Hirano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luigi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider providing edit summaries; thank you!

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit you made does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(become old-fashioned!) 16:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strange World (film)

I undid your edit for Strange World (film), because, per WP:FILMMARKETING, do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters. Instead, use reliable sources to provide useful commentary about a method, such as a trailer's intended effect or the audience's reported reaction to it. Thanks. Also, while its true that you did say I learn about spelling grammer, you actually did misspelled at the edit summary. When providing an edit summary, you must have to make sure about your spelling about edit summary. LancedSoul (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Strange World (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. LancedSoul (talk) 10:44, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Raya and the Last Dragon. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. LancedSoul (talk) 10:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Ignoring multiple warnings, continued additions of unsourced.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 14:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maxbmogs (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was only trying to help, but Lance is so stubborn, he doesn't want his sentences to be corrected. I try to take away the grammatical mistakes, but he just reverts them without reason. He's been making mistakes since he joined this wiki, and you're siding with him!???? Maxbmogs (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maxbmogs (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm making another unblock request because I believe my edits are right, that removing the misspelled paragraphs is better than leaving them there at all. Maxbmogs (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:42, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maxbmogs (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maxbmogs (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me! I've seen the error of my ways and LancedSoul is a good speller and I promise I will never revert his edits again. Maxbmogs (talk) 18:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you've seen the error of your ways in the nine minutes since your last request was declined. If you have, please tell specifically how. Your next request will likely be your last on wiki chance, so make it count. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maxbmogs (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know really what else to do, but I believe my blocking sentence should end right about now, and that I won't make any disruptive edits without first leaving an explanation in the edit summary box. I also won't make fun of any user regardless of how good their spelling and grammar is, nor will I tell off any users unless they're the ones disrupting and that I'm reporting that user. We all want to make Wikipedia a better website for everyone.

-Please? --Maxbmogs (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what I'm looking at here, but it isn't an unblock request that addresses the block reason, nor is it part of a request series approaching that goal in an acceptable fashion. It might just be my strange sense of humor, but your promise not to make disruptive edits without an explanative edit summary looks absurd in the context of your other requests. Perhaps you're trolling? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2022

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 16:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Pinocchio (upcoming stop-motion film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 16 § Pinocchio (upcoming stop-motion film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Evolution (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Evolution (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Maxbmogs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Doraemon (2020–present) episodes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]