User talk:Mattdaviesfsic/Archive 4

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

March 2023

Personnel sections on album articles

Hello. Just letting you know in regards to an edit [1] you made on a draft you accepted in January, now at Highway X. Per MOS:ALBUM, personnel sections, like track lists, don't need to be sourced as it's expected they come from the liner notes. Really only if there's something contentious (like an "uncredited" appearance) will it need explicit citation. Ss112 02:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

British Rail Class 390‎‎

Any chance you can take a look / keep an eye on it? I'm not going to go 3RR and in fact have reported the editor for sockpuppetry, so going to await the outcome on that. In the meantime large amount of unsourced content has been put back into the article repeatedly. Thx. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Resubmitted draft

Hi - I'm sorry for the delay, I've lost my login details and can't seem to recover them. I've expanded and resubmitted Draft:Kenneth_Baillie just now, as you requested. Thanks for reviewing! Will look forward to seeing your suggestions 192.41.114.225 (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Draft:National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics

hi @Mattdaviesfsic:I resubmitted an article (Draft:National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics) following your indications a couple of months ago. I'm aware the waiting list is very long and I hope I'm not bothering you but since you were the last editor of the page I'm wondering if you could take a fresh look on it. thank you so much,Marinadalessa (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, looks good, thanks. I'll leave this to another editor to review as I'm semi-retired now, but it does look a great deal better - well done! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Mattdaviesfsic, sounds great thanks for your help. Marinadalessa (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft:List of teams to overcome 2–0 series deficits

I believe I fixed what needed to be fixed in the article draft. Can you please take another look and let me know if anything else needs changing? 131.247.224.25 (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Looks a great deal better from what I remember - I'll leave this to another reviewer to have a look at, will probably be accepted. Well done, great work! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! 131.247.224.25 (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)